CodeSonar vs PyCharm comparison

CodeSecure and JetBrains are both solutions in the Static Code Analysis category. CodeSecure is ranked #10, while JetBrains is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.6. CodeSecure holds a 3.3% mindshare in SCAS, compared to JetBrains’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of CodeSecure users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of JetBrains users who would recommend it.

CodeSonar

Read 7 CodeSonar reviews

2,581 Views
490 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

PyCharm

Read 13 PyCharm reviews

408 Views
408 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

CodeSonar

PyCharm

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

CodeSonar and PyCharm are competing software development tools. PyCharm seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set.

Features: PyCharm offers intelligent code analysis, integrated version control systems, and support for various frameworks. CodeSonar focuses on static code analysis, identifying vulnerabilities, and catching dead code.

Room for Improvement: PyCharm could improve by expanding its support for non-Python languages, optimizing performance with large projects, and enhancing debugging tools for advanced analysis. CodeSonar could benefit from expanding its feature set beyond static analysis, improving integration with popular IDEs, and simplifying its deployment process for less technical users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: PyCharm offers seamless deployment across environments with robust IDE integration, while CodeSonar requires more specialized knowledge for security-sensitive deployments. Both products offer customer service, but PyCharm's support options are more straightforward.

Pricing and ROI: CodeSonar presents a lower initial cost, suitable for budget-constrained users, while PyCharm offers higher ROI through its comprehensive functionality and efficiency, despite higher costs.

To learn more, read our detailed CodeSonar vs. PyCharm Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CodeSonar vs. PyCharm

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CodeSonar

Ranking in Static Code Analysis

10th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (31st)

PyCharm

Ranking in Static Code Analysis

8th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Static Code Analysis category, the mindshare of CodeSonar is 3.3%, up from 2.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PyCharm is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Code Analysis

Featured Reviews

Mathieu ALBRESPY

Intigration Developer at ez-Wheel

Nice interface, quick to deploy, and easy to expand

This is the first time I've used this kind of software. It was the only one we could apply to analyze with MISRA rules. At my new company, I tried to use Klocwork. I tried to use it, just once so I cannot compare it exactly with CodeSonar. I also have a plugin for my Visual Studio and I try to make it work. It's not easy, however, I don't think that we have this kind of functionality with CodeSonar. It can do some incremental analysis. However, since this feature is also available on CodeSonar, it would be a good idea to have a plugin on Visual Studio just to have a quick analysis.

Read full review

Shravan Revanna

Vice President at E-Cell Ramaiah

Gives access to documentation references when hovered over the code

We have integrated the tool with GitHub. PyCharm provides easy integration with GitHub, allowing us to push changes directly. Many plugins are available on PyCharm for GitHub integration, including GitHub Copilot for auto code completion and GitHub Copilot Chat for assistance with code-related queries. The solution has significantly improved my coding efficiency with its feature that shows documentation when I hover over code. This feature, which was recently introduced, is especially useful when using an inbuilt function from a Python package because it gives me immediate access to documentation and references, helping me understand how to use the function properly.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"CodeSonar’s most valuable feature is finding security threats."

"It has been able to scale."

"The tool is very good for detecting memory leaks."

"What I like best about CodeSonar is that it has fantastic speed, analysis and configuration times. Its detection of all runtime errors is also very good, though there were times it missed a few. The configuration of logs by CodeSonar is also very fantastic which I've not seen anywhere else. I also like the GUI interface of CodeSonar because it's very user friendly and the tool also shows very precise logs and results."

"The most valuable feature of CodeSonar is the catching of dead code. It is helpful."

"The most valuable features of CodeSonar were all the categorized classes provided, and reports of future bugs which might occur in the production code. Additionally, I found the buffer overflow and underflow useful."

"There is nice functionality for code surfing and browsing."

"The product's IDE feature is quite user-friendly."

"The integrated code structure makes coding more organized and manageable compared to using Python alone."

"It is an excellent, fully integrated IDE with smart code analysis capability and a built-in debugger. It is a fantastic tool."

"We have integrated the tool with GitHub. PyCharm provides easy integration with GitHub, allowing us to push changes directly. Many plugins are available on PyCharm for GitHub integration, including GitHub Copilot for auto code completion and GitHub Copilot Chat for assistance with code-related queries."

"The automated package installation is helpful. I like the code highlighting features. A huge library of plugins is available, including AI coding tools, though I don't use those myself. The debugging tools are good, showing errors and problem lines."

"The recent AI-powered code completion is pretty cool."

"PyCharm has an excellent user experience, and I appreciate its cross-platform capabilities."

"PyCharm is saving me time and money in general."

More PyCharm pros

Cons

"The scanning tool for core architecture could be improved."

"In a future release, the solution should upgrade itself to the current trends and differentiate between the languages. If there are any classifications that can be set for these programming languages that would be helpful rather than having everything in the generic category."

"It was expensive."

"In terms of areas for improvement, the use case for CodeSonar was good, but compared to other tools, it seems CodeSonar isn't a sound static analysis tool, and this is a major con I've seen from it. Right now, in the market, people prefer sound static analysis tools, so I would have preferred if CodeSonar was developed into a sound static analysis tool formally, in terms of its algorithms, so then you can see it extensively used in the market because at the moment, here in India, only fifty to sixty customers use CodeSonar. If the product is developed into a sound static analysis tool, it could compete with Polyspace, and from its current fifty customers, that number could go up to a hundred."

"There could be a shared licensing model for the users."

"It would be beneficial for the solution to include code standards and additional functionality for security."

"CodeSonar could improve by having better coding rules so we did not have to use another solution, such as MISRA C."

"The navigation can be better."

"The solution does not support some features of OpenCV even though it is part of a PyCharm package."

"The refactor facility in PyCharm is not on par with the refactor facility in IntelliJ. It could be improved since IntelliJ offers many more options for refactoring."

"They should improve the product's interactiveness."

"The user interface and overall user experience could be more intuitive to make it easier for users to navigate and utilize the software effectively."

"There should be support for the RUST plugin in the Community edition for debugging."

"PyCharm's use of system resources can get pretty heavy. Loading, in particular, takes longer than I would like and I think they should optimize it so that it's a bit lighter on the system."

"Notebooks in PyCharm is not as intuitive as it could be."

More PyCharm cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Our organization purchased a license to use the solution."

"The application’s pricing is high compared to other tools."

"Pricing is a bit costly."

"The solution's price depends on the number of licenses needed and the source code for the project."

"The community edition is free and the professional edition has a licensing fee."

"The community edition is free, which is good."

"The price is reasonable."

"I don't have much info on the pricing, but I would say it is somewhat competitive."

"I use the free community version, so I'm saving money there."

"They have a free Community edition, and they also have a licensed version. They definitely have an annual license. They probably also have a monthly license. Its pricing is good and reasonable. It is a little bit more expensive than the others, but it is well worth it. I would rate it a four out of five in terms of pricing."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Code Analysis solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

23%

Computer Software Company

11%

University

11%

Aerospace/Defense Firm

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about PyCharm?

The integrated code structure makes coding more organized and manageable compared to using Python alone.

See all answers

What needs improvement with PyCharm?

The refactor facility in PyCharm is not on par with the refactor facility in IntelliJ. It could be improved since IntelliJ offers many more options for refactoring.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for PyCharm?

My use case for PyCharm code usually involves rapid prototyping, especially related to GenAI.

See all answers

Comparisons

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs CodeSonar

Compared 50% of the time

Coverity vs CodeSonar

Compared 24% of the time

Polyspace Code Prover vs CodeSonar

Compared 7% of the time

Axivion Static Code Analysis vs CodeSonar

Compared 3% of the time

Understand vs CodeSonar

Compared 3% of the time

More CodeSonar Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

July 2025

Download CodeSonar product report

Buyer's Guide

Static Code Analysis

August 2025

Download PyCharm product report

Overview

GrammaTech enables organizations to develop software applications more efficiently, on-budget, and on-schedule by helping to eliminate harmful defects that can cause system failures, enable data breaches, and ultimately increase corporate liabilities in today’s connected world. GrammaTech is the developer of CodeSonar, the most powerful source and binary code analysis solution available today. Extraordinarily precise, CodeSonar finds, on average, 2 times more serious defects in software than other static analysis solutions. Designed for organizations with zero tolerance for defects and vulnerabilities in their applications, CodeSonar provides static analysis for applications where reliability and security are paramount - widely used by software developers in avionics, medical, automotive, industrial control, and other mission-critical applications. Some of GrammaTech's customers include Toyota, GE, Hyundai, Kawasaki, LG, Lockheed Martin, NASA, Northrop Grumman, Panasonic, and Samsung.

CodeSecure

Be More Productive
Save time while PyCharm takes care of the routine. Focus on the bigger things and embrace the keyboard-centric approach to get the most of PyCharm's many productivity features.

JetBrains

Sample Customers

Viveris, Micrel Medical Devices, Olympus, SOFTEQ, SONY

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

CodeSonar vs. PyCharm

July 2025

Free Report: CodeSonar vs. PyCharm

Find out what your peers are saying about CodeSonar vs. PyCharm and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CodeSonar vs. PyCharm report.

See our list of best Static Code Analysis vendors.

We monitor all Static Code Analysis reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.