SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning comparison

Sonar and Tenable are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. Sonar is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.3, while Tenable is ranked #19 with an average rating of 7.6. Sonar holds a 23.5% mindshare in AS, compared to Tenable’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of Sonar users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Tenable users who would recommend it.

SonarQube Server (formerly ...

Read 116 SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) reviews

30,422 Views
22,349 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Tenable.io Web Application ...

Read 17 Tenable.io Web Application Scanning reviews

1,836 Views
1,327 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

SonarQube Server (formerly ...

Tenable.io Web Application ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 15, 2025

SonarQube Server and Tenable.io Web Application Scanning compete in the software development and security scanning market. Tenable.io seems to have the upper hand in comprehensive security scanning while SonarQube offers a balanced approach to code quality and security.

Features: SonarQube Server provides support for over 20 programming languages and offers customizable coding rules, making it highly versatile. Integration features and an active community contribute to its strength. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning excels in robust security scanning with prioritization of vulnerabilities and detailed reporting, focusing primarily on web application security.

Room for Improvement: SonarQube could enhance its programming language support, improve security scanning capabilities, and streamline its user interface. Users cite analysis time and configuration as areas for improvement. Technical support is sometimes insufficient. Tenable.io could improve its user interface, reporting features, and dashboard usability. Users desire better pricing transparency and cloud platform support coordination.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SonarQube Server offers deployment across hybrid, on-premises, and cloud environments, but relies heavily on community support due to its open-source model. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning offers streamlined deployment in public and private clouds, though some find its technical support lacking responsiveness and prices less transparent.

Pricing and ROI: SonarQube's open-source foundation offers cost-effective deployment with optional paid plug-ins. The ROI is favorable despite complaints about premium version pricing. Tenable.io's pricing is deemed reasonable by some, though small businesses may find it costly. Its focus on identifying and fixing vulnerabilities quickly offers good ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 856,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

SonarQube Server (formerly ...

Ranking in Application Security Tools

1st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

116

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (1st), Software Development Analytics (1st)

Tenable.io Web Application ...

Ranking in Application Security Tools

19th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) is 23.5%, down from 26.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is 1.3%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Sthembiso Zondi

Head of Software Engineering at ronaldmariah@gmail.com

Consistent improvements in code quality and security with effective integration and reliable technical support

The features of SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) that I find most useful are the suggestions received from reviewing the code. When they review the code, they provide suggestions on how to fix it, and we find those very useful from a development perspective. We use SonarQube Server's (formerly SonarQube) centralized management and visualization of code quality metrics on the dashboard because that's the executive dashboard that we send to the executives to show where we are in terms of quality, security, and where the company can improve. We use that for organizational improvement purposes. The ability to tailor metrics tracking in SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) has been beneficial to my team. There are team-specific dashboards which are related to specific repositories they utilize, and we have that aggregative dashboard that shows the whole organization's performance. We can drill down per specific repository, which makes it easier for the team to improve specific things.

Read full review

Harshal Deshmukh

CEO and Managing Director at Digidata Infsystems Private Limited

Simple tool to use, good dashboard capabilities and offers asset criticality ratings

It has good dashboard capabilities and gives good results with priority ratings, asset criticality ratings, and exposure scores for vulnerabilities. It also provides automated web application scanning, which customers appreciate because it doesn't disturb the web application or hamper the business. While testing the web application, sometimes it happens that the website or application goes down. But with Tenable.io Web Application Scanning, it doesn't affect the business. It has good unified web application scanning and exposure management.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I like that it has a better dashboard compared to Clockwork. It's also stable."

"Apart from the security point of view, I like that it makes it easy to detect code smells and other issues in terms of code quality and standards."

"The solution offers a very good community edition."

"Overall, I would rate SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) as a 9 out of 10."

"The stability is good."

"The solution has a wide variety of features and an open-source community that you are able to learn Java, JavaScript, or any other programing language."

"It is a good deal compared to all other tools on the market."

"We are using the Community edition. So, we don't have to incur any licensing costs. This is the best part."

More SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) pros

"The solution is stable."

"We use the tool for our websites. We have a vulnerable subdomain. The tool helps to scan it for vulnerabilities."

"I would recommend Tenable.io Web Application Scanning to others."

"All the features are valuable to us as they offer cutting-edge scanning methods and address the latest issues with a contemporary approach. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is highly stable. I rate it a nine out ten. Since the solution works on the Cloud, it's highly scalable. I rate the scalability a nine out of ten. The setup of the solution is straightforward. The Return on Investment is substantial. I recommend the solution to all."

"Our customers adopt this solution because of the replication testing and the vulnerability assessment it can do. It is a multi-faceted product."

"We can get detailed information about vulnerabilities."

"It has good unified web application scanning and exposure management."

"The most effective feature of the product is the ability to scan the entire environment."

More Tenable.io Web Application Scanning pros

Cons

"We called support and complained but have not received any information as we use the free version. We had to fix it on our own and could not escalate it to the tool's developer."

"We did have some trouble with the LDAP integration for the console."

"We had some issues where the Quality Gate check sometimes gets stuck and it is unclear."

"There isn't a very good enterprise report."

"The scanning part could be improved in SonarQube. We have used Coverity for scanning, and we have the critical issues reported by Coverity. When we used SonarQube for scanning and looked at the results, it seems that some of them have incorrect input. This part can be improved for C and C++ languages."

"There are times that we have the database crash. However, this might be an issue with how we have configured it and not a software issue. Apart from this, I do not see any issues with the solution."

"This solution finds issues that are similar to what is found by Checkmarx, and it would be nice if the overlap could be eliminated."

"The tool needs to be more compatible with C/C++ language"

More SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) cons

"I would like for them to add proxy filtering, where you can transfer and alter the package. It is fully automated. Other web application testers programs are actually proxy software, and the proxy software gives you the flexibility of modifying the outgoing package, which will actually help you in exploiting any vulnerability in detail."

"The dashboard could be more user-friendly."

"The report customization needs to be better."

"The cloud and the on-premises versions have their own controllers, and there is no way to centrally manage controllers."

"The market is standard for vulnerability scanning, however, the posture can be improved through Tenable's prioritization engine."

"The solution's dashboards could be improved and made more user-friendly."

"It would be great if there were a dashboard that is more user-friendly."

"Sometimes it lags with different cloud environments."

More Tenable.io Web Application Scanning cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We use the free version; there are no hidden costs or licensing required."

"A low cost long-term solution for non-critical situations."

"It's an open-source product."

"Some of the plugins that were previously free are not free now."

"There is both a free and licensed version. The free version has limitations on development languages and support."

"The solution is cheaper than other products."

"I do not know about the pricing as I am using the community edition, which is free. But I compared the pricing with Sigma, and it is higher than SonarQube."

"The price of the solution could be reduced."

More SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) pricing and cost advice

"I rate the product's pricing a four out of ten."

"The application is extremely affordable. There are no additional costs involved with licensing. We switched to Tenable.io Web Application Scanning from other solutions due to pricing."

"The pricing is okay."

"The price of the solution is reasonable compared to the competitors. The license cost is based on the number of users and the annual usage."

"Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is expensive for small businesses."

"It follows the same licensing scheme as Tenable.io and Tenable. sc."

"For Tenable.io Web Application Scanning, it comes to around 6,50,000 Indian rupees, plus taxes."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Government

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

12%

Government

12%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Is SonarQube the best tool for static analysis?

I am not very familiar with SonarQube and their solutions, so I can not answer. But if you are asking me about which tools that are the best for for Static Code Analysis, I suggest you have a look...

See all answers

Which gives you more for your money - SonarQube or Veracode?

SonarQube is easy to deploy and configure, and also integrates well with other tools to do quality code analysis. SonarQube has a great community edition, which is open-source and free. Easy to use...

See all answers

How would you decide between Coverity and Sonarqube?

We researched Coverity, but in the end, we chose SonarQube. SonarQube is a tool for reviewing code quality and security. It helps to guide our development teams during code reviews by providing rem...

See all answers

What do you like most about Tenable.io Web Application Scanning?

The most effective feature of the product is the ability to scan the entire environment.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tenable.io Web Application Scanning?

Improvements could include providing coverage reports in the free version and features related to security reports. Also, enhancing technical support would be beneficial as there is room for improv...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Tenable.io Web Application Scanning?

I would recommend Tenable.io Web Application Scanning as it provides us with good reports, which help improve our code base, despite the lack of financial benefits. Overall, I would rate it seven o...

See all answers

Comparisons

Coverity vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Compared 13% of the time

Checkmarx One vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Compared 12% of the time

GitHub Advanced Security vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Compared 11% of the time

SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Compared 7% of the time

Veracode vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Compared 7% of the time

More SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) Competitors

Acunetix vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 26% of the time

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 12% of the time

Qualys Web Application Scanning vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 11% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 8% of the time

Veracode vs Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Compared 7% of the time

More Tenable.io Web Application Scanning Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

May 2025

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) report

Download SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

June 2025

Tenable.io Web Application Scanning report

Download Tenable.io Web Application Scanning product report

Also Known As

Sonar

No data available

Interactive Demo

Sonar

Demo not available

Tenable

Overview

SonarQube Server enhances code quality and security via static code analysis. It detects vulnerabilities, improves standards, and reduces technical debt, integrating into CI/CD pipelines.

SonarQube Server is a comprehensive tool for enhancing code quality and security. It offers static code analysis to identify vulnerabilities, improve coding standards, and reduce technical debt. By integrating into CI/CD pipelines, it provides automated checks for adherence to best practices. Organizations use it for code inspection, security testing, and compliance, ensuring development environments with better maintainability and fewer issues.

What are the key features of SonarQube Server?

Support for 20+ languages: Extensive programming language support suitable for diverse coding environments.
Custom coding rules: Allows for tailored rule sets to match specific coding standards.
Flexible quality gates: Define criteria for code acceptance at various intervals.
CI/CD integration: Seamless integration with Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment tools.
Rich interface: User-friendly dashboard with detailed visual insights.

What benefits should users expect from SonarQube Server?

Improved code quality: Enhanced analysis contributes to fewer bugs and improved coding practices.
Security enhancements: Identifies and mitigates security vulnerabilities pre-emptively.
Maintainability: Reduces technical debt, yielding long-term development efficiency.
Customizable: Flexibility in configuration aligns with specific project needs.

Many industries implement SonarQube Server to uphold coding standards, maintain security protocols, and streamline their software development lifecycle. In sectors like finance and healthcare, adhering to regulations and ensuring reliable software is critical, making SonarQube Server invaluable. It is often integrated into CI/CD pipelines, ensuring that code changes meet set standards before deployment. This approach enhances productivity and maintains compliance with industry-specific requirements.

Sonar

Tenable.io Web Application Scanning safely, accurately and automatically scans your web applications, providing deep visibility into vulnerabilities and valuable context to prioritize remediation.

Tenable

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

IMDEX

Buyer's Guide

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

June 2025

Free Report: SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning

Find out what your peers are saying about SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs. Tenable.io Web Application Scanning report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.