Eggplant Performance vs Oracle Application Testing Suite comparison

Keysight Technologies and Oracle are both solutions in the Performance Testing Tools category. Keysight Technologies is ranked #16, while Oracle is ranked #13. Keysight Technologies holds a 2.4% mindshare in PTT, compared to Oracle’s 3.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Keysight Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Eggplant Performance

Read 4 Eggplant Performance reviews

677 Views
413 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Oracle Application Testing ...

Read 24 Oracle Application Testing Suite reviews

1,793 Views
484 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Eggplant Performance

Oracle Application Testing ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 5, 2025

Oracle Application Testing Suite and Eggplant Performance are competing products in the field of software testing. Based on data comparisons, Eggplant Performance appears to have an edge due to its comprehensive features and value. However, Oracle Application Testing Suite attracts attention with its pricing and support.

Features: Oracle Application Testing Suite offers an integrated testing environment with functional and load testing capabilities, real-time diagnostics, and streamlined Oracle environment testing. Eggplant Performance supports advanced automation, broad technology integration, and high scalability, meeting diverse testing requirements.

Room for Improvement: Oracle Application Testing Suite could benefit from enhanced scalability options beyond Oracle environments, improved integration with non-Oracle technologies, and better automation capabilities. Eggplant Performance can improve its initial setup cost, expand its support for older platforms, and enhance its reporting capabilities to be more user-friendly.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle Application Testing Suite provides a practical deployment model and efficient support for Oracle-invested organizations, while Eggplant Performance offers cloud-based deployment, flexibility, and outstanding customer service, ideal for businesses needing rapid updates and continuous support.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle Application Testing Suite is considered more cost-effective with a lower initial setup cost, yielding good ROI for Oracle-centric firms. Eggplant Performance, though requiring a higher upfront investment, delivers substantial ROI through its versatile and efficient automation capabilities, valuable for organizations seeking long-term benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed Eggplant Performance vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Eggplant Performance vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,311 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Eggplant Performance

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

16th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Oracle Application Testing ...

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

13th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (22nd), Load Testing Tools (12th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Performance Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Eggplant Performance is 2.4%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Application Testing Suite is 3.0%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Performance Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Oracle Application Testing Suite	3.0%
Eggplant Performance	2.4%
Other	94.6%

Performance Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Shyam_Prasad

AVP - Testing & QA at Laminaar Aviation

Offers unique object identification, ideal for UI layer regression automation but limited scalability

Performance is one key area for improvement. It can be slower compared to other tools I've used. Secondly, we have a very limited resource pool that uses this tool in India. So, finding resources familiar with Eggplant in India is challenging due to lack of affiliation programs and so on.

Read full review

Rishabh-Sharma

Senior Engineer at Cignity Technology

Requires little maintenance, is stable, and easy to deploy

Oracle Application Testing Suite can improve by covering more browsers as compared to other solutions because they're considering the Edge browser as well, but the solution is working on different Windows operating platforms. For example, in our current Windows 2012 R2 server, if I want to automate the Edge browser, I need to upgrade that particular Windows to Windows 10.1 or some other Windows platform, because it's not supported in Windows 2012 feature. That is an issue. If cross-browsers can be incorporated, then support should be provided. There should be a single operating system where everything can be incorporated. I have faced issues with some indexing items. For example, the solution is able to derive some properties from the screen, such as button locations or text locations, but there are some elements, for example, unnamed buttons or text, where there is no name or ID or any other identifying information. Indexing doesn't always work, and we have to go to those elements manually and inspect them to determine their class, and then input that information into the system.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Customer Service: Excellent and very personal."

"We've been really fortunate in that we've had virtually zero downtime in all the time we've been using Eggplant."

"We don't have a big team of people that can watch the dials and check that everything is okay. We're doing a lot of the monitoring of our website and our product at the side of the desk. We need a solution that does a lot for us, and that's what Eggplant does."

"It is not a conventional test automation tool. It uses optical character recognition (OCR) to identify objects. It makes it the best in the class."

"It's been a revelation to us in terms of its ability to assist us in exploratory testing and to integrate with our current model-driven architecture."

"We find the solution stable and scalable."

"We find the front-end interface of this solution to be very user-friendly, meaning easy navigation even for novice users."

"OpenScript has many features that make it useful, including the ability to record and playback."

"This tool did a much better job recording the http requests during web load testing than other open source tools."

"Oracle Application Testing Suite's most valuable feature is it works very smoothly with all Oracle Java-based applications."

"My advice to others is if they are using any Oracle Cloud Fusion-based or on-premise-based application, this is a good solution to use."

"This is the best tool I have used till today as it allows us to handle automation in variety of ways."

"Overall, since it comes with all the three packages, it's very good."

"The graphics are very intuitive and it's very easy to get scale of development."

More Oracle Application Testing Suite pros

Cons

"Bugs occur fairly frequently, but they are very responsive in identifying them and scheduling them for fixes in future releases."

"I'd like to see the ability to integrate the user experience through device forms like AWS device forms or source labs."

"One area I can think of to improve is the usability of the reports that we get."

"Performance is one key area for improvement. It can be slower compared to other tools I've used."

"I'd like to see the ability to integrate the user experience through device forms like AWS device forms or source labs."

"I have faced issues with some indexing items."

"It needs to be compatible with all browsers."

"There is one piece of functionality that is currently not offered and would be very good to have: Support for Digital Certificates authentication and Single Sign-On (SSO)."

"Transaction handling was very simple and I’d say quite primitive."

"I would like to see better dashboards."

"If there's a feature we want in OATS that's missing and we report that to Oracle, it takes a long time."

"Oracle Application Testing Suite could improve by offering desktop-based application automation. It is lacking in this area at the moment."

More Oracle Application Testing Suite cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is competitive in India."

"Eggplant came out as the most competitive in terms of commercials (terms and conditions) which was positive. When we did the initial negotiations, Eggplant started at a price but they were open to negotiations and we did negotiate a discount. That was really important to us because it showed a level of commitment to us."

"Customers need to negotiate properly to get the tool at a lower price."

"There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

"ORACLE is giving at a very competitive rates to all its customers, and its a simple licensing process."

"The price of the Oracle Application Testing Suite is not expensive. It is less expensive than other solutions."

"The complete package, including load testing and performance analysis, has a licensing fee."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Energy/Utilities Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Government

13%

Manufacturing Company

Performing Arts

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	13

Comparisons

Apache JMeter vs Eggplant Performance

Compared 14% of the time

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs Eggplant Performance

Compared 13% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Eggplant Performance

Compared 12% of the time

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs Eggplant Performance

Compared 12% of the time

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs Eggplant Performance

Compared 12% of the time

More Eggplant Performance Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 9% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 5% of the time

IBM Engineering Test Management vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 5% of the time

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 5% of the time

More Oracle Application Testing Suite Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Performance Testing Tools

March 2026

Download Eggplant Performance product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Application Testing Suite

March 2026

Download Oracle Application Testing Suite product report

Also Known As

TestPlant eggPlant Performance

OATS

Overview

eggPlant Performance provides sophisticated performance testing and load testing tools that can test the widest range of technology and can scale up to simulate any load you need, but are still easy-to-use. eggPlant Performance has been designed to cleanly manage the difficult stuff so you spend more of your time looking at what really matters – improving the user experience of your application. It ensures that your cloud and server based applications will continue to work, perform, and provide an excellent user experience with hundreds or thousands of simultaneous users. eggPlant Performance consists of three main components: Studio, Test Controller, and Analyzer. Studio is used to create the different components of a load test (including scripts, test data, test definitions, and monitoring targets). Test Controller is used subsequently to execute the tests and monitor them during runtime. Analyzer is then used to view completed test runs and their results, as well as generate a wide variety of charts and tables to analyze the data. eggPlant Performance supports a variety of virtual user types for different automation options, depending on the performance or load testing requirements and objectives. — Web HTPP/S: For protocol-level web scripting — Rich clients/UI-based: This includes Citrix VUs (for automating any desktop app published over Citrix), eggPlant Functional VUs (for integration with TestPlant’s functional UI testing tool), WinDriver VUs(for driving the interface of any Windows-based rich client application through a combination of object- and image-based approaches), Selenium VUs (for automating the user experience of browsers). — TCP/UDP: For recording network traffic

Keysight Technologies

Application Testing Suite is a comprehensive, integrated testing solution that ensures the quality, scalability, and availability of your Web applications, Web Services, packaged Oracle Applications and Oracle databases.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Cisco

Comic Relief UK, The Forestry Commission, TAFE SA, Silentnight Group, Victorian Department of Primary Industries

Buyer's Guide

Eggplant Performance vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite

March 2026

Free Report: Eggplant Performance vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite

Find out what your peers are saying about Eggplant Performance vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Eggplant Performance vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite report.

See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.