Code42 Incydr vs Teramind comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Code42 Logo
574 views|436 comparisons
Teramind Logo
51 views|35 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Code42 Incydr and Teramind based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Forcepoint, Broadcom and others in Data Loss Prevention (DLP).
To learn more, read our detailed Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Report (Updated: February 2024).
755,469 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It had the ability to preseed by sending in a data drive and could restore by sending the user a data drive.""Code42 Next-Gen DLP is scalable.""Security tools: Being able to monitor data going in and coming off our endpoints. Seeing what it is and where it's going is awesome.""t has a very user friendly status bar with common errors and has logs built in to the console so we can review the issues or status of CrashPlan.""Backup and recovery have been great, but I love having the ability to keep the hybrid type build which they offer.""There are a couple of things. One of them is that they have what they call Incydr. Their detection and response solution to the insider threat area is called Incydr. That gives visibility to the clients that have widely dispersed employee bases due to work from home, or that had a dispersed workforce predating any of the work from home requirements. Even though they might not be inside the organization physically, they're inside the organization. It allows us to get some visibility into what people are doing, what the context is, and how to control what might be the potential for intellectual property theft or file exposure.""It required very little ongoing maintenance once setup.""Risk factors can be adjusted for all intricate details."

More Code42 Incydr Pros →

"The product provides data protection and employee monitoring features in a single console."

More Teramind Pros →

Cons
"What I think could be improved is how I get support.""You can't always filter out data that you'd like to.""I would like to see more flexibility on privileges, perhaps create another kind of admin for regions. Also, I would like the ability to access logs without having to be on the actual device or a super-admin.""I think one we can improve is the compression.""The application, written in Java, required far more system resources on a Client than other solutions.""Reporting could use an overhaul. It is very limited.""More security would be nice, I would love to be able to remotely brick a stolen laptop and it's hard disk drive (HDD).""Java, please get rid of Java."

More Code42 Incydr Cons →

"The user experience should be improved."

More Teramind Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "They were the best solution and surprisingly enough, the cheapest."
  • "It is 100% worth the cost to get and keep the support, especially when setting it up."
  • "It used to be a good solution for SOHO in particular as it had unlimited storage for a reasonable price. However, their pricing model has changed and they are now primarily targeting enterprise users."
  • "The pricing is reasonable. It's my understanding that the cost is about $7 for unlimited storage in the cloud per server."
  • "It was expensive. It was more expensive than Eureka, and it was more expensive than Barracuda Backup, but what we got was a full team. They didn't come in and nickel and dime us. They provided the assistance we needed. They didn't say that they need to charge us for something or it is going to take another statement of work. It was all bundled into it... We pay for the software maintenance. It is probably 18% or 20% of the license fee for rev releases."
  • More Code42 Incydr Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions are best for your needs.
    755,469 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Risk factors can be adjusted for all intricate details.
    Top Answer:In a couple of instances, we had a little bit of trouble in getting it distributed throughout the organization. We ultimately managed to do it, but they talk about it being a pretty simple process… more »
    Top Answer:When I first became acquainted with Code42, we were implementing it at an employer I worked with, and that was a successful implementation. I now work for a consulting firm, and we do system… more »
    Top Answer:The product provides data protection and employee monitoring features in a single console.
    Top Answer:The license is based on the systems we use. We can also get a license based on the user base. It is an advantage.
    Top Answer:The solution must improve the UI. Searching for things on the UI is difficult. The user experience should be improved. I can understand it as a technical person, but our customers’ administrators have… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    574
    Comparisons
    436
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    1,697
    Rating
    8.5
    Views
    51
    Comparisons
    35
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Code42 Next-Gen DLP, Code42 Next-Gen Data Loss Protection, Code42 Forensic File Search, Code42 Backup + Restore
    Learn More
    Overview

    Detect file exfiltration via web browsers, USB, cloud apps, email, file link sharing, Airdrop, and more. See how files are moved and shared across your entire organization – without the need for policies, proxies or plugins. Incydr automatically identifies when files move outside your trusted environment, allowing you to easily detect when files are sent to personal accounts and unmanaged devices.

    Incydr prioritizes file activity based on 120+ contextual Incydr Risk Indicators (IRIs). This prioritization works on day 1 without any configuration. Incydr’s risk scoring logic is use case-driven and transparent to administrators. Incydr uses Watchlists to programmatically protect data from employees who are most likely to leak or steal files, such as departing employees.

    Take action with appropriate responses to contain, resolve and educate on detected risk. Use Incydr Flows or SOAR integrations to initiate response controls that are proportionate to an activity’s risk severity. You’ll stop data leaks without getting in the way of employee collaboration and sanctioned file activity.

    Improving your Insider Risk posture requires a change in employee behavior. Code42 Instructor provides bite-sized training to employees, delivered when they need it. Use Instructor in tandem with Incydr to send responsive video lessons when employees put data at risk. You’ll ensure appropriate data governance and compliance with security standards and corporate policies as well as report on the positive impact of your Insider Risk Management program.

    Founded in 2001, the company is headquartered in Minneapolis, Minnesota, and backed by Accel Partners, JMI Equity, NEA, and Split Rock Partners. For more information, visit code42.com.

    Teramind provides a user-centric security approach to monitor employee behavior. Our software streamlines employee data collection in order to identify suspicious activity, detect possible threats, monitor employee efficiency, and ensure industry compliance. We help reduce security incidents by providing real-time access to user activities by offering alerts, warnings, redirects and user lock-outs to keep your business running as efficiently and secure as possible. We offer both cloud-based and on-premise deployment options to meet your organization’s requirements.

    Sample Customers
    Adobe, Okta, Samsung, Taylormade, Boston University, Lending Club, North Highland, Stanford University, Ping Identity, Qualcomm, Pandora.
    Government, Healthcare, Finance, Retails, Energy, Utilities and more. Example: Orange, Holiday Inn, Azteca
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    University18%
    Healthcare Company11%
    Media Company8%
    Non Profit8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Retailer6%
    Comms Service Provider6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Government9%
    Insurance Company6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business31%
    Midsize Enterprise31%
    Large Enterprise38%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise60%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business28%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise52%
    Buyer's Guide
    Data Loss Prevention (DLP)
    February 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Forcepoint, Broadcom and others in Data Loss Prevention (DLP). Updated: February 2024.
    755,469 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Code42 Incydr is ranked 14th in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 2 reviews while Teramind is ranked 40th in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 1 review. Code42 Incydr is rated 9.0, while Teramind is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Code42 Incydr writes "Provides comprehensive visibility and protection, helps in identifying the gaps in security, and comes with excellent onboarding support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Teramind writes "A stable solution that provides data protection and employee monitoring features in a single console". Code42 Incydr is most compared with Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention, Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, Backup and Restore for SharePoint & Microsoft Office 365, MetaDefender Kiosk and CrowdStrike Falcon, whereas Teramind is most compared with ObserveIT and Veriato.

    See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.

    We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.