Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Check Point Remote Access VPN vs SecureLink comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 13, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Check Point Remote Access VPN
Ranking in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN
5th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
76
Ranking in other categories
Remote Access (6th)
SecureLink
Ranking in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN
33rd
Average Rating
7.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Enterprise Infrastructure VPN category, the mindshare of Check Point Remote Access VPN is 3.8%, down from 3.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SecureLink is 0.7%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Infrastructure VPN Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Check Point Remote Access VPN3.8%
SecureLink0.7%
Other95.5%
Enterprise Infrastructure VPN
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2751156 - PeerSpot reviewer
Centralized user management reduces administrative costs and improves deployment speed
They could make Check Point Remote Access VPN easier to integrate with Entra ID and Azure, so that we can use Azure roles together with the VPN. The documentation on how to integrate is out of date, not maintained, and not really supported from Check Point's side. It's a great and stable VPN service that could benefit from more and better features, such as Active Directory or Entra ID integrations.
FS
Efficient technical support with good synchronization features, but it needs better security
We would like to be to secure access to all of the servers for all of the internal workers and engineers. We would like to have tools that provide us with security for our servers. I would like to see an improved repository to better see the users. We have a new project that requires a lot of security we will not continue with SecureLink. The security features offered in SecureLink are not enough.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Our number of users working remotely vastly increased during the COVID 19 pandemic. Check Point Remote Access VPN allowed us to quickly make the transition from in-office to remote work."
"We use it to connect our sites. We have a couple of sites that need to interconnect."
"Once we install and connect the VPN service, it keeps on running until we disconnect."
"Organizations that already use the Check Point NGFW Solution do not require any additional hardware, which makes the implementation straightforward and reduces the time to go live."
"The product's initial setup phase was easy."
"The complexity is hidden within a full mesh network, allowing seamless user-to-application connectivity with minimal delay."
"Our users find the interface very comfortable to use."
"It operates effectively, particularly during challenges like adversities or infrastructure issues."
"The most valuable feature is synchronizing the limited access for partners or sub-contractors."
 

Cons

"The interface itself needs improvement. When you need to create something, you have to go through a lot of steps. It needs to be simplified."
"Compliance Check on Check Point should be improved by having more configurable conditions to support multi-platforms and adding more granularity."
"There is always room for innovation and the addition of new features."
"Check Point Remote Access VPN's connectivity and establishment takes time and needs to be faster."
"Sometimes we have some small problems with Check Point Remote Access VPN. For example, problems with authentication."
"Generally, the license is included with the Check Point gateway licensing, however, in terms of the number of users that can be activated for use, it is generally five users."
"Check Point Remote Access VPN handles up to a hundred megabytes for clients, but I want it to be able to handle up to one gigabyte."
"Without a doubt and with the new trends in technology, Check Point should already have a blade with a 2MFA solution and not through some other vendor."
"The security features offered in SecureLink are not enough."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Organizations that already have the Check Point NGFW need to purchase an additional license to have access to the VPN functionality."
"I can say that the licensing costs are charged annually."
"My understanding is that the pricing and licensing are very competitive, and it's not one of their more expensive products. We buy licenses for the solution and have licenses for the endpoint servers."
"The solution is pretty expensive. The rating is an eight."
"The price of this product is good."
"I give the price of the solution a five out of ten."
"There is a license required for this solution."
"The product is expensive. I rate its pricing a ten out of ten. For the cost of one product, we could purchase two or three Fortinet solutions with the same amount of money."
"We are not happy with the recent increase in the price."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Infrastructure VPN solutions are best for your needs.
867,445 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Government
7%
Healthcare Company
31%
Performing Arts
8%
Non Profit
6%
Media Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business33
Midsize Enterprise32
Large Enterprise33
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Check Point Endpoint Remote Access VPN?
They could make Check Point Remote Access VPN easier to integrate with Entra ID and Azure, so that we can use Azure roles together with the VPN. The documentation on how to integrate is out of date...
What is your primary use case for Check Point Endpoint Remote Access VPN?
We have been using Check Point Remote Access VPN for about a year. We use Check Point Remote Access VPN as the main way to access resources inside our data centers. We have tied it together with th...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Check Point Remote Access VPN, Check Point Endpoint Remote Access VPN
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Osmose, International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW)
NISC, Sotera Wireless, InterSystems, Allscripts, Cerner, Allscripts
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, OpenVPN, Cisco and others in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN. Updated: August 2025.
867,445 professionals have used our research since 2012.