Camunda vs SoftExpert BPM comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Camunda Logo
32,793 views|19,869 comparisons
88% willing to recommend
SoftExpert Logo
152 views|88 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Camunda and SoftExpert BPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Camunda vs. SoftExpert BPM Report (Updated: April 2024).
771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"We are using the BPMN engine of Camunda; we are not using the user interface. We are using just the engine, the back end of this. For us, it is working quite well.""We can easily define and deploy business processes. Camunda provides the tools that allow business people to design business processes. We don't have to have developers for it. It is so easy to use that our business people can go into the tool and model their business processes. We get time to do other things than just designing business processes.""The solution is useful for small projects.""The most valuable features are the workflow, the task list, and the modeler where we use VPN.""I love that Camunda is a very developer-friendly platform, and my customers have evaluated the pricing as reasonable.""Camunda's process diagram creation and deployment is very easy.""I like everything about the entire BPM that comes with the BPM suite.""The solution is easily compatible with HTML forms and HTML language programming and that is the most significant part."

More Camunda Pros →

"A complete project management suite in one integrated package.""The most valuable feature of SoftExpert BPM is its ease of use."

More SoftExpert BPM Pros →

Cons
"I would like to have a feature for audit logging, audit logs and audit log management. And some history of use for the audit logs.""The latency of API could be decreased.""I think it would be important to internationalize the Cockpit and the Admin as well as with the Tasklist.""I would also like a very easy to use form builder.""The product's initial setup phase is difficult for beginners.""The initial set up could be simplified, it's complex.""It lacks some preset features and configurations which would make it more plug-and-play for customers.""The product does not have a dictionary."

More Camunda Cons →

"The form in SoftExpert BPM should improve.""It could do more to use all the data it collects to intelligently manage the user experience."

More SoftExpert BPM Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It is less cost-prohibitive than other solutions on the market. This solution was in our price range."
  • "We are using the open-source version of this solution."
  • "Camunda is much cheaper."
  • "I use the open-source free version."
  • "The open-source version of the product is free to use."
  • "The cost of this solution is better than some competing products."
  • "Licensing costs are anywhere from $80,000 to $100,000 USD per year."
  • "We use the open-source version, which can be used at no cost."
  • More Camunda Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The price of SoftExpert BPM is not expensive."
  • More SoftExpert BPM Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
    771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You can… more »
    Top Answer:Appian is fast when building simple to medium solutions. This solution offers simple drag-and-drop functionality with easy plug-and-play options. The initial setup was seamless and very easy to… more »
    Top Answer:Camunda Platform allows for visual demonstration and presentation of business process flows. The flexible Java-based option was a big win for us and allows for the integration of microservices very… more »
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature of SoftExpert BPM is its ease of use.
    Top Answer:The price of SoftExpert BPM is not expensive.
    Top Answer:The form in SoftExpert BPM should improve.
    Ranking
    Views
    32,793
    Comparisons
    19,869
    Reviews
    24
    Average Words per Review
    921
    Rating
    8.1
    Views
    152
    Comparisons
    88
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    180
    Rating
    10.0
    Comparisons
    Apache Airflow logo
    Compared 21% of the time.
    Bizagi logo
    Compared 9% of the time.
    Pega BPM logo
    Compared 9% of the time.
    IBM BPM logo
    Compared 8% of the time.
    Appian logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    Also Known As
    Camunda BPM
    Learn More
    Camunda
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Camunda enables organizations to orchestrate processes across people, systems, and devices to continuously overcome complexity and increase efficiency. A common visual language enables seamless collaboration between business and IT teams to design, automate, and improve end-to-end processes with the required speed, scale, and resilience to remain competitive. Hundreds of enterprises such as Atlassian, ING, and Vodafone orchestrate business-critical processes with Camunda to accelerate digital transformation. To learn more visit camunda.com.

    SoftExpert is a market leader in software and services for enterprise-wide business process improvement and compliance management, providing the most comprehensive application suite to empower organizations to increase business performance at all levels and to maximize industry-mandated compliance and corporate governance programs.

    Sample Customers
    24 Hour Fitness, Accruent, AT&T Inc., Atlassian, CSS Insurance, Deutsche Telekom, Generali, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, Swisscom AG, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VHV Group, Zalando
    Coca Cola, CRODA, CSN, Abril, Midea Carrier
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company22%
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Comms Service Provider12%
    Government12%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm26%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Insurance Company6%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business48%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise33%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise69%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Camunda vs. SoftExpert BPM
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda vs. SoftExpert BPM and other solutions. Updated: April 2024.
    771,212 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Camunda is ranked 1st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 69 reviews while SoftExpert BPM is ranked 22nd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 2 reviews. Camunda is rated 8.2, while SoftExpert BPM is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SoftExpert BPM writes "Quick deployment, high availability, and easy to use". Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian, whereas SoftExpert BPM is most compared with . See our Camunda vs. SoftExpert BPM report.

    See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

    We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.