Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Codebeamer vs Helix ALM comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
8.0
Organizations using Codebeamer experience substantial efficiency gains, reducing admin and workload efforts, enhancing AUTOSPICE tasks, and simplifying certifications.
Sentiment score
8.1
Helix ALM improved traceability, collaboration, and efficiency, reducing project delays and costs, while enhancing project visibility, control, and defect detection.
ROI can manifest through cost savings and increased development speed.
The solution has produced a return on investment.
Codebeamer saves time and money for certain use cases, such as AUTOSPICE implementations.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.9
Codebeamer's support is praised for quick responses and helpful live chat, but users want a hotline and more languages.
Sentiment score
6.9
Helix ALM's customer service is praised for being responsive, knowledgeable, and efficient, aiding users with excellent support and onboarding.
If I raise an issue as high priority, I receive responses in six to eight hours.
For out-of-the-box support, the customer service from PTC is satisfactory.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.8
Codebeamer excels in scalability across platforms, rated highly by users for handling enterprise needs efficiently despite adaptation challenges.
Sentiment score
5.0
Helix ALM is praised for its scalability, integration, and stable performance, making it ideal for large, growing teams and projects.
In a project, I have experienced up to 180 licenses running during peak times and as low as ten licenses during downtime without facing upgrade or downgrade issues.
On a scale from one to ten, I would rate the scalability of Codebeamer as eight or nine because it is a highly scalable solution.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.9
Codebeamer is stable and reliable, with high user ratings, minor glitches, and occasional performance slowdown on busy servers.
Sentiment score
7.3
Helix ALM is praised for its robust performance, reliability, and high responsiveness, especially during complex tasks and updates.
Running it independently or with a bigger server generally doesn't cause any issues.
From a scale of one to ten, I would rate the stability of Codebeamer as eight to nine because the solution is highly stable.
There were stability issues due to version compatibility.
 

Room For Improvement

Codebeamer needs to improve UI, integration, customization, and marketing, while enhancing features, reporting, and support for diverse workflows.
Users find Helix ALM slow, unintuitive, with limited reporting, poor integration, and inadequate documentation.
Beyond standards management for specific industries, Codebeamer should develop standards for areas where software code management and hardware-software integration are needed.
If terminology changes, modifications must be done manually or by exporting the document to Word or Excel, which is time-consuming.
Codebeamer struggles with some DevOps integrations and lacks AI features for enhanced user assistance.
 

Setup Cost

Codebeamer's pricing aligns with industry standards, offering valued features for enterprises needing ASPICE and ISO 26262 compliance.
Helix ALM provides scalable, flexible pricing with per-user costs based on modules, and discounts for higher user counts.
Codebeamer is on the expensive side, but it provides ready-made modules for standards like ASPICE and ISO 26262, which might justify the cost for customers looking for those solutions.
Codebeamer is fairly priced against competition.
 

Valuable Features

Codebeamer excels with traceability, Agile metrics, seamless integration, regulatory compliance, and industry templates, enhancing project management efficiency.
Helix ALM excels in managing requirements, tracking issues, and test management with flexibility, customization, robust traceability, and integration capabilities.
Its integration capability is very high, with almost eighty to eighty-five percent of integrations available readily out of the box, minimizing the need for specific integration-related work.
Codebeamer saves on time and resources with its web-based client, eliminating the need to install it on every system.
The requirements management aspect of Codebeamer is critical because it helps various industries, such as automotive or medical devices, to capture requirements based on industry-specific standards and processes.
 

Categories and Ranking

Codebeamer
Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
10th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Helix ALM
Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
19th
Average Rating
6.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
Application Requirements Management (7th), Test Management Tools (15th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category, the mindshare of Codebeamer is 8.8%, up from 5.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Helix ALM is 0.6%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
 

Featured Reviews

SHRINIVAS ALAGERI - PeerSpot reviewer
Built-in project management modules simplify processes while compatibility improvements are needed
Codebeamer could improve its customization capabilities and integration options. For instance, older versions of PDM Windchill ( /products/ptc-windchill-reviews ) face compatibility issues with newer versions of Codebeamer, requiring users to downgrade Codebeamer to establish integration. The installation on Linux can be tricky, and backward compatibility needs enhancement. Also, Codebeamer struggles with some DevOps integrations and lacks AI features for enhanced user assistance.
Harold Pogue - PeerSpot reviewer
Helix ALM is insanely configurable, with great traceability, and flexibility
The most valuable features of Helix ALM are traceability and flexibility. One thing that distinguishes Helix ALM from other solutions is that it is a hybrid cloud model. Helix ALM is not a full cloud implementation like Valerian, Jira Jama, or Atlassian, where we just go through a browser onto the cloud. In the case of Helix, we have code that goes on our computer and then that communicates to the cloud. We have the backup and distribution capability of the cloud, but we have code executing on our machine, and we don't need to worry much about speed and internet lag problems.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.
850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
31%
Computer Software Company
14%
Healthcare Company
7%
Transportation Company
6%
Healthcare Company
16%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Computer Software Company
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about codeBeamer ALM?
The platform provided the flexibility to expand our business processes, accommodating or altering them to suit the requirements of a changing environment.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for codeBeamer ALM?
Codebeamer is fairly priced against competition. Customers prefer it due to its pricing, scalability, features, functionality, and integration with multiple tools. On a scale of one to ten, I would...
What needs improvement with codeBeamer ALM?
There should be more integration tools available. Although Codebeamer has a substantial amount of integration options with multiple tools, new technologies and software constantly emerge. Therefore...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Helix ALM?
I rate the product price a nine on a one to ten scale, where one is low price and ten is high price.
What needs improvement with Helix ALM?
Helix ALM should be able to integrate with other systems better. Helix ALM should also have an easier user interface, and the solution needs to have drag-and-drop tools included in it.
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

codeBeamer ALM
TestTrack
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Medtronic, Align Technology, Daimler, Samsung, Harman, Dassault
Invision, Softing, CACI, Hunter Industries, ITSO, Itron, EEC, Database Consultants Australia, VirtualScopics, March Networks, WorkForce
Find out what your peers are saying about Codebeamer vs. Helix ALM and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.