Cisco UCS Director vs Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP) comparison

Cisco and Flexera are both solutions in the Cloud Management category. Cisco is ranked #20 with an average rating of 7.7, while Flexera is ranked #32. Cisco holds a 1.4% mindshare in CM, compared to Flexera’s 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 73% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of Flexera users who would recommend it.

Cisco UCS Director

Read 15 Cisco UCS Director reviews

602 Views
572 Comparison Views

73% willing to recommend

Flexera Cloud Management Pl...

Read 4 Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP) reviews

591 Views
561 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

Cisco UCS Director

Flexera Cloud Management Pl...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP) and Cisco UCS Director compete in cloud computing management. Flexera CMP seems to have the upper hand with flexibility in pricing and strong customer service, appealing to cost-sensitive organizations.

Features: Flexera CMP is appreciated for multi-cloud management, cost optimization tools, and automation features that simplify cloud operations. Cisco UCS Director stands out with comprehensive infrastructure management, orchestration, and detailed monitoring, catering to businesses with complex IT networks.

Room for Improvement: Flexera CMP could improve integration capabilities and expand feature sets for handling more sophisticated infrastructure. Additionally, enhancing blueprinting tools to match competitors might be beneficial. Cisco UCS Director could simplify its deployment complexity and offer better documentation for user guidance. The pricing model might also be reevaluated for smaller businesses.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Flexera CMP’s cloud-based model allows easy and quick setup, supported by responsive and knowledgeable customer service. In contrast, Cisco UCS Director’s extensive customization options make deployment more complex, though it provides adequate support for technical setups suitable for experienced IT teams.

Pricing and ROI: Flexera CMP offers a flexible pricing structure with potential for faster ROI, especially for smaller businesses. Cisco UCS Director may require a higher initial investment, but provides significant long-term value through its robust feature set, making the cost worthwhile for companies seeking comprehensive infrastructure management.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco UCS Director vs. Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP) Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS Director vs. Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP)

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,760 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco UCS Director

Ranking in Cloud Management

20th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Flexera Cloud Management Pl...

Ranking in Cloud Management

32nd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Cloud Management category, the mindshare of Cisco UCS Director is 1.4%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP) is 2.1%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Cisco UCS Director	1.4%
Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP)	2.1%
Other	96.5%

Cloud Management

Featured Reviews

Sunny Nair

Solution Architect and Senior Consultant at Keysight Technologies

Good multi-cloud management capability, but third-party and legacy integration needs improvement

Normally, UCS Director is used primarily for orchestration, but when we look at a non-Cisco data infrastructure components, the UCS Director needs a bit more improvement in terms of integration with third-party systems and with existing older systems. I feel that more development or a more integrated road map should be set up so that it becomes a common platform for any infrastructure. In the next release of this solution, I would like to see changes in the navigation controls of UCS Director. That would be helpful. Modifying the icons that are available for use, as well as virtualization aspects.

Read full review

reviewer2035479

Business Development Manager at a tech services company with 201-500 employees

Good CMPs for cloud provisioning and excellent scalability

There is a problem with integration due to invalid private node security certificates. However, the issue can be resolved by correcting the certificates. Getting OEMs like Huawei or Morpheus to change their products is difficult, but we found a middle ground where both Huawei and Morpheus can integrate seamlessly through Terraform. So far, the integration has been successful, but it may create a problem when the platform is under a huge load of 46 million students. We have already requested the World Bank and universities to build their case. If that kind of situation arises, they can approach Huawei and Morpheus or go with Plexadera in the end. Although the RSP or SMAX are built around Morpheus specifications specifically, we still have more certified engineers in Pakistan to win that project. The higher education commission of Pakistan has already taken up the matter with both Morpheus and Huawei. VMware refused to do anything, but Huawei has agreed to change the certificate if there is an issue. We have already identified the issue, so they will correct it if the cloud solution is finally deployed for that number of students.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I can manage multiple workloads whether it's on AWS, Azure, or on-premises. They can be managed by using the UCS Director."

"The product is flexible and compact. It has a lot of features."

"The reason we went with Cisco is that it comes at a very negligible cost as part of the BOQ. Compared to the competition's products, which are incredibly expensive, UCS Director is low-cost."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is the fabric sharing."

"A product that really aids in systems management without complexity."

"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"Feature-wise, the solution helps one to add multiple environments in one place...It is a scalable product."

"The main feature of this solution is the integration with all the Cisco solutions and other vendors."

More Cisco UCS Director pros

"The most valuable feature is Optima, which is something that we use quite extensively."

"With this platform, users could migrate to the cloud on the go and use public cloud services like Oracle database while integrating with their own local storage."

Cons

"There aren’t any areas of improvement that immediately come to mind."

"The product's pricing needs to improve."

"The product could allow more programmatic opportunities through better development of the API."

"The tool should be a lot more intuitive and make it easy for us to understand and migrate."

"Simplifying the user interface would go a long way to making it more usable."

"We cannot depend on this solution to manage all of the data center's infrastructure."

"There could be an improvement with the integration with the newest solutions from other vendors' technologies."

"It is not easy to add or expand the product."

More Cisco UCS Director cons

"There is a problem with integration due to invalid private node security certificates."

"Technical support is an area that can be improved."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost of this solution is significant."

"Cisco UCS Director is expensive...I rate the solution's pricing a three out of ten."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price and ten is a high price, I rate the pricing around five to six out of ten."

"I rate Cisco UCS Director's price a three out of ten. Cisco UCS Director is not an affordable product. With Cisco UCS Director, there is a need to pay an overall price, which consists of the product, software, and support."

"I would rate the product's pricing an eight out of ten."

"The budget doesn’t work for the state and local governments."

"The price is higher than an open-source product, or CloudForms, or IBM Cloud Pak, but it is still not very high."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

11%

Performing Arts

Insurance Company

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	11

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cisco UCS Director?

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco UCS Director?

While the pricing might be seen as expensive, it provides value for money due to reliable service and excellent technical support.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco UCS Director?

It should be more of a cloud-based architecture for Cisco UCS Director, and it should be affordable to small customers as well because the pricing is a major challenge when we talk about Cisco UCS ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Cisco Intersight vs Cisco UCS Director

Compared 35% of the time

VMware Aria Automation vs Cisco UCS Director

Compared 28% of the time

Morpheus vs Cisco UCS Director

Compared 13% of the time

IBM Turbonomic vs Cisco UCS Director

Compared 12% of the time

OpenNebula vs Cisco UCS Director

Compared 11% of the time

More Cisco UCS Director Competitors

IBM Spectrum Computing vs Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP)

Compared 19% of the time

Morpheus vs Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP)

Compared 19% of the time

VMware Aria Automation vs Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP)

Compared 17% of the time

Spot vs Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP)

Compared 15% of the time

Lumen Cloud Application Manager vs Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP)

Compared 12% of the time

More Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS Director

October 2025

Download Cisco UCS Director product report

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Management

October 2025

Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP) report

Download Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP) product report

Also Known As

No data available

RightScale Cloud Management Platform, MultiCloud Platform

Overview

Cisco UCS Director enables automated delivery of physical and virtual data center resources, empowering data centers to move at the speed of business.

Cisco

Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP) offers comprehensive capabilities for managing cloud environments, enabling businesses to control costs, optimize resources, and ensure compliance across multiple cloud providers.

Flexera CMP is designed to streamline cloud management by providing a unified platform that supports automation, reporting, and policy enforcement. It empowers IT departments to efficiently manage multi-cloud environments by offering tools for workload optimization, visibility into cloud usage patterns, and governance features. Flexera CMP's integrations and customizable workflows enable seamless deployment and management of applications, reducing the complexity often associated with cloud operations.

What are the key features of Flexera CMP?

Multi-Cloud Management: Provides a centralized interface to manage resources across different cloud providers.
Cost Optimization: Identifies cost-saving opportunities through analysis and reporting tools.
Automation: Streamlines processes with automation capabilities for provisioning and lifecycle management.
Governance: Enforces policies to ensure compliance with industry standards and internal guidelines.
Reporting: Offers detailed analytics and reports on cloud utilization and performance.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Cost Reduction: Helps in reducing cloud spending through proactive cost management and optimization.
Resource Efficiency: Enhances resource allocation and utilization across cloud platforms.
Improved Compliance: Ensures adherence to best practices and regulatory requirements.
Increased Productivity: Automates routine tasks, allowing IT teams to focus on strategic initiatives.
Enhanced Visibility: Provides insights into cloud operations for better decision-making.

Flexera CMP is particularly valuable for industries with complex IT environments such as finance, healthcare, and technology, where effective cloud management is critical to maintaining continuous operations. By leveraging Flexera CMP, these industries can optimize their cloud strategies, balance workloads efficiently, and ensure data security and compliance, thereby driving business transformation.

Flexera

Sample Customers

Entel, Data#3, Cegal, NESIC, LightEdge

Amazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud Platform, Rackspace, Softlayer, Cloudstack, OpenStack, Vmware

Buyer's Guide

Cisco UCS Director vs. Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP)

September 2025

Free Report: Cisco UCS Director vs. Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP)

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco UCS Director vs. Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP) and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco UCS Director vs. Flexera Cloud Management Platform (CMP) report.

See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.