Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning comparison

Check Point Software Technologies and Tenable are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. Check Point Software Technologies is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.8, while Tenable is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.5. Check Point Software Technologies holds a 0.3% mindshare in AS, compared to Tenable’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Check Point Software Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Tenable users who would recommend it.

Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Read 48 Check Point CloudGuard WAF reviews

1,844 Views
443 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Tenable.io Web Application ...

Read 17 Tenable.io Web Application Scanning reviews

1,889 Views
1,492 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Tenable.io Web Application ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Tenable.io Web Application Scanning and Check Point CloudGuard WAF compete in the cybersecurity domain. While Tenable.io is favored for affordability and support, Check Point CloudGuard WAF's robust features make it a preferred investment.

Features: Tenable.io Web Application Scanning offers comprehensive scanning capabilities, integration options, and high precision vulnerability detection. Check Point CloudGuard WAF excels in advanced threat prevention mechanisms, real-time defense, and adaptive threat intelligence. Users believe CloudGuard's features are more advanced, giving it an edge in robustness.

Room for Improvement: Tenable.io could improve by enhancing speed, user configurability, and interface design. Check Point CloudGuard WAF users seek more intuitive management tools, improved documentation, and streamlined user interfaces. The suggested improvements for Tenable.io are deemed more critical for user satisfaction.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is noted for a smooth deployment process with reliable support. Check Point CloudGuard WAF involves a more complex setup but remains manageable due to comprehensive support channels and available resources. Tenable.io is seen as easier to deploy, though CloudGuard's complexity is offset by thorough support.

Pricing and ROI: Tenable.io is recognized for cost-effectiveness and satisfactory ROI, appealing to budget-conscious users. Check Point CloudGuard WAF, with higher initial costs, justifies its pricing through significant ROI linked to advanced protection. Users feel CloudGuard offers substantial security benefits, making it worthy of its premium positioning.

To learn more, read our detailed Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Ranking in Application Security Tools

7th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Web Application Firewall (WAF) (10th)

Tenable.io Web Application ...

Ranking in Application Security Tools

18th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Check Point CloudGuard WAF is 0.3%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is 1.3%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Check Point CloudGuard WAF	0.3%
Tenable.io Web Application Scanning	1.3%
Other	98.4%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Dialungana Malungo

Principal Cybersecurity Specialist at Unitel S.A.

Protects our web applications and APIs and has a very low false positive rate

CloudGuard WAF is a very straightforward solution. I do not have to worry about signatures. Most of the solutions that are out there are mainly based on signatures, and I have to do a lot of maintenance to get the signature updates, and sometimes, due to a lack of resources, I am not able to do so. With CloudGuard WAF, I have peace of mind, because most of the features are AI-based, and there is not much configuration that needs to be done on my side. Once set, I only go to CloudGuard WAF to check. I do not have to worry about signatures or updates. Everything is done perfectly, and I have a sense of peace because I know our applications are safe. It is very important for us that CloudGuard WAF protects our applications against threats without relying on signatures. That is definitely one of the key features I need.

Read full review

Jahanzeb Feroze Khan

Assistant Manager Network Security at Institute of Business Administration, Karachi

The setup of the solution is straightforward. It involves installing the package and gaining access. It took no time at all since we deployed it on the cloud. We assigned the necessary configurations, and everything was set up and ready to go within a few seconds. I would rate the setup as a perfect ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It offers good functionality of the application that is currently running."

"It is a very scalable and stable solution."

"It provides advanced analytics that gives each team time to prepare for any threat that might occur in the future."

"The most valuable feature we have found in Check Point CloudGuard WAF is its rich logging capabilities."

"After integrating AppSec with other applications, team members can easily work without fear of confidential information exposure."

"The tool's most valuable feature is AI, which makes operations easier. Moreover, it is easy to deploy."

"I find the configuration and real-time monitoring features valuable."

"They offer free trials, which is quite appreciative and grabs more attention from new users and businesses."

More Check Point CloudGuard WAF pros

"Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is very easy to use."

"The solution's instant reports feature is the most effective for detecting threats."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"Our customers adopt this solution because of the replication testing and the vulnerability assessment it can do. It is a multi-faceted product."

"We can get detailed information about vulnerabilities."

"Tenable.io Web Application Scanning provides a detailed report, identifying functions that are complex and need to be more maintainable and readable."

"The most effective feature of the product is the ability to scan the entire environment."

"It collects the vulnerabilities on the hostnames and sends them to the Tenable.io cloud. Tenable has its own cloud where Tenable.io is running, but there are many connectors to other cloud solutions. Tenable can do vulnerability scanning for other cloud managers such as Azure, Amazon, and so on."

More Tenable.io Web Application Scanning pros

Cons

"For the next release, I would suggest considering features like enhanced threat intelligence integration."

"In terms of features, I do not have any negatives. Their integration is extremely quick. It is better than others I have been involved with in the past. Their pricing model, however, can be better."

"The creation of security profiles for each application takes a lot of time."

"You need to know exactly the system. You cannot have someone running the system if they don't have the knowledge to do so."

"I am pretty happy with the current version. I have not yet used it to its full potential, but there could be improvements as I explore it further."

"The coding configurations can be simplified to save time for IT teams and developers."

"Check Point CloudGuard WAF can be improved; initially, the setup is very complicated, and there's not a lot of documentation available, plus it didn't have something for anti-bot, but other than that, it is fine."

"We would like to have a solution of this type for the administration of applications from mobile devices."

More Check Point CloudGuard WAF cons

"The platform's technical support services could be better."

"The solution's dashboards could be improved and made more user-friendly."

"Tenable.io Web Application Scanning could improve by offering faster fuzzing."

"Tenable.io Web Application Scanning conducts a general scan, which wastes time. The scan needs to be specific."

"It would be great if there were a dashboard that is more user-friendly."

"The cloud and the on-premises versions have their own controllers, and there is no way to centrally manage controllers."

"The technical support should be improved. Currently, some attacks are detected while others are not."

"Sometimes it lags with different cloud environments."

More Tenable.io Web Application Scanning cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool's licensing costs are yearly and competitive."

"The sales team or account managers from Check Point are top-notch. As I am using other products as well, my pricing was competitive compared to others."

"I work for an Indian banking client. In India, companies are on a budget. The company liked Check Point very much, but it was a little bit costly compared to FortiWeb. However, it had more features compared to FortiWeb."

"Considering all the benefits we've observed, we find the price to be satisfactory."

"As Infiniti customers, the pricing is manageable, as we have allowances dedicated to each Check Point product. The price is not as high compared to other options I have dealt with in the past."

"Check Point CloudGuard Application Security's pricing is not friendly."

"If the pricing for the Infinity platform covers everything, it would be more straightforward. I had a hard time selling it to our CEO as a former CFO because of the differentials. There are different deltas year to year over a five-year period. It is very difficult to explain. It would be easier to digest for our executives if there was a flatter scale"

"It is not cheap, but it is worth it."

More Check Point CloudGuard WAF pricing and cost advice

"I rate the product's pricing a four out of ten."

"The price of the solution is reasonable compared to the competitors. The license cost is based on the number of users and the annual usage."

"The pricing is okay."

"Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is expensive for small businesses."

"The application is extremely affordable. There are no additional costs involved with licensing. We switched to Tenable.io Web Application Scanning from other solutions due to pricing."

"For Tenable.io Web Application Scanning, it comes to around 6,50,000 Indian rupees, plus taxes."

"It follows the same licensing scheme as Tenable.io and Tenable. sc."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

20%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

Government

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

12%

Government

10%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	25
Midsize Enterprise	18
Large Enterprise	16

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about CloudGuard for Application Security?

We have not had any incidents. We could realize its benefits immediately. We watched and monitored the traffic, and it was amazing to see the results.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudGuard for Application Security?

I don't know about the pricing, setup cost, or licensing for Check Point CloudGuard WAF, as I don't manage costs.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudGuard for Application Security?

Check Point CloudGuard WAF can be improved; initially, the setup is very complicated, and there's not a lot of documentation available, plus it didn't have something for anti-bot, but other than th...

See all answers

What do you like most about Tenable.io Web Application Scanning?

The most effective feature of the product is the ability to scan the entire environment.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tenable.io Web Application Scanning?

Improvements could include providing coverage reports in the free version and features related to security reports. Also, enhancing technical support would be beneficial as there is room for improv...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Tenable.io Web Application Scanning?

I would recommend Tenable.io Web Application Scanning as it provides us with good reports, which help improve our code base, despite the lack of financial benefits. Overall, I would rate it seven o...

See all answers

Comparisons

Imperva Application Security Platform vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Compared 19% of the time

F5 Advanced WAF vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Compared 14% of the time

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Compared 11% of the time

open-appsec vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Compared 10% of the time

More Check Point CloudGuard WAF Competitors

Acunetix vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 18% of the time

Qualys Web Application Scanning vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 10% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 8% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 8% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 7% of the time

More Tenable.io Web Application Scanning Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Check Point CloudGuard WAF

October 2025

Download Check Point CloudGuard WAF product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

September 2025

Tenable.io Web Application Scanning report

Download Tenable.io Web Application Scanning product report

Also Known As

Check Point CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard AppSec

No data available

Overview

Check Point CloudGuard WAF offers advanced security for web applications and APIs with features such as intrusion prevention, bot prevention, and AI-driven threat detection, ensuring organizations achieve high-level protection and efficient security management.

Check Point CloudGuard WAF integrates with APIs, providing a seamless security enhancement while reducing false positives. Its scalability supports rapid deployment, valuable for companies aiming to secure resources in clouds like AWS and Azure. Enhanced threat prevention, comprehensive compliance support, and advanced threat protection methods such as SQL injection and cross-site scripting prevention are key strengths. Despite its robust capabilities, there are opportunities for improvement, such as lower costs, improved third-party tool integration, and a more intuitive interface to enhance usability.

What are the key features of Check Point CloudGuard WAF?

Intrusion Prevention System: Effectively detects and blocks unauthorized access attempts.
Bot Prevention: Shields applications from malicious bot traffic.
AI-driven Threat Detection: Uses advanced algorithms to identify and mitigate threats.
Log Management: Offers extensive logging capabilities for tracking and analysis.
Scalability: Supports rapid deployment across different environments, including multi-cloud.

What benefits should users expect from Check Point CloudGuard WAF?

Security Efficiency: Combines high-grade protection with ease of use to simplify security management.
Cost Efficiency: Aids in effective resource utilization, minimizing overhead.
Compliance Support: Helps meet various industry standards effortlessly.
Enhanced Threat Protection: Provides robust safeguards against common web vulnerabilities.

Check Point CloudGuard WAF is predominantly applied within industries requiring stringent security standards, such as financial services, healthcare, and e-commerce. Its deployment strengthens the defense of critical APIs, facilitates compliance, and supports efficient multi-cloud security management, aligning well with evolving industry demands.

Check Point Software Technologies

Tenable.io Web Application Scanning safely, accurately and automatically scans your web applications, providing deep visibility into vulnerabilities and valuable context to prioritize remediation.

Tenable

Sample Customers

Orange España, Paschoalotto

IMDEX

Buyer's Guide

Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

September 2025

Free Report: Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.