Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade vs Kiteworks comparison

Check Point Anti-Spam and E...

Read 13 Kiteworks reviews

2,796 Views
308 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 3, 2024

Kiteworks and Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade are competitors in secure email management. Kiteworks has an advantage with its integrated secure communication tools, while Check Point is favored for comprehensive email security and anti-spam solutions.

Features: Kiteworks offers secure file sharing, email encryption, and a private content network. It supports large file transfers and includes a built-in antivirus and two-factor authentication for added security. Check Point provides strong anti-spam filtering, advanced threat prevention, and malware detection. It also includes DLP features and a customizable block list for enhanced email protection.

Room for Improvement: Kiteworks could enhance administrative controls for file access, streamline its two-factor authentication setup, and improve user interface intuitiveness. Check Point could increase the accuracy of its spam filtering, enhance integration with existing IT systems, and offer more cost-effective pricing models to remain competitive in the market.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Check Point is known for its flexible deployment with scalable cloud and on-premise options, backed by robust customer support. Kiteworks provides seamless integration with current systems, focusing on user-friendly deployment processes and effective support channels.

Pricing and ROI: Kiteworks usually involves a higher initial setup cost due to its integration capabilities, though it delivers substantial ROI through improved secure communication. Check Point offers a straightforward cost structure, providing strong ROI with its targeted threat prevention and email security features.

To learn more, read our detailed Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade vs. Kiteworks Report (Updated: September 2025).

Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade vs. Kiteworks

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,202 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Check Point Anti-Spam and E...

Ranking in Email Security

11th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Kiteworks

Ranking in Email Security

32nd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Content Management (16th), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (5th), Content Collaboration Platforms (14th), Secure Email Gateway (SEG) (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Email Security category, the mindshare of Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade is 0.8%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kiteworks is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Email Security Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade	0.8%
Kiteworks	0.5%
Other	98.7%

Email Security

Featured Reviews

Abnet Tsegaye Belay

Cybersecurity Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Has reduced phishing threats and provided better visibility through detailed dashboards and logging

One thing I noticed with Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade is that without configuring the MTA or transfer agent, it cannot work fully. The MTA feature has significant resource needs, and without it, we cannot use the full-fledged features of Anti-Spam and Email Security Blades. Its dependency on MTA is substantial. I chose 8 out of 10 for Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade because of the MTA dependency feature. Disabling MTA is problematic as it is very important for deploying this solution. If you want full content scanning or threat extraction and emulation, you have to enable MTA to work effectively.

Read full review

Sukkanta Banerjee

Senior Software Engineer at Wipro Limited

Two-factor authentication and .ZIP format make large file transfers very secure

The most valuable feature is the ability to send a large file of 30 GB in size and more. In Outlook and other email applications, you cannot send files that are larger than 20 MB. But with Kiteworks, 30 GB is transferable by default and, with the proper approval, a file of up to 100 GB can be sent. It makes file transfer very easy and smooth. Also, only the .ZIP format is supported because it is a very secure mode of file transfer, and that is why it is recommended. It also has built-in antivirus, so if it detects any malware it will quarantine the file and it won't be delivered. This is really important to keep the service up and running in a proper and secure manner. With people working from home, the data needs to be checked to see what kind of data is being sent. It has a two-factor authentication mechanism. For example, if a person with a particular domain is using Kiteworks and sends a file to a party outside of his domain, that external party has to go through two-factor authentication. The receiver gets a link that takes them to the setup of a temporary account, which will be valid for three days. The recipient will also receive a customized password separately. Only after all these steps will they be able to access the file. That access is only available to a person with the mail ID to which the file was sent. In addition, admins can see who is sending sensitive content, what that content is, and to whom it is being sent, and can track emails. One week of good training will give a user complete knowledge for using the solution. The system is very easy to use. You just click on "Compose," attach a file, and send it. It's very easy compared to Outlook or Teams. It's quite simple, even for someone logging in for the first time. It is very smooth and easy to send files.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Since the engine is made to block by IP, domains, and reputation, we minimized the spam threats that end up in the user's mailbox."

"DLP features can help prevent sensitive information from being leaked via email."

"Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade has positively impacted my organization because unlike my previous dashboard, it shows pop-ups for bot activity or whenever malware or ransomware attacks occur in any system."

"This product integrates well and is easy to manage."

"It has provided us with an easy way to avoid invasive mail."

"By drastically reducing the volume of spam and unwanted emails, employees can focus more on their work rather than sorting through cluttered inboxes. This leads to improved productivity and efficiency within the organization."

"It does a better job of recognizing spammers."

"The best features of Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade are its security features, which help the team perform their daily tasks without having to concern for potential security breaches."

More Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade pros

"The solution can be used remotely; it's easy to upload and share files."

"I like Kiteworks or Accellion because it's continuously upgraded. I also know that it probably works with a lot of clients."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to send a large file of 30 GB in size and more. In Outlook and other email applications, you cannot send files that are larger than 20 MB. But with Kiteworks, 30 GB is transferable by default and, with the proper approval, a file of up to 100 GB can be sent. It makes file transfer very easy and smooth."

"The solution removes the limitations with file attachment size that is found with regular email."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to allow end-users to manage their own information and data with minimal administration. That's the best feature from my perspective."

"Scalability is impressive."

"The top two features are the two-factor authentication, which is pretty good. It's easily understood by the users. And their API is rather robust. We have numerous integrations that work off the API."

"The most valuable aspect of Kiteworks is undoubtedly the private content network. This feature is particularly beneficial for us. Furthermore, it serves as a centralized platform that enables us to track and manage our information exchange."

More Kiteworks pros

Cons

"The pattern used to filter emails could be improved"

"The solution's technical support is an area with shortcomings that need to be improved for the better."

"Without configuring the MTA or transfer agent, it cannot work fully."

"Recognizing spammers and spam email sourcing is extremely lagging these days, and the performance could be improved to provide better efficiency."

"Regarding Checkpoint, I would suggest an easier interface to understand. The interface is a bit overwhelming with information overload for someone new to it."

"The ease of use with the user interface could be better as it is very static."

"The customer support for Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade rates at 6 out of 10. Sometimes the Check Point support has issues as they do not respond immediately when I log a ticket and sometimes they lag."

"Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade could improve by focusing more on promoting and marketing its products. Despite having a great solution, it hasn't captured a larger market share, possibly due to insufficient promotion. It should also incorporate a module to monitor client identities, similar to CrowdStrike. It could also improve by systemizing and simplifying their documentation to make it easier to find needed information."

More Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade cons

"Perhaps there could be a notification to users about their bandwidth or network packet loss."

"There are always issues when there are bugs or upgrades. The challenge with upgrading is getting more storage from the customer. Every time we have a new version, it requires additional storage. This means that the customer would need to procure more storage for their server, which they don't like because it means additional cost to them. So, I think my request would be that the version upgrades don't require any significant storage requirement."

"It could be more stable. In the next release, it would be better if it was more stable with improved performance."

"In my experience, their technical support can be a little slow."

"I noticed the Kiteworks login UI is very basic, lacking customization. Allowing more HTML tags to add hyperlinks or user-friendly information on the home page would be very useful."

"It would be nice if Kiteworks could provide a free version of the platform so that it could be used for a certain number of file transfers. We could be charged a fee if we exceeded the number of allotted file transfers."

"The one feature, which I have also requested directly to Kiteworks, is to have a scheduled upgrade function. Currently, one of my engineers logs in after hours for the upgrade. We're a hospital, and we're 24/7, but the primary users are seven to five. So, we log in the early evening just to push a button to tell it to do the update. It would be nice if that could be very easily scheduled."

"File location could be improved."

More Kiteworks cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Reasonably priced solution."

"For licensing, my company makes yearly payments, which is expensive."

"This is a simple system with a very low cost and basic functions, which surely is ideal for a small company."

"I rate the pricing as an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive."

"I rate the product pricing a seven out of ten."

"Choosing the correct set of licenses is essential because, without the additional software blade licenses, the Check Point gateways are just a stateful firewall."

"The cost is competitive with other security products on the market."

"The license management is changing and confusing. If I could make one change to it, it would be better license management through the API."

"They changed it midstream. We were being charged a certain flat rate for SFTP traffic. For whatever reason, at the beginning of the year, our pricing changed, and we are now being charged more for using a feature of the product than we were when we first bought it. That has been our experience with billing. It turned out to be more expensive than when we started with it."

"The price of Kiteworks is reasonable."

"The solution is very expensive because we are buying with Malaysian Ringgit and it's sold in US dollars."

"It is not really expensive. I mean, to me it's obviously expensive, but it's worth it."

"I believe it's a little costly, but given the faith that we put into it from a security perspective to maintain the integrity of our patient information that is being transferred through this system, that's a small price to pay. So, on the surface, it might look like a lot of money, but depending on the need for security, which is where we feel it shines, it's okay price-wise."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Email Security solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,202 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Security Firm

23%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Government

15%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Retailer

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	24
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	18

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Large Enterprise	11

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade?

We now have better security and fewer false positives.

What needs improvement with Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade?

There is room for improvement with Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade, particularly with the interface, which is not new people friendly; however, users will learn it, and it's...

What is your primary use case for Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade?

My main use case for Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade includes phishing protection, ransomware protection, and spam protection. The solution helps with compliance and integra...

What is Kiteworks?

Kiteworks is a secured file sharing platform that enables users to collaborate with different parties across a robust offering of secured protected channels. Users have the option of virtual privat...

What needs improvement with Kiteworks?

I'm not a network expert, however, there must be some room for improvement. Perhaps there could be a notification to users about their bandwidth or network packet loss. If users receive such notifi...

What advice do you have for others considering Kiteworks?

Scalability is impressive. It can be highly available, resilient, and scalable infrastructure. I can confidently give it a nine. It suits any level of organization, whether a small setup with two a...

Abnormal Security vs Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade

Comparisons

Compared 55% of the time

Barracuda Email Security Gateway vs Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade

Compared 22% of the time

Cisco Secure Email vs Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade

Compared 13% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Office 365 vs Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade

Compared 10% of the time

More Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade Competitors

Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct vs Kiteworks

Compared 35% of the time

SharePoint vs Kiteworks

Compared 12% of the time

FileCloud vs Kiteworks

Compared 8% of the time

GoAnywhere MFT vs Kiteworks

Compared 7% of the time

Box vs Kiteworks

Compared 7% of the time

More Kiteworks Competitors

Product Reports

Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade

October 2025

Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade report

Download Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade product report

Download Kiteworks product report

September 2025

Also Known As

No data available

Accellion

Overview

Check Point Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade is a comprehensive solution designed to protect organizations from the growing threat of spam and email-based attacks. With advanced threat prevention capabilities, it ensures that businesses can effectively manage their email security and prevent the infiltration of malicious content.

This software blade offers a multi-layered approach to email security, combining anti-spam, anti-virus, and anti-phishing technologies to provide robust protection against a wide range of threats. It employs advanced machine learning algorithms to continuously analyze and identify new spam and phishing techniques, ensuring that organizations stay one step ahead of cybercriminals.

The Anti-Spam and Email Security Software Blade also includes advanced content filtering capabilities, allowing organizations to define and enforce email policies based on specific criteria. This ensures that sensitive information is protected and that employees are not exposed to potentially harmful content.

Furthermore, this software blade integrates seamlessly with existing email infrastructure, making deployment and management simple and efficient. It supports all major email platforms, including Microsoft Exchange and Office 365, ensuring compatibility with a wide range of environments.

With real-time monitoring and reporting capabilities, organizations can gain valuable insights into their email security posture. This enables them to identify potential vulnerabilities and take proactive measures to mitigate risks.

Check Point Software Technologies

Kiteworks empowers organizations to effectively manage risk in every send, share, receive, and save of sensitive content over numerous communications channels: email, file sharing, managed file transfer, APIs, and web forms. The Kiteworks platform unifies, tracks, controls, and secures sensitive content moving within, into, and out of an organization, significantly improving risk management and ensuring regulatory compliance.

Sample Customers

SF Police Credit Union (SFPCU)

United States Securities and Exchange Commission, National Health Service, Husch Blackwell LLP, NYC Health + Hospitals, Viatris, MITRE Corporation, Chubb, Kraft Heinz, KPMG, Kohler, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Purdue Pharma, AVL