CRITICALSTART vs Field Effect MDR comparison

Critical Start and Field Effect are both solutions in the Managed Detection and Response (MDR) category. Critical Start is ranked #28, while Field Effect is ranked #5 with an average rating of 9.2. Critical Start holds a 1.2% mindshare in MDR, compared to Field Effect’s 1.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Critical Start users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Field Effect users who would recommend it.

CRITICALSTART

Read 10 CRITICALSTART reviews

2,527 Views
1,744 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Field Effect MDR

Read 31 Field Effect MDR reviews

4,748 Views
4,748 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CRITICALSTART

Field Effect MDR

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 3, 2024

CRITICALSTART and Field Effect MDR are prominent players in the managed detection and response market. While CRITICALSTART offers competitive pricing and proactive support, Field Effect MDR's robust features justify its higher cost, appealing to those seeking depth in security solutions.

Features: CRITICALSTART emphasizes real-time threat interception, extensive log data management, and efficient alert consolidation. Field Effect MDR is known for its comprehensive threat analysis, user-friendly monitoring, and advanced analytical capabilities offering holistic security insights.

Room for Improvement: CRITICALSTART could enhance user interface speed, integrate more data sources, and improve mobile app responsiveness. Field Effect MDR may streamline its deployment process, reduce vulnerability management workload, and enhance the visibility of false positive filtering capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CRITICALSTART offers a quick deployment process with responsive, proactive customer support, aiding rapid integration. Field Effect MDR requires more initial setup, but provides thorough guidance and robust ongoing support ensuring overall system alignment.

Pricing and ROI: CRITICALSTART provides cost-effective setup options promising a swift ROI, ideal for budget-conscious businesses. Field Effect MDR, while requiring a higher upfront investment, delivers comprehensive security features that offer significant long-term ROI potential.

To learn more, read our detailed CRITICALSTART vs. Field Effect MDR Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

CRITICALSTART vs. Field Effect MDR

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CRITICALSTART

Ranking in Managed Detection and Response (MDR)

28th

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (25th)

Field Effect MDR

Ranking in Managed Detection and Response (MDR)

5th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Managed Detection and Response (MDR) category, the mindshare of CRITICALSTART is 1.2%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Field Effect MDR is 1.5%, down from 3.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Managed Detection and Response (MDR) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Field Effect MDR	1.5%
CRITICALSTART	1.2%
Other	97.3%

Managed Detection and Response (MDR)

Featured Reviews

Justin Hadley

Sr. Manager, Security Engineering at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees

The transparency of data in the platform is perfect: You see everything as they are seeing it

Their Zero Trust Analytics Platform (ZTAP) engine, which is kind of their correlation engine, is by far and away one of the best in the business. We can filter and utilize different lists to build out different alerts, such as, what to alert on and when not to alert. This engine helps reduce our number of alerts and false positives. The service's Trusted Behavior Registry helps the provider solve every alert. The way that they have it built out is very intelligent. The way every alert comes in, it gets triaged one direction or another. If it is already a false positive, then it is still getting addressed and reviewed on a regular cadence. Also, true positive alerts get escalated to the appropriate personnel. Its mobile app is great. The ability just to be able to quick reference and see what's coming in when you're on the move or go. You don't always need to have your computer or laptop handy, because you can operate it just from the mobile app. It can communicate with analysts, which is great. The mobile app is great at affecting the efficiency of our security operations. Those guys are using it throughout the day, whether that be at the office, home, or off hours. Typically, they triage from the mobile app. Then, if an escalation needs to be done on a computer, they will pull out a computer. We were on the original UI for a few years, so the updated UI has been a refreshing change. It has significantly more ability to filter and translate data, then load that data. It is rather intuitive to click through for some of our junior analysts or interns, especially as we are starting to onboard and teach them different aspects of the security operations team.

Read full review

reviewer2753850

Owner at a tech services company with 1-10 employees

Customer security is enhanced with software and update detection while licensing process needs improvement

A quick specific example of how I use Field Effect MDR to keep my customers secure is that it helps me identify computers that need updates, even when I believe they are already updated. Field Effect MDR finds software and Windows updates that aren't being completed, which I find very valuable.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Their Zero Trust Analytics Platform (ZTAP) engine, which is kind of their correlation engine, is by far and away one of the best in the business. We can filter and utilize different lists to build out different alerts, such as, what to alert on and when not to alert. This engine helps reduce our number of alerts and false positives."

"The biggest lesson is transitioning from alert overload to being at a point where we do have eyes on alerts, where every alert is truly possible."

"Out of all the service providers I've had to work with over the years—I've been here six years—CRITICALSTART is my favorite to work with."

"The way that the user interface presents data enables our team to be able to make decisions significantly quicker, rather than have to dig into the details or go back to the original tools."

"After a year of using the service, our expectations have been met in terms of services delivered on time, on budget, and on spec."

"This has been a positive experience and money well spent."

"From where we were prior to going into them, the service has increased our analysts’ efficiency to the point that they can focus on other areas of the business. It gives me the ability to allow analysts to do Level 3 and 4 work and stay out of the weeds of the alerts, where you tend to get alert fatigue. The service takes care of much of the Tier 1 and Tier 2 triage. It is more effective than what we had been used to, because it allows the filtering of Level 1 and Level 2 type alerts to be taken care of. This leaves less for us to handle, which is a good thing."

"I also use their mobile app. It's very easy to use and very convenient to be able to respond to alerts wherever you are. I love the app. You can respond and communicate, per ticket, with their SOC in near real-time. The response is very quick."

More CRITICALSTART pros

"I get alerts if there's malicious activity or restrictions, should they any suspicious activity emerge."

"A client of ours with Field Effect MDR is less likely to be a victim of a cyber attack."

"We are getting visibility over the network, not just for those hosts that have a Field Effect EDR agent but also things like the Internet of Things, guest networks, or rogue devices. We definitely have visibility into all network traffic, which is very cool."

"I appreciate the "set it and forget it" nature of Field Effect Covalence."

"The ARO alerts are helpful to use almost daily to get a sense of what actions we need to take to expedite security measures."

"Unlike previous solutions, where we were solely informed of security incidents, Covalence's MDR allows for real-time incident prevention."

"The most valuable features are AROs, which provide timely notifications for out-of-compliance or out-of-specification detections."

"It is very user-friendly. We have regular reports to see what is going on."

More Field Effect MDR pros

Cons

"The UI has become slower but it's not something I would call them out on."

"In terms of responsiveness, when I open up an alert, sometimes it takes a bit of time to load. However, it only happened once or twice."

"There is room for improvement with the new UI, and that's about it. I would like to see a more intuitive design."

"They just did a user interface overhaul to the website portal that you use for troubleshooting tickets. The old one was fine. The new one is not intuitive and I hate it."

"During the six-month integration and rollout, there were some bumpy roads along the way. There were communication breakdowns between the project manager, CRITICALSTART leadership, and us (as the customer). I expressed my displeasure during the integration in their inability to effectively communicate when there were holdups or issues. They were going through some growing pains at that time, but they have been right there for us ever since."

"The biggest room for improvement is not necessarily in their service or offering, but in the products that they support."

"They could dig a little bit deeper into the Splunk alerts when they feel like they need to be escalated to us."

"They could dig a little bit deeper into the Splunk alerts when they feel like they need to be escalated to us. For example, if a locked account shows up, they could do a little extra digging to verify that the locked account was due to a bad password on the local system. They could just do a little extra digging within the Splunk environment instead of pushing it onto us to go do that extra little digging."

More CRITICALSTART cons

"I'd suggest that Field Effect focus more on including things like phishing simulation and cybersecurity training."

"The interface is perhaps the weakest part of the entire platform, and that does not mean that it is deficient. It is just not as optimized and as efficient as other aspects of the platform."

"In my experience, Field Effect MDR is somewhat stable. However, I have one situation where it has been two months trying to resolve an installation issue on a server, which has consumed a significant amount of time."

"Field Effect MDR could broaden its cloud application integrations to integrate better with Office 365, Azure, Salesforce, etc. They integrate about 15 to 20 out of the box. I'd love to see a lot more than that."

"There are tags for security threats, but I only view them. I do not action anything. I just see what is happening. Sometimes, they are a little bit vague, and I am unsure what they mean, so I leave that to the IT experts. Overall, we are quite satisfied with their product and how it is working."

"The tagging of ARO closure has room for improvement."

"Covalence should provide a live view of the endpoint because the endpoint view in the portal is 5 to 15 minutes behind the actual status of the endpoint and its vulnerabilities. When it doesn't update with the actual status, it makes managing those things harder because sometimes something gets updated, and one of those vulnerabilities has gone away, but that doesn't appear in the ARO."

"I'd like improved visibility into the backend data where logs are stored, along with integrations with a wider range of products."

More Field Effect MDR cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing has always been competitive. They have always been good to us. They will make it a fight. They don't try to hide anything; it's always been fully transparent and well-worth what we pay for it."

"There are contractual penalties if their SLAs are not met. This commitment was very important in our decision to go with this service, because not having downtime is extremely important to us. The providers has not missed an SLA in the 18 months that I have worked with them."

"As far as the expense goes, it's very competitive pricing and the services you get are almost like you have a person on your team."

"The pricing of other services was so insane that they weren't even an option."

"It costs a lot for what we felt comfortable to spend."

"I've told CRITICALSTART that I think the managed service they provide is cheaper than it should be. It's a really good deal."

"Overall, for what I'm paying for it, and the benefit I'm getting out of it, it is right where it needs to be, if not a little bit in my favor. For what it costs me to actually have this service, I could afford one internal person to do that job, but now I have a team of 10 or more who are doing that job, and they don't sleep because they work shifts."

"It is a little pricey. It is a little on the high end, but we are continuing to use it. We signed the contract and have not canceled, so we find value in having it."

"The pricing is comparable to what else is out there."

"We're currently enrolled in the volume package, which offers tiered pricing based on usage."

"Covalence is cost-effective."

"The pricing isn't sized, so Field Effect doesn't make it easy for anything under 25 users. I'm not crazy about that."

"The shift to a per-user pricing model and the introduction of a base price for the on-premises or virtual appliance has been particularly advantageous."

"Field Effect is fairly priced from my perspective. You get a lot of bang for the buck with this and a level of visibility that provides you with greater peace of mind knowing that the system is carefully monitored. You also have automated responses for known malicious behavior at any time of the day. Someone could have their Office 365 mailbox compromised at 2 in the morning on a Saturday when most people are asleep or not paying attention, and the system can prevent an issue in an automated way."

"The licensing model itself is solid, but we're ironing out some inconsistencies in how customer profiles are configured."

More Field Effect MDR pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed Detection and Response (MDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

12%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

22%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Outsourcing Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	32
Midsize Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Field Effect Covalence?

Pricing was initially a concern, but the recent updates have resolved that by offering a more accessible buying cost.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Field Effect Covalence?

One way Field Effect MDR can be improved is through its licensing process, which is not ideal. The licensing process is difficult because I have to access a separate website to complete it.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Field Effect Covalence?

My main use case for Field Effect MDR is keeping my customers secure.

See all answers

Comparisons

ServiceNow Security Operations vs CRITICALSTART

Compared 12% of the time

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR vs CRITICALSTART

Compared 10% of the time

Binary Defense MDR vs CRITICALSTART

Compared 9% of the time

Expel vs CRITICALSTART

Compared 9% of the time

SentinelOne Wayfinder Threat Detection and Response vs CRITICALSTART

Compared 6% of the time

More CRITICALSTART Competitors

CrowdStrike Falcon Complete MDR vs Field Effect MDR

Compared 9% of the time

Bitdefender MDR vs Field Effect MDR

Compared 8% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs Field Effect MDR

Compared 7% of the time

SentinelOne Wayfinder Threat Detection and Response vs Field Effect MDR

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Defender Experts for Hunting vs Field Effect MDR

Compared 5% of the time

More Field Effect MDR Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CRITICALSTART

August 2026

Download CRITICALSTART product report

Buyer's Guide

Field Effect MDR

August 2026

Download Field Effect MDR product report

Also Known As

Critical Start, CriticalStart

Field Effect Covalence

Overview

CRITICALSTART enhances cybersecurity through advanced alert management, expert guidance, and a user-friendly interface. It promotes efficient monitoring and response to alerts, utilizing a Zero Trust model for heightened security.

CRITICALSTART is designed for organizations seeking to manage security alerts and streamline monitoring processes. Known for its quick response times and efficient alert filtering, it integrates tools like Cylance and Carbon Black to offer managed detection and response services. Users experience enhanced security by focusing on critical threats while the platform's easy navigation aids in efficiently responding to alerts. Improvement areas include better alert prioritization, enhanced compliance disclosure, and smoother integration with third-party communication tools.

What are the key features of CRITICALSTART?

Alert Management: Efficient handling and filtering of alerts to minimize noise.
Expert Guidance: Insights for integrating SIEM and optimizing response strategies.
Mobile Access: Easy access through a mobile app to manage alerts on the go.
Zero Trust Model: Enhances security by minimizing unnecessary access and noise.
User-Friendly Interface: Seamless navigation enhances user interaction and response times.

What advantages and ROI should users consider?

Improved Security Confidence: Advanced alert handling promotes a secure environment.
Increased Efficiency: Streamlined monitoring allows focus on critical threats.
Expert Insight: Professional guidance enhances security strategies and operations.
Quick Response Times: Rapid handling of threats reduces potential impacts.

In industry applications, organizations use CRITICALSTART to bolster cybersecurity measures across finance, healthcare, and technology sectors. Managed detection services and third-party integration make it suitable for enterprises looking to optimize security operations and minimize alert fatigue while ensuring 24/7 monitoring and protection.

Critical Start

Field Effect delivers intelligence-grade managed detection and response for the AI era.

Built on Federated Smart Compute™ and nation-state tradecraft, our holistic MDR platform uncovers weaknesses early, blocks attacks in real time, and reduces risk across the entire threat surface—endpoint, network, cloud, and more.

With an 18-second median time to detect, Field Effect helps MSPs and overwhelmed IT teams outpace agentic attacks and achieve premium protection with the team they have.

Field Effect

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Field Effect MDR is widely adopted by managed service providers (MSPs) and organizations with lean IT teams. It is used to monitor, detect, and respond to threats across distributed environments, helping businesses strengthen their cybersecurity posture while maintaining operational efficiency. Organizations rely on Field Effect MDR to protect hybrid infrastructures, secure cloud applications, and defend against modern threats, including increasingly automated and AI-driven attacks, while maintaining compliance and resilience in a rapidly evolving threat landscape.

Buyer's Guide

CRITICALSTART vs. Field Effect MDR

August 2026

Free Report: CRITICALSTART vs. Field Effect MDR

Find out what your peers are saying about CRITICALSTART vs. Field Effect MDR and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CRITICALSTART vs. Field Effect MDR report.

See our list of best Managed Detection and Response (MDR) vendors.

We monitor all Managed Detection and Response (MDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.