We performed a comparison between Check Point Remote Access VPN and SecureLink based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenVPN, Fortinet, Cisco and others in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN."It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"The solution has good performance."
"To maintain the authorization of the connected user, Check Point provides multi-factor authentication for an RA VPN client to make sure legitimate users have access to resources."
"The solution has been solid for me for over five years."
"I found the MEP feature the most valuable. This has improved users' latency allowing the users to connect to the nearest Azure Check Point VM."
"Scalability is great. We have been able to grow as a corporation due in part to this type of solution."
"It is easy to install the Endpoint Remote Access VPN client to different platforms."
"The solution offers great security features, including zero-day protection, malware protection, anti-phishing, et cetera."
"For a basic setup, implementation is quite easy."
"The security of the solution is a good feature, the stability is a valuable feature, and the customization is also a nice feature."
"The most valuable feature is synchronizing the limited access for partners or sub-contractors."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"I would like the support to be faster."
"You have no ability to reserve a total number of licenses. The VPN user licenses are assigned per gateway, and if you enable MEP function is not so easy to size the gateway licenses."
"The ability to allow split-tunneling while still following our corporate policy needs to be on the table."
"The client-side UI is fundamental, and there is nothing to see."
"We encounter challenges for the product’s installation and troubleshooting processes compared to other VPN products."
"The main feature that would be improved within Check Point Remote Access is its operation within Linux OS, as it currently does not have many features for that OS."
"We have noted some stability issues."
"Sometimes we have some small problems with Check Point Remote Access VPN. For example, problems with authentication."
"The security features offered in SecureLink are not enough."
More Check Point Remote Access VPN Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Check Point Remote Access VPN is ranked 6th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 57 reviews while SecureLink is ranked 38th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN. Check Point Remote Access VPN is rated 8.8, while SecureLink is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Check Point Remote Access VPN writes "Is easy to use and has a nice interface, but the scalability needs to improve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SecureLink writes "Efficient technical support with good synchronization features, but it needs better security". Check Point Remote Access VPN is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server, Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, Check Point Harmony Mobile, Fortinet FortiClient and Zscaler Private Access, whereas SecureLink is most compared with Citrix Gateway, OpenVPN Access Server, Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway, Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client and Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks.
See our list of best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.