Coralogix vs Mezmo comparison

Coralogix and Mezmo are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Coralogix is ranked #22 with an average rating of 8.2, while Mezmo is ranked #80. Coralogix holds a 1.1% mindshare in APM, compared to Mezmo’s 0.1% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Coralogix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Mezmo users who would recommend it.

Coralogix

Read 11 Coralogix reviews

2,603 Views
1,536 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Mezmo

Read 2 Mezmo reviews

520 Views
270 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Coralogix

Mezmo

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Coralogix and Mezmo compete in the log analytics and monitoring field. Coralogix is favored for its integration capabilities, while Mezmo is preferred for its troubleshooting features, making it ideal for users who value feature depth.

Features: Coralogix provides strong integration options, efficient large data handling, and smooth deployment, making it suitable for enterprise environments. Mezmo offers robust troubleshooting features, comprehensive analytics, and a user-friendly interface, appealing to users seeking in-depth analytics capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Coralogix could enhance its alerting mechanisms, provide more flexible customization, and diversify its data visualization options. Mezmo could improve its configuration process, offer better support quality, and enhance its data visualization features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Coralogix offers a smooth deployment process and consistent support services, ensuring reliable implementation and assistance. Mezmo is appreciated for its straightforward setup but faces inconsistencies in support service quality.

Pricing and ROI: Coralogix is considered cost-effective with a high ROI, especially for enterprises handling large data volumes. Although Mezmo is relatively higher in price, it is seen as offering significant value for detailed analytics, justifying the cost.

To learn more, read our detailed Coralogix vs. Mezmo Report (Updated: August 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Coralogix vs. Mezmo

August 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Coralogix

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

22nd

Ranking in Log Management

21st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (23rd), API Management (16th), Streaming Analytics (13th), Anomaly Detection Tools (1st)

Mezmo

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

80th

Ranking in Log Management

52nd

Average Rating

9.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Observability Pipeline Software (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Coralogix is 1.1%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Mezmo is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Jorge Florez

Head SRE Latam at PayU

SaaS platform used by developers to store and conveniently search for logs

If a company has the budget and the log service is critical for them, I would say use Coralogix. It is a very good service for that. I would rate Coralogix an eight out of ten. It is an excellent service for storing logs for a long time. The capacity is unlimited for unindexed logs. The cost model is also very efficient because you pay for the ingested data per month. This can be compared to a solution like New Relic where you have to pay it upfront and cannot limit the data ingestion. Coralogix provides an easy way to search for logs and to visualize them. This a great feature because developers are constantly looking for or browsing logs.

Read full review

Theodore Omtzigt

President and Founder at STILLWATER SUPERCOMPUTING INC

It consolidates all logs into one place and provides required features and functionalities

Every once in a while, our IBM cloud operational implementation gets behind. Sometimes, when we have a customer event, we do not get access to the latest logs for about 30 minutes, particularly for the sites that are heavily utilized. This is clearly not good. It is impossible to do RCA when you can't look at the logs that pertain to the time period in which the event occurred. It could be more of an operational problem than a feature problem. I don't have visibility about whether it is a LogDNA issue or just an operational issue.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Coralogix scales well, and I will rate it nine out of ten."

"A non-tech person can easily get used to it."

"The log monitoring is good, and the dashboards that we create are beneficial."

"The best feature of this solution allows us to correlate logs, metrics and traces."

"The overall stability and reliability of Coralogix are excellent, and I rarely encounter issues."

"The solution offers very good convenience filtering."

"For now, we have not experienced any stability issues."

"Numerous data monitoring tools are available, but Coralogix somehow fine-tunes our policies and effectively supports our teams."

More Coralogix pros

"LogDNA consolidates all logs into one place, which is super valuable."

"The solution aggregates all event streams, so that if there are any issues, it's all in the same interface."

Cons

"Coralogix should have some AI capabilities to auto-detect anomalies and provide suggestions."

"Coralogix should have some AI capabilities to auto-detect anomalies and provide suggestions. The increasing volume of data and the resulting bandwidth charges are concerns."

"Maybe they could make it more user-friendly."

"From my experience, Coralogix has horrible Terraform providers."

"It would be helpful if Coralogix could integrate the main modules that any organization requires into a single subscription."

"The user interface is not intuitive, especially when first onboarding, and improvements could be made here."

"We want it to work at what it is expected to work at and not really based on the updated configuration which one developer has decided to change."

"The user interface could be more intuitive and explanatory."

More Coralogix cons

"No ability to encapsulate a query or a filter, and communicate or share that among the team."

"Every once in a while, our IBM cloud operational implementation gets behind. Sometimes, when we have a customer event, we do not get access to the latest logs for about 30 minutes, particularly for the sites that are heavily utilized. This is clearly not good. It is impossible to RCA when you can't look at the logs that pertain to the time period in which the event occurred. It could be more of an operational problem than a feature problem. I don't have visibility about whether it is a LogDNA issue or just an operational issue."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Currently, we are at a very minimal cost, which is around $400 per month since we have reduced our usage. Initially, we were at $900 per month."

"The cost of the solution is per volume of data ingested."

"We are paying roughly $5,000 a month."

"The platform has a reasonable cost. I rate the pricing a three out of ten."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Coralogix?

Numerous data monitoring tools are available, but Coralogix somehow fine-tunes our policies and effectively supports our teams.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Coralogix?

The pricing is expensive. We need to reduce logs to manage costs. Despite the expense, I believe it is worth the money to have Coralogix as a tool.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Coralogix?

Change might not be the correct word, but with every service, there is always room to improve. They are improving their services daily and deploy new features. When we had missing features that we ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Datadog vs Coralogix

Compared 25% of the time

New Relic vs Coralogix

Compared 10% of the time

Grafana vs Coralogix

Compared 9% of the time

Elastic Search vs Coralogix

Compared 7% of the time

Sentry vs Coralogix

Compared 6% of the time

More Coralogix Competitors

Datadog vs Mezmo

Compared 47% of the time

Cribl vs Mezmo

Compared 32% of the time

Grafana Loki vs Mezmo

Compared 21% of the time

More Mezmo Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Coralogix

August 2025

Download Coralogix product report

Buyer's Guide

Cribl vs. Mezmo

July 2025

Download Mezmo product report

Also Known As

No data available

LogDNA

Overview

Coralogix is a stateful streaming data platform that provides real-time insights and long-term trend analysis with no reliance on storage or indexing, solving the monitoring challenges of data growth in large-scale systems.

Ingest log, metric, and security data from any source for a single, centralized platform to monitor and alert on your applications. As data is ingested, Coralogix instantly narrows millions of events down to common patterns for deeper insights and faster troubleshooting. Proactive data storage optimization enables up to 70% savings on monitoring costs with better performance.

Coralogix

Today’s enterprises must manage a massive amount of machine data. They require a platform that enables engineering teams to deliberately route and store structured and unstructured data for different teams with unique use cases. Legacy platforms weren’t made for this moment.
‍
Mezmo, formerly LogDNA, lets organizations ingest, process, route, analyze, and store all of their log data. Purpose-built for modern engineering teams—including developers, SREs, IT Operations, and Security Engineers—the Mezmo platform is trusted by thousands of companies for SaaS, cloud, and hybrid applications.

Mezmo

Sample Customers

Payoneer, AGS, Monday.com, Capgemini

Instacart, Asics, Lime, Salesforce

Buyer's Guide

Coralogix vs. Mezmo

August 2025

Free Report: Coralogix vs. Mezmo

Find out what your peers are saying about Coralogix vs. Mezmo and other solutions. Updated: August 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Coralogix vs. Mezmo report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors and best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.