Cider vs Legit Security comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Palo Alto Networks Logo
171 views|126 comparisons
Legit Security Logo
324 views|161 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cider and Legit Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about GitGuardian, Sonatype, JFrog and others in Software Supply Chain Security.
To learn more, read our detailed Software Supply Chain Security Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,479 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Supply Chain Security solutions are best for your needs.
769,479 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer:The true value proposition of Legit lies not in its features but in its ability to support our product security program's focus on creating guardrails instead of toll gates.
Top Answer:Legit Security's secret detection works. However, there are some limitations to its effectiveness. One issue is that engineering teams don't always embed secrets in the same way, making it difficult… more »
Ranking
Views
171
Comparisons
126
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
324
Comparisons
161
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
1,416
Rating
10.0
Comparisons
Learn More
Palo Alto Networks
Video Not Available
Legit Security
Video Not Available
Overview

Gain granular visibility with engineering technologies, systems and processes, all the way from code to deployment. Easily connect Cider to your ecosystem and seamlessly integrate security without interrupting engineering. Optimize your CI/CD security, based on a set of prioritized risks and recommendations tailored to your environment.

Legit Security provides application security posture management platform that secures application delivery from code to cloud and protects an organization's software supply chain from attack. The platform’s unified application security control plane and automated SDLC discovery and analysis capabilities provide visibility and security control over rapidly changing environments and allow security issues to be prioritized based on context and business criticality to improve security team efficiency and effectiveness.

Sample Customers
Information Not Available
Google, NYSE, Kraft-Hienz, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, and many other large enterprise and Fortune 500 customers. Learn more by going to: https://www.legitsecurity.com/...
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company23%
Financial Services Firm12%
Pharma/Biotech Company12%
University10%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business34%
Midsize Enterprise16%
Large Enterprise50%
Buyer's Guide
Software Supply Chain Security
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about GitGuardian, Sonatype, JFrog and others in Software Supply Chain Security. Updated: April 2024.
769,479 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Cider is ranked 13th in Software Supply Chain Security while Legit Security is ranked 5th in Software Supply Chain Security with 4 reviews. Cider is rated 0.0, while Legit Security is rated 10.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Legit Security writes "Correlates information based on the integrations I have, which is extremely helpful". Cider is most compared with , whereas Legit Security is most compared with Snyk, Ox Security, Cycode and Docker.

See our list of best Software Supply Chain Security vendors.

We monitor all Software Supply Chain Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.