Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs WALLIX Bastion comparison

CyberArk and WALLIX are both solutions in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category. CyberArk is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.6, while WALLIX is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.2. CyberArk holds a 3.2% mindshare in PAM, compared to WALLIX’s 7.8% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of CyberArk users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of WALLIX users who would recommend it.
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege...
Read 38 CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager reviews
  • 3,979 Views
  • 1,194 Comparison Views
86% willing to recommend
WALLIX Bastion
Read 12 WALLIX Bastion reviews
  • 2,961 Views
  • 2,872 Comparison Views
85% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 6, 2024

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager and WALLIX Bastion are competitors in the endpoint and access management category. Based on user reviews, WALLIX Bastion has the upper hand in terms of features, while CyberArk excels in customer support and pricing, making it ideal for cost-conscious buyers.

Features: CyberArk offers granular policy management, ease of integration with existing systems, and a straightforward setup process. WALLIX Bastion is recognized for comprehensive session management, scalability, and its capability for large-scale deployments.

Room for Improvement: CyberArk users desire an improved reporting mechanism, better analytics, and enhanced documentation. WALLIX users seek more robust operational documentation, better onboarding processes, and improved user guides.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CyberArk is noted for its seamless deployment and responsive support. WALLIX requires more time to deploy, but its advanced features justify this complexity. Both products offer distinct strengths in setup ease and support quality.

Pricing and ROI: CyberArk provides competitive pricing with a quicker ROI, appealing to budget-sensitive users. WALLIX involves a higher initial investment but offers valuable returns over time due to its robust features.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. WALLIX Bastion Report (Updated: July 2025).
Buyer's Guide
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. WALLIX Bastion
July 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 864,574 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege...
Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)
3rd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
38
Ranking in other categories
Endpoint Compliance (5th), Anti-Malware Tools (5th), Application Control (5th), Ransomware Protection (5th)
WALLIX Bastion
Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)
5th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category, the mindshare of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is 3.2%, down from 3.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WALLIX Bastion is 7.8%, down from 8.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Privileged Access Management (PAM)
 

Featured Reviews

Sumit Chavan - PeerSpot reviewer
Helps secure the infrastructure and control users with admin rights
There are many features that are currently missing. A customization option is required for certain policies. For instance, if we need to stop PowerShell scripting, we have to create a different policy for that. Being able to create a sub-level policy within a top-level policy would be good. Currently, no user-based policy option is available inside the EPM console. We can only create computer-based policies. The database is available, but there is a drawback in not being able to create local groups on the EPM console. We only have to depend on Active Directory. This limits infrastructure security as we depend on the Active Directory team to manage user groups. If they remove any users, we lose control. If we could create groups locally and block them or set specific policies, we would have more control. Local endpoint management is missing from the EPM site. Moreover, there is an issue with policies not running as expected when we make enhancements. We have to find multiple ways to whitelist applications or enhance policies.
Read full review
Herve Choupot - PeerSpot reviewer
Enhancing administration security with critical feature improvements needed
My primary use case is to make a training about Active Directory security. In my experience, I work with Bastion. I emphasize the importance of having a good knowledge of Bastion to avoid vulnerabilities It helps by providing some security features for administration, although it's crucial to be…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager enhances computer security by providing minimal access, effectively preventing ransomware attacks."
"We did immediately begin to see results when using CyberArk."
"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager (EPM) 's most valuable feature is its ability to manage user application privileges and protect against ransomware attacks by controlling access to specific files and applications."
"I am impressed with the product's seamless integration. The PAM wallet and enterprise password wallet are good also good."
"You can use it to strip users of their local admin rights and, at the same time, elevate applications for them."
"This is the number one product for privilege account security."
"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager has had a positive impact on my customers' security posture."
"It allows whitelisting."
More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager pros
"The interface is very simple. It doesn't need any plug-ins, just browsers that are installed at the beginning."
"We use WALLIX Bastion to provide access and to monitor sessions."
"Its video recording capabilities have definitely been key for us."
"The most valuable feature of WALLIX Bastion is its password management capability, which is central to safeguarding sensitive information."
"Bastion provides a kind of isolation between the administration laptop and the server you want to administer."
"The support is great. They offer 24/7 support, but the specific level of support depends on your subscription. There's a weekday-only option, and a 24/7 option that covers all days of the week. They also have offices in different regions, including West Africa, so people there can easily get support. There's no need to worry about getting assistance."
"The solution's technical support team is helpful."
"Bastion provides a kind of isolation between the administration laptop and the server you want to administer."
More WALLIX Bastion pros
 

Cons

"The product is expensive."
"The turnaround time of the support team is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"CyberArk is a pretty heavy solution."
"While CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is a great tool, I believe the functionality could be wider. If it could work not only with permissions but also involve pure EDR tasks or User and Entity Behavior Analytics, it would be great."
"Performance could be better. We have a couple of problems with CyberArk right now. One of the problems is performance in our environment. Support also takes a long time to respond. If the user already has local admin rights, then I can't collect any events in the console from this device. There are also some options in CyberArk that are not working properly, and are not helpful in this case. I can't collect any information to create a proper policy for the device. I have to investigate everything manually, or even disable the local admin from the device. I can collect the events only after this, and it's very time consuming. In my case, it's a waste of resources."
"The CyberArk team is working on a feature to identify devices without the Endpoint Privilege Manager running, which is currently missing."
"The product's threat protection and defense capabilities need enhancement."
"The management of Privilege Access is not satisfactory."
More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager cons
"There should be more effort to increase the level of security."
"There could be more automation features for the solution."
"For me, the main issue has to do with the system performance itself."
"The main problem of Bastion, CyberArk, and WALLIX is that they have the same interface for both administration and users, which is not a good idea from a security perspective."
"The performance of WALLIX Bastion's password manager is very low."
"The scalability of WALLIX Bastion is rated seven out of ten. While it meets our current needs, scaling up the solution is not as easy, and improvements could be made in this area."
"The password management needs improvement. Management of Access Manager should be improved as well."
"Based on my experience as a sales tech person, one area of improvement could be a more unified licensing model."
More WALLIX Bastion cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager has a very high price, so it's a one out of ten for me in terms of pricing."
"Pricing depends on how many devices you use. Right now, on-premise, it costs us a little, but it's worth it. It seems like the cloud solution is much more expensive. We got this solution one year ago, and it's like we bought the solution, and now they are not going to support it on-premise anymore. We are in the implementation phase, and we missed this, and we already paid for the licenses. This is wasted time from my perspective, and CyberArk should be more customer-friendly."
"The tool's pricing is reasonable for customers."
"The price of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is expensive. The solution is priced based on the number of accounts onboarded and the number of concurrent sessions. Everyone else is included in the price, such as support."
"I believe it's quite a reasonably priced solution. It's not very common to use CyberArk because it's a niche solution, but customers who are willing to control administrative accounts are willing to pay this money."
"The professional services for one eight-hour day would be $1,800."
"We pay about $17 per user."
"I feel that the price of the product is nominal. It must be around 10 to 15 USD per installation. I rate the product price an eight to nine out of ten, where one is high price, and ten is low price."
More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager pricing and cost advice
"The solution's price is mid-ranged."
"Some extra price needs to be paid for license."
"The solution's pricing is comparable to that of other products."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
864,574 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Government
8%
Computer Software Company
18%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Government
9%
Financial Services Firm
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Looking for recommendations and a pros/cons template for software to detect insider threats
This is an inside-out --- outside-in --- inside-in question, as an insider can be an outsider as well. There is no short answer other than a blend of a PAM tool with Behavioral Analytics and Endpo...
See all answers
What do you like most about CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager?
The most valuable feature of the solution is its performance.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager?
I believe it's quite a reasonably priced solution. It's not very common to use CyberArk because it's a niche solution, but customers who are willing to control administrative accounts are willing t...
See all answers
What do you like most about WALLIX Bastion?
The support is great. They offer 24/7 support, but the specific level of support depends on your subscription. There's a weekday-only option, and a 24/7 option that covers all days of the week. The...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for WALLIX Bastion?
The price of WALLIX Bastion is rated five out of ten, positioning it in the middle. The cost is justified by the features and capabilities we receive.
See all answers
What needs improvement with WALLIX Bastion?
The auditing and reporting features of WALLIX Bastion could be improved. Customizable reports could be introduced to generate dynamic reports based on our requirements. Adding flowcharts for the re...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

CrowdStrike Falcon vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager
Compared 17% of the time
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Logo
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager
Compared 15% of the time
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager
Compared 15% of the time
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Logo
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager
Compared 10% of the time
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Logo
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager
Compared 2% of the time
More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Competitors
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs WALLIX Bastion Logo
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs WALLIX Bastion
Compared 28% of the time
Teleport vs WALLIX Bastion Logo
Teleport vs WALLIX Bastion
Compared 11% of the time
One Identity Safeguard vs WALLIX Bastion Logo
One Identity Safeguard vs WALLIX Bastion
Compared 7% of the time
ManageEngine PAM360 vs WALLIX Bastion Logo
ManageEngine PAM360 vs WALLIX Bastion
Compared 6% of the time
KeeperPAM vs WALLIX Bastion Logo
KeeperPAM vs WALLIX Bastion
Compared 2% of the time
More WALLIX Bastion Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager
August 2025
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager reportDownload CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager product report
Buyer's Guide
WALLIX Bastion
July 2025
WALLIX Bastion reportDownload WALLIX Bastion product report
 

Also Known As

Viewfinity
Bastion
 

Overview

CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager, a critical and foundational endpoint control addresses the underlying weaknesses of endpoint defenses against a privileged attacker and helps enterprises defend against these attacks through removing local admin rights, enforcing least privilege, and implementing foundational endpoint security controls across all Windows, macOS and Linux endpoints from hybrid to cloud environments.

Click here for a free 30 day trial: CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager free trial

CyberArk

WALLIX offers cybersecurity and privileged access management solutions that secure and protect your most critical IT assets.

WALLIX
 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
RTBF, Pharmagest, Michelin Group, Niort Hospital
Buyer's Guide
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. WALLIX Bastion
July 2025
Free Report: CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. WALLIX Bastion
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. WALLIX Bastion and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
864,574 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. WALLIX Bastion report.
See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.

We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.