Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

CrossBrowserTesting vs QA Madness Automated Testing comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

CrossBrowserTesting
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
19
Ranking in other categories
Functional Testing Tools (28th)
QA Madness Automated Testing
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Regression Testing Tools (28th), Test Automation Services (2nd)
 

Featured Reviews

CN
Knowledgeable support, scalable, and stable
We use CrossBrowserTesting for testing our web-based applications We had some issues with the onboarding process and the cloud conductivity could improve. I have used CrossBrowserTesting within the past 12 months. CrossBrowserTesting is stable. I have found CrossBrowserTesting to be scalable.…
Use QA Madness Automated Testing?
Share your opinion
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Regression Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
864,574 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Accenture, Sony, Los Angeles Times, ADP, Verizon, T-Mobile, Wistia
DevPocket, Ewave, Fight Camp, Above The Fray
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Katalon Studio and others in Regression Testing Tools. Updated: July 2025.
864,574 professionals have used our research since 2012.