Cisco Cloud Services Router vs Juniper MX Series Routers comparison

Cisco and Juniper are both solutions in the Routers category. Cisco is ranked #8, while Juniper is ranked #5 with an average rating of 9.0. Cisco holds a 4.5% mindshare in R, compared to Juniper’s 13.4% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Juniper users who would recommend it.

Cisco Cloud Services Router

Read 17 Cisco Cloud Services Router reviews

614 Views
589 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Juniper MX Series Routers

Read 34 Juniper MX Series Routers reviews

1,740 Views
1,392 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Cisco Cloud Services Router

Juniper MX Series Routers

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 9, 2025

Juniper MX Series Routers and Cisco Cloud Services Router compete in the network infrastructure space, focusing on routing and cloud applications. Cisco has a slight advantage in feature richness, appealing to tech buyers willing to invest more for advanced capabilities.

Features: Juniper MX Series Routers are renowned for robust scalability, high performance, and versatile network integration. They offer strong security and energy efficiency. Cisco Cloud Services Router excels with advanced cloud integration, exceptional traffic management, and application hosting flexibility.

Room for Improvement: Juniper could enhance cloud services and simplify advanced network features. Energy efficiency is vital, yet more cloud-centric features would benefit users. Cisco could improve initial deployment simplicity and integration for non-cloud-focused environments. Pricing accessibility is an area where it could refine offerings.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Juniper MX Series Routers are praised for simple deployment and a supportive network facilitating seamless infrastructure integration. Cisco Cloud Services Router, despite comprehensive support and documentation, may involve complex integration due to advanced cloud-centric features.

Pricing and ROI: Juniper MX Series Routers typically offer lower initial costs and better perceived ROI through energy savings and performance. Cisco Cloud Services Router may require higher upfront investments but delivers significant ROI by optimizing cloud operations and infrastructure benefits over time.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco Cloud Services Router vs. Juniper MX Series Routers Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Cloud Services Router vs. Juniper MX Series Routers

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,515 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Cloud Services Router

Ranking in Routers

8th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Juniper MX Series Routers

Ranking in Routers

5th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Carrier Grade Network Address Translation (CGNAT) (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Routers category, the mindshare of Cisco Cloud Services Router is 4.5%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Juniper MX Series Routers is 13.4%, up from 12.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Routers Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Juniper MX Series Routers	13.4%
Cisco Cloud Services Router	4.5%
Other	82.1%

Routers

Featured Reviews

VENKATESHREDDY

Associate IT Director at Diligent Global

Manageable, provides excellent support, and easily integrates with other products

One central area for improvement in Cisco is its product line offering. Cisco has ISE and other products, such as DNS Center and other components. Instead of small to medium-sized customers purchasing devices and maintaining the devices, it would be great if customers could have subscriptions. A CAPEX/OPEX model instead of that Cisco code, where the pricing model is subscription-based, would give much better flexibility for the customers. The pricing and model for Cisco Cloud Services Router and other Cisco products could be improved. One good example of what I want to be added to the Cisco Cloud Services Router in its next version is for it to be more of a plug-and-play product. For example, Juniper has developed QR codes, so if you need to plug in a device, you scan from your phone and connect to the internet. That's it. You can provision the device remotely through the cloud orchestrator, so I want to see a similar function or feature in Cisco Cloud Services Router.

Read full review

Patrick Anaku

Senior Network Engineer at Roke Telkom

Performance excels with reliable uptime and robust features

The best features of Juniper MX Series Routers include their performance, which is quite good for us in terms of hardware performance. The Junos OS, the software, is stable, and we don't have many issues with the Juniper system itself. They have numerous features that allow us to deliver services, be it Layer 2 connectivity to customers, Layer 3 connectivity, data center connectivity, or even security features. Hardware performance has been a top-notch reason why we chose Juniper in the beginning, especially the MX series, which performs well in terms of network uptime and we don't encounter many failures. We have had a bad experience here and there with the ACX series, and their network performance is not so great compared to MX, so we have mostly done away with the ACX and only use MX at some of the core sites. I have seen a return on investment from the solution. Initially, we deployed MX80s on the network, and since our company has been in operation since 2006, from that point we used MX80s until around 2016 when we upgraded most of them to MX204s. From our experience, once we buy an MX204, we don't have issues with it; we have never had to replace an MX204 on the network. Once we deploy it, it works until we decide to upgrade the capacity. The return on investment is significant, as once we buy it, we have no worries about performance.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of the Cisco Cloud Services Router is it can make your migrations smooth. For example, if you want to migrate to the cloud, but you don't want to change the IP. You can extend your VLAN from on-premise to the cloud without having to change the IP."

"What's best about Cisco Cloud Services Router is the support. It's excellent, and so far, no significant challenges. Another valuable feature of the product is easy integration with other products."

"The routing service for NPLS called Layer 3-IP is fantastic."

"The most important feature is that it is designed for mobile vehicle communication in harsh conditions."

"It integrates well with the other products we're using. We have it with multiple windows like Palo Alto, Arista and it easily integrated with them."

"It connects all the accounts with the weaknesses, and this is what we were looking for. Also, it connects with the on-premise side."

"The most valuable features of the Cisco Cloud Services Router are the integration with Amazon and Oracle cloud."

"This solution is scalable."

More Cisco Cloud Services Router pros

"It offers high protection and I like it."

"The most valuable feature of Juniper MX Series Routers is its exceptional policy management capabilities."

"The product is easy to use."

"The stability of Juniper is better than Cisco's."

"Juniper Switches is stable, easy to use, flexible, and has good performance. Also, the technology is good. It has a lifetime warranty and the prices are also very good."

"The most valuable feature is the capacity of the throughput for the firewall."

"We are able to easily build chassis with Juniper MX Series Routers."

"It's one of the more stable routers."

More Juniper MX Series Routers pros

Cons

"I would like the ability to moderate between devices on-premise to off-premise. This would be a vast improvement."

"The initial setup is easy for one device but is more complex when numerous devices need to be configured."

"It could grow or adapt to changes in the cloud. For example, cloud does not support autoscaling. When people want to grow, they have to do manual activities."

"A CAPEX/OPEX model, where the pricing model is subscription-based, would give much better flexibility for the customers. The pricing and model for Cisco Cloud Services Router and other Cisco products could be improved."

"I would like some deployment examples and guides specific to AWS VPCs and how to separate your subnets. Then, how they tie-in with the Internet gateway and any NAT services that we are running on our VPC. This would be extremely helpful."

"Cisco Cloud Services Router could improve the GUI."

"The ease of use within the AWS environment needs to improve. Sometimes, it is very esoteric in how you use it. Therefore, you have to learn to use it, then you are able to."

"They have an online registration that happens after they pick up block months. If they could decrease to yearly or something, sometimes the device is not cell phone accessible. That becomes an issue or challenge for us. If that can be improved, that would be really great."

More Cisco Cloud Services Router cons

"The third-level customer support coming from Juniper itself could be much better. To get assistance from Juniper, we sometimes have to wait for weeks and months. I don't really appreciate that. Their support should be faster."

"We'd appreciate it if they had a better GUI. It would be more flexible for the customers that way."

"The initial setup is not easy."

"The solution needs to offer SDN features."

"The price of this solution should be improved."

"Juniper Enterprise Routers could improve by adding a graphical user interface(GUI). They do not have one. Most of our team has to have a background or expertise in Juniper. When compared to other solutions, they have a GUI. It will be easier for new team members to get familiar with, configure, or set up the router. Additionally, adding some monitoring tools would help us."

"If you are setting up a site-to-site VPN between a Juniper and Cisco device then you may encounter some issues."

"It is not scalable, unfortunately."

More Juniper MX Series Routers cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We would prefer to go through the vendor instead of AWS, as we have a relationship with the vendor and can get discounts directly from them. Going through the vendor, it is much cheaper for us. Though, we would still keep it hosted on AWS."

"The pricing is good for what it offers."

"Purchasing through the AWS Marketplace was easy. It was almost a one-click process to purchase CSR."

"The licensing model is good with this appliance: Bring Your Own License (BYOL)."

"Purchasing it through the AWS Marketplace was very simple. We went through the AWS Marketplace because it was the easiest way to get the product up and running very quickly."

"The pricing is fine, though it might have been cheaper going through a partner or doing a direct buy."

"We never buy the product on the AWS Marketplace. We only download it. We always use BYOL. We never buy the license in the AWS Marketplace, because it's very expensive."

"You do need to pay a licensing fee to use the solution. You can do a yearly or three-year subscription. The product itself is quite expensive. It would be ideal if they offered the product at a cheaper price."

More Cisco Cloud Services Router pricing and cost advice

"$300 to $400 is the hardware cost and for licensing cost, it may be around, for support and all, $100 per year."

"The prices for Juniper MX Series Routers are reasonable."

"I would rate it around a three. While I'm not deeply involved in pricing discussions, I believe it is comparatively more affordable than Cisco."

"I would rate the pricing model a seven out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive. It is not cheap."

"The solution is more expensive compared to other solutions."

"There is a license for this solution and the price is very competitive. The cost is less expensive than some competitors, such as Cisco. There are additional costs for support licenses."

"The pricing of Juniper MX Series Routers is okay compared to other technologies."

"The price of this solution is better than other competitors, such as Cisco. We receive a lot of discounts which make the price less expensive and attractive."

More Juniper MX Series Routers pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Routers solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,515 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	10

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	19
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	8

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What needs improvement with Juniper MX Series Routers?

The areas of Juniper MX Series Routers that have room for improvement include the port count; for instance, the MX204 has only four 40G or 100G ports, which is quite limited. While I know there are...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Juniper MX Series Routers?

I work with an internet service provider in Uganda and have experience working with Juniper MX Series Routers, as we use Mikrotik, Juniper, and Cisco routers on our infrastructure. We have a mix of...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Juniper MX Series Routers?

The solution is deployed in our organization as hardware and it is on-prem, as we run on on-prem solutions. On a scale of one to ten, I rate Juniper MX Series Routers a nine.

See all answers

Comparisons

MikroTik Routers and Switches vs Cisco Cloud Services Router

Compared 22% of the time

HPE Enterprise Routers vs Cisco Cloud Services Router

Compared 18% of the time

MikroTik Cloud Router Switch vs Cisco Cloud Services Router

Compared 15% of the time

Nokia 7750 Service Router vs Cisco Cloud Services Router

Compared 12% of the time

ADTRAN NetVanta Routers and Switches vs Cisco Cloud Services Router

Compared 9% of the time

More Cisco Cloud Services Router Competitors

ACX Series Routers vs Juniper MX Series Routers

Compared 19% of the time

Huawei Enterprise Routers vs Juniper MX Series Routers

Compared 15% of the time

MikroTik Routers and Switches vs Juniper MX Series Routers

Compared 14% of the time

A10 Networks Thunder CGN vs Juniper MX Series Routers

Compared 11% of the time

HPE Enterprise Routers vs Juniper MX Series Routers

Compared 4% of the time

More Juniper MX Series Routers Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Cloud Services Router

January 2026

Download Cisco Cloud Services Router product report

Buyer's Guide

Juniper MX Series Routers

January 2026

Download Juniper MX Series Routers product report

Also Known As

Cisco CSR, Cisco Cloud Services Router 1000v, Cisco CSR 1000v

Juniper Enterprise Routers, MX Series, Junos Address Aware

Overview

The Cisco Cloud Services Router is a reliable and scalable solution for extending network layers from the head office to the cloud, maintaining connections from branch offices through the cloud environment. Its most valuable features are its integration with Amazon and Oracle Cloud, its ability to smooth migrations without changing IP, and excellent technical support.

The product is stable, easy to integrate with other products, and offers a fantastic routing service for NPLS called Layer 3-IP. It has helped organizations by providing higher resilience solutions, centralized troubleshooting, and easy management of services on the infrastructure side.

Cisco

Juniper MX Series Routers are designed for high throughput with flexible MPLS configuration and robust policy management, offering reliability and scalability for enterprise needs. They feature seamless Cisco integration, strong performance driven by the Trio chipset, and user-friendly management.

Known for their exceptional performance, Juniper MX Series Routers enable enterprises and ISPs to expand network connectivity and efficiency. Their reliable hardware supports tasks like border routing and internet connectivity, catering to high-performance networking and automation. Trio chipset technology ensures stability, while interchangeable line cards maintain top-level performance. These routers are favored for their easy configuration and robust support, though improvements in pricing, VPN compatibility, and stronger DDoS protection are needed. Users seek additional cloud integration, enhanced security features, and expanded port options on models like the MX204.

What are the key features of Juniper MX Series Routers?

High Throughput: Ensures fast and efficient network data transfer.
Flexible MPLS Configuration: Adapts seamlessly to varied network environments.
Robust Policy Management: Provides extensive control over network traffic policies.
Seamless Cisco Integration: Simplifies operations for mixed equipment environments.
Trio Chipset Technology: Boosts performance and ensures network stability.
User-Friendly Interface: Facilitates easy configuration and management.

What benefits should users evaluate?

Scalability: Supports growing network needs without compromising performance.
Reliability: Offers consistent and dependable network operations.
Support and Documentation: Access to comprehensive resources for efficient management.
Performance: Maintains high levels of throughput and stability for enterprise needs.
Automation Support: Streamlines network operations for greater efficiency.

In industries like telecommunications and data centers, Juniper MX Series Routers are widely implemented to manage complex networking tasks such as VPNs, MPLS, and BGP deployments. Service providers often rely on these routers for backbone roles, benefitting from their performance and scalability to maintain robust and efficient network infrastructures.

Juniper

Sample Customers

Under Armour, HealthSparq, Adobe

AARNet Pty Ltd, Allegro Networks, Atlantech Online, Availity, Baloise Insurance, Black Lotus, CATV, Blue Box

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Cloud Services Router vs. Juniper MX Series Routers

February 2026

Free Report: Cisco Cloud Services Router vs. Juniper MX Series Routers

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Cloud Services Router vs. Juniper MX Series Routers and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,515 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco Cloud Services Router vs. Juniper MX Series Routers report.

See our list of best Routers vendors.

We monitor all Routers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.