IT Central Station is now PeerSpot: Here's why
  • Home
  • Digital.ai TeamForge vs. Micro Focus ALM Octane

Digital.ai TeamForge vs Micro Focus ALM Octane comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Use Digital.ai TeamForge?
Jesper Halden
Helps in controlling the quality in different areas, and has good filtering, reporting, and integration features
It can simplify testing by structuring it after the application modules that you are defining yourself, and these are both tests and defects... Read more →
Buyer's Guide
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
July 2022
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Microsoft, Micro Focus and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Updated: July 2022.
DOWNLOAD NOW
620,068 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "Going forward, I think we will want to explore adding more licenses."
  • "The solution has reduced our testing costs."
  • "Microsoft is a big challenge for Micro Focus when it comes to pricing because they are much cheaper. But it definitely depends on the complexity of the environment. If it has multiple technologies, at that point, looking at other options and Microsoft would be a feasible approach."
  • "The comparison is always with Jira, so the pricing of Octane is a bit on the higher side. But if you look at what you have to add to Jira, on the plug-in side, to have the same abilities you have with Octane, you're more or less even, or even ahead with Octane."
  • "There is a conversion fee for changing licenses."
  • "The cost of this product is very high."
  • "The senior management of my company handles the purchases of the solution. However, the price per developer was a major reason we switched from Jira. Apart from the complexity and the support, the price was a major reason that a team of 20 people unanimously decided that we would prefer to go with Micro Focus ALM Octane rather than Jira. The senior management had seen some benefit in it and they preferred it over Jira because the per developer cost was less and the support was superior."
  • "ALM Octane is very expensive."

    • More Micro Focus ALM Octane Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    620,068 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Is Jira better or would you go with Micro Focus ALM Octane?
    Top Answer:Hi Netanya, Basically , it all depends on the use cases for your environment and the business needs. Hope the below data may be relevant to you for identifying your needs and deciding on the… more »
    Read all 3 answers   →
    What do you like most about Micro Focus ALM Octane?
    Top Answer:The dashboards and metric reporting are valuable features.
    Read all 25 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus ALM O...
    Top Answer:ALM is a little pricier than Zephyr Enterprise. Because of our familiarity with ALM and the fact that we had all the integrations, it was easier to resume using it.
    Read all 19 answers   →
    Ranking
    25th
    out of 33 in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
    Views
    229
    Comparisons
    186
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    3rd
    out of 33 in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
    Views
    11,205
    Comparisons
    6,887
    Reviews
    16
    Average Words per Review
    1,024
    Rating
    8.3
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    CollabNet TeamForge
    Micro Focus Octane
    Learn More
    Digital.ai
    Micro Focus
    Overview

    Gain visibility into software development with a versatile and secure management platform for traditional and bi-modal development. With Digital.ai TeamForge, software teams have the flexibility to choose the best possible workflows without risking overall process compliance. 

    Micro Focus ALM Octane helps organizations implement a “quality everywhere” approach and improve Agile and DevOps development and testing processes to improve the flow of work across the software delivery value stream. You can tightly align quality efforts from development to release, employ a broad range of tests anchored by automation, and continuously monitor and improve for increased throughput. Micro Focus fosters an open approach so that quality is visible, traceable, and continuously improved. By synchronizing quality and testing with Agile and DevOps processes, risks are mitigated early in the software delivery value stream – speeding the way for faster delivery and improved customer satisfaction.

    ALM Octane facilitates a tailored and scalable approach for large enterprises. You can deploy your way and minimize infrastructure needs with deployment options spanning on-premises, SaaS, and public cloud (Amazon Web Services and Microsoft Azure Marketplaces). Similarly, various licensing options can tailor the features to meet specific needs with support for thousands of concurrent users in geographically disperse locations.

    Offer
    Learn more about Digital.ai TeamForge
    Learn More
    Learn more about Micro Focus ALM Octane
    Learn More
    Sample Customers
    Philips Medical Systems, Life Technologies, Barclays Global Investors (BGI), ADVA Optical Networking, Sun Microsystems, SingleMind Consulting, Intel
    Orange, Airbus, Haufe Group, Kellogg's, Claro, Bon Secours, World Wide Technology
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company26%
    Government19%
    Comms Service Provider14%
    Insurance Company6%
    REVIEWERS
    Comms Service Provider30%
    Transportation Company22%
    Financial Services Firm22%
    Consumer Goods Company4%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company27%
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    Government9%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise68%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise3%
    Large Enterprise84%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business12%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise75%
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
    July 2022
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Microsoft, Micro Focus and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Updated: July 2022.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    620,068 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Digital.ai TeamForge is ranked 25th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites while Micro Focus ALM Octane is ranked 3rd in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 18 reviews. Digital.ai TeamForge is rated 0.0, while Micro Focus ALM Octane is rated 8.4. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Micro Focus ALM Octane writes "Reporting engine, widgets, and dashboards are a huge plus, and powerful REST interface means we can interact with other tools". Digital.ai TeamForge is most compared with Rally Software, Jira and TFS, whereas Micro Focus ALM Octane is most compared with Jira, Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, Microsoft Azure DevOps, ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management and TFS.

    See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.

    We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.