CloverETL vs Zapier comparison

Javlin and Zapier are both solutions in the Cloud Data Integration category. Additionally, 100% of Javlin users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Zapier users who would recommend it.

CloverETL

Read 2 CloverETL reviews

430 Views
241 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Zapier

Read 49 Zapier reviews

1,459 Views
613 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

CloverETL

Zapier

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CloverETL and Zapier based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Cloud Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed CloverETL vs. Zapier Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CloverETL vs. Zapier

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 861,803 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CloverETL

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Integration (60th), Data Visualization (40th)

Zapier

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Data Integration (10th)

Featured Reviews

it_user856614

Lead Programmer at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees

Very easy to schedule jobs and monitor them, however we run out heap space even with a high allocation

Flexibility: We can bring in data from multiple sources, e.g., databases, text files, JSON, email, XML, etc. This has been very helpful Connectivity to various data sources: The ability to extract data from different data sources gives greater flexibility. Server features for scheduler: It is…

Read full review

Sachin Shrtivastava

Automation Engineer at Axe Automation

Automation of simple tasks improves with user-friendly interface but needs enhancement in handling complex scenarios

In my opinion, what could be improved in Zapier is its UI, which operates as a one-line system. Compared to Make.com and other tools that have a drag-and-drop system, this is lacking. If the scenario or automation is complex, it becomes difficult to create and deploy because of various routes. For example, with 20 routes, it becomes really difficult to create them due to certain limits, and the UI is not conducive for viewing all the routes.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Server features for scheduler: It is very easy to schedule jobs and monitor them. The interface is easy to use."

"Connectivity to various data sources: The ability to extract data from different data sources gives greater flexibility."

"No dependence on native language and ease of use."

"Key features include wealth of pre-defined components; all components are customizable; descriptive logging, especially for error messages."

"We find it effortless to set up. We really don't have to do anything other than finding the application in the Zapier catalog. And as long as the application has been re-integrated into Zapier, they're able to then just provide the connection details and hook it up."

"The most valuable aspect is the ability to integrate with over 20,000 applications, which is a superior feature compared to Make.com that has limited applications access."

"Zapier's best feature would be the ease of use, and it is really easy to use and really user-friendly."

"The initial setup is pretty easy to do."

"Zapier is a really good tool for connecting multiple different platforms and data sources. For example, with Quickbase, I can easily integrate data from other sources like AWS or task-tracking platforms such as ClickUp or Asana."

"The most valuable feature of Zapier is it saves me time doing repetitive tasks."

"Zapier handles everything under the sun that you would think you need in automation. It is the most mature integration platform and service on the market."

"Zapier luckily has a wide range of integrations, I would say."

More Zapier pros

Cons

"Needs: easier automated failure recovery; more, and more intuitive auto-generated/filled-in code for components; easier/more automated sync between CloverETL Designer and CloverETL Server."

"Resource management: We typically run out of heap space, and even the allocation of high heap space does not seem to be enough."

"Its documentation could be improved."

"I would like to see them improve the Quickbase integration. Currently, it only allows triggering actions when records are added, but it would be more useful if we could also trigger actions when records are modified or deleted."

"The solution does not work properly when we apply filters and we get errors."

"Zapier could be a little faster, but that might not be possible. I would encourage Zapier to make more API endpoints for each application"

"Some recent changes to the solution have made it bulky and not as intuitive to use as it previously was."

"At the moment, they allow a limited number of apps. I look forward to getting more apps for each package."

"We currently switch from Zapier because it was so expensive. My experience shows that for our use cases, other tools are cheaper."

"There could be improvements in creating more complex workflows within the data domain."

"It could support various languages along with Python."

More Zapier cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Zapier's price is good."

"There is a free plan that is, of course, limited. However, it allows you to understand and check true scenarios for a while."

"Think your Zaps through to make sure you don't use more Zaps than you need."

"Per task, there is a monthly plan involving 15 euros...Also, in different forms, they just give you the ability to use different features. They charge 18.58 euros for the first standard plan, which includes 750 tasks. So, it is about 25 cents per task."

"It's very straightforward licensing. There's only one cost you have to pay, and if you want a relevant pricing plan, I think you have two or three different models or packages which include the number of notifications or Zaps, as they call it, that you can program."

"The least expensive plan is $24 a month, and you can go all the way to $800 a month if you're a huge company using many tasks."

"It's very affordable."

"The price of Zapier is approximately $75 monthly."

More Zapier pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

861,803 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

University

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Zapier?

The product's most valuable feature is automation.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zapier?

The pricing is in accordance with market standards and even lower in some cases. The license setup cost is reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Zapier?

See all answers

Comparisons

SAS Visual Analytics vs CloverETL

Compared 52% of the time

Pentaho Data Integration and Analytics vs CloverETL

Compared 48% of the time

More CloverETL Competitors

Coefficient vs Zapier

Compared 17% of the time

Fivetran vs Zapier

Compared 15% of the time

SnapLogic vs Zapier

Compared 9% of the time

AWS Glue vs Zapier

Compared 9% of the time

Coupler.io vs Zapier

Compared 8% of the time

More Zapier Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Data Integration

July 2025

Download CloverETL product report

Buyer's Guide

Zapier

June 2025

Download Zapier product report

Overview

CloverETL is a rapid, end-to-end data integration solution. Businesses choose CloverETL for its usability and intuitive controls, along with its lightweight footprint, flexibility, and processing speed. Achieving true, rapid data integration means much more than just raw data processing power. Rapid refers to an end-to-end process that begins the moment a data-related problem is recognized to the point when the data is in the right place and form to be analyzed and monetized.

Javlin

Zapier is a tool for primarily non-technical users to connect together web apps.

An integration between two apps is called a Zap. A Zap is made up of a Trigger and one or more Actions or Searches.

Whenever the trigger happens in one app, Zapier will automatically perform the actions or searches in another app in order.

Zaps are very lightweight and easy to set up. Zaps do not import or export old data (they only operate on new items created after the Zap is enabled). Zaps are also not kept in sync ("two way syncing") after the Zap is triggered.

Zaps are deceivingly simple if you're used to dealing with complex and difficult integrations. Their simplicity is what enables anyone to create them.

Zapier

Sample Customers

IBM, Oracle, MuleSoft, GoodData, Thomson Reuters, salesforce.com, Comcast, Active Network, SHOP.CA

BuzzFeed, Groupon, Spotify, Columbia University, FOX

Buyer's Guide

CloverETL vs. Zapier

July 2025

Free Report: CloverETL vs. Zapier

Find out what your peers are saying about CloverETL vs. Zapier and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

861,803 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CloverETL vs. Zapier report.

See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.