Cisco UCS Manager vs ManageEngine IT360 comparison

Cisco and ManageEngine are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Cisco is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.8, while ManageEngine is ranked #73. Cisco holds a 1.3% mindshare in IM, compared to ManageEngine’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of ManageEngine users who would recommend it.

Cisco UCS Manager

Read 27 Cisco UCS Manager reviews

2,065 Views
1,859 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

ManageEngine IT360

Read 5 ManageEngine IT360 reviews

921 Views
359 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Cisco UCS Manager

ManageEngine IT360

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

ManageEngine IT360 and Cisco UCS Manager are both competing in the comprehensive IT management solutions category. ManageEngine IT360 stands out primarily due to its affordability and easier deployment, whereas Cisco UCS Manager is favored for its advanced capabilities, specifically in environments needing extensive server management.

Features: ManageEngine IT360 provides strong network performance monitoring, application monitoring, and fault management, allowing an integrated perspective on IT operations. Cisco UCS Manager focuses on server and storage management, unified computing, and virtualization, known for its hardware management depth.

Room for Improvement: ManageEngine IT360 could improve in hardware integration, advanced server capabilities, and virtualization features. Cisco UCS Manager would benefit from pricing flexibility, simpler deployment, and broader application monitoring capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ManageEngine IT360 is known for its straightforward deployment and robust support throughout installation and ongoing services. Cisco UCS Manager's deployment is complex, reflecting its detailed hardware management, but it compensates with strong technical support.

Pricing and ROI: ManageEngine IT360 offers competitive pricing and a solid ROI, appealing to cost-conscious buyers. On the other hand, Cisco UCS Manager demands a higher upfront cost but delivers significant ROI through powerful features, making it valuable in heavily server-dependent setups.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco UCS Manager vs. ManageEngine IT360 Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS Manager vs. ManageEngine IT360

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 880,745 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco UCS Manager

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

18th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

ManageEngine IT360

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

73rd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (98th), IT Asset Management (28th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Cisco UCS Manager is 1.3%, down from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ManageEngine IT360 is 0.4%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Cisco UCS Manager	1.3%
ManageEngine IT360	0.4%
Other	98.3%

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Rob-Croxford

Consultant at rcnss

A market leader with an enhanced user interface for seamless experience

There is room for improvement in terms of cost and complexity to set up. It doesn't work straight out of the UCS, so someone who knows what they're doing is needed immediately, and it can be quite confusing. Some settings are still fairly well hidden, even the basic ones. Companies don't really understand how long it takes to set up. Also, when changes are pushed, it can take their phone line off the system for twenty minutes to half an hour. Out-of-the-box functionality is an issue, too. I know that my company is different, however, the basics are always the same. You do your tap lines, zip lines, and stuff like that, then you get your internal phone line system. That can all be automated and scripted, and it's probably part of the automation process. However, I haven't really seen it.

Read full review

Ziyad Moghalis

It manager at PTC (Public Telecomuncation Corporation)

Good monitoring and alerting capability, and it is easy to deploy

This solution is good for configuration management. The monitoring capability is easy to use and it can be done without any training. ManageEngine is easy to deploy. It is easy to identify and collect information from all of the nodes on the network. The alerting capability is good and it will send out emails.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features of Cisco UCS Manager include the visibility it provides and the ease of identifying issues within the Cisco environment."

"Ease of management is certainly the most valuable feature in this product."

"Cisco UCS has different layers of security, and you can do multiple installations of your LIAMs on top of the server and Blade. You can install VMware, Windows Server, Hyper-V, etc."

"The management is one of the most valuable features of this solution."

"I can deploy something in my 50-odd servers all in one go, in parallel, whereas if I was to do that individually, it could be a nightmare."

"I can quickly manage the provisioned servers."

"The reporting functionality will give you any report you want."

"The most valuable features are flexibility and management."

More Cisco UCS Manager pros

"It is easy to identify and collect information from all of the nodes on the network."

"The technical support is good."

"The product helps users stay on top of gaining insight into the active directory, permissions and security sets, and user group policy changes."

Cons

"Some settings are still fairly well hidden, even the basic ones."

"The primary challenge we face is identifying the correct version to deploy during firmware upgrades or compute updates."

"I want to be able to schedule multiple sequential updates in one go."

"I would like to see improved visibility into the operating system, enabling us to identify issues directly from the operating system itself."

"There is room for improvement in terms of cost and complexity to set up. It doesn't work straight out of the UCS, so someone who knows what they're doing is needed immediately, and it can be quite confusing."

"The interface and the way it is constructed is very complex. They should work to simplify it. It's quite difficult for somebody who doesn't know the product very well. Users should be able to get proficient with it faster. There's definitely room for improvement there."

"The automation within the solution needs to be simplified."

"Improving functionalities similar to InterSite within UCS Manager would be beneficial."

More Cisco UCS Manager cons

"The ManageEngine features could improve to show graphs of the traffic and network utility."

"The product could use more intelligence, automation and general availability of product information."

"We would like to have support for integration with ServiceDesk."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Cisco UCS is more expensive than Dell and HP, but it is more reliable. I see less issues and it's quite stable."

"With product discounts which can be negotiated, the product is a great value."

"You buy the hardware and then you get Cisco UCS Manager for free."

"We need to take a license for each port, which amounts to a big sum."

"The pricing for Cisco UCS Manager is okay for its market, so it's a four out of five for me."

"Cisco UCS Manager’s annual licensing fee is expensive."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

880,745 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	18

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cisco UCS Manager?

When one server fails, we can attach the service profile to a new server, which saves a lot of time.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco UCS Manager?

My experience with the pricing of Cisco UCS Manager ( /products/cisco-ucs-manager-reviews ) is that it is reasonable. Recently, we acquired an excellent bundle with significant discounts, with offe...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco UCS Manager?

For improvements, while the current graphical user interface is satisfactory, it could be further simplified for different tasks. While it has been improved from using Java to HTML, simplifying the...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Cisco Intersight vs Cisco UCS Manager

Compared 64% of the time

Nutanix Prism vs Cisco UCS Manager

Compared 5% of the time

HPE OneView vs Cisco UCS Manager

Compared 4% of the time

Splunk Observability Cloud vs Cisco UCS Manager

Compared 4% of the time

Datadog vs Cisco UCS Manager

Compared 3% of the time

More Cisco UCS Manager Competitors

Netreo vs ManageEngine IT360

Compared 19% of the time

Alluvio AppResponse vs ManageEngine IT360

Compared 13% of the time

eG Enterprise vs ManageEngine IT360

Compared 13% of the time

Kentik vs ManageEngine IT360

Compared 12% of the time

Motadata Network Management System vs ManageEngine IT360

Compared 11% of the time

More ManageEngine IT360 Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS Manager

January 2026

Download Cisco UCS Manager product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

January 2026

Download ManageEngine IT360 product report

Also Known As

No data available

IT360

Overview

Cisco UCS Manager helps significantly reduce management and administration expenses by automating routine tasks to increase operational agility. Customers can extend the benefits of Cisco UCS Manager globally across an enterprise to thousands of servers in multiple domains with Cisco UCS Central Software.

Cisco

With IT360 you will deliver services efficiently with maximum scalability. Service providers can now accurately manage the SLAs and release new services faster with features like Multi-tenancy, High Availability, Enterprise level systems and Datacenter monitoring, Remote site monitoring and Customer and site-specific dashboards.

ManageEngine

Sample Customers

Management Science Associates, Peak 10, Virtual Consulting Professionals

Khimji Ramdas, RME Global, Bank of Namibia, DORMA, PMSI, National Commodities Exchange, EMA, Redstone, First Source

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS Manager vs. ManageEngine IT360

January 2026

Free Report: Cisco UCS Manager vs. ManageEngine IT360

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco UCS Manager vs. ManageEngine IT360 and other solutions. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

880,745 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco UCS Manager vs. ManageEngine IT360 report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.