Centreon vs Netrounds comparison

Centreon and Juniper are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Centreon is ranked #27 with an average rating of 7.3, while Juniper is ranked #96. Centreon holds a 1.3% mindshare in NMS, compared to Juniper’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Centreon users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Juniper users who would recommend it.

Centreon

Read 31 Centreon reviews

8,080 Views
6,545 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Netrounds

Read 3 Netrounds reviews

1,475 Views
1,180 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Centreon

Netrounds

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Netrounds and Centreon compete in network management and monitoring. Centreon often has the upper hand due to its extensive features, justifying its cost for many organizations.

Features: Netrounds specializes in active monitoring with detailed diagnostics and real-time alerts that provide insights into network performance, making it ideal for targeted monitoring tasks. Centreon offers a broad suite covering network, system, and application monitoring, enhancing its adaptability for complex environments with features like customizable dashboards and automated reporting.

Room for Improvement: Netrounds could improve by expanding its integration capabilities and offering more customizability in reporting features. Adding a broader range of pre-built configurations could enhance user experience for new customers. Centreon may benefit from simplifying its setup process to reduce the need for specialized expertise, and enhancing its user interface to make it more intuitive for users. Improving the speed of software updates could also provide a smoother user experience.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Netrounds offers straightforward cloud-based deployment coupled with an intuitive setup process, leading to quick implementation. Centreon provides flexible deployment with on-premise and hybrid models, which may require more time and technical expertise. Despite this, its responsive customer service often enhances the overall deployment experience, helping offset the complexity.

Pricing and ROI: Netrounds has competitive pricing with scalable solutions offering strong ROI without compromising performance. Specific pricing details aren't provided, but its cost-effective model appeals to smaller organizations. Centreon's pricing is higher, reflecting its comprehensive solutions, yet it delivers significant ROI for larger enterprises due to its extensive monitoring capabilities and customization options. The choice between them depends on an organization's specific needs and budget constraints.

To learn more, read our detailed Centreon vs. Netrounds Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Centreon vs. Netrounds

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 903,067 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Centreon

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

27th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Infrastructure Monitoring (27th), Cloud Monitoring Software (20th)

Netrounds

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

96th

Average Rating

9.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Diagnostics (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Centreon is 1.3%, down from 2.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Netrounds is 0.4%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Centreon	1.3%
Netrounds	0.4%
Other	98.3%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Sulesh PK

Monitoring and Operations Pilot at Egis S.A.

Experience enhanced monitoring with real-time alerts and efficient support

I would like to see automation in the poller features, as currently, the poller is not automated. If we could automate the addition or removal of hosts in the poller, it would improve efficiency. Sometimes, Centreon does not show the status of services as updated, which should be addressed. Additionally, enhancements are needed in identifying configuration issues, providing real-time alerts in case of issues, and improving the HTTP configuration tasks, as Centreon does not currently display issues with HTTP links, requiring manual investigation.

Read full review

it_user738366

Head of Network Operations at a tech company with 51-200 employees

Fast and easy notification of problems on the network

Network quality monitoring of multicast TV channels and other network monitorings. This product gives us a good historical overview over the network and quick alarms for problems Fast and easy notification of problems on the network. The web GUI Grouping of jobs Making your own dashboards…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We are alerted on service impacts and not when something is down. We have saved a lot of time on non-business-hours intervention."

"Centreon provides timesaving and costsaving benefits as it lets us manage multiple devices on a single platform."

"It's the best tool on the market for that at the moment."

"It supports active monitoring so we don't have to use traps. From time to time traps are not very useful because we never know if they are actually working or not. The reporting part is also valuable as are the event logs. Using them we can check right away if something has had a hiccup."

"What I like most about Centreon is that it is very flexible and customizable, based on the user and/or business needs. Centreon is very flexible when it comes to monitoring parameters. We can use scripts found on the internet or scripts created by our infra/apps team. Also, the data visualization features are very simple and straightforward, yet very informative."

"The most valuable feature is that we can manually configure everything we need. After it comes inside the interface of Centreon, you can display it. Because the interface is quite user-friendly, you can manually configure the configuration very deeply, which is very pleasant and useful because you can monitor and see everything on your service list, dashboard, or MAP. The most useful feature for me is that you can create your own plugin and monitoring query."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to build an abstraction of service visualization. You can add services to an entity called Business Activities and you can see the state of these activities."

"E-mail alert notifications are valuable."

More Centreon pros

"Network quality monitoring of multicast TV channels and other network monitorings."

"The live packet capture feature enables quicker troubleshooting and better network monitoring."

Cons

"There is room for improvement in the area of artificial intelligence. The product gives us a lot of information, but it's only information. We want the product to do more auto-remediation."

"The pricing setup costs and licensing weren't very good in the past."

"The most important issue is the capability to interconnect with other systems."

"It is necessary to improve service monitoring of database services in the free version."

"Sometimes, when the GUI and some of the search fields are being reset, and I return to the page, then I have to set them again. Therefore, some improvement on the UI and the filtering is needed."

"Response times can be slow, often leaving us to resolve basic issues in-house."

"Centreon is very bad with auto-scanning. It's very monolithic software. It doesn't have microservices and it only has basic clustering. You cannot, for example, have six or seven nodes for Centreon's cloud processes."

"Currently, we have to go through all of the different templates and take a look at how the template is configured, and how specific parameters may change across different templates with different precedents, megatons, etc. It's a lot of work and involves trial and error. I wish they could simplify the process."

More Centreon cons

"The web interface is ok, but I would like to see if it was possible to group jobs better and to create our own dashboards."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Open-source solutions like this can be very cost effective for an organization looking for a product that they can quickly implement, as there is no initial cost and there are no license renewal fees. However, it is important to take into consideration some of the related costs that may come along as needed, such as training, support, and product enhancements."

"You purchase a package. You have a support contract (there is also a platinum support contract) and it is per module. That means you have to pay, e.g., for the MBI module or the BAM module. Or, if you want to save a lot of money, you can pay for IMP, which is the complete package."

"The pricing starts at around 5000 euro. However, this depends on: Your environment, the size of your host, how many hosts you have, how many remote pollers you have, and if you want to use the Monitoring Business Intelligence or Centreon MAP functionalities."

"The solution has a free part and after that threshold, you will need to pay. For example, if you believe you can create an interesting map, most of the time, you will have to pay 10,000 Euros per year for having access to these components."

"I would like to see improvement in the licensing model. You can purchase X number of licenses, up to 1,000 devices or 1,000 instances. Your next batch is 2,000. But what if you only need, say, 1,200? The model could be changed a little bit."

"The price is not too high. Licensing is driven by how many hosts you monitor, but because you can run the agentless version, you don't have to declare every host to Centreon, one at a time. That means you can drive your infrastructure supervision with a very low number of declared hosts."

"They only sell four hour slots for support, so if you have just one question, then you need to pay for four hours. Or, you need to wait until you have enough questions to fill those four hours. They are not flexible in this."

"Centreon is better than Nagios XI in regards to cost and support response times, when you have a problem. If you have a problem, it costs money to contact the Nagios XI support."

More Centreon pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

903,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

11%

Construction Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	14

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Centreon?

Centreon's pricing is not very expensive. Initially, I rated it seven, but corrected to five out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Centreon?

I have certain concerns with Centreon, such as being unable to set downtime for multiple devices at once due to the limitation of adding only 50 devices in a single go. Increasing this limit would ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Centreon?

We are using Centreon for monitoring devices, both LAN and WAN devices. There are subsidiaries for my company, so if any devices go down or there are any service alerts, we receive alerts through C...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Zabbix vs Centreon

Compared 10% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Centreon

Compared 9% of the time

Datadog vs Centreon

Compared 7% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Centreon

Compared 7% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs Centreon

Compared 5% of the time

More Centreon Competitors

Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance vs Netrounds

Compared 15% of the time

ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs Netrounds

Compared 15% of the time

ThousandEyes vs Netrounds

Compared 11% of the time

Colasoft nChronos vs Netrounds

Compared 10% of the time

LinkSprinter vs Netrounds

Compared 8% of the time

More Netrounds Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Centreon

June 2026

Download Centreon product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

June 2026

Download Netrounds product report

Overview

Centreon offers a robust IT infrastructure monitoring platform, featuring user-friendly dashboards and real-time monitoring. It excels in scalability and integration, making it suitable for monitoring diverse network environments.

Centreon stands out with its unified monitoring capabilities, providing businesses with user-friendly dashboards and extensive plugins for customization. Its scalability ensures companies can expand monitoring tasks without incurring additional costs. Integration capabilities allow seamless interaction with ticketing systems and automation tools. Centreon offers customizable reporting and effectively manages downtimes, providing real-time feedback and proactive maintenance through Business Activity and Anomaly Detection features. Despite its strengths, users find areas for improvement including downtime scheduling, API functionalities, UI enhancements, end-to-end monitoring, and documentation. Businesses are increasingly demanding better automation, network discovery, cloud monitoring, and notification options.

What are Centreon's standout features?

Unified Monitoring: Delivers a comprehensive monitoring platform for IT infrastructure.
User-Friendly Dashboards: Offers intuitive and customizable dashboards for efficient monitoring.
Extensive Plugins: Enables flexibility and customization through numerous plugins.
Scalability: Allows expansion of monitoring duties without additional costs.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly integrates with ticketing systems and other tools.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Cost Efficiency: Minimized resolution time through proactive maintenance features.
Ease of Use: Simplifies monitoring with its user-friendly interface.
Proactive Issue Resolution: Real-time monitoring and alerts help prevent service outages.
Customizable Reporting: Adapts reports to meet specific organizational requirements.
Diverse Network Management: Capable of handling diverse IT environments efficiently.

Centreon is implemented across industries to monitor IT infrastructures, including networks, servers, and applications. Companies leverage it to track server performance, manage network devices, and receive timely alerts on device status. Its ability to integrate with ticketing systems and automation tools streamlines operations, enhancing global IT infrastructure monitoring and customer service management with real-time feedback and issue resolution.

Centreon

Netrounds offers a comprehensive suite aimed at network performance and service quality, providing effective solutions for service assurance and network diagnostics.

Netrounds is tailored for dynamic network environments, delivering essential features for automated active testing, monitoring, and troubleshooting. Its cloud-native architecture allows seamless integration with diverse network infrastructures, ensuring consistent performance and reliability. Netrounds' capabilities are especially beneficial for telecom operators and enterprises, enabling them to maintain high service levels and quickly identify network issues. The platform facilitates proactive network management, fostering operational efficiency.

What features make Netrounds valuable?

Active Testing: Continuous testing across multiple network segments to proactively identify issues.
Monitoring: Real-time visibility into network performance metrics.
Troubleshooting Tools: Comprehensive tools to diagnose and resolve network problems rapidly.
Automation: Streamlined operations through automated testing and monitoring workflows.
Cloud Integration: Support for cloud environments, enhancing flexibility and scalability.

What benefits and ROI should you look for?

Improved Network Reliability: Reducing downtime through proactive monitoring and testing.
Operational Efficiency: Lower operational costs with automated processes.
Enhanced Service Quality: Boost customer satisfaction with robust service assurance.
Faster Problem Resolution: Minimized time in identifying and fixing network issues.

Netrounds is leveraged across various sectors, including telecommunications and enterprise IT. In telecom, its active testing and monitoring capabilities ensure reliable service delivery and customer satisfaction. Enterprises use it for maintaining application performance across complex infrastructures, optimizing network investments, and streamlining IT operations.

Juniper

Sample Customers

Airbus, Bollore, BT, Canal Plus, Kuehne Nagel, Limagrain, LVMH, Oberthur Technologies, Orange, Darty, Addax Petroleum, Plastic Omnium, Auchan, Valeo, Saint Gobin, Clarins, Hugo Boss, JC Decaux, French Government (Defense, Justice, Environment, Agriculture), OptiComm, Thales, Zeiss.

Telenor, Sappa, Clas Ohlson, Netnordic, Kabelnoord, Lunet

Buyer's Guide

Centreon vs. Netrounds

June 2026

Free Report: Centreon vs. Netrounds

Find out what your peers are saying about Centreon vs. Netrounds and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

903,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Centreon vs. Netrounds report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.