Checkmk vs DX NetOps comparison

Checkmk and Broadcom are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Checkmk is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.4, while Broadcom is ranked #44 with an average rating of 8.0. Checkmk holds a 3.8% mindshare in NMS, compared to Broadcom’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Checkmk users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Checkmk

Read 9 Checkmk reviews

3,526 Views
3,137 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

DX NetOps

Read 7 DX NetOps reviews

1,135 Views
676 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Checkmk

DX NetOps

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

DX NetOps and Checkmk are competing in network monitoring and management. Checkmk appears to have the upper hand due to its extensive feature set and perceived long-term ROI, despite DX NetOps' appealing pricing and support options.

Features: Checkmk offers flexibility, scalability, and a wide range of integrations, making it suitable for diverse environments. Its extensive customization options allow users to tailor the monitoring system to their specific needs. DX NetOps provides network visibility and comprehensive monitoring solutions, with an integrated suite offering performance analytics. Checkmk's adaptability and extensive feature set often outweigh the comprehensive suite provided by DX NetOps for those needing extensive customization.

Room for Improvement: Checkmk could enhance its user interface to make navigation more intuitive for new users. Improvements in documentation would benefit those seeking to leverage its full potential. Scaling could be more seamless as complexity increases. DX NetOps could improve deployment processes to make them more user-friendly and less intricate. Adding integration capabilities with more third-party tools would enhance its utility. Simplifying pricing models could make it easier for companies to evaluate long-term costs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Checkmk offers quick deployment with robust configuration options that effectively accommodate diverse environments, with customer service praised for being responsive and solution-oriented. DX NetOps provides a strong support infrastructure; however, its deployment process might be more complex, posing a challenge for some companies.

Pricing and ROI: DX NetOps is appealing to cost-sensitive organizations, with competitive pricing and good support for short-term solutions. Checkmk may have higher initial setup costs, but it is seen as providing better long-term ROI due to its versatility and high functionality, favoring those in complex environments over DX NetOps' budget-friendly nature.

To learn more, read our detailed Checkmk vs. DX NetOps Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Checkmk vs. DX NetOps

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Checkmk

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

11th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Server Monitoring (5th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (13th), Cloud Monitoring Software (12th)

DX NetOps

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

44th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AIOps (17th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Checkmk is 3.8%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of DX NetOps is 0.5%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Paolo Sala

Application performance and System monitoring at Agos

A reasonably priced tool for system and application monitoring

The main room for improvement is in the solution's presentation and the integration area. In our company, we use the integration capabilities from ServiceNow. We also have another big monitoring solution in place in our company, which is Dynatrace. At the moment, there doesn't exist an out-of-the-box integration for Dynatrace. I think that the integration and the exporting of the data collected are areas where Checkmk lacks but should try to improve the most. The only implementation of Checkmk that allows high availability is the virtual appliance that has the option for the availability of a different box. Otherwise, you have to find a way to implement it manually with some custom solution, which could be an improvement.

Read full review

Mark Tukh

Principal Presale Consultant at Ness Technologies

Leverages comprehensive network monitoring and AI-driven automation for enhanced performance analysis

There is a model for network traffic analysis in the NetOps product called NetOps Flow Analyzer. It provides all the necessary protocols and analysis. DX NetOps supports network monitoring across hybrid environments, though I hope it works out of the box. The product features include automation through AI, allowing out-of-the-box analysis of performance data, building baseline trends, and enabling configuration of dynamic thresholds relative to collected data.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Checkmk was built on a platform that was user-friendly, and I could build my charts easily."

"It's versatile, scalable, and easier to use compared to other solutions like Nagios and OMD."

"We can monitor multiple sites using the product."

"I really like the auto-discovery feature."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it has a lot of different pieces, and they all work together...It is a very scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"The most valuable features of Checkmk are its resource monitoring, infra monitoring, and log factor configuration."

"The initial setup of Checkmk was easy...It is a very stable solution."

"The alerting system in Checkmk really works properly."

More Checkmk pros

"The AI is the best feature in this solution."

"It is straightforward to configure, and you can quickly gather data from your infrastructure."

"The product features include automation through AI, allowing out-of-the-box analysis of performance data, building baseline trends, and enabling configuration of dynamic thresholds relative to collected data."

"I like that it provides an overall view of our network. From the topology view to every event, we can view it. We can also see the interface utilization for future capacity planning. It fits our use case and environment."

"A highly scalable solution."

"It's good for root cause analysis for network problems and network link problems."

"I rate the stability of the product as ten on a scale of one to ten, indicating that it is very stable."

"The solution is stable."

Cons

"Checkmk does not work too easily with the PowerStore. I use a PowerShell script as Checkmk runs on Linux and a Windows system, connecting with the Checkmk agent."

"The initial setup is a bit complex."

"The main challenge for us is that we're moving from Nagios to Checkmk, and we're still getting used to the new way of working."

"In Checkmk, the documentation can probably be improved a bit more."

"It is easy for tech-savvy people, but newcomers might find it intimidating."

"If an alert is generated for a specific pattern in the log, and if Checkmk catches that log, it will stay there even after the alert is resolved."

"Checkmk does not allow running scripts at varying intervals."

"Sometimes we receive alerts, and it can become annoying when you acknowledge an alert. It is very clunky when you acknowledge the alert. The process is not very intuitive, and there are instances where it feels a bit cumbersome to acknowledge an alert."

More Checkmk cons

"It would be better if they had an NFA network analysis feature. We appreciate features like extended network security for bucket flows, but it would be better to have some IDs, IPS functionalities, DDoS, or something like that."

"Technical support needs to be better. They need to be more knowledgeable and responsive."

"Lacks dashboards and better integration with other solutions."

"Technical support could be more responsive."

"One improvement that could make the product better is to streamline its modules into a more cohesive solution."

"The licensing cost of DX NetOps is expensive, not very affordable, and on the top of the price range in the market."

"It would be useful to have more AI features."

"The hardware requirements can be improved."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Checkmk is a fairly reasonably priced solution."

"The product is affordable."

"The price of Checkmk is cheaper compared to other enterprise products."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Government

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Checkmk?

The most valuable feature of the solution is that it has a lot of different pieces, and they all work together...It is a very scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Checkmk?

I will get more information about Checkmk when the proof of concept is done. It's going to be before the summer. There will be a report about the tool and a recommendation to use it. So far, it loo...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Checkmk?

Checkmk ( /products/checkmk-reviews ) is a monitoring tool, so that's what I will use it for. Right now, it's not in production, but it's in a proof of concept phase. It looks good, so probably, du...

See all answers

What do you like most about DX NetOps?

It is straightforward to configure, and you can quickly gather data from your infrastructure.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for DX NetOps?

The licensing cost of DX NetOps is expensive, not very affordable, and on the top of the price range in the market. However, there are no extra expenses in addition to the standard licensing fee.

See all answers

What needs improvement with DX NetOps?

It would be useful to have more AI features.

See all answers

Comparisons

Zabbix vs Checkmk

Compared 48% of the time

Icinga vs Checkmk

Compared 9% of the time

LibreNMS vs Checkmk

Compared 7% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Checkmk

Compared 4% of the time

Observium vs Checkmk

Compared 3% of the time

More Checkmk Competitors

DX Spectrum vs DX NetOps

Compared 35% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs DX NetOps

Compared 19% of the time

AppNeta by Broadcom vs DX NetOps

Compared 15% of the time

vRealize Network Insight vs DX NetOps

Compared 12% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs DX NetOps

Compared 11% of the time

More DX NetOps Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Checkmk

April 2025

Download Checkmk product report

Buyer's Guide

DX NetOps

April 2025

Download DX NetOps product report

Overview

Checkmk is a powerful tool for monitoring IT infrastructure, providing vital insights on servers, databases, network devices, and custom applications.

Primarily used for supervising IT infrastructure, Checkmk helps organizations ensure service availability by monitoring hosts, processes, load, storage, and network appliances. With support for both Linux and Windows environments across multiple data centers, Checkmk performs compliance checks and preserves historical data for core network devices.

What are the key features of Checkmk?

Auto-discovery: Automatically identifies new hosts and applies monitoring rules.
Custom monitoring: Enhances MySQL performance tracking.
Slack integration: Provides immediate downtime alerts.
Graphical trend analysis: Offers 400 days of trend data.
Multiple site monitoring: Ensures seamless data synchronization through task automation.
Resource and infrastructure monitoring: Configures log factors to fit budget constraints.
System metric imports: Includes servers, SQL, file systems, and application monitoring.

What benefits and ROI should users look for in reviews?

Time-saving: Auto-discovery and task automation streamline processes.
Proactive alerts: Immediate downtime notifications optimize response times.
Historical insights: Long-term graphical trend analysis aids strategic planning.
Cost efficiency: Resource monitoring aligned with budget constraints.

Checkmk is deployed extensively in large enterprise environments for monitoring critical infrastructure. It proves particularly useful under conditions of frequent power outages or network issues, helping maintain smooth operations. While the alert acknowledgment process and interface require improvements, and the lack of an agent-less platform complicates server management, the strengths in auto-discovery, integration, and comprehensive monitoring make Checkmk a strong contender for IT infrastructure monitoring.

Checkmk

DX NetOps by CA Technologies, a Broadcom company, improves your time to value through advanced AI capabilities and unified network visibility that delivers simplified NetOps intelligence into the user experience that traverses modern architectures. DX NetOps accomplishes this through high scale, unified network monitoring that enables full-stack analytics for assuring traditional and modern architectures. DX NetOps converts inventory, topology, device metrics, faults, flow and packet analysis into actionable intelligence for network operations teams. Complimented by our AIOps solution, DX NetOps enables IT teams to establish proactive, autonomous remediation capabilities across the applications, infrastructure, and networks that fuel superior user experiences.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Fujitsu

Buyer's Guide

Checkmk vs. DX NetOps

April 2025

Free Report: Checkmk vs. DX NetOps

Find out what your peers are saying about Checkmk vs. DX NetOps and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Checkmk vs. DX NetOps report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.