Centreon vs Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) comparison

Centreon and Google are both solutions in the Cloud Monitoring Software category. Centreon is ranked #21 with an average rating of 7.3, while Google is ranked #16 with an average rating of 10.0. Centreon holds a 2.3% mindshare in CMS, compared to Google’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Centreon users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Google users who would recommend it.

Centreon

Read 31 Centreon reviews

8,544 Views
4,870 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Google Cloud's operations s...

Read 10 Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) reviews

4,559 Views
1,413 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Centreon

Google Cloud's operations s...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

Centreon and Google Cloud's operations suite compete in the realm of network and cloud monitoring. Google Cloud's operations suite appears to have an upper hand due to its extensive cloud capabilities and strong logging features.

Features: Centreon offers a platform for monitoring multiple LAN and WAN devices across organizations on a single interface. It provides customizable reporting and dashboarding and boasts scalability without additional licensing costs, focusing on reducing manual checks and saving time. Google Cloud's operations suite excels in multi-cloud integration, strong logging capabilities, and automatic monitoring, which are beneficial for cloud services.

Room for Improvement: Centreon could enhance its cloud monitoring capabilities, including web application tracking and AI features. Users find the alert configuration process cumbersome and express the need for advanced mobile app features and better release management. Google Cloud's operations suite could refine its APM functionality and offer more detailed application logging insights. Users also highlight difficulties in cost prediction due to usage-based pricing variability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Centreon is mainly deployed in on-premises or hybrid environments, with praised but not 24/7 technical support. Google Cloud's operations suite supports both public and private cloud deployments, offering ease of use and flexibility. While Centreon receives mixed reviews on support availability and costs, Google Cloud benefits from extensive online resources, catering well to developers requiring streamlined cloud operations.

Pricing and ROI: Centreon is notable for its cost-effectiveness as an open-source solution, though pricing can rise with enterprise features and support. It consolidates multiple solutions into a single platform, reducing costs, with ROI evident in reduced mean time to resolution and labor savings. Google Cloud's operations suite, considered cost-effective for basic use, has variable pricing due to its usage-based model, leading to potential unexpected costs. Nevertheless, both demonstrate strong ROI through enhanced productivity and efficiency, with Centreon focusing on resource savings and Google Cloud's suite offering scalable cloud capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Centreon vs. Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Centreon vs. Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Centreon

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

21st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (27th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (27th)

Google Cloud's operations s...

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

16th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (28th), Log Management (26th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Cloud Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Centreon is 2.3%, down from 3.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) is 0.9%, down from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)	0.9%
Centreon	2.3%
Other	96.8%

Cloud Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Sulesh PK

Monitoring and Operations Pilot at Egis S.A.

Experience enhanced monitoring with real-time alerts and efficient support

I would like to see automation in the poller features, as currently, the poller is not automated. If we could automate the addition or removal of hosts in the poller, it would improve efficiency. Sometimes, Centreon does not show the status of services as updated, which should be addressed. Additionally, enhancements are needed in identifying configuration issues, providing real-time alerts in case of issues, and improving the HTTP configuration tasks, as Centreon does not currently display issues with HTTP links, requiring manual investigation.

Read full review

Anand_Patel

Senior Technical Architect at T-Systems International GmbH

Offers reliable Ops Agent and logging transport feature with easy third-party integrations

As part of our company, we implemented several changes in our log analytics pattern, including the storage and procurement process. Earlier, before implementing the solution, our company was able to procure only one year of data, but later, we came to the three-year mark. Around 15-20% reduction has been witnessed in the total analytic consumption of our company. The aforementioned result was possible because the solution allowed the creation of a dashboard where factors like storage costs, proportion of logs, and logs presence in a storage bucket or Big Query can all be checked. Earlier all logs were stored in a raw storage, but currently our company is able to move logs in table bucket that contributes towards cost savings. It has default integration for all gcp services. recently managed Prometheus support gives more flexibility to organizations to remain connected with their current Prometheus setup. We leveraged integrated FinOps Hub for recommendations for our workloads and server configurations, helpd us lot in order to get maximum TCO.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"My advice would be to go ahead with Centreon; don't waste time, go ahead."

"E-mail alert notifications are valuable."

"We use the remote server functionality on some customer sites, because you can see an independent view and are not dependent on a single connection. If you have branch offices or bigger office outside your headquarters, you can use remote servers because if the connection is broken or disrupted, then remote server will obtain a view of your environment and server availability. This is a good point against using other solutions. Because with other solutions, you don't have this feature. Then, you will be blind if you have this type of a situation."

"We have a single GUI where we can view the status of all our infrastructure."

"The product is available in ISO image format, ready for deployment. Centreon also has a comprehensive guide and documentation that are simple and easy to follow."

"The dashboards are valuable because they ease troubleshooting and viewing. It becomes easier to locate the source of a problem... The dashboards make it easier to communicate with our clients. They don't want to see the alert console, they want to see a beautiful dashboard representing their network and their business and to watch it in case something is wrong in their environment."

"I can't point to one valuable feature. All of Centreon is good."

"Predetermined templates allow for simple and fast service monitoring configuration."

More Centreon pros

"It has really been helpful in detecting, identifying, and troubleshooting issues with cloud services used in the organization."

"I like the monitoring feature."

"The most valuable feature is the multi-cloud integration, where there is support for both GCP and AWS."

"I would tell potential users that the current version is much nicer than the previous one."

"The solution has improved our organization by reducing latency and also monitoring the costs of GCP usage by using the logging and monitoring features."

"Google Stackdriver is all about activity."

"It has reduced the amount of time that we would take for troubleshooting."

"The cloud login enables us to get our logs from the different platforms that we currently use."

More Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) pros

Cons

"I think Centreon's security could be improved by leveraging AI. That's where things are heading in the industry."

"Opening a ticket on the website of Centreon can be difficult for my colleague, but not for me because my English is good. However, my colleague doesn't speak English well, as our company is in Quebec and our first language is French."

"Improvements I would like to see include a discovery solution, better reports, and end-to-end monitoring."

"Centreon is actually missing an easy way to create a trendline for the metrics. Actually it is possible to create it, but you need a good knowledge of math, Centreon, and RRD."

"It is necessary to improve service monitoring of database services in the free version."

"They only sell four hour slots for support, so if you have just one question, then you need to pay for four hours."

"To get it started is a lot of work, since it comes empty. We had to push information into it to make it work."

"Sometimes, Centreon does not show the status of services as updated, which should be addressed."

More Centreon cons

"Google Stackdriver is a stable product, but there is some lagging we cannot stop."

"This solution could be improved if it offered the ability to analyze charts, such as a solution like Kibana."

"The logging functionality could be better."

"The process of logging analytics can be improved"

"It is difficult to estimate in advance how much something is going to cost."

"It could be more stable."

"If I want to track any round-trip or breakdowns of my response times, I'm not able to get it."

"If I want to track any round-trip or breakdowns of my response times, I'm not able to get it. My request goes through various levels of the Google Cloud Platform (GCP) and comes back to my client machine. Suppose that my request has taken 10 seconds overall, so if I want to break it down, to see where the delay is happening within my architecture, I am not able to find that out using Stackdriver."

More Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"You purchase a package. You have a support contract (there is also a platinum support contract) and it is per module. That means you have to pay, e.g., for the MBI module or the BAM module. Or, if you want to save a lot of money, you can pay for IMP, which is the complete package."

"The pricing works out well for us, given our environment and where we are."

"I would like to see improvement in the licensing model. You can purchase X number of licenses, up to 1,000 devices or 1,000 instances. Your next batch is 2,000. But what if you only need, say, 1,200? The model could be changed a little bit."

"The pricing is acceptable."

"The solution is very effective, despite the low price."

"In terms of licensing, you have to think through if the components that need licensing are really needed. For example, the Map module: If you don't need a map to be shown, I don't see a point in paying for those licenses, if you just use it a couple of times a month or a couple of times a week... You can use the Centreon free version and get the main features. The licensing part is, I would say, only for bigger customers who have the option to pay more and who really need those kinds of modules, fancy reports, etc."

"The pricing starts at around 5000 euro. However, this depends on: Your environment, the size of your host, how many hosts you have, how many remote pollers you have, and if you want to use the Monitoring Business Intelligence or Centreon MAP functionalities."

"The price is not too high. Licensing is driven by how many hosts you monitor, but because you can run the agentless version, you don't have to declare every host to Centreon, one at a time. That means you can drive your infrastructure supervision with a very low number of declared hosts."

More Centreon pricing and cost advice

"The cost of using Stackdriver depends on usage."

"We have a basic standard license without any additional costs."

"The cost could be lower."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

12%

Construction Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	14

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	9

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Centreon?

Centreon's pricing is not very expensive. Initially, I rated it seven, but corrected to five out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Centreon?

I have certain concerns with Centreon, such as being unable to set downtime for multiple devices at once due to the limitation of adding only 50 devices in a single go. Increasing this limit would ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Centreon?

We are using Centreon for monitoring devices, both LAN and WAN devices. There are subsidiaries for my company, so if any devices go down or there are any service alerts, we receive alerts through C...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Google Stackdriver?

As Ops Suite, is a google product which effectively comes at zero setup cost, in order to manage your on-premises logs on onsite, it involves negligible cost for using ops agent and it also include...

See all answers

Comparisons

Zabbix vs Centreon

Compared 9% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Centreon

Compared 8% of the time

Datadog vs Centreon

Compared 7% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Centreon

Compared 6% of the time

Nagios XI vs Centreon

Compared 5% of the time

More Centreon Competitors

Datadog vs Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)

Compared 8% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)

Compared 7% of the time

AWS X-Ray vs Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)

Compared 6% of the time

Amazon CloudWatch vs Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)

Compared 5% of the time

Mezmo vs Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)

Compared 4% of the time

More Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Centreon

August 2026

Download Centreon product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

August 2026

Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) report

Download Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) product report

Also Known As

No data available

Google Stackdriver, Stackdriver, Stackdriver Monitoring, Stackdriver Logging, Google Cloud Monitoring

Overview

Centreon offers a robust IT infrastructure monitoring platform, featuring user-friendly dashboards and real-time monitoring. It excels in scalability and integration, making it suitable for monitoring diverse network environments.

Centreon stands out with its unified monitoring capabilities, providing businesses with user-friendly dashboards and extensive plugins for customization. Its scalability ensures companies can expand monitoring tasks without incurring additional costs. Integration capabilities allow seamless interaction with ticketing systems and automation tools. Centreon offers customizable reporting and effectively manages downtimes, providing real-time feedback and proactive maintenance through Business Activity and Anomaly Detection features. Despite its strengths, users find areas for improvement including downtime scheduling, API functionalities, UI enhancements, end-to-end monitoring, and documentation. Businesses are increasingly demanding better automation, network discovery, cloud monitoring, and notification options.

What are Centreon's standout features?

Unified Monitoring: Delivers a comprehensive monitoring platform for IT infrastructure.
User-Friendly Dashboards: Offers intuitive and customizable dashboards for efficient monitoring.
Extensive Plugins: Enables flexibility and customization through numerous plugins.
Scalability: Allows expansion of monitoring duties without additional costs.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly integrates with ticketing systems and other tools.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Cost Efficiency: Minimized resolution time through proactive maintenance features.
Ease of Use: Simplifies monitoring with its user-friendly interface.
Proactive Issue Resolution: Real-time monitoring and alerts help prevent service outages.
Customizable Reporting: Adapts reports to meet specific organizational requirements.
Diverse Network Management: Capable of handling diverse IT environments efficiently.

Centreon is implemented across industries to monitor IT infrastructures, including networks, servers, and applications. Companies leverage it to track server performance, manage network devices, and receive timely alerts on device status. Its ability to integrate with ticketing systems and automation tools streamlines operations, enhancing global IT infrastructure monitoring and customer service management with real-time feedback and issue resolution.

Centreon

Google Cloud's operations suite is a comprehensive toolset offering multi-cloud support, insights into performance, uptime, health, and scalable logging for seamless cloud operations.

This suite by Google Cloud provides robust features for organizations managing workloads on GCP and AWS. It offers real-time logging and monitoring, aiding in efficient troubleshooting and performance analysis. With automatic monitoring, statistical insights for Kubernetes and VPNs, and the ability to manage logs, it helps in optimizing technology changes and supports risk management. Despite needs for better APM, cost clarity, migration tools, and enhanced documentation, companies benefit from its capabilities in tracking errors and analyzing metrics in execution environments.

What are the key features of Google Cloud's operations suite?

Multi-cloud Integration: Seamless support for GCP and AWS environments.
Performance Visibility: Insights into system health and uptime.
Scalable Logging: Efficient log management and export capabilities.
User-friendly Interface: Intuitive interaction for easy monitoring configuration.

What benefits and ROI can be expected from Google Cloud's operations suite?

Enhanced Monitoring: Real-time updates facilitate swift response to performance issues.
Efficient Troubleshooting: Detailed log analysis helps resolve code issues quickly.
Performance Analysis: Dashboards support engineering load testing and SLA monitoring.

Industries utilizing Google Cloud's operations suite find it invaluable for optimizing cloud operations, especially in sectors involving extensive database requests and workload execution. Java and Python teams leverage its logging and alert capabilities for improved error tracking and metrics analysis, crucial for maintaining high-performance standards in tech-driven environments.

Google

Sample Customers

Airbus, Bollore, BT, Canal Plus, Kuehne Nagel, Limagrain, LVMH, Oberthur Technologies, Orange, Darty, Addax Petroleum, Plastic Omnium, Auchan, Valeo, Saint Gobin, Clarins, Hugo Boss, JC Decaux, French Government (Defense, Justice, Environment, Agriculture), OptiComm, Thales, Zeiss.

Uber, Batterii, Q42, Dovetail Games

Buyer's Guide

Centreon vs. Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)

August 2026

Free Report: Centreon vs. Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)

Find out what your peers are saying about Centreon vs. Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Centreon vs. Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) report.

See our list of best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.