Centerity Monitor vs Icinga comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Centerity Systems Logo
394 views|238 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Icinga Logo
3,564 views|3,156 comparisons
84% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Centerity Monitor and Icinga based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring.
To learn more, read our detailed IT Infrastructure Monitoring Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,479 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The machine learning feature is valuable."

More Centerity Monitor Pros →

"I like the ability to amend and adjust things really easily, which is useful in a case where you could make it auto-discover and then set a template to say all of these applications or servers under this template have an automatic threshold set that you’d set up manually.""The apply rules feature saves a lot of time.""The value of Icinga is that it has hundreds of plugins, so it's really easy to monitor pretty much anything.""Macros and the ability to connect it to Google Maps are valuable features.""It is really easy in Icinga to create your own plugin and integrate it without any fuss. And it works just perfectly fine.""There's a module called Icinga Director, which helps us configure the product using an intuitive interface through clicks instead of creating a text configuration. It's very helpful for us.""An affordable solution for small organizations to do basic network monitoring.""The best thing about the solution is how it highlights errors, the issues, and what needs my attention. The solution directs me to areas that I should look for first."

More Icinga Pros →

Cons
"They can improve the functionality that provides some numbers related to the behavior of the metrics."

More Centerity Monitor Cons →

"The tool currently fails to provide notifications to users.""The installation and configuration are very complex.""One of the areas that are frustrating is remote monitoring for more than one machine.""In general, the product does not look good. However, it does what it is supposed to do. So, the improvements should focus on usability and UI.""The solution lacks many features important to higher-level IT management and network support.""The user interface should be improved.""Icinga’s automation could be improved.""One thing that Icinga lacks is the capability to create advanced and customized dashboards within the tool itself."

More Icinga Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "The product is inexpensive compared to other DBM products."
  • "This is an open-source solution with paid support."
  • "It's an open-source solution."
  • "We're using the free version of Icinga."
  • "Even though Icinga's financial cost is low, it is an expensive product regarding the resources required to maintain and operate it."
  • "The solution is free to use."
  • "The solution is cheap."
  • More Icinga Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
    769,479 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:The best thing about the solution is how it highlights errors, the issues, and what needs my attention. The solution directs me to areas that I should look for first.
    Top Answer:I wasn't involved with the finance side of the product. I just tested the product and gave feedback to the IT team in our company.
    Top Answer:I didn't have a problem with Icinga since I just use it for monitoring purposes. I haven't faced any issues with Icinga to date, and I think that it is a good solution. Right now, in my company… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    394
    Comparisons
    238
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    3,564
    Comparisons
    3,156
    Reviews
    8
    Average Words per Review
    596
    Rating
    7.9
    Comparisons
    Zabbix logo
    Compared 26% of the time.
    Checkmk logo
    Compared 21% of the time.
    Nagios Core logo
    Compared 15% of the time.
    Nagios XI logo
    Compared 8% of the time.
    Centreon logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    Also Known As
    Icinga Cloud Monitoring
    Learn More
    Overview
    Centerity is the pioneer provider of an All-in-One, IT Monitoring and Business Service Management (BSM) platform. Whereas legacy tools have focused on monitoring individual technologies which led to silos of performance data, Centerity breaks down silos by extending its monitoring coverage across all technology layers, from infrastructure (physical, virtual, converged, AWS, etc.) to applications (OS, SAP, Cloudera, etc.) and databases (SAP HANA, Hadoop, NoSQL, etc.), thereby providing an integrated, holistic view of system health, performance and availability. Centerity’s unique, unified platform, named a Gartner Cool Vendor in ITOM, can serve the needs of both IT executives and administrators while providing a complete business intelligence layer across all IT assets via cross technical and functional domain impact and trend analysis through its Business Service Management (BSM) capabilities.
    Icinga monitors infrastructures of all sizes with the integrated cluster system secured by SSL, Integrates with DevOps tools and uses an object based configuration or provision on users' monitoring code through the REST API. Icinga has a lightweight and extensible web interface to keep an eye on your environment and provides modules that extend the functionality of Icinga Web 2. Additionally, it offers a fully preconfigured monitoring stack or just add an external perspective.
    Sample Customers
    Centerity Systems has thousands of customers world wide, including Fortune 500 Enterprises such as Cisco, General Electric, Siemens, Harris Corporation, and Coca-Cola.
    Puppet Labs, Audi, Spacex, Debian, Snapdeal, McGill, RIPE Network Coordination Centre
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company21%
    Comms Service Provider15%
    Construction Company7%
    Legal Firm6%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm29%
    Computer Software Company29%
    Educational Organization14%
    University14%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    Government7%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise29%
    Large Enterprise52%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business47%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise37%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise59%
    Buyer's Guide
    IT Infrastructure Monitoring
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring. Updated: April 2024.
    769,479 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Centerity Monitor is ranked 68th in IT Infrastructure Monitoring while Icinga is ranked 23rd in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 16 reviews. Centerity Monitor is rated 7.0, while Icinga is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Centerity Monitor writes "A user-friendly solution that comes with a valuable machine learning feature". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Icinga writes "A stable, scalable and cost-effective solution that helps with inbuilt scripts for easy modification". Centerity Monitor is most compared with , whereas Icinga is most compared with Zabbix, Checkmk, Nagios Core, Nagios XI and Centreon.

    See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

    We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.