Cisco UCS Director vs Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP) comparison

Cisco and Flexera are both solutions in the Cloud Management category. Cisco is ranked #22 with an average rating of 8.0, while Flexera is ranked #34. Cisco holds a 1.3% mindshare in CM, compared to Flexera’s 1.7% mindshare. Additionally, 71% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of Flexera users who would recommend it.

Cisco UCS Director

Read 14 Cisco UCS Director reviews

575 Views
314 Comparison Views

71% willing to recommend

Flexera Cloud Management Pl...

Read 4 Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP) reviews

486 Views
230 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

Cisco UCS Director

Flexera Cloud Management Pl...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP) and Cisco UCS Director compete in cloud computing management. Flexera CMP seems to have the upper hand with flexibility in pricing and strong customer service, appealing to cost-sensitive organizations.

Features: Flexera CMP is appreciated for multi-cloud management, cost optimization tools, and automation features that simplify cloud operations. Cisco UCS Director stands out with comprehensive infrastructure management, orchestration, and detailed monitoring, catering to businesses with complex IT networks.

Room for Improvement: Flexera CMP could improve integration capabilities and expand feature sets for handling more sophisticated infrastructure. Additionally, enhancing blueprinting tools to match competitors might be beneficial. Cisco UCS Director could simplify its deployment complexity and offer better documentation for user guidance. The pricing model might also be reevaluated for smaller businesses.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Flexera CMP’s cloud-based model allows easy and quick setup, supported by responsive and knowledgeable customer service. In contrast, Cisco UCS Director’s extensive customization options make deployment more complex, though it provides adequate support for technical setups suitable for experienced IT teams.

Pricing and ROI: Flexera CMP offers a flexible pricing structure with potential for faster ROI, especially for smaller businesses. Cisco UCS Director may require a higher initial investment, but provides significant long-term value through its robust feature set, making the cost worthwhile for companies seeking comprehensive infrastructure management.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco UCS Director vs. Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP) Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS Director vs. Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP)

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 857,162 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco UCS Director

Ranking in Cloud Management

22nd

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Flexera Cloud Management Pl...

Ranking in Cloud Management

34th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Cloud Management category, the mindshare of Cisco UCS Director is 1.3%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP) is 1.7%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Management

Featured Reviews

Sunny Nair

Solution Architect and Senior Consultant at Keysight Technologies

Good multi-cloud management capability, but third-party and legacy integration needs improvement

Normally, UCS Director is used primarily for orchestration, but when we look at a non-Cisco data infrastructure components, the UCS Director needs a bit more improvement in terms of integration with third-party systems and with existing older systems. I feel that more development or a more integrated road map should be set up so that it becomes a common platform for any infrastructure. In the next release of this solution, I would like to see changes in the navigation controls of UCS Director. That would be helpful. Modifying the icons that are available for use, as well as virtualization aspects.

Read full review

reviewer2035479

Business Development Manager at a tech services company with 201-500 employees

Good CMPs for cloud provisioning and excellent scalability

There is a problem with integration due to invalid private node security certificates. However, the issue can be resolved by correcting the certificates. Getting OEMs like Huawei or Morpheus to change their products is difficult, but we found a middle ground where both Huawei and Morpheus can integrate seamlessly through Terraform. So far, the integration has been successful, but it may create a problem when the platform is under a huge load of 46 million students. We have already requested the World Bank and universities to build their case. If that kind of situation arises, they can approach Huawei and Morpheus or go with Plexadera in the end. Although the RSP or SMAX are built around Morpheus specifications specifically, we still have more certified engineers in Pakistan to win that project. The higher education commission of Pakistan has already taken up the matter with both Morpheus and Huawei. VMware refused to do anything, but Huawei has agreed to change the certificate if there is an issue. We have already identified the issue, so they will correct it if the cloud solution is finally deployed for that number of students.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Cisco UCS Director is straightforward to use, which we greatly appreciate."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is the fabric sharing."

"A product that really aids in systems management without complexity."

"The product is flexible and compact. It has a lot of features."

"I can manage multiple workloads whether it's on AWS, Azure, or on-premises. They can be managed by using the UCS Director."

"The main feature of this solution is the integration with all the Cisco solutions and other vendors."

"This is a user-friendly solution that is very good and easy to use."

"The solution is helpful for centralized management."

More Cisco UCS Director pros

"With this platform, users could migrate to the cloud on the go and use public cloud services like Oracle database while integrating with their own local storage."

"The most valuable feature is Optima, which is something that we use quite extensively."

Cons

"The product's pricing needs to improve."

"There aren’t any areas of improvement that immediately come to mind."

"There could be an improvement with the integration with the newest solutions from other vendors' technologies."

"There are a lot of bugs in the solution. This is an area in the solution that can be improved."

"Simplifying the user interface would go a long way to making it more usable."

"The product could allow more programmatic opportunities through better development of the API."

"I would like to see more integration with other solutions."

"Currently, Cisco UCS Director is unable to integrate with another product or with a server from another brand."

More Cisco UCS Director cons

"Technical support is an area that can be improved."

"There is a problem with integration due to invalid private node security certificates."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Cisco UCS Director is expensive...I rate the solution's pricing a three out of ten."

"I rate Cisco UCS Director's price a three out of ten. Cisco UCS Director is not an affordable product. With Cisco UCS Director, there is a need to pay an overall price, which consists of the product, software, and support."

"The budget doesn’t work for the state and local governments."

"The cost of this solution is significant."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price and ten is a high price, I rate the pricing around five to six out of ten."

"I would rate the product's pricing an eight out of ten."

"The price is higher than an open-source product, or CloudForms, or IBM Cloud Pak, but it is still not very high."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

857,162 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

31%

Financial Services Firm

19%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Transportation Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cisco UCS Director?

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco UCS Director?

While the pricing might be seen as expensive, it provides value for money due to reliable service and excellent technical support.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco UCS Director?

There aren’t any areas of improvement that immediately come to mind.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Cisco Intersight vs Cisco UCS Director

Compared 53% of the time

VMware Aria Automation vs Cisco UCS Director

Compared 31% of the time

OpenNebula vs Cisco UCS Director

Compared 16% of the time

More Cisco UCS Director Competitors

IBM Spectrum Computing vs Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP)

Compared 28% of the time

Morpheus vs Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP)

Compared 22% of the time

Spot vs Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP)

Compared 20% of the time

VMware Aria Automation vs Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP)

Compared 17% of the time

IBM Turbonomic vs Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP)

Compared 13% of the time

More Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS Director

June 2025

Download Cisco UCS Director product report

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Management

May 2025

Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP) report

Download Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP) product report

Also Known As

No data available

RightScale Cloud Management Platform, MultiCloud Platform

Overview

Cisco UCS Director enables automated delivery of physical and virtual data center resources, empowering data centers to move at the speed of business.

Cisco

Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP) optimizes cloud costs and resources while efficiently managing multi-cloud environments. Its features for monitoring and governance aid in compliance. Valued for integration capabilities and automation tools, Flexera CMP streamlines cloud operations.

Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP) excels in multi-cloud management, cost optimization, and automation. Users appreciate its detailed analytics and reporting features that effectively track usage and costs. The platform's flexibility in integrating with different cloud environments allows seamless operations across various services, while its governance and policy enforcement are significant strengths. However, some users note the need for better integration with additional cloud providers, a high installation complexity, and that the support documentation lacks depth. Reporting features could be more comprehensive, and scalability issues exist in larger environments. Frequent updates can sometimes disrupt ongoing activities.

What are the Key Features of Flexera CMP?

Multi-Cloud Management: Enables management across different cloud services efficiently.
Cost Optimization: Provides tools to optimize and reduce cloud expenditure.
Automation Tools: Streamlines operations with powerful automation capabilities.
Detailed Analytics and Reporting: Offers insight into usage and costs with robust reporting.
Governance and Policy Enforcement: Maintains cloud usage compliance through strong policy enforcement.
Integration Capabilities: Integrates seamlessly with leading cloud providers for unified operations.

What Benefits Should Users Look For?

Operational Efficiency: Enhances cloud operations through efficient management and automation.
Cost Savings: Reduces spending with advanced cost optimization tools.
Compliance Assurance: Facilitates governance and maintains compliance effortlessly.
Insightful Analytics: Provides detailed reports for better decision-making and tracking.
Seamless Integration: Supports multiple cloud environments for a cohesive cloud strategy.

Flexera Cloud Management Platform is utilized across numerous industries, including finance, healthcare, and technology, to manage multi-cloud setups. Financial institutions leverage its cost optimization features to streamline expenses. Healthcare providers use its governance tools to ensure strict compliance with regulations. Technology companies benefit from its automation capabilities, allowing them to focus on innovation while Flexera CMP handles cloud infrastructure tasks.

Flexera

Sample Customers

Entel, Data#3, Cegal, NESIC, LightEdge

Amazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud Platform, Rackspace, Softlayer, Cloudstack, OpenStack, Vmware

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS Director vs. Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP)

June 2025

Free Report: Cisco UCS Director vs. Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP)

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco UCS Director vs. Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP) and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

857,162 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco UCS Director vs. Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP) report.

See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.