CyberArk Identity vs WSO2 Identity Server comparison

CyberArk and WSO2 are both solutions in the Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) category. CyberArk is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.3, while WSO2 is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.3. CyberArk holds a 3.5% mindshare in CIaA, compared to WSO2’s 3.0% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of CyberArk users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of WSO2 users who would recommend it.

CyberArk Identity

Read 29 CyberArk Identity reviews

4,192 Views
587 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

WSO2 Identity Server

Read 11 WSO2 Identity Server reviews

1,333 Views
573 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CyberArk Identity

WSO2 Identity Server

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 27, 2025

CyberArk Identity and WSO2 Identity Server are both leading solutions in the identity management space, each offering distinct strengths in security and user management. CyberArk stands out with its advanced security features, especially in privileged account management, while WSO2 is favored for its cost-effective, open-source model and efficient integrations.

Features: CyberArk Identity is known for password rotation, multi-factor authentication, and seamless integration with UiPath Orchestrator. Its security is enhanced by features like adaptive interfaces and ecosystem support. WSO2 Identity Server excels in API integrations, simplifying single sign-on processes, and offers strong connectivity with Active Directory and LDAP, making customer identity management straightforward with minimal customization required.

Room for Improvement: CyberArk Identity could improve in mobile device management, network management, and federation capabilities. Users have noted challenges with scalability, third-party SMS integration, and usability. WSO2 Identity Server faces criticism for its high availability architecture, LDAP synchronization, and complex installation process. Additional detailed documentation and integration connectors are needed, particularly for non-cloud versions.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CyberArk supports deployment across on-premises, private, and public clouds but has mixed feedback regarding support, citing issues with skill set and response times. WSO2 supports hybrid, public, and on-premises environments, generally receiving positive feedback for its technical support responsiveness and quality, perceived as more consistent and straightforward than CyberArk's.

Pricing and ROI: CyberArk Identity is often viewed as expensive, but its robust security features provide significant benefits, resulting in a positive ROI by preventing penalties. WSO2's open-source pricing model offers a cost-effective alternative, making it attractive for budget-conscious organizations, with ROI enhanced by reasonable licensing costs and optional support fees.

To learn more, read our detailed CyberArk Identity vs. WSO2 Identity Server Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk Identity vs. WSO2 Identity Server

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,311 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CyberArk Identity

Ranking in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)

7th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Authentication Systems (9th), Identity Management (IM) (9th), Authorization Software (3rd), Enterprise Password Managers (9th), User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (9th), Access Management (8th), Active Directory Management (6th), Cloud Resource Access Management (3rd)

WSO2 Identity Server

Ranking in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)

10th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) category, the mindshare of CyberArk Identity is 3.5%, down from 3.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WSO2 Identity Server is 3.0%, up from 2.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
CyberArk Identity	3.5%
WSO2 Identity Server	3.0%
Other	93.5%

Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)

Featured Reviews

Hariharan Thangasamy

Cybersecurity Delivery Analyst at Accenture

Has strengthened privileged access control and improved audit visibility through session monitoring and password rotation

On the identity product side, it is awesome. However, they can improve in the documentation parts. For example, if there is a migration process, I can see the maximum customers are moving from self-hosted to on-premises or from on-premises to the cloud. It would be helpful if they released a generalized document for processes such as migration. A clear overview document would assist us in understanding more about the tool, configurations, and automations to enhance our security. Regarding the initial setup of CyberArk Identity, I faced some challenges. At some points, I could not find proper documentation for deploying, enhancing, or integrating with other components. I could not find the proper documentation in the community portal.

Read full review

Ritesh_Shah

Senior Solution Architect at Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Utilizing key management and seamless single sign-on integration for enhanced user profile management

WSO2 Identity Server's key management feature stands out as a particularly impactful feature for enhancing security. Additionally, from a user perspective, the self-user portal and user profile management capabilities are highly valuable. It allows users to manage their profiles, change passwords, and offers a self-care portal type of functionality. The single sign-on capability integrates seamlessly with various platforms, including Google, Facebook, LDAP, and Active Directory, which supports rapid product launches.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The initial setup of CyberArk Identity was straightforward."

"The most valuable feature of CyberArk Identity is the adaptive interface."

"The tool helps with authentication. It acts as an MFA for any kind of privileged access that occurs in our organization."

"The most valuable features of CyberArk Identity are its ability to control access to administrative staff."

"The integration capabilities, ability to integrate CyberArk into the overall IBB strategy of our current clients."

"The initial setup is straightforward. It takes me up to an hour and a half."

"The setup, via cloud, is simple."

"As soon as it is implemented, it fundamentally changes how users access systems, providing immediate security benefits."

More CyberArk Identity pros

"It's very easy to implement everything."

"The feature that I found most valuable was the ecosystem, which is very comprehensive and allowed me to find the components that I wanted to use, including the identity server and the API."

"We use the solution for customer identity management, authenticating customers coming in through a web portal."

"The product provides easy integration between API manager and IT server components."

"The single sign-on procedure itself, as well as the ability to connect to external user sources such as Microsoft Active Directory and LDAP servers, are the solution's most valuable features."

"I would rate the solution's stability eight or nine out of ten."

"Some of the valuable features of the solution are the easy integration with processes, such as Single Sign-On. Overall WSO2 is straightforward and does not need customization."

"Comprehensive ecosystem."

More WSO2 Identity Server pros

Cons

"At the moment CyberArk needs to enrich Conjur and it needs to be made more viable so that its adoption can be made much faster."

"To enhance the product, they can consider improving the user interface of the software and possibly the customer support team."

"The solution's difficulty in gaining skill sets should be improved because it's a vertical product."

"CyberArk Identity could improve by having the ability to better manage the network, such as Cisco. There seem to be some issues in this area."

"They can include the Mobile Device Management (MDM) feature."

"One area for improvement is the complexity of the learning curve for new users."

"We would like to see an improvement in the ability to manage mobile devices."

More CyberArk Identity cons

"This solution requires extensive knowledge to be used effectively as certain areas of its use are not user friendly."

"This solution does not have BPM workflows already integrated, we had to integrate the BPM module externally. They do not provide full-featured auditing and certification modules out of the box."

"I tried the product but I found it very cumbersome, so I no longer use it."

"First, improvements have to been made in the high availability architecture. This has to do with the master-slave replication, and how the load balancing is handled between the identity servers."

"This solution does not have BPM workflows already integrated, we had to integrate the BPM module externally."

"Sometimes working with the code is difficult because I search for documentation about the code and how to work with the code, which is where I believe they should improve, by providing some documentation on how to work with the code."

"There needs to be a good support model and easy-to-understand documentation."

More WSO2 Identity Server cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's not that affordable compared to Delinea or other products. They're less expensive and allow more customization. For the cost, it is expensive."

"I would rate the tool’s pricing a seven out of ten. The product’s pricing is expensive and is on a yearly basis. You will need to pay around 10,000 GBP for 500 users."

"There is an initial license and then there is a subscription needed."

"The solution is cheap and I rate its pricing an eight out of ten."

"CyberArk Identity is an expensive solution."

"The pricing is acceptable. It is worth considering what we are protecting with the amount charged."

"We find that the pricing and licensing of this solution is adequate, as compared to the other competitors in the market."

"Their pricing is obviously a lot higher than many vendors in the marketplace but their service is also unmatched."

More CyberArk Identity pricing and cost advice

"I have found the solutions license is priced competitively compared to others."

"WSO2 Identity Server is not an expensive solution."

"We have to take their support, but that is a minimal charge if I'm comparing it to other identity managers."

"At this time we are working with the open-source version."

"They should bring in some good pricing models to host the marketplace."

"I rate the product price an eight out of ten. There is a need to pay more for the extra features provided by the solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Healthcare Company

Comms Service Provider

10%

Transportation Company

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	10

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about CyberArk Identity?

The integration capabilities, ability to integrate CyberArk into the overall IBB strategy of our current clients.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CyberArk Identity?

I am not certain about CyberArk Identity's exact pricing model. For comparison, Okta was around five dollars per user. CyberArk Identity offers good discounts to some clients, which influences thei...

See all answers

What needs improvement with CyberArk Identity?

We do not specifically use the password vaulting feature of CyberArk Identity. The centralized user dashboard of CyberArk Identity has not been that important for us. If it would be possible to sha...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for WSO2 Identity Server?

The pricing is currently the same as the API Manager, so it's not surprising. Since we used it primarily for SSO and the self portal, there were no additional pricing concerns.

See all answers

What needs improvement with WSO2 Identity Server?

Currently, all required features are supported. If new use cases for artificial intelligence arise, it could be beneficial to incorporate those. However, for our current projects, WSO2 Identity Ser...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for WSO2 Identity Server?

We deployed WSO2 Identity Server to fulfill our single sign-on (SSO) requirements. Whenever we implement the API Manager, instead of using the API Manager's inbuilt key manager, we use WSO2 Identit...

See all answers

Comparisons

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs CyberArk Identity

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs CyberArk Identity

Compared 6% of the time

Okta Platform vs CyberArk Identity

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Intune vs CyberArk Identity

Compared 4% of the time

Ping Identity Platform vs CyberArk Identity

Compared 4% of the time

More CyberArk Identity Competitors

Auth0 Platform vs WSO2 Identity Server

Compared 25% of the time

Okta Platform vs WSO2 Identity Server

Compared 22% of the time

Ping Identity Platform vs WSO2 Identity Server

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs WSO2 Identity Server

Compared 8% of the time

Amazon Cognito vs WSO2 Identity Server

Compared 6% of the time

More WSO2 Identity Server Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk Identity

March 2026

Download CyberArk Identity product report

Buyer's Guide

WSO2 Identity Server

March 2026

Download WSO2 Identity Server product report

Also Known As

Idaptive

No data available

Overview

CyberArk Identity is a versatile identity management solution suitable for a wide range of enterprises. It is designed to enhance enterprise security and improve user experience. Its focus on security, compliance, and operational efficiency, combined with positive user feedback, makes it a strong contender in the identity management space.

CyberArk Identity offers a robust suite of features to manage user identities and access privileges. It focuses on securing access to resources across various environments, including cloud and on-premises applications. Its capabilities include single sign-on (SSO), multi-factor authentication (MFA), lifecycle management, and privileged access management. These features are engineered to streamline access control, enhance security, and ensure compliance with regulatory standards.

Single Sign-On (SSO) simplifies user access by providing a single authentication point for multiple applications.
Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) adds an extra layer of security by requiring additional verification methods.
Lifecycle Management automates user account provisioning and deprovisioning, aligning with HR processes and compliance requirements.
Privileged Access Management secures and monitors access to critical systems and data by privileged users.

According to our user interviews, CyberArk Identity is praised for its reliability and user-friendly interface. IT professionals highlight the ease of integration with existing systems, while business executives appreciate the visibility it provides into access and identity management across the organization. Users also commend the responsive customer support, which is crucial for enterprise-level solutions.

IT Professionals found that CyberArk Identity's focus on multi-layered security significantly reduced the risk of data breaches and unauthorized access. With a centralized dashboard and automation features, you can streamline identity and access management tasks, saving time and reducing complexity. Finally, it helps meet various compliance requirements.

CyberArk

WSO2 Identity Server can be used to simplify identity and access management (IAM) related activities in the enterprise. The product is based on open standards and open source principles. WSO2 Identity Server comes with seamless, easy to use integration capabilities that help connect applications, user stores, directories and identity management systems.

WSO2

Sample Customers

MLB, Citi, Pfizer, SulAmerica, GE Capital, Shiseido

Nutanix, ELM, AlmavivA, BDigital, StubHub, M-creations, MedVision360

Buyer's Guide

CyberArk Identity vs. WSO2 Identity Server

March 2026

Free Report: CyberArk Identity vs. WSO2 Identity Server

Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk Identity vs. WSO2 Identity Server and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CyberArk Identity vs. WSO2 Identity Server report.

See our list of best Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) vendors.

We monitor all Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.