Digital.ai Application Security vs GitHub comparison

Digital.ai and GitHub are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. Digital.ai is ranked #36, while GitHub is ranked #7 with an average rating of 9.0. Digital.ai holds a 0.3% mindshare in AS, compared to GitHub’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of GitHub users are willing to recommend the solution.

Digital.ai Application Secu...

Read 1 Digital.ai Application Security review

439 Views
404 Comparison Views

0% willing to recommend

GitHub

Read 94 GitHub reviews

3,809 Views
2,247 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Digital.ai Application Secu...

GitHub

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 13, 2025

GitHub and Digital.ai compete in different domains of application development and security. GitHub has an advantage in pricing and support, whereas Digital.ai is preferred for its advanced security features.

Features: GitHub offers source code management, collaboration tools, and integration with development tools. Digital.ai provides application shielding, threat intelligence, and other security measures.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitHub offers straightforward deployment with robust support. Digital.ai requires more complex setup focused on security integration, supported by strong technical assistance.

Pricing and ROI: GitHub is known for competitive pricing, delivering favorable ROI for development-focused organizations. Digital.ai has higher initial costs due to its security features, offering significant ROI in application protection.

To learn more, read our detailed Application Security Tools Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 861,803 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Digital.ai Application Secu...

Ranking in Application Security Tools

36th

Average Rating

6.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

GitHub

Ranking in Application Security Tools

7th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Version Control (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Digital.ai Application Security is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub is 0.9%, down from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Arne Dormaels

Business Developer at Ghent University

Helps to improve knowledge on software security

I used the tool to prepare for the interview as a Business Developer. It helped me improve my understanding on software security. I would like the tool to integrate AI and automation that is dedicated to detecting software vulnerabilities. I have used the tool for two weeks. I would rate the…

Read full review

Pervez Roy

Solutions Architect at Small Systems LTD

Very good for collaboration on software projects

We use GitHub for code repository alongside Bitbucket GitHub is very good for collaboration on software projects. We prefer Bitbucket for commercial use, while GitHub is used for open source. You can get the differences, history of changes, and version control for various pull requests. You can…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I used the tool to prepare for the interview as a Business Developer. It helped me improve my understanding on software security."

"GitHub's version control is valuable."

"Any complex banking can be handled very easily in GitHub. It allows us to integrate with tools like Grid, where we can merge and resolve conflicts without any hassle."

"GitHub is a very good tool, and people should use it more than any other, even Bitbucket."

"A great feature is being able to have different repositories and different kinds of projects in a single solution at a single time. It's just a click away."

"The most valuable features are GitHub are the standard features, they are very useful."

"The version control functionality for this solution has been most valuable, especially when managing projects with multiple versions."

"The solution has been stable for us."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is the version control field."

More GitHub pros

Cons

"I would like the tool to integrate AI and automation that is dedicated to detecting software vulnerabilities."

"There is a bit of a learning curve."

"They're improving the work items to track the progress of the team, but in my experience, Azure DevOps is better in this functionality. GitHub needs to improve the form to track the progress of the work done by a team."

"From the recruiting standpoint, I would like to see email IDs and phone numbers and a brief introduction about their profile."

"The solution can improve by adding video guides, official guides, or short courses that cater to beginners who are new to the system. These resources could offer step-by-step guidance on how to use GitHub, including common procedures such as pulling and committing. Currently, many of us have to resort to searching for information on how to do these tasks via Google. An official guide provided by GitHub itself would be a valuable asset to newcomers and would save them time and effort."

"GitHub could have better integration or capability with other solutions."

"The initial setup and implementation could be easier, I had some difficulties with it at first but I don't have a development background."

"I faced one or two breakdowns. That said, they lasted only for a few seconds or a minute."

"It is currently only from the development perspective. It doesn't have features related to project management and testing. It is not like Azure. So, there is a lot of room for improvement. It is a version control product, and it would be good if they can come up with a complete DevOps product."

More GitHub cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"It is open-source. There is no license for GitHub."

"There are no licensing fees for the features that we use."

"The licensing model for GitHub is user-based. Whenever the new developer joins we have to get a new license and register their ID. The overall price of the solution is reasonable."

"We have an enterprise licensing agreement, and I am not part of the finance department so I can't say how much it costs."

"I think, in terms of price, GitHub is okay compared to other tools."

"We pay a licensing fee for GitHub, which could be cheaper."

"Regarding pricing, I'd rate it eight out of ten. It's decent and not too expensive, and small businesses can also afford it. With AWS taking CodeCommit out of the market, I don't see many competitors for small companies in terms of GitHub."

"I use the free version of the tool."

More GitHub pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

861,803 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

27%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

I am not aware about the pricing, so I will not be able to give feedback.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub?

Sometimes we do not get the exact solution, and the suggested solution does not work, so GitHub could improve in that area. We have used GitHub mainly for the code generation part. That is the only...

See all answers

Comparisons

CAST Highlight vs Digital.ai Application Security

Compared 100% of the time

More Digital.ai Application Security Competitors

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 16% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 12% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs GitHub

Compared 10% of the time

AWS CodeCommit vs GitHub

Compared 8% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs GitHub

Compared 8% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

June 2025

Download Digital.ai Application Security product report

Buyer's Guide

GitHub

July 2025

Download GitHub product report

Also Known As

Arxan Application Protection, Digital.ai Application Protection

No data available

Overview

Our proprietary protection capabilities shield apps from reverse engineering, tampering, API exploits, and other attacks that can put your business, your customers, and your bottom line at risk.

Digital.ai

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

GitHub

Sample Customers

Valencell

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

June 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Tools. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

861,803 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.