We performed a comparison between Cisco Cloud Services Router and Juniper MX Series Routers based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Routers solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution has good performance."
"It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"It connects all the accounts with the weaknesses, and this is what we were looking for. Also, it connects with the on-premise side."
"It provides peace of mind because it is a stable product that you aren't going to lose sleep over at night wondering if it will be running or not."
"The most valuable features of the Cisco Cloud Services Router are the integration with Amazon and Oracle cloud."
"AWS has a reference architecture to enable the Cisco routers in high availability and Transit VPC. This is a very powerful router and can enable us to use Transit VPC in AWS, and this is a very powerful feature that we use."
"The bandwidth and throughput are pretty good."
"It handles stress very well. We have not reached a point of needing to worry about its capabilities."
"It is definitely scalable. It can handle a lot more traffic and group work compared to any other products that I've evaluated. It could easily scale a lot more than what I'm doing right now."
"It seems pretty stable. We have never had any issues with it."
"The solution is stable."
"The functionality and stability are great."
"We are able to easily build chassis with Juniper MX Series Routers."
"Juniper Switches is stable, easy to use, flexible, and has good performance. Also, the technology is good. It has a lifetime warranty and the prices are also very good."
"I would say it is very user-friendly."
"The most valuable feature of Juniper MX Series Routers is its exceptional policy management capabilities."
"The most valuable feature is the standard routing protocol."
"The product is easy to use."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"I would like the ability to moderate between devices on-premise to off-premise. This would be a vast improvement."
"I would like some deployment examples and guides specific to AWS VPCs and how to separate your subnets. Then, how they tie-in with the Internet gateway and any NAT services that we are running on our VPC. This would be extremely helpful."
"Cisco Cloud Services Router could improve by having more features. It is lacking features, such as virtualization and containerization. Additionally, there should be increased security and connectivity between routers."
"It could grow or adapt to changes in the cloud. For example, cloud does not support autoscaling. When people want to grow, they have to do manual activities."
"If you lose connectivity to the cloud, it is difficult to establish connectivity between hub and spoke."
"There should be a system in place to help existing users make an easier transition to the newer interfaces."
"It is too complex. It is not easy to set up, even with the documentation that they provided. It is a little confusing."
"They have an online registration that happens after they pick up block months. If they could decrease to yearly or something, sometimes the device is not cell phone accessible. That becomes an issue or challenge for us. If that can be improved, that would be really great."
"While it is challenging to pinpoint specific areas for enhancement, there is room for better support and updates for Ansible."
"The solution could improve by providing better training to allow more sales of the solution in the market."
"The initial setup is not easy."
"The security features could be better."
"In terms of what could be improved, they could extend the software warranty to be for its lifetime, as well. At the moment, the software warranty is limited, I think to one year."
"The third-level customer support coming from Juniper itself could be much better. To get assistance from Juniper, we sometimes have to wait for weeks and months. I don't really appreciate that. Their support should be faster."
"The web interface can be improved."
"The setup was a bit complex."
Cisco Cloud Services Router is ranked 6th in Routers with 17 reviews while Juniper MX Series Routers is ranked 3rd in Routers with 33 reviews. Cisco Cloud Services Router is rated 8.0, while Juniper MX Series Routers is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Cisco Cloud Services Router writes "Useful for smooth migrations, high availability, and simple deployment". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Juniper MX Series Routers writes "Good performance, long life span, and easy to set up". Cisco Cloud Services Router is most compared with MikroTik Routers and Switches, MikroTik Cloud Router Switch, HPE Enterprise Routers and Huawei Enterprise Routers, whereas Juniper MX Series Routers is most compared with MikroTik Routers and Switches, Cisco Enterprise Routers, Huawei Enterprise Routers, MikroTik Cloud Router Switch and ExtremeRouting. See our Cisco Cloud Services Router vs. Juniper MX Series Routers report.
See our list of best Routers vendors.
We monitor all Routers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
