Cisco UCS Manager vs SolarWinds ipMonitor comparison

Cisco and SolarWinds are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Cisco is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.7, while SolarWinds is ranked #55 with an average rating of 6.0. Cisco holds a 1.2% mindshare in IM, compared to SolarWinds’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of SolarWinds users who would recommend it.

Cisco UCS Manager

Read 27 Cisco UCS Manager reviews

1,749 Views
1,539 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

SolarWinds ipMonitor

Read 2 SolarWinds ipMonitor reviews

344 Views
210 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

Cisco UCS Manager

SolarWinds ipMonitor

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cisco UCS Manager and SolarWinds ipMonitor based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco UCS Manager vs. SolarWinds ipMonitor Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS Manager vs. SolarWinds ipMonitor

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,760 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco UCS Manager

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

17th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SolarWinds ipMonitor

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

55th

Average Rating

6.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (75th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Cisco UCS Manager is 1.2%, down from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SolarWinds ipMonitor is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Cisco UCS Manager	1.2%
SolarWinds ipMonitor	0.2%
Other	98.6%

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Edwin Mwosa

IT Infrastructure Manager at KTDA

Enhanced network oversight with rapid issue identification and good efficiency

We mainly use Cisco UCS Manager to integrate and manage our Cisco switches across the building. We also utilize it for network integration. It provides an integrated solution for our Cisco environment, streamlining our operations and managing multiple Cisco devices like switches and routers Cisco…

Read full review

Masud Alam

Manager at Optimum Origens Inc.

IP address management improves network efficiency but licensing cost could decrease

We are using SolarWinds for NPM and NCM, and we use IP address management for IP address monitoring. It helps us track which IP address is live and which is not. It also provides DHCP reservation and allows us to declare IP addresses for our integration. We have been using it for IP address…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"A main feature of Cisco UCS Manager is its reliability, as all of the computing blades are in cluster mode."

"I can quickly manage the provisioned servers."

"It is more robust than other solutions. So, the stability is good."

"The hardware is very powerful and it is a stable solution."

"The most valuable features are flexibility and management."

"For the blade architecture and ease of use, I consider Cisco UCS Manager the best option on the market at the moment."

"Cisco UCS has different layers of security, and you can do multiple installations of your LIAMs on top of the server and Blade. You can install VMware, Windows Server, Hyper-V, etc."

"The reporting functionality will give you any report you want."

More Cisco UCS Manager pros

"IPAM is used for IP address reservation and tracking, helping us easily identify live IP addresses."

"The most valuable feature is the availability of end devices."

Cons

"The integration with other solutions could be better. I think Cisco can only integrate using Intersight. There is a second interface available as a SaaS platform, in the cloud, or on-premise. It's based on the Redfish protocol, which is standard for all the B-series servers in the market. We can integrate other solutions using API."

"We have three data centers and if we could manage all three data centers using one interface, it would be great."

"Upgrading the firmware is a difficult procedure."

"I want to be able to schedule multiple sequential updates in one go."

"The pricing can be better."

"There is room for improvement in terms of cost and complexity to set up. It doesn't work straight out of the UCS, so someone who knows what they're doing is needed immediately, and it can be quite confusing."

"I would like to see Cisco UCS optionally work as a hyper-converged system because right now, it only operates as a converged system."

"Getting a CLI report on routers, switches, or any other CLI configuration device is difficult."

More Cisco UCS Manager cons

"The licensing cost is high compared to open source tools."

"The solution does not include enough features and has some performance issues."

"The licensing cost is high compared to open source tools."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Cisco UCS is more expensive than Dell and HP, but it is more reliable. I see less issues and it's quite stable."

"With product discounts which can be negotiated, the product is a great value."

"We need to take a license for each port, which amounts to a big sum."

"You buy the hardware and then you get Cisco UCS Manager for free."

"Cisco UCS Manager’s annual licensing fee is expensive."

"The pricing for Cisco UCS Manager is okay for its market, so it's a four out of five for me."

"The solution is a bit expensive because the annual license does not include new features that are priced as add-ons."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

Government

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	18

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cisco UCS Manager?

When one server fails, we can attach the service profile to a new server, which saves a lot of time.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco UCS Manager?

My experience with the pricing of Cisco UCS Manager ( /products/cisco-ucs-manager-reviews ) is that it is reasonable. Recently, we acquired an excellent bundle with significant discounts, with offe...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco UCS Manager?

For improvements, while the current graphical user interface is satisfactory, it could be further simplified for different tasks. While it has been improved from using Java to HTML, simplifying the...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SolarWinds ipMonitor?

The licensing cost is high compared to other open-source tools. Being a corporate client, we require corporate licensing, which adds to the cost.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SolarWinds ipMonitor?

The licensing cost is high compared to open source tools. The state monitoring tools could be improved with AI integration to track IP usage history. There is no local support; we must contact thei...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SolarWinds ipMonitor?

See all answers

Comparisons

Cisco Intersight vs Cisco UCS Manager

Compared 75% of the time

Nutanix Prism vs Cisco UCS Manager

Compared 8% of the time

HPE OneView vs Cisco UCS Manager

Compared 7% of the time

Everbridge IT Alerting vs Cisco UCS Manager

Compared 4% of the time

Zabbix vs Cisco UCS Manager

Compared 4% of the time

More Cisco UCS Manager Competitors

SolarWinds NPM vs SolarWinds ipMonitor

Compared 100% of the time

More SolarWinds ipMonitor Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS Manager

October 2025

Download Cisco UCS Manager product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

October 2025

Download SolarWinds ipMonitor product report

Also Known As

No data available

ipMonitor

Overview

Cisco UCS Manager helps significantly reduce management and administration expenses by automating routine tasks to increase operational agility. Customers can extend the benefits of Cisco UCS Manager globally across an enterprise to thousands of servers in multiple domains with Cisco UCS Central Software.

Cisco

Monitor network devices, servers, VMware hosts and applications from one console
Receive alerts for availability and performance issues
Monitor network status on maps and NOC view
Minimize downtime by automating remediation actions
Enhance monitoring with built-in reports and dashboards

SolarWinds

Sample Customers

Management Science Associates, Peak 10, Virtual Consulting Professionals

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS Manager vs. SolarWinds ipMonitor

September 2025

Free Report: Cisco UCS Manager vs. SolarWinds ipMonitor

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco UCS Manager vs. SolarWinds ipMonitor and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco UCS Manager vs. SolarWinds ipMonitor report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.