Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs TitanHQ SpamTitan comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 9, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.4
Check Point Harmony SASE users report cost savings, improved security, and productivity, with benefits often outweighing expenses despite ROI challenges.
Sentiment score
7.8
SpamTitan enhances security, reduces spam, cuts IT workload, and boosts productivity with minimal maintenance, proving cost-effective for users.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) blocked access to those URLs at the network level before users could click through.
We are saving 40% of our time, which is good.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.1
Check Point Harmony SASE's customer service is professional and knowledgeable, but response times vary, especially for complex issues.
Sentiment score
7.9
TitanHQ SpamTitan support is praised for responsiveness, expertise, and efficient issue resolution, making it a preferred choice.
I would rate support 10 out of 10.
After updating firmware, data utilization was visible for a few days before collapsing again.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.2
Check Point Harmony SASE is easily scalable and deployable, highly rated for performance and security across diverse organizations.
Sentiment score
7.7
SpamTitan offers scalable, seamless integration for all company sizes, handling growth smoothly without performance issues or service disruptions.
The cloud-native model ensures we are not tied to any specific location or hardware, which has been a great game changer in terms of agility.
The scalability of Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) is good, and I can add more users and devices easily as my organization grows.
I would rate it nine out of ten for scalability.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.7
Check Point Harmony SASE is reliable with minimal downtime, praised security, minor bugs, and ratings of seven to ten.
Sentiment score
8.0
Users praise TitanHQ SpamTitan's strong reliability and stability, with minimal downtime and issues quickly resolved.
Even the support team does not have a proper solution for this issue.
After the last improvement, I can say it is much more stable now.
There are some lags and glitches with connectivity, so I would rate the stability as between seven or eight out of ten.
TitanHQ SpamTitan's stability is impeccable.
 

Room For Improvement

Check Point Harmony SASE needs interface, networking improvements, better integration, enhanced features, documentation, and support for diverse user needs.
SpamTitan struggles with an outdated interface, limited features, sluggish performance, and high false positives, frustrating users.
An example of when the support cycle took longer than expected was when I had a ticket open for nearly six to seven months regarding a simple issue.
A local data center in Turkey would enhance the product, as currently, our Internet traffic goes to another country, which is problematic for us.
One area for improvement is integration with third-party identity providers.
The user interface needed improvement, but we've just updated it. It looks really modern now, and it's a lot easier to use.
 

Setup Cost

Check Point Harmony SASE offers flexible pricing, valuable for larger organizations, but requires a minimum of 50 users.
TitanHQ SpamTitan is affordable, offering competitive pricing for both businesses and educational institutions, with straightforward licensing and no hidden costs.
Cost efficiency is a consideration, as SASE products are not the cheapest security products.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) is that it is a rental service, but I find it satisfactory.
It is a bit expensive.
It is rated highly because of its affordability and its great value.
 

Valuable Features

Check Point Harmony SASE offers secure VPN, multi-factor authentication, Zero Trust, and robust threat protection for efficient and streamlined management.
SpamTitan offers robust spam and virus protection with customizable management, powerful filtering, and extensive reporting features for enhanced security.
The biggest win for us has been the visibility and control. We now know what is happening across all branches and users, regardless of their location, and we can respond to threats in real time.
The firewall management is the most valuable feature for me.
The best key features of Harmony are stabilization, private access, and Internet access.
The most valuable features of TitanHQ SpamTitan are how effective it is and how little maintenance it requires.
 

Categories and Ranking

Check Point Harmony SASE (f...
Ranking in Anti-Malware Tools
8th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
61
Ranking in other categories
Secure Web Gateways (SWG) (6th), Firewalls (16th), Enterprise Infrastructure VPN (7th), ZTNA as a Service (5th), ZTNA (5th), Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) (7th)
TitanHQ SpamTitan
Ranking in Anti-Malware Tools
9th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
80
Ranking in other categories
Email Security (13th), Office 365 Protection (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Anti-Malware Tools category, the mindshare of Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) is 0.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TitanHQ SpamTitan is 0.6%, down from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Anti-Malware Tools
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer8099174 - PeerSpot reviewer
Secure access with an intuitive design and straightforward controls
In terms of improvement, Perimeter 81 could enhance its reporting and analytics capabilities to provide more detailed insights into network activity. Additionally, expanding integration options with a broader range of third-party tools would be beneficial for seamless compatibility with various existing systems. As for additional features in the next release, it would be great to see advanced threat detection and response capabilities integrated into the platform. This would further enhance security by proactively identifying and mitigating potential threats. Additionally, improved mobile device management features and more comprehensive user behavior analytics would be valuable additions to meet evolving cybersecurity needs.
George Kajaia - PeerSpot reviewer
Work hours are not lost searching through spam emails to determine which emails are legitimate
In history on the reporting graph, when you are trying to search for sender by address, it won't search by domain. I could send an email from SendGrid with my domain, but with SpamTitan, if you search by that domain then it wouldn't search it. It only searches from the field, not in the envelope field. Unfortunately, mass mailing companies, like SendGrid, send email with the form address and that completely differs from the domain envelope form address. There is no way to search for the envelope form. So, I gave them an idea to improve this filtering. For example, if I have to search an email sent by SendGrid, then I am forced to search by the recipient, then find the emails marked as spam. This is quite a huge hassle. They told me that they are aware of this and will try to add it, but they haven't added it yet. I would like to implement a secondary delivery pool for mass mailings, having an alternate pool for mass mailing lists since there is only a single mail queue with SpamTitan. For example, if 10,000 emails are being sent, then the queue will be large. Unfortunately, without a secondary delivery pool, legitimate emails will wait in the queue to be delivered to my email. Therefore, I would like to have two queues: one for everyday emails and another for mass mailings. Now, I have to decide whether to buy a second SpamTitan license just for this reason because I am very satisfied with the functionality of SpamTitan overall and don't want to use another sender's appliance for this. From 2020 to 2021, there was a huge switch in the types of spam coming in. SpamTitan's anti-spam should be enabled to catch this spam. The spam catching rate went down over the last three to four years. I think this is because spammers are evolving and using different methods to send spam emails. The phishing rate of SpamTitan is not great, even Exchange Online Protection catches phishing better than SpamTitan. The most worrying are the phishing emails. I would like SpamTitan to upgrade and improve the phishing catch rate. The sandbox of the Bitdefender engine is not working correctly. They sent me an email that they pulled it because it was not working as it was intended to work. So, they are working on this as well, and maybe the sandbox will be fixed. The sandbox is for viruses. If something goes through then it is sent to the sandbox for analysis. However, I am not using the sandbox right now. I am just quarantining this type of attachment right away.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Anti-Malware Tools solutions are best for your needs.
852,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
19%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Comms Service Provider
5%
Computer Software Company
21%
Manufacturing Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
6%
Comms Service Provider
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Perimeter 81?
Even after restarting, it tries to quickly reestablish connection which is very helpful.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Perimeter 81?
It's essential to consider the organization's specific requirements and budget. Here are some general recommendations: * Evaluate your needs * Understand pricing models * Request a quote * Compare ...
What needs improvement with Perimeter 81?
In terms of improvement, Perimeter 81 could enhance its reporting and analytics capabilities to provide more detailed insights into network activity. Additionally, expanding integration options wit...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for TitanHQ SpamTitan?
The pricing model is reasonable money for the product. It is rated highly because of its affordability and its great value.
What needs improvement with TitanHQ SpamTitan?
If you had asked me a few weeks ago, I would have said the user interface needed improvement, but we've just updated it. It looks really modern now, and it's a lot easier to use. At the moment, I d...
 

Also Known As

Check Point Quantum SASE
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Aqua Security, Cognito, Multipoint, Kustomer, Postman, Meredith
De Montfort University, Scope Services, Park County School District, NRC, Quality Smith, Toyota, CarTrawler, Videotron
Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. TitanHQ SpamTitan and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
852,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.