Centreon vs Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) comparison

Centreon and Google are both solutions in the Cloud Monitoring Software category. Centreon is ranked #20 with an average rating of 7.3, while Google is ranked #16 with an average rating of 10.0. Centreon holds a 2.4% mindshare in CMS, compared to Google’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Centreon users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Google users who would recommend it.

Centreon

Read 31 Centreon reviews

8,080 Views
4,767 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Google Cloud's operations s...

Read 10 Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) reviews

4,265 Views
1,322 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Centreon

Google Cloud's operations s...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

Centreon and Google Cloud's operations suite compete in the realm of network and cloud monitoring. Google Cloud's operations suite appears to have an upper hand due to its extensive cloud capabilities and strong logging features.

Features: Centreon offers a platform for monitoring multiple LAN and WAN devices across organizations on a single interface. It provides customizable reporting and dashboarding and boasts scalability without additional licensing costs, focusing on reducing manual checks and saving time. Google Cloud's operations suite excels in multi-cloud integration, strong logging capabilities, and automatic monitoring, which are beneficial for cloud services.

Room for Improvement: Centreon could enhance its cloud monitoring capabilities, including web application tracking and AI features. Users find the alert configuration process cumbersome and express the need for advanced mobile app features and better release management. Google Cloud's operations suite could refine its APM functionality and offer more detailed application logging insights. Users also highlight difficulties in cost prediction due to usage-based pricing variability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Centreon is mainly deployed in on-premises or hybrid environments, with praised but not 24/7 technical support. Google Cloud's operations suite supports both public and private cloud deployments, offering ease of use and flexibility. While Centreon receives mixed reviews on support availability and costs, Google Cloud benefits from extensive online resources, catering well to developers requiring streamlined cloud operations.

Pricing and ROI: Centreon is notable for its cost-effectiveness as an open-source solution, though pricing can rise with enterprise features and support. It consolidates multiple solutions into a single platform, reducing costs, with ROI evident in reduced mean time to resolution and labor savings. Google Cloud's operations suite, considered cost-effective for basic use, has variable pricing due to its usage-based model, leading to potential unexpected costs. Nevertheless, both demonstrate strong ROI through enhanced productivity and efficiency, with Centreon focusing on resource savings and Google Cloud's suite offering scalable cloud capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Centreon vs. Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Centreon vs. Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 902,988 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Centreon

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

20th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (27th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (27th)

Google Cloud's operations s...

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

16th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (26th), Log Management (24th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Cloud Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Centreon is 2.4%, down from 3.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) is 0.9%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)	0.9%
Centreon	2.4%
Other	96.7%

Cloud Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Sulesh PK

Monitoring and Operations Pilot at Egis S.A.

Experience enhanced monitoring with real-time alerts and efficient support

I would like to see automation in the poller features, as currently, the poller is not automated. If we could automate the addition or removal of hosts in the poller, it would improve efficiency. Sometimes, Centreon does not show the status of services as updated, which should be addressed. Additionally, enhancements are needed in identifying configuration issues, providing real-time alerts in case of issues, and improving the HTTP configuration tasks, as Centreon does not currently display issues with HTTP links, requiring manual investigation.

Read full review

Anand_Patel

Senior Technical Architect at T-Systems International GmbH

Offers reliable Ops Agent and logging transport feature with easy third-party integrations

As part of our company, we implemented several changes in our log analytics pattern, including the storage and procurement process. Earlier, before implementing the solution, our company was able to procure only one year of data, but later, we came to the three-year mark. Around 15-20% reduction has been witnessed in the total analytic consumption of our company. The aforementioned result was possible because the solution allowed the creation of a dashboard where factors like storage costs, proportion of logs, and logs presence in a storage bucket or Big Query can all be checked. Earlier all logs were stored in a raw storage, but currently our company is able to move logs in table bucket that contributes towards cost savings. It has default integration for all gcp services. recently managed Prometheus support gives more flexibility to organizations to remain connected with their current Prometheus setup. We leveraged integrated FinOps Hub for recommendations for our workloads and server configurations, helpd us lot in order to get maximum TCO.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Centreon is one of our core tools and if we didn't have it, we couldn't do our job effectively."

"Centreon is a really capable tool that increases efficiency and gives you more information."

"We are alerted on service impacts and not when something is down. We have saved a lot of time on non-business-hours intervention."

"Centreon provides timesaving and costsaving benefits as it lets us manage multiple devices on a single platform."

"You can concentrate and orchestrate several other solutions from other vendors. You can consolidate those solutions all in one place, then maintain and monitor from that single point. This creates ease of use. It is a very powerful solution from this point of view."

"Once everything is set up correctly, it reduces our MTTR by 50 percent."

"We have a single GUI where we can view the status of all our infrastructure."

"Valuable features include the ability to schedule downtime, intensity or depth of monitoring which it does, different plugin packs, Centreon MAP, Centreon BI."

More Centreon pros

"Google's technical support is very good."

"Provides visibility into the performance uptime."

"I would tell potential users that the current version is much nicer than the previous one."

"We find the solution to be stable."

"Offers a valuable logging transport feature"

"It's easy to use."

"It has reduced the amount of time that we would take for troubleshooting."

"It has really been helpful in detecting, identifying, and troubleshooting issues with cloud services used in the organization."

More Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) pros

Cons

"The product collects the information, but it fails to send them via SMS, WhatsApp or Telegram."

"I would like them to improve their documentation. When I faced some issues, I was looking for more documentation on the Internet. There is official documentation on Centreon's website, which sometimes is useful. Sometimes it is not very useful, as you cannot find the information or enough examples of configuration. The answer for me was to contact the support, who helped me, but I was not able to find all the information by myself on Centreon's website. A Centreon community or blog would be helpful."

"Centreon supports officially 10,000 services per poller. That is not much for larger customers, because this limit is reached very quickly. We use it with three times the limit without any problems, but Centreon says, "Okay, we are only supporting it with 10,000 services." We are aware that increasing the limit has different impacts because they need to support it. However, for most customers, it would be be very good if they could increase the limit of services."

"The most important issue is the capability to interconnect with other systems. It already exists for some of them. For example, the Stream Connector is something we use to populate data in another system. This kind of facility for connecting should exist for all products that it makes sense to have connected to a monitoring solution."

"Centreon needs to improve the granularity of the data as well as the graphical data. It would also be better to if there was improvement to the filtering/grouping system as well as the creation of views."

"There are times when we face issues with Centreon being in development mode. Sometimes we do not receive alerts, causing business impact, and users ask why no alerts were received."

"It is necessary to improve service monitoring of database services in the free version."

"Release management and quality of testing need improvement, because with each major upgrade we have many issues coming in. Then, it takes several minor upgrades to get rid of them."

More Centreon cons

"If I want to track any round-trip or breakdowns of my response times, I'm not able to get it. My request goes through various levels of the Google Cloud Platform (GCP) and comes back to my client machine. Suppose that my request has taken 10 seconds overall, so if I want to break it down, to see where the delay is happening within my architecture, I am not able to find that out using Stackdriver."

"This solution could be improved if it offered the ability to analyze charts, such as a solution like Kibana."

"If I want to track any round-trip or breakdowns of my response times, I'm not able to get it."

"It could be even more automated."

"The process of logging analytics can be improved"

"While we are satisfied with the overall performance, in certain cases we must add additional metrics and additional tools like Grafana and Dynatrace."

"Operations documentation could be a bit better. It took us some time to get up and running with it."

"Lacking sufficient operations documentation."

More Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"You purchase a package. You have a support contract (there is also a platinum support contract) and it is per module. That means you have to pay, e.g., for the MBI module or the BAM module. Or, if you want to save a lot of money, you can pay for IMP, which is the complete package."

"In terms of licensing, you have to think through if the components that need licensing are really needed. For example, the Map module: If you don't need a map to be shown, I don't see a point in paying for those licenses, if you just use it a couple of times a month or a couple of times a week... You can use the Centreon free version and get the main features. The licensing part is, I would say, only for bigger customers who have the option to pay more and who really need those kinds of modules, fancy reports, etc."

"Centreon is always available to develop new plugins when needed. The most important thing is that their maintenance account yearly subscription fee includes the fact that they will maintain the new plugins that you requested them to deliver."

"The pricing is acceptable."

"The solution has a free part and after that threshold, you will need to pay. For example, if you believe you can create an interesting map, most of the time, you will have to pay 10,000 Euros per year for having access to these components."

"Their licensing model is really easy. You have one license and you have access to all the features, compared to other tools where you have to purchase add-ons."

"The solution is very effective, despite the low price."

"The tool is cheaply priced."

More Centreon pricing and cost advice

"We have a basic standard license without any additional costs."

"The cost could be lower."

"The cost of using Stackdriver depends on usage."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

11%

Construction Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

13%

Construction Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	14

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	9

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Centreon?

Centreon's pricing is not very expensive. Initially, I rated it seven, but corrected to five out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Centreon?

I have certain concerns with Centreon, such as being unable to set downtime for multiple devices at once due to the limitation of adding only 50 devices in a single go. Increasing this limit would ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Centreon?

We are using Centreon for monitoring devices, both LAN and WAN devices. There are subsidiaries for my company, so if any devices go down or there are any service alerts, we receive alerts through C...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Stackdriver?

As Ops Suite, is a google product which effectively comes at zero setup cost, in order to manage your on-premises logs on onsite, it involves negligible cost for using ops agent and it also include...

See all answers

Comparisons

Zabbix vs Centreon

Compared 10% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Centreon

Compared 9% of the time

Datadog vs Centreon

Compared 7% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Centreon

Compared 7% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs Centreon

Compared 5% of the time

More Centreon Competitors

Datadog vs Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)

Compared 8% of the time

AWS X-Ray vs Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)

Compared 7% of the time

Amazon CloudWatch vs Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)

Compared 6% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)

Compared 5% of the time

New Relic vs Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)

Compared 4% of the time

More Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Centreon

June 2026

Download Centreon product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

June 2026

Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) report

Download Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) product report

Also Known As

No data available

Google Stackdriver, Stackdriver, Stackdriver Monitoring, Stackdriver Logging, Google Cloud Monitoring

Overview

Centreon offers a robust IT infrastructure monitoring platform, featuring user-friendly dashboards and real-time monitoring. It excels in scalability and integration, making it suitable for monitoring diverse network environments.

Centreon stands out with its unified monitoring capabilities, providing businesses with user-friendly dashboards and extensive plugins for customization. Its scalability ensures companies can expand monitoring tasks without incurring additional costs. Integration capabilities allow seamless interaction with ticketing systems and automation tools. Centreon offers customizable reporting and effectively manages downtimes, providing real-time feedback and proactive maintenance through Business Activity and Anomaly Detection features. Despite its strengths, users find areas for improvement including downtime scheduling, API functionalities, UI enhancements, end-to-end monitoring, and documentation. Businesses are increasingly demanding better automation, network discovery, cloud monitoring, and notification options.

What are Centreon's standout features?

Unified Monitoring: Delivers a comprehensive monitoring platform for IT infrastructure.
User-Friendly Dashboards: Offers intuitive and customizable dashboards for efficient monitoring.
Extensive Plugins: Enables flexibility and customization through numerous plugins.
Scalability: Allows expansion of monitoring duties without additional costs.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly integrates with ticketing systems and other tools.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Cost Efficiency: Minimized resolution time through proactive maintenance features.
Ease of Use: Simplifies monitoring with its user-friendly interface.
Proactive Issue Resolution: Real-time monitoring and alerts help prevent service outages.
Customizable Reporting: Adapts reports to meet specific organizational requirements.
Diverse Network Management: Capable of handling diverse IT environments efficiently.

Centreon is implemented across industries to monitor IT infrastructures, including networks, servers, and applications. Companies leverage it to track server performance, manage network devices, and receive timely alerts on device status. Its ability to integrate with ticketing systems and automation tools streamlines operations, enhancing global IT infrastructure monitoring and customer service management with real-time feedback and issue resolution.

Centreon

Google Cloud's operations suite is a comprehensive toolset offering multi-cloud support, insights into performance, uptime, health, and scalable logging for seamless cloud operations.

This suite by Google Cloud provides robust features for organizations managing workloads on GCP and AWS. It offers real-time logging and monitoring, aiding in efficient troubleshooting and performance analysis. With automatic monitoring, statistical insights for Kubernetes and VPNs, and the ability to manage logs, it helps in optimizing technology changes and supports risk management. Despite needs for better APM, cost clarity, migration tools, and enhanced documentation, companies benefit from its capabilities in tracking errors and analyzing metrics in execution environments.

What are the key features of Google Cloud's operations suite?

Multi-cloud Integration: Seamless support for GCP and AWS environments.
Performance Visibility: Insights into system health and uptime.
Scalable Logging: Efficient log management and export capabilities.
User-friendly Interface: Intuitive interaction for easy monitoring configuration.

What benefits and ROI can be expected from Google Cloud's operations suite?

Enhanced Monitoring: Real-time updates facilitate swift response to performance issues.
Efficient Troubleshooting: Detailed log analysis helps resolve code issues quickly.
Performance Analysis: Dashboards support engineering load testing and SLA monitoring.

Industries utilizing Google Cloud's operations suite find it invaluable for optimizing cloud operations, especially in sectors involving extensive database requests and workload execution. Java and Python teams leverage its logging and alert capabilities for improved error tracking and metrics analysis, crucial for maintaining high-performance standards in tech-driven environments.

Google

Sample Customers

Airbus, Bollore, BT, Canal Plus, Kuehne Nagel, Limagrain, LVMH, Oberthur Technologies, Orange, Darty, Addax Petroleum, Plastic Omnium, Auchan, Valeo, Saint Gobin, Clarins, Hugo Boss, JC Decaux, French Government (Defense, Justice, Environment, Agriculture), OptiComm, Thales, Zeiss.

Uber, Batterii, Q42, Dovetail Games

Buyer's Guide

Centreon vs. Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)

June 2026

Free Report: Centreon vs. Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)

Find out what your peers are saying about Centreon vs. Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Centreon vs. Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) report.

See our list of best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.