Conga Composer vs OpenText Content Manager comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Conga and OpenText are both solutions in the Document Management Software category. Conga is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.0, while OpenText is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.0. Conga holds a 2.5% mindshare in DMS, compared to OpenText’s 6.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Conga users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 86% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Conga Composer

Read 19 Conga Composer reviews

1,857 Views
984 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Content Manager

Read 23 OpenText Content Manager reviews

5,408 Views
1,731 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

Conga Composer

OpenText Content Manager

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Conga Composer and OpenText Content Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Document Management Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Conga Composer vs. OpenText Content Manager Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Conga Composer vs. OpenText Content Manager

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 915,341 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Conga Composer

Ranking in Document Management Software

3rd

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Document Automation Software (1st)

OpenText Content Manager

Ranking in Document Management Software

6th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Content Management (11th), File Archiving (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Document Management Software category, the mindshare of Conga Composer is 2.5%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Content Manager is 6.0%, down from 10.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Document Management Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Conga Composer	2.5%
OpenText Content Manager	6.0%
Other	91.5%

Document Management Software

Featured Reviews

Skumar Skumar

Salesforce Application Support Specialist at Vectra AI

Document creation has become faster and more accurate but complex templates still need improvement

In terms of improvements for Conga Composer, we did start seeing a lot of requests related to customization, which were initially difficult. As people got to know that it's very easy to customize it, we started to get those more and more, and we saw fewer errors. Earlier, there were many requests to manually adjust the contract value, which was not possible with the CPQ quote documents. With Conga Composer, we can customize it to some level. For exception cases, we can modify the template and generate the contract in a way they want it. While we did not record any metrics, looking at the overall tickets and the reduction in errors we used to see, I think it has improved efficiency by a lot, and our stakeholders agree. However, I would say that despite being easy to set up these templates, there are limitations around looping. Some functionalities break when dealing with large templates, around 30 to 40 pages long. We jumped on their support, but we could not come to a resolution, so we ended up reducing the overall complexity of our template. I think Conga Composer could improve its adoption for Conga Composer Sign. Right now, the adoption is not very great. People use Conga Composer mainly for document generation and then go separately for DocuSign. To get a better hold of the market, Conga should definitely invest more into Conga Composer Sign.

Read full review

Anwar Hassan

Enterprise Information Manager in Practice at Mannai

Improved content management with good reliability and an easy setup

We are a system integrator. We deal with client requirements to determine the best solutions that should be deployed. Our primary use case for OpenText Content Manager is managing enterprise content, such as documents and emails, as well as engineering document management OpenText Content Manager…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"What I like about Conga Composer is that it's much easier than Salesforce's native templating. It's simple to add merge fields, write queries to pull data and access up to four levels of related objects. This makes it very comfortable to get all the needed data into templates."

"As an implementer, what stands out for me is that I've been on it for more than ten years now, so I kind of saw some change in the UI, and it's very nice."

"The initial setup of Conga Composer is easy."

"The most valuable feature of Conga Composer is its user-friendly interface, which allows professionals to handle the product easily."

"Conga Composer is easy to use, especially for C-level executives, as it simplifies the contract signing process."

"In my 2.5 years of experience with Conga Composer, I can say that it was one of the best document generation tools that I have used in a very long time."

"I find the Conga email template creation and the document template creation features very useful."

"It's quite simple."

More Conga Composer pros

"We like how the solution allows us to have retention of records and workflows, as well as its fire plan."

"Go for it."

"HPE Content Manager provides organizations with a reliable system for managing massive amounts of information, in a structured, compliant and secure way, with a level of functionality and reliability that I have not seen matched by custom-built or other systems."

"My advice to others is that they cannot go wrong with the solution."

"The product is valuable generally due to its wide use and acceptance in the public sector in my region."

"It has a robust search but has often been difficult for people to learn."

"Drag and drop: With users having dual screens nowadays, this functionality is used a lot by staff and is also a good way to show people who are new to TRIM (HPE Content Manager) the simplicity of how things can be done."

"For a records management system, Content Manager is a really good system."

Cons

"Conga Composer can be improved because it has a steep learning curve, especially for new users."

"The query builder could use some updates."

"We have not been using Conga Composer extensively or deeply to look for improvements."

"Conga Composer is somewhat slow."

"It would be better to have a custom button that automatically sends a document to the client's email and sends it for a signature with a single click."

"The debugging skills could be improved as we need to stay alert for issues."

"I had only one minor issue, which was resolved quickly due to their prompt assistance."

"The initial setup is at an intermediate level of difficulty since understanding Conga Composer for the first time can be confusing."

More Conga Composer cons

"Due to very limited use in the industry, vendor and contract support are hard to find."

"Generally speaking, HPE’s support for the product has been weak since the acquisition from TOWER Software."

"This web client requires more refinement to be viable as a desktop client replacement."

"It has extensive configuration restrictions for administrators and file extension limitations. Clunky in look and feel."

"Pricing is an issue, as it is too expensive."

"The ease of use should be addressed."

"OpenText Content Manager needs to improve its user interface. Its installation process is difficult and can be made easier."

"We now have 2 proxies, 5 distribution servers and about 40 IDOL engines with tons of data on CEs. It is a scalable solution, but we see performance degradation and maintenance nightmares."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's not cheap, but it's not overly expensive either."

"I think the tool costs around six dollars per user."

"Regarding pricing, I believe it’s around fifty dollars, but I’m not entirely sure. Overall, I find the pricing reasonable and am quite satisfied with the product. The value we get from it justifies the cost, as it requires minimal maintenance and is straightforward to use. The functionality it provides aligns well with the investment."

"The fees incurred are for the licensing and maintenance."

"I would suggest that you do a thorough evaluation of all competing products and look for support for these products in your local area."

"The solution's licensing cost depends on the customer domain. Though its costs are high, the product is worth the money. You have to pay a one-time cost and support costs."

"I rate the product price an eight or nine on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive. The solution is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Document Management Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

Transportation Company

Government

10%

Financial Services Firm

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	8

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Conga Composer?

Not Sure, As i implemented the Quote Documents as per business need but client directly buy it for salesforce

See all answers

What needs improvement with Conga Composer?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Conga Composer?

One of the main use cases for Conga Composer would be to generate quote documents. We had different types of quote documents in our business process, so we used different kinds of Conga Composer te...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Content Manager?

Pricing is a disadvantage as it is very expensive, especially in this market.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Content Manager?

Pricing is an issue, as it is too expensive. Support and services need to be more user-friendly. The support has been slow, and there is room for improvement. Additionally, they could improve build...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Content Manager?

See all answers

Comparisons

Box - Intelligent Content Management vs Conga Composer

Compared 10% of the time

SS&C Blue Prism vs Conga Composer

Compared 10% of the time

CA View vs Conga Composer

Compared 8% of the time

DocuWare vs Conga Composer

Compared 7% of the time

More Conga Composer Competitors

SharePoint vs OpenText Content Manager

Compared 10% of the time

Alfresco vs OpenText Content Manager

Compared 8% of the time

IBM FileNet vs OpenText Content Manager

Compared 5% of the time

Adobe Experience Manager vs OpenText Content Manager

Compared 4% of the time

OpenText Content Management vs OpenText Content Manager

Compared 4% of the time

More OpenText Content Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Conga Composer

October 2026

Download Conga Composer product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Content Manager

September 2026

Download OpenText Content Manager product report

Also Known As

Conga

Micro Focus Content Manager, HPE Records Manager, HPE Content Manager

Overview

Conga Composer offers a powerful document generation tool with seamless Salesforce integration and dynamic data merging, allowing users to create customized templates for efficient workflows.

Featuring an intuitive interface, Conga Composer streamlines document creation through automation, reducing manual tasks and enhancing accuracy. Integrating with Salesforce, it supports dynamic data merging and customizable templates for Word and Excel. E-signature incorporation and multilingual support provide added functionality. Despite its capabilities, users note concerns over cost, documentation depth, and integration challenges beyond Salesforce. Improvements in template management, user guidance, and debugging support could enhance its usability.

What are the key features?

Intuitive Interface: User-friendly design simplifies document creation.
Seamless Salesforce Integration: Allows for smooth data merging and document generation within Salesforce.
Customizable Templates: Provides flexibility with Word and Excel templates.
Automation: Reduces manual tasks and enhances accuracy in workflows.
E-signature Support: Facilitates digital signing processes.
Multilingual Functionality: Supports multiple languages for broad applicability.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Increased Efficiency: Automation and dynamic data merging enhance productivity.
Improved Accuracy: Reduces errors in document creation with customizable templates.
Streamlined Workflows: Simplifies processes through integration with platforms like Salesforce.
Enhanced Functionality: Offers flexibility with e-signatures and multilingual support.

Conga Composer is widely applied in sectors like healthcare and finance, automating document creation for invoices, proposals, and reports. It integrates seamlessly with DocuSign for e-signatures, focusing on improving document accuracy and customization for different applications.

Conga

OpenText Content Manager delivers comprehensive document and information management with advanced security and retention functionalities.

OpenText Content Manager is a key player in enterprise content and records management. By integrating well with tools like SharePoint and Microsoft Office, it supports metadata search, audit trails, and document lifecycle management. Its drag-and-drop functionality aids in managing both paper and electronic records efficiently. Compliance with standards, combined with automated notifications for destruction and retention, enhances its efficiency. Although integration with other systems and ERP-like features for legal processes needs improvement, it remains a robust solution for content classification, tracking, and document security.

What are the key features?

Search and Retrieval: Efficiently locate documents with advanced metadata options.
Security Features: Robust controls for safeguarding sensitive data.
Retention Management: Automates lifecycle rules for document retention.
Workflow Capabilities: Streamlines approval processes and document handling.
Integration: Works with SharePoint, Microsoft Office, and other platforms.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Efficient Document Management: Reduction in time spent searching and managing records.
Compliance Assurance: Keeps up with regulatory standards and automates compliance tasks.
Scalability: Supports large-scale deployments, offering flexibility.
Improved Data Security: Enhances security protocols and audit trails.

In industries such as legal and engineering, OpenText Content Manager is vital for document archival and digital information handling. Sectors like SAP and Salesforce leverage it for data governance, content classification, and streamlined workflows. Organizations rely on it to bolster document security and facilitate content approval processes.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Arkus, CollegeTracks, Colorado Creative Industries, Davies Office, Delta Air, Depersico, Diagnostic Innovations, Digital Dolphin, Finnzymes

Missouri State Courts

Buyer's Guide

Conga Composer vs. OpenText Content Manager

September 2026

Free Report: Conga Composer vs. OpenText Content Manager

Find out what your peers are saying about Conga Composer vs. OpenText Content Manager and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Conga Composer vs. OpenText Content Manager report.

See our list of best Document Management Software vendors.

We monitor all Document Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.