Centreon vs InfoVista VistaInsight comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Centreon and Infovista are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Centreon is ranked #23 with an average rating of 7.7, while Infovista is ranked #90. Centreon holds a 1.2% mindshare in NMS, compared to Infovista’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Centreon users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Infovista users who would recommend it.

Centreon

Read 31 Centreon reviews

9,361 Views
7,395 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

InfoVista VistaInsight

Read 2 InfoVista VistaInsight reviews

1,888 Views
1,850 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Centreon

InfoVista VistaInsight

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

InfoVista VistaInsight and Centreon compete in network performance management. InfoVista VistaInsight offers competitive pricing and customer support, while Centreon excels with feature sets justifying its pricing.

Features: InfoVista VistaInsight offers comprehensive network monitoring, end-to-end visibility, and advanced analytics. Centreon provides IT infrastructure monitoring, broad compatibility, and automation features. Centreon is favored for flexibility and integration in complex environments.

Room for Improvement: InfoVista could enhance automation, expand third-party integrations, and provide more customizable dashboards. Centreon might improve its user interface, streamline its deployment process, and offer more cost-effective options for smaller businesses.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: InfoVista VistaInsight ensures seamless setup with strong customer support. Centreon's deployment is complex but allows detailed customization with comprehensive support. InfoVista offers a straightforward initial deployment, while Centreon is suited for tailored solutions.

Pricing and ROI: InfoVista VistaInsight offers a cost-effective setup with strong ROI potential by focusing on efficiency for the price. Centreon has a higher setup cost but provides robust ROI through extensive features and adaptability. Centreon prioritizes advanced functionalities despite its higher initial price.

To learn more, read our detailed Network Monitoring Software Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 915,341 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Centreon

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

23rd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Infrastructure Monitoring (26th), Cloud Monitoring Software (20th)

InfoVista VistaInsight

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

90th

Average Rating

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Centreon is 1.2%, down from 2.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of InfoVista VistaInsight is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Centreon	1.2%
InfoVista VistaInsight	0.4%
Other	98.4%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Sulesh PK

Monitoring and Operations Pilot at Egis S.A.

Experience enhanced monitoring with real-time alerts and efficient support

I would like to see automation in the poller features, as currently, the poller is not automated. If we could automate the addition or removal of hosts in the poller, it would improve efficiency. Sometimes, Centreon does not show the status of services as updated, which should be addressed. Additionally, enhancements are needed in identifying configuration issues, providing real-time alerts in case of issues, and improving the HTTP configuration tasks, as Centreon does not currently display issues with HTTP links, requiring manual investigation.

Read full review

Youssef El Hayek

OSS Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

A powerful service that is very stable and scalable

It's a very powerful service, you have to use your training and understand how to work it. After that, it's very easy to collect and to use. It may be hard to use for the administrators. It's like a Ferrari, if you're a very good driver you'll go to 300 but you have to know how to drive it. If you have a Ferrari but you don't know how to use it, it's not going to be good. Also, it's very important to understand what the customer needs to decide on what kind of products you are going to use, and what product and what solution to implement. I would rate the solution nine out of 10.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"For servers and for applications, it was very, very efficient."

"The most valuable feature is that we can manually configure everything we need. After it comes inside the interface of Centreon, you can display it. Because the interface is quite user-friendly, you can manually configure the configuration very deeply, which is very pleasant and useful because you can monitor and see everything on your service list, dashboard, or MAP. The most useful feature for me is that you can create your own plugin and monitoring query."

"We are alerted on service impacts and not when something is down. We have saved a lot of time on non-business-hours intervention."

"Centreon's real-time monitoring, despite having some manual aspects, supports us in managing our operations effectively."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to build an abstraction of service visualization. You can add services to an entity called Business Activities and you can see the state of these activities."

"We use the remote server functionality on some customer sites, because you can see an independent view and are not dependent on a single connection. If you have branch offices or bigger office outside your headquarters, you can use remote servers because if the connection is broken or disrupted, then remote server will obtain a view of your environment and server availability. This is a good point against using other solutions. Because with other solutions, you don't have this feature. Then, you will be blind if you have this type of a situation."

"It supports active monitoring so we don't have to use traps. From time to time traps are not very useful because we never know if they are actually working or not. The reporting part is also valuable as are the event logs. Using them we can check right away if something has had a hiccup."

"Centreon is a solution, and it is very good and efficient if you put all your infrastructure inside."

More Centreon pros

"My experience with technical support has been perfect."

"The product is excellent."

Cons

"Centreon introduced network discovery in the most recent update. However, it doesn't work well. Our previous monitoring tool could discover networking equipment on the network and identify the relationships between the devices."

"There is room for improvement in the area of artificial intelligence. The product gives us a lot of information, but it's only information. We want the product to do more auto-remediation."

"The problem with the reporting is you have to configure the report, and after that, you will have the same report every month, every week, every day. You have to sync it in order to have a great report."

"Centreon needs to improve the granularity of the data as well as the graphical data. It would also be better to if there was improvement to the filtering/grouping system as well as the creation of views."

"Release management and quality of testing need improvement, because with each major upgrade we have many issues coming in. Then, it takes several minor upgrades to get rid of them."

"The most important issue is the capability to interconnect with other systems."

"The product collects the information, but it fails to send them via SMS, WhatsApp or Telegram."

"I went through a few things with them to do with Centreon MAP, to do with active polygons, being able to draw an area and make that active. The functionality was in the older version of Centreon MAP and in the new version, which was a complete rewrite, they dropped it."

More Centreon cons

"However, the license is expensive."

"The presentation of the features can be improved. It can be more user-friendly for the visual part of the portal and to allow the customer to be able to use."

"The presentation of the features can be improved."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"If you need basic monitoring without dashboards, just monitoring, the plugins are very useful and really cheap. If you want a more complete solution with dashboards and reporting, the EMS solution is great and it is not that much more expensive. It's a good value. Really good."

"Their licensing model is really easy. You have one license and you have access to all the features, compared to other tools where you have to purchase add-ons."

"In terms of licensing, you have to think through if the components that need licensing are really needed. For example, the Map module: If you don't need a map to be shown, I don't see a point in paying for those licenses, if you just use it a couple of times a month or a couple of times a week... You can use the Centreon free version and get the main features. The licensing part is, I would say, only for bigger customers who have the option to pay more and who really need those kinds of modules, fancy reports, etc."

"It is perfect and very cheap if you are a little company or startup. After that, it is quite expensive for a big company."

"Centreon is an open source product. Thus, there is no need for licensing."

"For more complex tasks, we use prepaid support days and ask Centreon to come onsite."

"The solution has a free part and after that threshold, you will need to pay. For example, if you believe you can create an interesting map, most of the time, you will have to pay 10,000 Euros per year for having access to these components."

"I would like to see improvement in the licensing model. You can purchase X number of licenses, up to 1,000 devices or 1,000 instances. Your next batch is 2,000. But what if you only need, say, 1,200? The model could be changed a little bit."

More Centreon pricing and cost advice

"The license is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Computer Software Company

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

22%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	14

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Centreon?

Centreon's pricing is not very expensive. Initially, I rated it seven, but corrected to five out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Centreon?

I have certain concerns with Centreon, such as being unable to set downtime for multiple devices at once due to the limitation of adding only 50 devices in a single go. Increasing this limit would ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Centreon?

We are using Centreon for monitoring devices, both LAN and WAN devices. There are subsidiaries for my company, so if any devices go down or there are any service alerts, we receive alerts through C...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Zabbix vs Centreon

Compared 9% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Centreon

Compared 7% of the time

Datadog vs Centreon

Compared 6% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Centreon

Compared 6% of the time

Nagios XI vs Centreon

Compared 5% of the time

More Centreon Competitors

IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs InfoVista VistaInsight

Compared 13% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs InfoVista VistaInsight

Compared 11% of the time

ObserverLIVE vs InfoVista VistaInsight

Compared 6% of the time

LiveNX vs InfoVista VistaInsight

Compared 4% of the time

DX NetOps vs InfoVista VistaInsight

Compared 4% of the time

More InfoVista VistaInsight Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Centreon

October 2026

Download Centreon product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

September 2026

Download InfoVista VistaInsight product report

Also Known As

No data available

VistaInsight

Overview

Centreon offers a robust IT infrastructure monitoring platform, featuring user-friendly dashboards and real-time monitoring. It excels in scalability and integration, making it suitable for monitoring diverse network environments.

Centreon stands out with its unified monitoring capabilities, providing businesses with user-friendly dashboards and extensive plugins for customization. Its scalability ensures companies can expand monitoring tasks without incurring additional costs. Integration capabilities allow seamless interaction with ticketing systems and automation tools. Centreon offers customizable reporting and effectively manages downtimes, providing real-time feedback and proactive maintenance through Business Activity and Anomaly Detection features. Despite its strengths, users find areas for improvement including downtime scheduling, API functionalities, UI enhancements, end-to-end monitoring, and documentation. Businesses are increasingly demanding better automation, network discovery, cloud monitoring, and notification options.

What are Centreon's standout features?

Unified Monitoring: Delivers a comprehensive monitoring platform for IT infrastructure.
User-Friendly Dashboards: Offers intuitive and customizable dashboards for efficient monitoring.
Extensive Plugins: Enables flexibility and customization through numerous plugins.
Scalability: Allows expansion of monitoring duties without additional costs.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly integrates with ticketing systems and other tools.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Cost Efficiency: Minimized resolution time through proactive maintenance features.
Ease of Use: Simplifies monitoring with its user-friendly interface.
Proactive Issue Resolution: Real-time monitoring and alerts help prevent service outages.
Customizable Reporting: Adapts reports to meet specific organizational requirements.
Diverse Network Management: Capable of handling diverse IT environments efficiently.

Centreon is implemented across industries to monitor IT infrastructures, including networks, servers, and applications. Companies leverage it to track server performance, manage network devices, and receive timely alerts on device status. Its ability to integrate with ticketing systems and automation tools streamlines operations, enhancing global IT infrastructure monitoring and customer service management with real-time feedback and issue resolution.

Centreon

InfoVista VistaInsight provides network performance monitoring with comprehensive capabilities for enterprises. It ensures efficient management and optimization of network resources, delivering insights that enhance operational efficiency.

InfoVista VistaInsight offers advanced analytics and reporting to help businesses optimize their networks. Designed for IT professionals, it enables proactive monitoring and detailed reports tailored to different industry needs. Flexible and scalable, it supports effective network management, contributing to improved customer satisfaction and reduced downtime. Organizations benefit from real-time visibility into system performance, facilitating strategic decision-making and resource allocation.

What are the key features of InfoVista VistaInsight?

Performance Analytics: Provides detailed performance data for both local and global networks, ensuring better decision-making.
Scalability: Adapts to growing network demands, supporting efficient management as organizations expand.
Custom Reporting: Offers customizable reports to fit specific requirements, enhancing actionable insights.
Real-Time Monitoring: Delivers instant visibility into network status, allowing for quick response to any issues.
Automation Capabilities: Increases efficiency through automation, reducing manual intervention and errors.

What benefits or ROI should users consider?

Operational Efficiency: Increases efficiency by streamlining network operations, reducing complexity and costs.
Resource Optimization: Helps better allocate resources, maximizing output and minimizing wastage.
Downtime Reduction: Minimizes downtime through proactive issue identification, ensuring continuous operations.
Strategic Decision-Making: Enhances decisions with accurate, timely data, improving overall strategic outcomes.
Customer Satisfaction: Improves user experience by maintaining high network performance standards.

InfoVista VistaInsight is used in telecommunications, financial services, and healthcare industries to monitor and optimize network performance. In telecommunications, it ensures seamless service delivery, while in finance, it protects transaction integrity. Healthcare providers use it to maintain critical service reliability, enhancing patient care.

Infovista

Sample Customers

Airbus, Bollore, BT, Canal Plus, Kuehne Nagel, Limagrain, LVMH, Oberthur Technologies, Orange, Darty, Addax Petroleum, Plastic Omnium, Auchan, Valeo, Saint Gobin, Clarins, Hugo Boss, JC Decaux, French Government (Defense, Justice, Environment, Agriculture), OptiComm, Thales, Zeiss.

Ooredoo Tunisia

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

September 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, SolarWinds and others in Network Monitoring Software. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.