DataCore SANsymphony vs Dell VxFlex Ready Nodes comparison

DataCore and Dell Technologies are both solutions in the HCI category. DataCore is ranked #8 with an average rating of 9.6, while Dell Technologies is ranked #25. DataCore holds a 2.3% mindshare in HCI, compared to Dell Technologies’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of DataCore users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Dell Technologies users who would recommend it.

DataCore SANsymphony

Read 59 DataCore SANsymphony reviews

4,002 Views
2,081 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Dell VxFlex Ready Nodes

Read 2 Dell VxFlex Ready Nodes reviews

600 Views
600 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

DataCore SANsymphony

Dell VxFlex Ready Nodes

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 31, 2024

DataCore SANsymphony and Dell VxFlex Ready Nodes compete in the software-defined storage market. SANsymphony has an advantage in pricing and support, whereas VxFlex Ready Nodes leads in features and potential long-term value.

Features: DataCore SANsymphony provides dynamic storage management, high efficiency, and broad compatibility with existing infrastructures. Dell VxFlex Ready Nodes offer scalable performance, powerful compute and storage capabilities, and support for a wide range of workloads.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Dell VxFlex Ready Nodes offer streamlined deployment with integrated hardware and software and responsive support, easing implementation challenges. DataCore SANsymphony, while versatile, may have a more complex setup process but compensates with strong support.

Pricing and ROI: DataCore SANsymphony is more budget-friendly upfront and can deliver satisfactory ROI through effective performance. Dell VxFlex Ready Nodes might have higher initial costs but promises strong ROI through scalability and efficiency for demanding workloads.

To learn more, read our detailed DataCore SANsymphony vs. Dell VxFlex Ready Nodes Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

DataCore SANsymphony vs. Dell VxFlex Ready Nodes

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 882,594 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

DataCore SANsymphony

Ranking in HCI

8th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Storage Software (2nd), Software Defined Storage (SDS) (5th), Storage Performance (1st)

Dell VxFlex Ready Nodes

Ranking in HCI

25th

Average Rating

9.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the HCI category, the mindshare of DataCore SANsymphony is 2.3%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Dell VxFlex Ready Nodes is 1.0%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

HCI Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
DataCore SANsymphony	2.3%
Dell VxFlex Ready Nodes	1.0%
Other	96.7%

HCI

Featured Reviews

SigfridCecillon

Owner at Arsium

High availability and user-friendliness enhance infrastructure health and redundancy

I would rate technical support from DataCore SANsymphony a 10. Each time I contact the technical support, it's when I don't have a choice because it's very difficult for me on site, and each time, I have good people online who are able to help me solve the problem. Usually, the problems are not very technically difficult, but sometimes they are, and the support team is still there to help us resolve them. The majority of the problems are linked to licensing, so when the license has expired or the number is not correct, they are proactive and change things live, which is very good.

Read full review

Al Vasek

Executive Business Development Manager, Cloud and Managed Services at Presidio Networked Solutions

Ease of acquisition, simple deployment, and priced well

The support from Dell VxFlex Ready Nodes is okay. It could be better, they have to work on their approach. The approach they have I call "pass the baton". Every manufacturer does this, such as Cisco, Dell, and Microsoft. You call in, receive a call handler, and give them your problem. The first person you talk to can never fix your problem. They just collect information. There's probably a 5 percent chance that they could fix your problem. Then they pass it off to the next person, there is a lot of passing. That's why I call it "pass the baton". The company I work for the maintenance services is at 98 percent, we receive over 50,000 incidents a month, for those customers who have support through Dell, Cisco, or someone else, 98 percent of our incidents or ticket requests get resolved by your first point of contact. We try to take out that frustration. Knowing that it's possible to fix that model. I don't think it saves them much money, because they're tying up too many resources where if they could route those incidents to the person that could fix them the first time, it would just save a lot of frustration on the customer's behalf. It would make everything a lot more efficient, and a better overall customer support image. It is a bad model that many vendors use.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Mirroring is the most valuable feature because I can provide a high-level of service and optimize the use of obsolete storage."

"DataCore's ability to seamlessly move virtual volume data between storage pools as well as their synchronous mirroring has made maintenance and disaster recovery planning achievable."

"Storage is always available."

"The use of the RAM cache allows you to speed up the writing and reading of data while also allowing for a possible increase in performance by increasing the RAM on the servers."

"The most valuable feature for us is that we can adjust the size of the storage very easily, without stopping production."

"The documentation repository is really useful and kept updated."

"DataCore SANsymphony's stability is okay."

"The dashboard is very intuitive, and there are many counters to diagnose what happens during a short period (like when a backup is in progress)."

More DataCore SANsymphony pros

"Dell EMC VxFlex Ready Nodes can support what we call a heterogeneous environment. So you can have VMware workloads, Hyper-V workloads, bare metal Red Hat workloads, Kubernetes workloads all on the same cluster. You're not pigeonholed into either all bare metal or all virtualized. So it supports basically any platform."

"The most valuable features of Dell VxFlex Ready Nodes are the ease of acquisition."

Cons

"DataCore SANsymphony should integrate file servers at a good price into the solution."

"The cost is becoming prohibitive since they moved to a subscription model."

"I think the performance reporting can be improved by adding historical statistics into a database for the purpose of comparing."

"We'd like to manage the raid on the disk directly in SanSymphony."

"For customers or technicians that don't speak and understand English, it could be great to have other languages support, all the more so given the number of countries in which SanSymphony is used."

"There is no way of quickly matching the exact size of a vDisk to a disk pool."

"NVMeoF should be implemented. This protocol will play a major role in storage infrastructure in the future."

"I'd like to see the company make the renewal of the software cheaper."

More DataCore SANsymphony cons

"From a technical perspective, it's a pretty rock solid solution. I would say the only area for improvement is around its price."

"Dell VxFlex Ready Nodes is a little less sophisticated than some of the other solutions out there. A full-blown cloud foundation has a lot more to it."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is cost effective."

"We have licensing costs on a yearly basis. They charge per terabyte, so in terms of cost, it can be very costly. They have three different features, and you have to pay extra for those."

"The cost is at the same level as other storage solutions and it is easy to understand the licensing."

"This solution allows the use of off-the-shelf hardware and charges by the TB of storage."

"Pricing has improved but it is still expensive."

"In my case, the licensing per terabytes is very high and it must be licensed for each extra functionality."

"DataCore SANsymphony's pricing is very high and should be much cheaper."

"The pricing and licensing are better with DataCore."

More DataCore SANsymphony pricing and cost advice

"Dell VxFlex Ready Nodes is a cheaper solution than Nutanix and HyperFlex."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which HCI solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

882,594 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

14%

Computer Software Company

14%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Government

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	36
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	22

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for DataCore SANsymphony SDS?

Before choosing DataCore SANsymphony, I did not evaluate other options.

See all answers

What do you like most about DataCore SANsymphony?

The dashboard is very intuitive, and there are a lot of counters to diagnose what happens during a short period (like when a backup is in progress).

See all answers

What needs improvement with DataCore SANsymphony?

DataCore SANsymphony can be improved with high availability as it offers synchronous mirroring between physical and separate sites to ensure business continuity and disaster recovery. I do not have...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

StarWind Virtual SAN vs DataCore SANsymphony

Compared 7% of the time

Red Hat Ceph Storage vs DataCore SANsymphony

Compared 5% of the time

VMware vSAN vs DataCore SANsymphony

Compared 5% of the time

NetApp ONTAP vs DataCore SANsymphony

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Storage Spaces Direct vs DataCore SANsymphony

Compared 4% of the time

More DataCore SANsymphony Competitors

Azure Local vs Dell VxFlex Ready Nodes

Compared 17% of the time

VxRail vs Dell VxFlex Ready Nodes

Compared 17% of the time

HPE Alletra dHCI vs Dell VxFlex Ready Nodes

Compared 12% of the time

Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI) vs Dell VxFlex Ready Nodes

Compared 11% of the time

Fujitsu PRIMEFLEX vs Dell VxFlex Ready Nodes

Compared 9% of the time

More Dell VxFlex Ready Nodes Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

DataCore SANsymphony

February 2026

Download DataCore SANsymphony product report

Buyer's Guide

HCI

January 2026

Download Dell VxFlex Ready Nodes product report

Also Known As

DataCore Virtual SAN

VxFlex Ready Nodes

Overview

Experience peace of mind with DataCore SANsymphony, the ultimate software-defined storage solution alleviating storage management challenges. Say goodbye to the complexities of managing different storage tiers and disruptions with SANsymphony's block-level storage virtualization technology, empowering you to automate capacity provisioning and data placement across diverse storage environments including SAN, DAS, HCI, and JBOD. Break down silos, control data placement, meet business continuity objectives, boost performance, and seamlessly expand or refresh hardware with SANsymphony. Benefit from features like asynchronous replication for disaster recovery, minimizing data loss, accelerating application responsiveness, and integrating new technology non-disruptively. Trusted by industry leaders like NASA, Thorntons, Inc., and TUI Cruises, DataCore SANsymphony guarantees unparalleled flexibility, scalability, and reliability, ensuring uninterrupted data access and application availability while reducing storage costs and inefficiencies.

DataCore

VxRack FLEX and VxFlex Ready Nodes, also known as the Flex family, create a server-based SAN by combining virtualization software, known as VxFlex OS, with Dell EMC PowerEdge servers to deliver flexibility, scalability, and capacity on demand. Local storage resources are combined to create a virtual pool of block storage with varying performance tiers. The platform enables you to start small (with as little as four nodes) and scale incrementally. The Flex family provides enterprise-grade data protection, multi-tenant capabilities, and add-on enterprise features such as QoS, thin provisioning, and snapshots. VxFlex OS is the key enabler and provides an unmatched combination of performance, resiliency and flexibility to address enterprise data center needs. The unique features of VxFlex OS make it an excellent complement to Kubernetes for stateful applications, such as databases, continuous integration, logging and monitoring platforms.

Dell Technologies

Sample Customers

Volkswagen , Maimonides Medical Center, NASA, Thorntons, Inc., TUI, ISCO Industries, Pee Dee Electric Cooperative, United Financial Credit Union, Derby Supply Chain Solutions, Mission Community Hospital, Bellarmine College Preparatory, Colby-Sawyer College, Mount Sinai Health System, The Royal Institute of International Affairs, Quorn Foods, Bitburger, University of Birmingham, Stadtverwaltung Heidelberg, NetEnt to name a few.

Boys Town

Buyer's Guide

DataCore SANsymphony vs. Dell VxFlex Ready Nodes

February 2026

Free Report: DataCore SANsymphony vs. Dell VxFlex Ready Nodes

Find out what your peers are saying about DataCore SANsymphony vs. Dell VxFlex Ready Nodes and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

882,594 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our DataCore SANsymphony vs. Dell VxFlex Ready Nodes report.

See our list of best HCI vendors.

We monitor all HCI reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.