

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention and Check Point WAF compete in the data security sector, focusing on data loss prevention and application security, respectively. Check Point WAF appears to have the upper hand due to its AI-driven threat prevention and superior accuracy in minimizing false positives.
Features: Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention offers unified DLP across Microsoft 365 environments, integration with sensitivity labels, and native endpoint integration. Check Point WAF provides AI-driven threat prevention, protection against OWASP Top 10 threats, and advanced threat intelligence without relying on signatures.
Room for Improvement: Microsoft Purview needs enhancements in policy tuning, third-party app coverage, and reporting interfaces. Check Point WAF could improve its user interface, reduce setup complexity, and better integrate with DevOps pipelines.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Purview integrates smoothly with cloud environments, but customer support experiences vary. Check Point WAF supports various cloud environments but has a steeper learning curve. Its customer service is considered satisfactory.
Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention can be expensive as an add-on to Microsoft 365 E5 but offers good ROI through reduced data leaks. Check Point WAF is on the higher end of the pricing spectrum but provides significant security benefits and a reduction in false positives, justifying its cost.
When we are attacked, we can understand how important the solution is.
When you migrate to the cloud, it feels like saving 90% of your time.
Most of the operations happen in the background, so I do not spend much time on it.
We save a lot of time for legal by using Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention when searching data for legal and HR and employee issues.
I have also seen fewer accidental data sharing incidents, improved audit readiness, and increased the efficiency of the security team without needing additional headcount.
In these days of data breaches and data leakages that result in huge regulatory fines, we have not had any data breaches that could result in such fines.
They need to increase the number of people for 24/7 support.
They were responsive even before we committed to buying their solution.
I also received full technical support, especially during the implementation.
I rate it a ten because they are very quick to respond and very quick to escalate if needed.
Once we got to the Microsoft engineers, the experience was great.
In terms of support, it's top-notch and always available to help us with any support issues we raise.
If I need to scale, I open a Whatsapp group with the director and the team, and we quickly proceed to do so.
They have sufficient resources, and there are no challenges from a scalability perspective.
Check Point CloudGuard WAF's scalability is very good.
The policy working and detection technology need enhancements.
Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention scales well with the growing needs of our organization.
Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention scales effectively.
It is very stable.
It is very stable, never crashing or giving me an error that I can see.
I did not have any issues in the last three years during which I had more than ten critical services running on CloudGuard.
I would assess the stability and reliability of Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention as high.
The stability and reliability of Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention is great.
I assess the stability and reliability of Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention as quite good because I don't think it's ever gone down, unlike other parts of Azure.
The provider could improve by providing better guidance and support during the configuration process.
Future releases should include better bot mitigation, behavioral anomaly detection, compliance templates, advanced threat intel integration, and streamlined multi-cloud support to boost protection and usability.
A machine learning-based adaptive mode could help the WAF learn over time and auto-tune policies.
Business Premium users can get the data loss prevention features of E5, which is fantastic.
Implementing a degree of severity ranking is essential.
More guides, more examples, and more compliance frameworks such as NIST or even PCI compliance would be great.
It is more expensive than f5, where we purchased everything as bundles, and Check Point costs more, but it is worth the money.
It is less costly than Cloudflare, Fortinet, and other vendors.
I know that its price is relatively expensive compared to other products but it gives benefits that are worth it.
In terms of pricing, I would say it's unlimited value because it's bundled in our A5 and E5 licensing situation.
The pricing for Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention is generally set; E5 is required, but it comes with all other products, so I would say it is fine.
Advanced DLP and insider risk features became expensive when we scaled at the enterprise level.
Upon implementation and evaluation with third-party penetration testing, it meets rigorous security standards required for dealing with financial institutions.
It can protect against zero-day attacks and hidden anomalies.
The solution preemptively blocks zero-day attacks and detects hidden anomalies effectively.
Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention prevents users from sharing sensitive information outside the organization based on the configurations that we've implemented.
Microsoft Purview has helped improve our organization's ability to discover sensitive data significantly as we use eDiscovery Purview, which is incredibly helpful.
It finds social security numbers in the files when we scan for it, so that we can prevent those from leaving the company.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention | 6.1% |
| Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) | 0.7% |
| Other | 93.2% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 54 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 23 |
| Large Enterprise | 34 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 17 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 7 |
| Large Enterprise | 15 |
Check Point WAF offers a robust security framework with AI-driven threat detection and seamless integration, protecting applications and APIs in multi-cloud environments.
Effective in preemptively blocking threats through AI and machine learning, Check Point WAF reduces false positives and operational workload. Its integration capabilities and threat intelligence provide comprehensive protection against zero-day attacks, while centralized management facilitates cost-effective and insightful threat reporting.
What are the main features of Check Point WAF?Check Point WAF is employed in industries securing web applications and APIs, especially in multi-cloud environments. It effectively protects backend services, prevents unauthorized access, and monitors traffic, making it suitable for businesses with diverse infrastructures. It ensures compliance with security standards and adapts to fluctuating traffic patterns.
Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention helps businesses protect sensitive data through robust compliance automation and seamless multi-platform integration, supporting environments like Office 365, Azure, iOS, Android, and macOS.
Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention focuses on identifying sensitive data and maintaining compliance through automation and integration with platforms such as Exchange email, SharePoint, OneDrive, and Teams. Auto-labeling, classification controls, and monitoring capabilities ensure secure data management, reducing insider threat response times by 25%. While praised for its capabilities, improvements in system integration, endpoint handling, and incident management are needed. Licensing costs and limited language support pose challenges. Usability can be enhanced through interface updates and better documentation. OCR and scalability enhancements could improve policy propagation speed. More end-user training examples would be beneficial.
What are the key features?In industries such as finance, healthcare, and legal, Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention is crucial for safeguarding sensitive information due to strict compliance demands. It automates data classification and policy configurations, preventing accidental data leakage and ensuring security protocols align with regulatory standards.
We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.