Cisco UCS Manager vs IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor comparison

Cisco and IDERA are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Cisco is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.8, while IDERA is ranked #70. Cisco holds a 1.3% mindshare in IM, compared to IDERA’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of IDERA users who would recommend it.

Cisco UCS Manager

Read 27 Cisco UCS Manager reviews

2,065 Views
1,859 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

IDERA Uptime Infrastructure...

Read 5 IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor reviews

670 Views
369 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Cisco UCS Manager

IDERA Uptime Infrastructure...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Cisco UCS Manager and IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor are products in the IT infrastructure management category. Cisco UCS Manager seems to have the upper hand in hardware integration within Cisco environments, while IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor stands out in performance monitoring and cross-platform versatility.

Features: Cisco UCS Manager provides comprehensive server management, network configuration tools, and hardware integration, making it beneficial for data center environments. IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor offers performance monitoring, alerting, and dashboard capabilities, providing visibility across various platforms and supporting diverse systems.

Room for Improvement: Cisco UCS Manager could improve by simplifying deployment for non-Cisco environments, enhancing support for cross-platform integration, and streamlining user interface design. IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor might enhance its hardware management features, increase integration with specific hardware vendors, and improve network configuration tools for more extensive infrastructure use.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco UCS Manager offers seamless integration within Cisco's suite, benefiting those using Cisco hardware, but may present challenges for non-Cisco environments. IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor is known for straightforward deployment, supporting a diverse range of systems. Cisco provides robust resources for suite users, while IDERA offers flexible support that caters to broad systems coverage.

Pricing and ROI: Cisco UCS Manager might involve higher initial costs due to its hardware-centric model, but it provides significant ROI for businesses using extensive Cisco ecosystems. IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor generally offers a more cost-effective solution with rapid ROI through its software-based deployment and strong monitoring capabilities, appealing particularly to those focused on software-driven solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco UCS Manager vs. IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS Manager vs. IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 880,685 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco UCS Manager

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

18th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

IDERA Uptime Infrastructure...

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

70th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (97th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Cisco UCS Manager is 1.3%, down from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor is 0.4%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Cisco UCS Manager	1.3%
IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor	0.4%
Other	98.3%

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

Rob-Croxford

Consultant at rcnss

A market leader with an enhanced user interface for seamless experience

There is room for improvement in terms of cost and complexity to set up. It doesn't work straight out of the UCS, so someone who knows what they're doing is needed immediately, and it can be quite confusing. Some settings are still fairly well hidden, even the basic ones. Companies don't really understand how long it takes to set up. Also, when changes are pushed, it can take their phone line off the system for twenty minutes to half an hour. Out-of-the-box functionality is an issue, too. I know that my company is different, however, the basics are always the same. You do your tap lines, zip lines, and stuff like that, then you get your internal phone line system. That can all be automated and scripted, and it's probably part of the automation process. However, I haven't really seen it.

Read full review

Nafiu Garba

Special Assistant to the Governor ICT COO at a tech services company with 201-500 employees

It offers different licensing types that allow you to extend the services to clients; it lets you look into device performance and optimization and helps apply best practices

What I like best about IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor is that it offers different licensing types. Hence, it allows my organization to extend the services to clients and not just use the solution within the organization. My organization can leverage IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor to learn more about how clients perform because the solution lets you monitor and optimize devices and apply best practices.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Cisco UCS Manager is recommended for its ease of deployment and management capabilities."

"For the blade architecture and ease of use, I consider Cisco UCS Manager the best option on the market at the moment."

"The most valuable features of Cisco UCS Manager include the visibility it provides and the ease of identifying issues within the Cisco environment."

"I can quickly manage the provisioned servers."

"Ease of management is certainly the most valuable feature in this product."

"A main feature of Cisco UCS Manager is its reliability, as all of the computing blades are in cluster mode."

"The management is one of the most valuable features of this solution."

"Technical support has been good so far. We haven't had any issues with them. We're satisfied with the level of service they provide our company."

More Cisco UCS Manager pros

"My organization can leverage IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor to learn more about how clients perform because the solution lets you monitor and optimize devices and apply best practices."

Cons

"Upgrading the firmware is a difficult procedure."

"The primary challenge we face is identifying the correct version to deploy during firmware upgrades or compute updates."

"I would like to see Cisco UCS optionally work as a hyper-converged system because right now, it only operates as a converged system."

"Some settings are still fairly well hidden, even the basic ones."

"Cisco UCS Manager should have a simplified deployment in the sense of not having multiple machines, demilitarized zones, and on-premise options."

"Improving functionalities similar to InterSite within UCS Manager would be beneficial."

"Cisco UCS is expensive compared to others. The Cisco UCS Chassis is more expensive than a standalone server, but some companies require standalone servers because of their production load and affordability. You need to pay more if you require more features on the Blade or if you need more ports on the switch."

"I would like to see improved visibility into the operating system, enabling us to identify issues directly from the operating system itself."

More Cisco UCS Manager cons

"What I want to improve in IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor is the community aspect, where IDERA would provide customers with updates on functionalities, what comes next, what IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor upgrades would be released, etc. I also want the sustainability of IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor to improve."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Cisco UCS Manager’s annual licensing fee is expensive."

"We need to take a license for each port, which amounts to a big sum."

"With product discounts which can be negotiated, the product is a great value."

"Cisco UCS is more expensive than Dell and HP, but it is more reliable. I see less issues and it's quite stable."

"You buy the hardware and then you get Cisco UCS Manager for free."

"The pricing for Cisco UCS Manager is okay for its market, so it's a four out of five for me."

"I'm based in Nigeria, and the conversion rate affects the pricing for IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor, but globally, pricing is reasonable. I'm rating pricing for the solution seven on a scale of one to ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

880,685 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	18

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cisco UCS Manager?

When one server fails, we can attach the service profile to a new server, which saves a lot of time.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco UCS Manager?

My experience with the pricing of Cisco UCS Manager ( /products/cisco-ucs-manager-reviews ) is that it is reasonable. Recently, we acquired an excellent bundle with significant discounts, with offe...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco UCS Manager?

For improvements, while the current graphical user interface is satisfactory, it could be further simplified for different tasks. While it has been improved from using Java to HTML, simplifying the...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Cisco Intersight vs Cisco UCS Manager

Compared 64% of the time

Nutanix Prism vs Cisco UCS Manager

Compared 5% of the time

HPE OneView vs Cisco UCS Manager

Compared 4% of the time

Splunk Observability Cloud vs Cisco UCS Manager

Compared 4% of the time

Datadog vs Cisco UCS Manager

Compared 3% of the time

More Cisco UCS Manager Competitors

SolarWinds NPM vs IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor

Compared 23% of the time

Zabbix vs IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor

Compared 20% of the time

NetFortris LiveWatch vs IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor

Compared 20% of the time

IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor

Compared 19% of the time

TruView vs IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor

Compared 17% of the time

More IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS Manager

January 2026

Download Cisco UCS Manager product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

January 2026

IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor report

Download IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor product report

Also Known As

No data available

IDERA UIM, uptime software up.time

Overview

Cisco UCS Manager helps significantly reduce management and administration expenses by automating routine tasks to increase operational agility. Customers can extend the benefits of Cisco UCS Manager globally across an enterprise to thousands of servers in multiple domains with Cisco UCS Central Software.

Cisco

Uptime Infrastructure Monitor helps IT administrators to unify performance monitoring and optimization of IT infrastructure. Unlike its competition, it provides monitoring of a broad range of platforms and applications, ability to set service-level agreements, and support of both agent and agentless monitoring.

IDERA

Sample Customers

Management Science Associates, Peak 10, Virtual Consulting Professionals

TeleComputing; Manitoba Hydro; Blevins Inc.; City of Malmö

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS Manager vs. IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor

January 2026

Free Report: Cisco UCS Manager vs. IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco UCS Manager vs. IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor and other solutions. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

880,685 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco UCS Manager vs. IDERA Uptime Infrastructure Monitor report.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.