Checkmk vs DX NetOps comparison

Checkmk and Broadcom are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Checkmk is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.4, while Broadcom is ranked #45 with an average rating of 8.3. Checkmk holds a 3.9% mindshare in NMS, compared to Broadcom’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Checkmk users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Checkmk

Read 9 Checkmk reviews

4,470 Views
3,800 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

DX NetOps

Read 8 DX NetOps reviews

1,219 Views
1,097 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Checkmk

DX NetOps

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

DX NetOps and Checkmk are competing in network monitoring and management. Checkmk appears to have the upper hand due to its extensive feature set and perceived long-term ROI, despite DX NetOps' appealing pricing and support options.

Features: Checkmk offers flexibility, scalability, and a wide range of integrations, making it suitable for diverse environments. Its extensive customization options allow users to tailor the monitoring system to their specific needs. DX NetOps provides network visibility and comprehensive monitoring solutions, with an integrated suite offering performance analytics. Checkmk's adaptability and extensive feature set often outweigh the comprehensive suite provided by DX NetOps for those needing extensive customization.

Room for Improvement: Checkmk could enhance its user interface to make navigation more intuitive for new users. Improvements in documentation would benefit those seeking to leverage its full potential. Scaling could be more seamless as complexity increases. DX NetOps could improve deployment processes to make them more user-friendly and less intricate. Adding integration capabilities with more third-party tools would enhance its utility. Simplifying pricing models could make it easier for companies to evaluate long-term costs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Checkmk offers quick deployment with robust configuration options that effectively accommodate diverse environments, with customer service praised for being responsive and solution-oriented. DX NetOps provides a strong support infrastructure; however, its deployment process might be more complex, posing a challenge for some companies.

Pricing and ROI: DX NetOps is appealing to cost-sensitive organizations, with competitive pricing and good support for short-term solutions. Checkmk may have higher initial setup costs, but it is seen as providing better long-term ROI due to its versatility and high functionality, favoring those in complex environments over DX NetOps' budget-friendly nature.

To learn more, read our detailed Checkmk vs. DX NetOps Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Checkmk vs. DX NetOps

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Checkmk

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

8th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Server Monitoring (5th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (13th), Cloud Monitoring Software (12th)

DX NetOps

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

45th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AIOps (17th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Checkmk is 3.9%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of DX NetOps is 0.6%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Paolo Sala

Application performance and System monitoring at Agos

A reasonably priced tool for system and application monitoring

The main room for improvement is in the solution's presentation and the integration area. In our company, we use the integration capabilities from ServiceNow. We also have another big monitoring solution in place in our company, which is Dynatrace. At the moment, there doesn't exist an out-of-the-box integration for Dynatrace. I think that the integration and the exporting of the data collected are areas where Checkmk lacks but should try to improve the most. The only implementation of Checkmk that allows high availability is the virtual appliance that has the option for the availability of a different box. Otherwise, you have to find a way to implement it manually with some custom solution, which could be an improvement.

Read full review

Mark Tukh

Principal Presale Consultant at Ness Technologies

Leverages comprehensive network monitoring and AI-driven automation for enhanced performance analysis

There is a model for network traffic analysis in the NetOps product called NetOps Flow Analyzer. It provides all the necessary protocols and analysis. DX NetOps supports network monitoring across hybrid environments, though I hope it works out of the box. The product features include automation through AI, allowing out-of-the-box analysis of performance data, building baseline trends, and enabling configuration of dynamic thresholds relative to collected data.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The initial setup of Checkmk was easy...It is a very stable solution."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it has a lot of different pieces, and they all work together...It is a very scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"The alerting system in Checkmk really works properly."

"It's versatile, scalable, and easier to use compared to other solutions like Nagios and OMD."

"Overall, from one to ten, I rate Checkmk a nine."

"Checkmk helps me compare data and foresee issues."

"The most valuable features of Checkmk are its resource monitoring, infra monitoring, and log factor configuration."

"I really like the auto-discovery feature."

More Checkmk pros

"It is straightforward to configure, and you can quickly gather data from your infrastructure."

"I rate the stability of the product as ten on a scale of one to ten, indicating that it is very stable."

"The best features I've seen so far with DX NetOps are that it can work with large scale systems, and it has a lot of functionalities and matrices."

"A highly scalable solution."

"The AI is the best feature in this solution."

"The solution is stable."

"I like that it provides an overall view of our network. From the topology view to every event, we can view it. We can also see the interface utilization for future capacity planning. It fits our use case and environment."

"The product features include automation through AI, allowing out-of-the-box analysis of performance data, building baseline trends, and enabling configuration of dynamic thresholds relative to collected data."

More DX NetOps pros

Cons

"Sometimes we receive alerts, and it can become annoying when you acknowledge an alert. It is very clunky when you acknowledge the alert. The process is not very intuitive, and there are instances where it feels a bit cumbersome to acknowledge an alert."

"Checkmk does not work too easily with the PowerStore. I use a PowerShell script as Checkmk runs on Linux and a Windows system, connecting with the Checkmk agent."

"The initial setup is a bit complex."

"In Checkmk, the documentation can probably be improved a bit more."

"Checkmk does not allow running scripts at varying intervals."

"The main challenge for us is that we're moving from Nagios to Checkmk, and we're still getting used to the new way of working."

"I think that the integration and the exporting of the data collected are areas where Checkmk lacks but should try to improve the most."

"If an alert is generated for a specific pattern in the log, and if Checkmk catches that log, it will stay there even after the alert is resolved."

More Checkmk cons

"One improvement that could make the product better is to streamline its modules into a more cohesive solution."

"Lacks dashboards and better integration with other solutions."

"Technical support could be more responsive."

"The licensing cost of DX NetOps is expensive, not very affordable, and on the top of the price range in the market."

"Technical support needs to be better. They need to be more knowledgeable and responsive."

"It would be useful to have more AI features."

"It would be better if they had an NFA network analysis feature. We appreciate features like extended network security for bucket flows, but it would be better to have some IDs, IPS functionalities, DDoS, or something like that."

"The hardware requirements can be improved."

More DX NetOps cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of Checkmk is cheaper compared to other enterprise products."

"The product is affordable."

"Checkmk is a fairly reasonably priced solution."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Checkmk?

The most valuable feature of the solution is that it has a lot of different pieces, and they all work together...It is a very scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Checkmk?

I will get more information about Checkmk when the proof of concept is done. It's going to be before the summer. There will be a report about the tool and a recommendation to use it. So far, it loo...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Checkmk?

Checkmk ( /products/checkmk-reviews ) is a monitoring tool, so that's what I will use it for. Right now, it's not in production, but it's in a proof of concept phase. It looks good, so probably, du...

See all answers

What do you like most about DX NetOps?

It is straightforward to configure, and you can quickly gather data from your infrastructure.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for DX NetOps?

I think the pricing is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with DX NetOps?

We have not used the predictive analytics capability of DX NetOps in impacting our network management processes. My experience with using automated root cause analysis is that it tells the symptoms...

See all answers

Comparisons

Zabbix vs Checkmk

Compared 42% of the time

LibreNMS vs Checkmk

Compared 8% of the time

Icinga vs Checkmk

Compared 7% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Checkmk

Compared 5% of the time

Centreon vs Checkmk

Compared 4% of the time

More Checkmk Competitors

DX Spectrum vs DX NetOps

Compared 21% of the time

AppNeta by Broadcom vs DX NetOps

Compared 13% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs DX NetOps

Compared 11% of the time

vRealize Network Insight vs DX NetOps

Compared 10% of the time

ThousandEyes vs DX NetOps

Compared 9% of the time

More DX NetOps Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Checkmk

August 2025

Download Checkmk product report

Buyer's Guide

DX NetOps

August 2025

Download DX NetOps product report

Overview

Checkmk provides a comprehensive monitoring solution designed to streamline IT infrastructure management with features like auto-discovery, custom checks, and effective alerting.

Checkmk serves as a powerful tool for organizations managing large networks of servers, databases, and network appliances across multiple locations. It simplifies monitoring tasks with features like auto-discovery, custom scripting, and Slack integration. Users benefit from its resource monitoring capabilities and scalability, although there are areas for improvement, such as alert acknowledgment and greater usability. It supports both Linux and Windows environments, enabling effective oversight of IT infrastructure. The growing body of documentation enhances its adaptability in complex settings.

What are the key features of Checkmk?

Auto-Discovery: Identifies new hosts and applies monitoring rules automatically.
Custom Monitoring Checks: Tailor checks for databases and specific applications.
Slack Integration: Receive downtime alerts directly in Slack channels.
Automation for Scripts: Streamline repetitive tasks with scripts.
Effective Alerting System: Offers timely notifications on network activities.

What benefits can users expect?

Resource Efficiency: Saves time on configuration with automated features.
Scalability: Easily adapts to growing network and system requirements.
Cost-Effectiveness: Suitable option for budget-conscious users.
User-Friendly Setup: Easy to configure, reducing the learning curve.

Industries deploying Checkmk frequently utilize it for monitoring IT infrastructure, including servers and network appliances, to manage proactive issue identification and compliance. Companies employ it in the proof of concept phase or for ongoing monitoring, covering hosts, services, and custom application metrics.

Checkmk

DX NetOps by CA Technologies, a Broadcom company, improves your time to value through advanced AI capabilities and unified network visibility that delivers simplified NetOps intelligence into the user experience that traverses modern architectures. DX NetOps accomplishes this through high scale, unified network monitoring that enables full-stack analytics for assuring traditional and modern architectures. DX NetOps converts inventory, topology, device metrics, faults, flow and packet analysis into actionable intelligence for network operations teams. Complimented by our AIOps solution, DX NetOps enables IT teams to establish proactive, autonomous remediation capabilities across the applications, infrastructure, and networks that fuel superior user experiences.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Fujitsu

Buyer's Guide

Checkmk vs. DX NetOps

July 2025

Free Report: Checkmk vs. DX NetOps

Find out what your peers are saying about Checkmk vs. DX NetOps and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Checkmk vs. DX NetOps report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.