Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cisco Piston OpenStack [EOL] vs ZeroStack comparison

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Piston OpenStack [EOL]
Average Rating
7.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
ZeroStack
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
OpenStack (4th)
 

Featured Reviews

Bao Yi Chai - PeerSpot reviewer
The solution can be used for network services virtualization, but it needs to be more closely integrated between different solutions
I am using the Newton version of Cisco Piston OpenStack. Users should have a very competent in-house team or a third-party team ready to support them because Cisco Piston OpenStack is not an easy solution. It's more complex than VMware. Overall, I rate Cisco Piston OpenStack a seven out of ten.
Use ZeroStack?
Share your opinion
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which OpenStack solutions are best for your needs.
850,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cisco Piston OpenStack?
Cisco has a very wide network-based competency.
What needs improvement with Cisco Piston OpenStack?
Cisco Piston OpenStack needs to be more closely integrated between different solutions to work seamlessly for the client and the deployment team.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Piston OpenStack
No data available
 

Overview

Information not available
 

Sample Customers

Dualtec Cloud Builders
Financial institutions Healthcare institutions Leading educational institutions Managed services providers