Coralogix vs Graylog comparison

Coralogix and Graylog are both solutions in the Log Management category. Coralogix is ranked #20 with an average rating of 8.2, while Graylog is ranked #15 with an average rating of 7.0. Coralogix holds a 0.8% mindshare in Log Management, compared to Graylog’s 6.5% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Coralogix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Graylog users who would recommend it.

Coralogix

Read 11 Coralogix reviews

2,564 Views
1,103 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Graylog

Read 21 Graylog reviews

9,223 Views
9,223 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Coralogix

Graylog

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Coralogix and Graylog are leading solutions in log management and analytics. Based on user reviews, Graylog has an upper hand in features due to its comprehensive feature set, while Coralogix is preferred for pricing and customer support.

Features: Coralogix provides real-time monitoring, alert systems, and deep integrations, making it effective in immediate data insights. Graylog offers superior customization, scalability, and extensive data logging capabilities, leading to greater flexibility and robust architecture.

Room for Improvement: Coralogix users often desire enhanced data visualization tools and more customization options. Graylog users find challenges with initial configuration and face a steep learning curve, alongside occasional issues in user interface intuitiveness.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Coralogix is noted for its streamlined deployment and responsive support, providing immediate user guidance and assistance. Graylog requires more technical involvement during deployment but is reliable post-setup, although initial complexities can be cumbersome.

Pricing and ROI: Coralogix offers competitive pricing, seen as delivering quick ROI through efficient data analysis. Graylog involves higher setup costs but justifies them with its capability to handle large data volumes effectively, promising substantial ROI through advanced features.

To learn more, read our detailed Coralogix vs. Graylog Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Coralogix vs. Graylog

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 861,803 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Coralogix

Ranking in Log Management

20th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (21st), Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (22nd), API Management (16th), Streaming Analytics (12th), Anomaly Detection Tools (1st)

Graylog

Ranking in Log Management

15th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of Coralogix is 0.8%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Graylog is 6.5%, up from 5.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management

Featured Reviews

reviewer1915599

VP of Engineering at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees

Good capabilities, has a helpful interface and is straightforward to set up

We have asked for a couple of features from the company already. What typically happens is a lot of people - and developers are one of the biggest consumers of this product - go to this product to optimize their investigation process and specific configurations. That increases our data flow at times, so the cost changes. And a lot of changes happen due to that. We have asked the company to auto-revert the changes after a while so that the system works typically. We want it to work at what it is expected to work at and not really based on the updated configuration which one developer has decided to change.

Read full review

Ivan Kokalovic

DevOps Engineer at Proton Technologies

Facilitates backend service monitoring with efficient log retrieval and API flexibility

Graylog is valuable because it bridges technical knowledge to non-technical teams, presenting complex backend processes in a simple timeline. It boosts the knowledge of sales and customer support teams by allowing them to see the backend operations without needing to read the code. Its API is flexible for visualization, and its powerful search engine efficiently handles large volumes of log data. Moreover, its stability, fast search capabilities, and compatibility with languages like ANSI SQL enhance its utility in IT infrastructure.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The best feature of this solution allows us to correlate logs, metrics and traces."

"For now, we have not experienced any stability issues."

"The solution is easy to use and to start with."

"Coralogix scales well, and I will rate it nine out of ten."

"The most valuable feature of Coralogix is that it is a very good vendor for metrics."

"Numerous data monitoring tools are available, but Coralogix somehow fine-tunes our policies and effectively supports our teams."

"The solution offers very good convenience filtering."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

More Coralogix pros

"We're using the Community edition, but I know that it has really good dashboarding and alerts."

"Graylog is valuable because it bridges technical knowledge to non-technical teams, presenting complex backend processes in a simple timeline."

"What I like about Graylog is that it's real-time and you have access to the raw data. So, you ingest it, and you have access to every message and every data item you ingest. You can then build analytics on top of that. You can look at the raw data, and you can do some volumetric estimations, such as how big traffic you have, how many messages of data of a type you have, etc."

"UDP is a fast and lightweight protocol, perfect for sending large volumes of logs with minimal overhead."

"Allowing us to set up alerts and integrate with platforms we already use, such as Slack and OpsGenie to alert users of these errors proactively, is also a very useful feature."

"Real-time UDP/GELF logging and full text-based searching."

"I like the correlation and the alerting."

"Message forwarding through the in-built module."

More Graylog pros

Cons

"Maybe they could make it more user-friendly."

"The user interface could be more intuitive and explanatory."

"From my experience, Coralogix has horrible Terraform providers."

"The user interface is not intuitive, especially when first onboarding, and improvements could be made here."

"Coralogix should have some AI capabilities to auto-detect anomalies and provide suggestions."

"The documentation of the tool could be improved"

"The features we were missing in the past were related to the way we see our metrics and aggregate our data."

"It would be helpful if Coralogix could integrate the main modules that any organization requires into a single subscription."

More Coralogix cons

"Over six months, I had two similar issues where searches were performed on field "messages". It exhausted all the memory of the ES node causing an ES crash and a Graylog halt."

"We ran into problems with Elasticsearch throwing a circuit-breaking exception due to field data size being too large. It turned out that the heap size directly impacted this size in a high-throughput environment, causing unexplained instability in Graylog. We were able to troubleshoot on the Elasticsearch size, but we should have been able to reference some minimum requirements for Graylog to know that our settings weren't sufficient."

"With technical support, you are on your own without an enterprise license."

"The area in Graylog that needs to be improved or enhanced would be the integrations."

"The biggest problem is the collector application, as we wanted to avoid using Graylog Collector Sidecar due to its architecture."

"When it comes to configuring the processing pipeline, writing the rules can be very tedious, especially since the documentation isn't extensive on how the functions provided for these rules work."

"Graylog could improve the process of creating rules. We have to create them manually by doing parses and applying them. Other SIEM solutions have basic rules and you can create and get more events of interest."

"The infrastructure cost is the main issue. I like the rest. If the infrastructure costs could be lower, it would be fantastic."

More Graylog cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The platform has a reasonable cost. I rate the pricing a three out of ten."

"Currently, we are at a very minimal cost, which is around $400 per month since we have reduced our usage. Initially, we were at $900 per month."

"We are paying roughly $5,000 a month."

"The cost of the solution is per volume of data ingested."

"We're using the Community edition."

"It's an open-source solution that can be used free of charge."

"You get a lot out-of-the-box with the non-enterprise version, so give it a try first."

"Graylog is a free open-source solution. The free version has a capacity limitation of 2 GB daily, if you want to go above this you have to purchase a license."

"If you want something that works and do not have the money for Splunk or QRadar, take Graylog."

"I use the free version of Graylog."

"Having paid official support is wise for projects."

"There is an open source version and an enterprise version. I wouldn't recommend the enterprise version, but as an open source solution, it is solid and works really well."

More Graylog pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

861,803 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

17%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Government

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Coralogix?

Numerous data monitoring tools are available, but Coralogix somehow fine-tunes our policies and effectively supports our teams.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Coralogix?

The pricing is expensive. We need to reduce logs to manage costs. Despite the expense, I believe it is worth the money to have Coralogix as a tool.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Coralogix?

Change might not be the correct word, but with every service, there is always room to improve. They are improving their services daily and deploy new features. When we had missing features that we ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Graylog?

The product is scalable. The solution is stable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Graylog?

I am not familiar with the pricing details of Graylog, as I was not responsible for that aspect. It was determined that we didn't need an enterprise plan, which is more suited for clients with less...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Graylog?

An improvement I would suggest is in Graylog's user interface, such as allowing for font size adjustments. A potential enhancement could be the integration with Ollama to run large language models ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Datadog vs Coralogix

Compared 30% of the time

New Relic vs Coralogix

Compared 11% of the time

Grafana vs Coralogix

Compared 10% of the time

Elastic Search vs Coralogix

Compared 8% of the time

Sentry vs Coralogix

Compared 7% of the time

More Coralogix Competitors

Grafana Loki vs Graylog

Compared 35% of the time

Wazuh vs Graylog

Compared 25% of the time

syslog-ng vs Graylog

Compared 11% of the time

Security Onion vs Graylog

Compared 6% of the time

Fortinet FortiAnalyzer vs Graylog

Compared 3% of the time

More Graylog Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Coralogix

July 2025

Download Coralogix product report

Buyer's Guide

Graylog

July 2025

Download Graylog product report

Also Known As

No data available

Graylog2

Overview

Coralogix is a stateful streaming data platform that provides real-time insights and long-term trend analysis with no reliance on storage or indexing, solving the monitoring challenges of data growth in large-scale systems.

Ingest log, metric, and security data from any source for a single, centralized platform to monitor and alert on your applications. As data is ingested, Coralogix instantly narrows millions of events down to common patterns for deeper insights and faster troubleshooting. Proactive data storage optimization enables up to 70% savings on monitoring costs with better performance.

Coralogix

Graylog is purpose-built to deliver the best log collection, storage, enrichment, and analysis. Graylog is:

Considerably faster analysis speeds.
More robust and easier-to-use analysis platform.
Simpler administration and infrastructure management.
Lower cost than alternatives.
Full-scale customer service.
No expensive training or tool experts required.

Graylog

Sample Customers

Payoneer, AGS, Monday.com, Capgemini

Blue Cross Blue Shield, eBay, Cisco, LinkedIn, SAP, King.com, Twilio, Deutsche Presse-Agentur

Buyer's Guide

Coralogix vs. Graylog

July 2025

Free Report: Coralogix vs. Graylog

Find out what your peers are saying about Coralogix vs. Graylog and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

861,803 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Coralogix vs. Graylog report.

See our list of best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.