No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Conga CPQ vs Oracle E-Business Suite comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Conga CPQ
Ranking in Product Configuration and Quoting
8th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Oracle E-Business Suite
Ranking in Product Configuration and Quoting
2nd
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
157
Ranking in other categories
Field Service Management (1st), ERP (4th), Activity Based Costing Software (1st), Benefits Administration (3rd), Enterprise Resource Planning for Manufacturing (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Product Configuration and Quoting category, the mindshare of Conga CPQ is 2.5%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle E-Business Suite is 5.5%, up from 4.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Product Configuration and Quoting Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Oracle E-Business Suite5.5%
Conga CPQ2.5%
Other92.0%
Product Configuration and Quoting
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2853033 - PeerSpot reviewer
Salesforce Technical Lead at a outsourcing company with 501-1,000 employees
Configuring complex customized quotes has improved flexibility but still needs smoother approvals
There are many out-of-the-box features available in Conga CPQ compared to other CPQ systems, and we can easily customize the entire CPQ itself using many customizations and APIs that are not available in other systems. Out-of-the-box APIs are the best features that Conga CPQ offers, as everything can be customizable. The product bulk loader is a feature that has helped my team significantly. For instance, in other CPQ systems, implementing similar features requires extensive customization. However, with Conga CPQ, using the Add Multi-Prod API, we only need a CSV file with product codes and quantities. We check for any active price list items and prepare a wrapper class to input data to that API, which simplifies creating a cart with products. Conga CPQ positively impacts my organization with many ongoing projects involving its features. People appreciate its extensive features and the support from the Conga team, who respond immediately to any cases we raise.
Md. Mazharul Islam - PeerSpot reviewer
Incharge Corporate Accounts & ERP System at General Pharmaceuticals Limited.
Has connected financial data across departments and improved future cash flow planning
I would like to improve the integration with other solutions, as I need everything integrated, like the HR module, purchase module, SCM, production, and engineering. Each and every module should be connected to the finance module, and I think Oracle provides the right solution. Also, SAP, IFS, or Microsoft Dynamics 365 offer some solutions, but I am not as happy with them as I am with Oracle. I believe that Oracle E-Business Suite could improve by transitioning from Java-based scripts in our system to a web-based environment. While Oracle already has JD Edwards available in web-based format, I think it needs to be smoother for optimization and presentation in the future. In comparison, IFS is fully web-based, and all applications are sufficiently good and user-friendly. We are developing and trying to improve to a web-based setup, but it is currently too costly.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"After the Conga CPQ implementation was done, the business increased rapidly; they can create the products and do all those things within one day, go live within one week, and the users can sell the products within one or two weeks, increasing profits and sales."
"For complex pricing and orders, if organizations want more efficiency and error tracking, Conga CPQ is a strong choice."
"There are many out-of-the-box features available in Conga CPQ compared to other CPQ systems, and we can easily customize the entire CPQ itself using many customizations and APIs that are not available in other systems."
"Conga CPQ offers the best features, particularly pricing, allowing me to achieve complex pricing with ease, such as using the totaling callback and base price callback."
"It is a very consistent product on IBM and there is also a lot of knowledge data."
"Oracle has always been known for its finance modules and that is definitely a valuable feature."
"The kind of features they have provided is very helpful."
"I love SLA because it gives me flexibility to do things that I need without involving development, for example, adding descriptions that I need for my Latin American business with just a couple of clicks without any development involvement."
"It can easily be developed into an application."
"It does the job, it has a lot of features, and Oracle is constantly upgrading and adding things to it, so it's a solid product, but there is always room for improvement."
"As we have been using this for the past nine years we have had the opportunity to explore the product. Really everything has worked well and all the modules are very good."
"Online patching, which lets administrators apply patches on the fly and with minimum downtime to make it active."
 

Cons

"After converting to Conga LP revenue life cycle platform, we identified several areas for improvement. We run into more sync issues and data synchronization problems."
"Conga CPQ has some drawbacks. If you have a larger number of products that should be added to the cart, the cart is taking so much time to load."
"There are a few manual steps we need to take, such as handling a complex approval process in Conga CPQ."
"However, I am currently facing many difficulties with data synchronization, and it has several loopholes not working as expected in Turbo, such as validation callbacks working fine in Turbo but failing in RLP."
"Not user friendly."
"Deployment is not simple, particular with mobile applications."
"Deployment takes way too much time."
"Right now, I don’t think the version that we are using supports mobile devices."
"Oracle E-Business Suite uses an old technology (Forms), which is Java-based."
"Movement of CIP Inventory cannot be monitored in Inventory module when we are using the CIP Account or movement of CIP Inventory in Asset module, which is not flexible like Inventory module."
"The implementation took a long time but it was for many reasons. However, Oracle made sure that the solution and systems were up and running."
"From the business processes, there are areas where you could streamline new processes."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"Oracle scales the pricing, but E-Business Suite is still very expensive for small to mid-sized businesses."
"Oracle's pricing is lower than that of its competitors."
"Oracle's pricing is on the higher end."
"At the time of purchasing the license the price was reasonable."
"E-Business Suite's pricing could be lower."
"Oracle E-Business Suite is cheaper than SAP. It is expensive."
"USD $100,000 annually."
"Oracle prices are better in Vietnam and more flexible. If we need to customize something in Oracle, it's very flexible and easy to customize."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Product Configuration and Quoting solutions are best for your needs.
915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Construction Company
10%
Outsourcing Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business42
Midsize Enterprise34
Large Enterprise114
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Conga CPQ?
Conga CPQ could be improved as it has recently launched Conga RLP, a Revenue Lifecycle Platform, to enhance performance. However, I am currently facing many difficulties with data synchronization, ...
What is your primary use case for Conga CPQ?
I use out-of-the-box objects like price list item and price list to create a product and show it in the catalog, such as category, category hierarchy, and product hierarchy, while using attributes ...
What advice do you have for others considering Conga CPQ?
I would rate Conga CPQ an eight out of ten. I chose eight out of ten for Conga CPQ because, as I mentioned, I can handle complex pricing and approvals effectively. However, the two points deducted ...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle E-Business Suite?
The pricing for Oracle E-Business Suite is varying high, depending on the country. For small businesses or those generating low revenue, it is often expensive. However, for governments or multinati...
What needs improvement with Oracle E-Business Suite?
Oracle E-Business Suite has already provided many solutions and continues to do so for implementers and consultancy firms. They offer many benefits through easy steps, support forums, and communiti...
What is your primary use case for Oracle E-Business Suite?
I am working on an ERP solution that Oracle provides, which is Oracle E-Business Suite. Oracle E-Business Suite contains many modules that cover tax, finance, HR, projects, and many solutions they ...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Oracle EBS, OEBS
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Colab, Portobello, Saudi Telecom Company, DG Khan Cement, Dubai Holding
Find out what your peers are saying about Conga CPQ vs. Oracle E-Business Suite and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.