Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning comparison

Check Point Software Technologies and Tenable are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. Check Point Software Technologies is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.9, while Tenable is ranked #20 with an average rating of 8.5. Check Point Software Technologies holds a 0.5% mindshare in AS, compared to Tenable’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Check Point Software Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Tenable users who would recommend it.

Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Read 55 Check Point CloudGuard WAF reviews

3,329 Views
766 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Tenable.io Web Application ...

Read 18 Tenable.io Web Application Scanning reviews

2,265 Views
1,835 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Tenable.io Web Application ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Tenable.io Web Application Scanning and Check Point CloudGuard WAF compete in the cybersecurity domain. While Tenable.io is favored for affordability and support, Check Point CloudGuard WAF's robust features make it a preferred investment.

Features: Tenable.io Web Application Scanning offers comprehensive scanning capabilities, integration options, and high precision vulnerability detection. Check Point CloudGuard WAF excels in advanced threat prevention mechanisms, real-time defense, and adaptive threat intelligence. Users believe CloudGuard's features are more advanced, giving it an edge in robustness.

Room for Improvement: Tenable.io could improve by enhancing speed, user configurability, and interface design. Check Point CloudGuard WAF users seek more intuitive management tools, improved documentation, and streamlined user interfaces. The suggested improvements for Tenable.io are deemed more critical for user satisfaction.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is noted for a smooth deployment process with reliable support. Check Point CloudGuard WAF involves a more complex setup but remains manageable due to comprehensive support channels and available resources. Tenable.io is seen as easier to deploy, though CloudGuard's complexity is offset by thorough support.

Pricing and ROI: Tenable.io is recognized for cost-effectiveness and satisfactory ROI, appealing to budget-conscious users. Check Point CloudGuard WAF, with higher initial costs, justifies its pricing through significant ROI linked to advanced protection. Users feel CloudGuard offers substantial security benefits, making it worthy of its premium positioning.

To learn more, read our detailed Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,444 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Ranking in Application Security Tools

4th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Web Application Firewall (WAF) (8th)

Tenable.io Web Application ...

Ranking in Application Security Tools

20th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Check Point CloudGuard WAF is 0.5%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is 1.4%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Check Point CloudGuard WAF	0.5%
Tenable.io Web Application Scanning	1.4%
Other	98.1%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

KrishnakumarM

CISO at Pink Solutions

Cloud security has strengthened risk posture and improved advanced threat visibility

There are some API gateway and API securities I mentioned. If these are incorporated with AI-related features, particularly those seven key vulnerabilities I mentioned—token theft and tool poisoning—that would be beneficial. AI-related features are not included yet in Check Point CloudGuard WAF. However, they are present in FortiGate. That is the advantage of FortiGate now. FortiGate is stopping all AI-related vulnerabilities now. FortiGate has this capability. It is unfortunate that even Palo Alto also lacks one or two of these features. Check Point Quantum is very good, without a doubt. However, their capabilities are not in comparison with Palo Alto. There are some features, but there are some gaps in comparison with Palo Alto.

Read full review

Hatem Langar

Security Analyst at TOPNET

Web audits have identified vulnerabilities and now provide clear visibility into compliance gaps

We have experience with Tenable.io Web Application Scanning, and we use it as well; we have approximately ten licenses for web application scanning. We use it to find vulnerabilities, but Tenable.io Web Application Scanning does not include remediation; we remediate with other products. We use the…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution preemptively blocks zero-day attacks and detects hidden anomalies effectively."

"The solution's ability to handle multiple websites and applications without needing more expensive hardware is a key advantage."

"Check Point CloudGuard WAF provides great visibility and flexibility to use multiple FQDNs in a single load balancer."

"The ability to preemptively block zero day attacks and detect hidden anomalies is exactly its advantage."

"I rate it ten out of ten."

"CloudGuard Application Security is a one-stop unified solution for securing workloads and IT assets most efficiently."

"They offer free trials, which is quite appreciative and grabs more attention from new users and businesses."

"Support is the same with on-premise devices, and it is very good. Since it is cloud-based, I do not need them as much."

More Check Point CloudGuard WAF pros

"Tenable provides the end analysis results covering all the published vulnerabilities and information on the market."

"Our customers adopt this solution because of the replication testing and the vulnerability assessment it can do. It is a multi-faceted product."

"The most valuable feature is the reporting, which provides a good level of detail with respect to vulnerabilities."

"It collects the vulnerabilities on the hostnames and sends them to the Tenable.io cloud. Tenable has its own cloud where Tenable.io is running, but there are many connectors to other cloud solutions. Tenable can do vulnerability scanning for other cloud managers such as Azure, Amazon, and so on."

"The product provides comprehensive details and reports to help us understand everything and handle any patches in order to keep our system safe."

"Now that the license is centralized, it's a significant feature to manipulate assets based on their functions."

"I would recommend Tenable.io Web Application Scanning to others."

"All the features are valuable to us as they offer cutting-edge scanning methods and address the latest issues with a contemporary approach. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is highly stable. I rate it a nine out ten. Since the solution works on the Cloud, it's highly scalable. I rate the scalability a nine out of ten. The setup of the solution is straightforward. The Return on Investment is substantial. I recommend the solution to all."

More Tenable.io Web Application Scanning pros

Cons

"You need to know exactly the system. You cannot have someone running the system if they don't have the knowledge to do so."

"I feel like I need more clarity in understanding pricing for DDoS protection."

"Deeper and more transparent integration between Cloud Application Security and analysis monitoring tools could be very valuable - although the solution currently offers integrations with third-party security tools."

"CloudGuard for Application Security, like the other Check Point applications, has been presenting major latency problems when entering their administrative portal."

"While the GUI allows configuration for application-related features, specific definitions cannot be modified through the code."

"When I migrate the traffic from our mobile application to CloudGuard, we are not getting what we expected."

"The creation of security profiles for each application takes a lot of time."

"Improving the process for handling licensing renewals would be a welcome enhancement."

More Check Point CloudGuard WAF cons

"I would like for them to add intervening proxy, whereby you can alter the get/put requests."

"The platform's technical support services could be better."

"I would like for them to add proxy filtering, where you can transfer and alter the package. It is fully automated. Other web application testers programs are actually proxy software, and the proxy software gives you the flexibility of modifying the outgoing package, which will actually help you in exploiting any vulnerability in detail."

"The cloud and the on-premises versions have their own controllers, and there is no way to centrally manage controllers."

"Tenable.io Web Application Scanning conducts a general scan, which wastes time. The scan needs to be specific."

"The solution's dashboards could be improved and made more user-friendly."

"We have encountered some problems with the technical support from Tenable; I would rate it a five out of ten. It is not efficacious, especially the first-level support."

"It would be great if there were a dashboard that is more user-friendly."

More Tenable.io Web Application Scanning cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The sales team or account managers from Check Point are top-notch. As I am using other products as well, my pricing was competitive compared to others."

"It is not cheap, but it is worth it."

"Check Point CloudGuard WAF is expensive compared to Azure WAF."

"If the pricing for the Infinity platform covers everything, it would be more straightforward. I had a hard time selling it to our CEO as a former CFO because of the differentials. There are different deltas year to year over a five-year period. It is very difficult to explain. It would be easier to digest for our executives if there was a flatter scale"

"As Infiniti customers, the pricing is manageable, as we have allowances dedicated to each Check Point product. The price is not as high compared to other options I have dealt with in the past."

"Considering all the benefits we've observed, we find the price to be satisfactory."

"The tool's licensing costs are yearly and competitive."

"I find the pricing to be reasonable."

More Check Point CloudGuard WAF pricing and cost advice

"For Tenable.io Web Application Scanning, it comes to around 6,50,000 Indian rupees, plus taxes."

"I rate the product's pricing a four out of ten."

"It follows the same licensing scheme as Tenable.io and Tenable. sc."

"The pricing is okay."

"The application is extremely affordable. There are no additional costs involved with licensing. We switched to Tenable.io Web Application Scanning from other solutions due to pricing."

"The price of the solution is reasonable compared to the competitors. The license cost is based on the number of users and the annual usage."

"Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is expensive for small businesses."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,444 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

26%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	36
Midsize Enterprise	20
Large Enterprise	19

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about CloudGuard for Application Security?

We have not had any incidents. We could realize its benefits immediately. We watched and monitored the traffic, and it was amazing to see the results.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudGuard for Application Security?

Check Point CloudGuard WAF is expensive. It is a little bit expensive. You cannot avoid this from an Israeli product. Israeli products follow a certain pricing model. If they could reduce the cost ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudGuard for Application Security?

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tenable.io Web Application Scanning?

If there were a solution, I would like to see automation and an integrated remediation solution for vulnerability or patch management.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Tenable.io Web Application Scanning?

I do not understand what API approach means; I do not understand this term. I think Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is the best option on the market at the moment. My review rating for this pro...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Tenable.io Web Application Scanning?

I think the price is expensive. We do not have an idea of how much we have to pay approximately, but comparing to other products, Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is expensive.

See all answers

Comparisons

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Compared 14% of the time

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Compared 11% of the time

AWS WAF vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Compared 11% of the time

Imperva Application Security Platform vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Compared 9% of the time

F5 Advanced WAF vs Check Point CloudGuard WAF

Compared 9% of the time

More Check Point CloudGuard WAF Competitors

Acunetix vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 9% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 6% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 6% of the time

SonarQube vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 5% of the time

Qualys Web Application Scanning vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 5% of the time

More Tenable.io Web Application Scanning Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Check Point CloudGuard WAF

March 2026

Download Check Point CloudGuard WAF product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

February 2026

Tenable.io Web Application Scanning report

Download Tenable.io Web Application Scanning product report

Also Known As

Check Point CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard AppSec

No data available

Overview

Check Point CloudGuard WAF offers advanced security for web applications and APIs with features such as intrusion prevention, bot prevention, and AI-driven threat detection, ensuring organizations achieve high-level protection and efficient security management.

Check Point CloudGuard WAF integrates with APIs, providing a seamless security enhancement while reducing false positives. Its scalability supports rapid deployment, valuable for companies aiming to secure resources in clouds like AWS and Azure. Enhanced threat prevention, comprehensive compliance support, and advanced threat protection methods such as SQL injection and cross-site scripting prevention are key strengths. Despite its robust capabilities, there are opportunities for improvement, such as lower costs, improved third-party tool integration, and a more intuitive interface to enhance usability.

What are the key features of Check Point CloudGuard WAF?

Intrusion Prevention System: Effectively detects and blocks unauthorized access attempts.
Bot Prevention: Shields applications from malicious bot traffic.
AI-driven Threat Detection: Uses advanced algorithms to identify and mitigate threats.
Log Management: Offers extensive logging capabilities for tracking and analysis.
Scalability: Supports rapid deployment across different environments, including multi-cloud.

What benefits should users expect from Check Point CloudGuard WAF?

Security Efficiency: Combines high-grade protection with ease of use to simplify security management.
Cost Efficiency: Aids in effective resource utilization, minimizing overhead.
Compliance Support: Helps meet various industry standards effortlessly.
Enhanced Threat Protection: Provides robust safeguards against common web vulnerabilities.

Check Point CloudGuard WAF is predominantly applied within industries requiring stringent security standards, such as financial services, healthcare, and e-commerce. Its deployment strengthens the defense of critical APIs, facilitates compliance, and supports efficient multi-cloud security management, aligning well with evolving industry demands.

Check Point Software Technologies

Tenable.io Web Application Scanning safely, accurately and automatically scans your web applications, providing deep visibility into vulnerabilities and valuable context to prioritize remediation.

Tenable

Sample Customers

Orange España, Paschoalotto

IMDEX

Buyer's Guide

Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

March 2026

Free Report: Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,444 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.