Cisco UCS Manager vs ManageEngine IT360 comparison

Cisco and ManageEngine are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Cisco is ranked #19 with an average rating of 8.7, while ManageEngine is ranked #77. Cisco holds a 1.3% mindshare in IM, compared to ManageEngine’s 0.1% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of ManageEngine users who would recommend it.

Cisco UCS Manager

Read 27 Cisco UCS Manager reviews

1,810 Views
1,575 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

ManageEngine IT360

Read 5 ManageEngine IT360 reviews

454 Views
173 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Cisco UCS Manager

ManageEngine IT360

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

ManageEngine IT360 and Cisco UCS Manager are both competing in the comprehensive IT management solutions category. ManageEngine IT360 stands out primarily due to its affordability and easier deployment, whereas Cisco UCS Manager is favored for its advanced capabilities, specifically in environments needing extensive server management.

Features: ManageEngine IT360 provides strong network performance monitoring, application monitoring, and fault management, allowing an integrated perspective on IT operations. Cisco UCS Manager focuses on server and storage management, unified computing, and virtualization, known for its hardware management depth.

Room for Improvement: ManageEngine IT360 could improve in hardware integration, advanced server capabilities, and virtualization features. Cisco UCS Manager would benefit from pricing flexibility, simpler deployment, and broader application monitoring capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ManageEngine IT360 is known for its straightforward deployment and robust support throughout installation and ongoing services. Cisco UCS Manager's deployment is complex, reflecting its detailed hardware management, but it compensates with strong technical support.

Pricing and ROI: ManageEngine IT360 offers competitive pricing and a solid ROI, appealing to cost-conscious buyers. On the other hand, Cisco UCS Manager demands a higher upfront cost but delivers significant ROI through powerful features, making it valuable in heavily server-dependent setups.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco UCS Manager vs. ManageEngine IT360 Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS Manager vs. ManageEngine IT360

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,484 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco UCS Manager

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

19th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

ManageEngine IT360

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

77th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (110th), IT Asset Management (38th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Cisco UCS Manager is 1.3%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ManageEngine IT360 is 0.1%, down from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Edwin Mwosa

IT Infrastructure Manager at KTDA

Enhanced network oversight with rapid issue identification and good efficiency

We mainly use Cisco UCS Manager to integrate and manage our Cisco switches across the building. We also utilize it for network integration. It provides an integrated solution for our Cisco environment, streamlining our operations and managing multiple Cisco devices like switches and routers Cisco…

Read full review

Ziyad Moghalis

It manager at PTC (Public Telecomuncation Corporation)

Good monitoring and alerting capability, and it is easy to deploy

This solution is good for configuration management. The monitoring capability is easy to use and it can be done without any training. ManageEngine is easy to deploy. It is easy to identify and collect information from all of the nodes on the network. The alerting capability is good and it will send out emails.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features of Cisco UCS Manager include the visibility it provides and the ease of identifying issues within the Cisco environment."

"I can deploy something in my 50-odd servers all in one go, in parallel, whereas if I was to do that individually, it could be a nightmare."

"The interface is ergonomic and native. We can use UCS Manager to do all the configurations for the servers, including storage, networking, and all the other components we need inside the fabric. It's simple and flexible."

"What I like most about Cisco UCS Manager is the ease of administration. It also allows the central management of maintenance, installation, and configuration activities."

"For the blade architecture and ease of use, I consider Cisco UCS Manager the best option on the market at the moment."

"Technical support has been good so far. We haven't had any issues with them. We're satisfied with the level of service they provide our company."

"The hardware is very powerful and it is a stable solution."

"The solution is highly scalable, mainly because of the templates that make it easy for you to actually edit on the system."

More Cisco UCS Manager pros

"It is easy to identify and collect information from all of the nodes on the network."

"The product helps users stay on top of gaining insight into the active directory, permissions and security sets, and user group policy changes."

"The technical support is good."

Cons

"Its user interface can be improved. It can be more user-friendly."

"Cisco UCS is expensive compared to others. The Cisco UCS Chassis is more expensive than a standalone server, but some companies require standalone servers because of their production load and affordability. You need to pay more if you require more features on the Blade or if you need more ports on the switch."

"I found it a bit of a challenge to get training on UCSM. I've been trying to get that for some time now. I feel like I have to figure it out a lot of things myself. For years I've to log calls with support whenever I've got challenges that I cannot resolve. If I had some training or more manuals, I'd be better able to handle more things on my own."

"The pricing aspect should be addressed."

"The primary challenge we face is identifying the correct version to deploy during firmware upgrades or compute updates."

"In the next release, I would like to see improvements made to their security."

"We have three data centers and if we could manage all three data centers using one interface, it would be great."

"Getting a CLI report on routers, switches, or any other CLI configuration device is difficult."

More Cisco UCS Manager cons

"We would like to have support for integration with ServiceDesk."

"The product could use more intelligence, automation and general availability of product information."

"The ManageEngine features could improve to show graphs of the traffic and network utility."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Cisco UCS is more expensive than Dell and HP, but it is more reliable. I see less issues and it's quite stable."

"Cisco UCS Manager’s annual licensing fee is expensive."

"With product discounts which can be negotiated, the product is a great value."

"We need to take a license for each port, which amounts to a big sum."

"You buy the hardware and then you get Cisco UCS Manager for free."

"The pricing for Cisco UCS Manager is okay for its market, so it's a four out of five for me."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,484 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

23%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Government

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cisco UCS Manager?

When one server fails, we can attach the service profile to a new server, which saves a lot of time.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco UCS Manager?

My experience with the pricing of Cisco UCS Manager ( /products/cisco-ucs-manager-reviews ) is that it is reasonable. Recently, we acquired an excellent bundle with significant discounts, with offe...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco UCS Manager?

For improvements, while the current graphical user interface is satisfactory, it could be further simplified for different tasks. While it has been improved from using Java to HTML, simplifying the...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Cisco Intersight vs Cisco UCS Manager

Compared 80% of the time

Nutanix Prism vs Cisco UCS Manager

Compared 9% of the time

HPE OneView vs Cisco UCS Manager

Compared 7% of the time

Zabbix vs Cisco UCS Manager

Compared 4% of the time

More Cisco UCS Manager Competitors

Motadata Network Management System vs ManageEngine IT360

Compared 52% of the time

Ixia Network Packet Brokers vs ManageEngine IT360

Compared 48% of the time

More ManageEngine IT360 Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS Manager

August 2025

Download Cisco UCS Manager product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

August 2025

Download ManageEngine IT360 product report

Also Known As

No data available

IT360

Overview

Cisco UCS Manager helps significantly reduce management and administration expenses by automating routine tasks to increase operational agility. Customers can extend the benefits of Cisco UCS Manager globally across an enterprise to thousands of servers in multiple domains with Cisco UCS Central Software.

Cisco

With IT360 you will deliver services efficiently with maximum scalability. Service providers can now accurately manage the SLAs and release new services faster with features like Multi-tenancy, High Availability, Enterprise level systems and Datacenter monitoring, Remote site monitoring and Customer and site-specific dashboards.

ManageEngine

Sample Customers

Management Science Associates, Peak 10, Virtual Consulting Professionals

Khimji Ramdas, RME Global, Bank of Namibia, DORMA, PMSI, National Commodities Exchange, EMA, Redstone, First Source

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS Manager vs. ManageEngine IT360

July 2025

Free Report: Cisco UCS Manager vs. ManageEngine IT360

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco UCS Manager vs. ManageEngine IT360 and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,484 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco UCS Manager vs. ManageEngine IT360 report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.