Cybereason XDR vs Lumu comparison

Cybereason and Lumu Technologies are both solutions in the Extended Detection and Response (XDR) category. Cybereason is ranked #22 with an average rating of 8.7, while Lumu Technologies is ranked #17 with an average rating of 9.0. Cybereason holds a 0.7% mindshare in XDR, compared to Lumu Technologies’s 1.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Cybereason users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Lumu Technologies users who would recommend it.

Cybereason XDR

Read 3 Cybereason XDR reviews

1,457 Views
204 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Lumu

Read 8 Lumu reviews

890 Views
398 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Cybereason XDR

Lumu

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Cybereason XDR and Lumu compete in the cybersecurity market. Based on the data, Lumu seems to have the upper hand due to its simplicity and high detection skills, while Cybereason offers strong integration capabilities.

Features: Cybereason XDR provides comprehensive threat detection, seamless integration with existing infrastructure, and flexible threat response mechanisms. Lumu offers real-time visibility, actionable insights, and an easy-to-use interface which ensures effective threat identification.

Room for Improvement: Cybereason XDR could benefit from enhanced user adaptability, reduced complexity, and better customization options. Lumu could improve by expanding its customization abilities, scalability, and robustness of its features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cybereason XDR's deployment is complex, needing dedicated resources but offers highly regarded customer service. Lumu provides an easier, quicker deployment but occasionally less responsive support.

Pricing and ROI: Cybereason XDR entails higher setup costs but offers a solid long-term ROI through comprehensive support. Lumu's competitive pricing and cost-efficiency provide a favorable ROI, appealing to budget-conscious buyers.

To learn more, read our detailed Cybereason XDR vs. Lumu Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cybereason XDR vs. Lumu

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cybereason XDR

Ranking in Extended Detection and Response (XDR)

22nd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Lumu

Ranking in Extended Detection and Response (XDR)

17th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) (11th), Network Detection and Response (NDR) (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Extended Detection and Response (XDR) category, the mindshare of Cybereason XDR is 0.7%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Lumu is 1.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Extended Detection and Response (XDR)

Featured Reviews

Peter Nowak

Business Development Manager for Cybereason at Bechtle

Integration of multiple firewalls enables advanced threat detection

The integration of data from firewalls and Active Directory is most valuable. Cybereason XDR facilitates two-way communication, where the firewall sends data to the Cybereason system, and it can communicate with the firewall to stop unwanted communication. Customers can deal with multiple types of firewalls with ease. The behavioral analytics help detect advanced threats when attackers use existing software. The multilayered protection approach, including NGAV, integrates XDR detection with antivirus to assess and counter threats effectively.

Read full review

Juan Solano

IT Director at Atlantic Quantum Innovations

Protects against threats and handles it in time with moderate pricing

Mostly, Lumu is an automatic tool. We'll deploy on firewalls and DNS servers. Lumu detects every attack on our network. The other day, we had CLC, the command controller, and the tool reacted automatically. It detected the attack and immediately blocked it without intervention from my team. The improvement is in the security process, as it's now entirely automated. We no longer require a technician or engineer to monitor our network 24/7. Lumu updates with AI and global threat intelligence, which greatly assists us. Since our workload is lighter, Lumu handles all of our tasks. We're using FortiGate for the firewall and Kaspersky for endpoints. If you are going to Lumu, you need another solution for the endpoint. You need to integrate with other tools like firewalls or another antivirus. I recommend the solution based on the price, usability, and service offered by the solution. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution has an investigation feature, which is useful for building storylines."

"The integration of data from firewalls and Active Directory is most valuable."

"Cybereason XDR's most useful feature is the investigation."

"The integration of data from firewalls and Active Directory is most valuable."

"Lumu protects against threats immediately and handles them in time."

"I like Lumu's simple user interface. When we deployed it, we got full access, allowing us to identify IP addresses on the network and connect machine names to users. It helped us identify and block threats via the firewall. I also appreciate the chat support and ticket closure process. We're currently reviewing network detection solutions, and my recommendations include Lumu, Sentinel, and a few others. Regarding functionality and user-friendliness, I would recommend Lumu over the others."

"It's been helpful for overall extended network visibility."

"You can access external links, playbooks, MITRE Matrix, and a lot of information."

"The automated response to incidents works effectively out of the box, and the number of interfaces and platforms it can work with is impressive."

"The tool's support team helps partners resolve any problems with the product."

"Most of it is automated, so I do not have to watch it to get alerts."

"The context provided by the tool is very complete, it includes the miter matrix, playbooks, links, hashes, and much more."

Cons

"The one thing we sometimes have issues with is its integration with other security applications like antiviruses."

"Customer service is rated as a five out of ten. When they work and reach the right level, they are helpful, but getting to the right person can be time-consuming."

"Cybereason's customer support could be better."

"There could be more integrations with other data sources like NDR systems."

"The integration with different vendors and endpoints could be improved."

"It would be good if we could access the physical logs."

"Lumu's ability to discover threats is an area of concern where improvements are needed."

"Nothing so far needs to be improved."

"The reports need improvement."

"The free version is minimal compared to the full version."

"Having a larger support network would be beneficial. Nobody I know has heard of Lumu, so they are in the same space as Darktrace or CrowdStrike, but people give blank stares."

"I am happy with the current features. However, one important one is to improve the reports."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is cheaper than Microsoft Defender. It has a subscription and no standard license."

"It is the cheapest solution we found."

"Compared to Lumu, other solutions are more expensive. SentinelOne was a bit cheaper, and another provider's price structure is unclear, but Lumu fit our budget nicely. SentinelOne's cost depends on the number of devices, and it might be similar to Lumu's, depending on deployment."

"The tool is available at a good price. The tool offers a good and competitive price for customers."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Extended Detection and Response (XDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

22%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Educational Organization

12%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cybereason XDR?

The solution has an investigation feature, which is useful for building storylines.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cybereason XDR?

There could be more integrations with other data sources like NDR systems. Additionally, technical support has been slow in recent times. Enabling multifactor authentication has been problematic fo...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Cybereason XDR?

I use Cybereason XDR for customers who don't have a SOC or managed SOC yet and want to be protected on more than their desktops. It is especially used in the manufacturing industry, yet not exclusi...

See all answers

What do you like most about Lumu?

Lumu protects against threats immediately and handles them in time.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Lumu?

There is always room for improvement. I am not giving it a perfect score because I am sure there is something that could be enhanced.Having some sort of certification or training, along with more p...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Lumu?

We use it as our managed SOC instead of contracting with an MSP. It coordinates endpoint and gives us a single pane of glass for our security events.It fulfills the role of a SIEM, serving as our d...

See all answers

Comparisons

Wazuh vs Cybereason XDR

Compared 40% of the time

Microsoft Defender XDR vs Cybereason XDR

Compared 24% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cybereason XDR

Compared 16% of the time

Cynet vs Cybereason XDR

Compared 11% of the time

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs Cybereason XDR

Compared 8% of the time

More Cybereason XDR Competitors

Darktrace vs Lumu

Compared 55% of the time

Wazuh vs Lumu

Compared 11% of the time

Stellar Cyber Open XDR vs Lumu

Compared 10% of the time

Vectra AI vs Lumu

Compared 8% of the time

Fortinet FortiGate IPS vs Lumu

Compared 5% of the time

More Lumu Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Extended Detection and Response (XDR)

June 2025

Download Cybereason XDR product report

Buyer's Guide

Lumu

June 2025

Download Lumu product report

Overview

Cybereason is the leader in endpoint protection, offering endpoint detection and response, next-generation antivirus, and managed monitoring services. Founded by elite intelligence professionals born and bred in offense-first hunting, Cybereason gives enterprises the upper hand over cyber adversaries.

Cybereason

Lumu Technologies is a cyber-security company that illuminates threats, attacks, and adversaries affecting enterprises worldwide. Using actionable intelligence, Lumu provides a radical way to secure networks by enhancing and augmenting existing defense capabilities established over the past 25 years.

Lumu Technologies

Sample Customers

MOTOROLA MOBILITY

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Cybereason XDR vs. Lumu

June 2025

Free Report: Cybereason XDR vs. Lumu

Find out what your peers are saying about Cybereason XDR vs. Lumu and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cybereason XDR vs. Lumu report.

See our list of best Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vendors.

We monitor all Extended Detection and Response (XDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.