Cambium Networks Wireless LAN vs Mojo Networks comparison

Cambium Networks and Arista are both solutions in the Wireless LAN category. Cambium Networks is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.5, while Arista is ranked #26. Cambium Networks holds a 1.9% mindshare in Wireless LAN, compared to Arista’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Cambium Networks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Arista users who would recommend it.

Cambium Networks Wireless LAN

Read 19 Cambium Networks Wireless LAN reviews

1,275 Views
1,275 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Mojo Networks

Read 17 Mojo Networks reviews

686 Views
665 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Cambium Networks Wireless LAN

Mojo Networks

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 31, 2024

Mojo Networks and Cambium Networks compete in the Wireless LAN market. Cambium Networks often has the upper hand due to its advanced features catering to enterprise needs, although Mojo Networks provides better pricing and support.

Features: Mojo Networks offers robust security measures, innovative cloud-based management for centralized control, and excellent analytics capabilities. Cambium Networks Wireless LAN is known for extensive scalability options, reliability in diverse environments, and ease of configuration without licensing hassles.

Room for Improvement: Mojo Networks could enhance its scalability for larger deployments, improve network visibility tools, and streamline integration with third-party platforms. Cambium Networks Wireless LAN can work on reducing initial setup complexity, improve support for real-time analytics, and enhance indoor coverage consistency.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Mojo Networks provides a straightforward deployment process with comprehensive remote support, allowing easy network management. Cambium Networks Wireless LAN offers a flexible deployment model with excellent in-field support, adapting to complex installations with a robust customer service approach.

Pricing and ROI: Mojo Networks offers competitive setup costs, leading to a quicker ROI for smaller enterprises. Cambium Networks Wireless LAN, while higher in initial costs, delivers greater long-term ROI through its comprehensive feature set and scalability, proving cost-effective for large organizations.

To learn more, read our detailed Cambium Networks Wireless LAN vs. Mojo Networks Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cambium Networks Wireless LAN vs. Mojo Networks

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,768 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cambium Networks Wireless LAN

Ranking in Wireless LAN

14th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mojo Networks

Ranking in Wireless LAN

26th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Wireless LAN category, the mindshare of Cambium Networks Wireless LAN is 1.9%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Mojo Networks is 0.6%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Wireless LAN Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Cambium Networks Wireless LAN	1.9%
Mojo Networks	0.6%
Other	97.5%

Wireless LAN

Featured Reviews

Manoj Adiga

Senior Manager Solutions at iBus Network & Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.

Reliable connectivity and robust support enhance customer experience

We are working with version 2.0, which is usually the latest one.Cambium Networks Wireless LAN is 100% reliable, as I have never faced any issues in our deployment after deployment, and the support is also very good. It takes a maximum of 15-20 minutes to configure one particular site of Cambium Networks Wireless LAN. The usual deployment process involves inspecting the hardware at our warehouse, dispatching it to the customer location, where the vendor installs the access point, and once it has internet, the configuration will be directly pushed from the cloud to the access point, making it up and running. Currently, around 100 plus of my customers are using this solution. My customers are a mix of medium and enterprise businesses. The least amount my customers usually pay is around $1,000, and the largest amount is approximately $10,000 per year. On a scale of 1-10, I rate Cambium Networks Wireless LAN a 9 overall.

Read full review

Robert Wambani

CTO at JabJabGroup

Offers great control and visibility to users, along with availability on the cloud

The other solutions did not offer the visibility that Mojo Networks offered. During the rolling out of the installation process, you have to go through the on-premises model to be able to make some changes. If somebody needs to make necessary changes, you must go to the on-premises model with the initial product. With the cloud solution, you don't have to go for the on-premises model, as you can make the changes over the cloud. The stability offered by Mojo Networks is better than the other products available in the market since, with other tools, you need to keep restarting them frequently, and it may be required once or twice a day, especially if it is used as an enterprise solution or in an enterprise environment, where the traffic is too high, causing the build-up of a lot of cache memory, fill-ups, and SRAM, a reason why one will have to restart such products.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is a stable and secure platform."

"The product is user-friendly and helps with cost minimization."

"The product's initial setup phase is very simple and involves just a PnP process."

"The cloud-based management provided by Cambium Networks is particularly valuable to us, as it allows us to efficiently manage Wi-Fi, point-to-point connections, firewalls, and switches across various locations from a centralized platform. This enables us to be proactive in providing support and ensures smooth operations for our clients."

"Cambium Networks Wireless LAN is easy to deploy. The implementation can take two weeks to four months."

"Cambium Networks Wireless LAN was highly scalable, allowing deployment of fewer access points while covering more area, adapting well with the evolution of wireless standards."

"We can scale it if we need to."

"The after-sales services are helpful."

More Cambium Networks Wireless LAN pros

"The cloud-based architecture of the controller is valuable because it obviously saves on my hardware costs."

"The stability of the solution has been good. We haven't had any issues."

"Built-in guest analytics and advanced guest portal features allow our customers to create a guest experience which is typically only available with complex and expensive third-party software."

"We just plugged it in and it worked. That just doesn't happen. We plugged it in and it worked and all 100 kids got on the test and started testing."

"The fact that they are autonomous and can function even without access to the management panel is the most valuable aspect of this solution."

"Initial setup was straightforward."

"The configuration is simple and the reports can be automated."

"The most important feature is ease of use. We can simply take an access point and plug it in, then it is automatically configured for us."

More Mojo Networks pros

Cons

"If they could include some sort of web filtering, in-built antivirus, anti-malware, and data stream scanning in the next release."

"Cambium Networks Wireless LAN should improve its pricing."

"The platform's cost needs improvement."

"The solution’s technical support could be faster."

"The problem with the tool is that its prices are on the higher end."

"The direct technical support from Cambium teams needs to be improved."

"Our areas for improvement would be a refresh with the most recent technology available."

"Not a lot of technical engineers are familiar with Cambium Networks Wireless LAN. They are familiar with implementing and using other solutions such as Aruba. Therefore, Cambium Networks needs to be more visible in the marketplace."

More Cambium Networks Wireless LAN cons

"Needs greater simplicity in the management portal. Currently, the Mojo portal presents different “apps” to configure the devices, create splash pages, configure security settings, and monitor the network. This can be confusing, although Mojo has made great strides in combining these into “Aware”."

"The renewal costs that come with it are very expensive."

"The solution is a bit pricier than Cisco."

"I would like to have a single pane of glass to better control the access point and the switching."

"The product's initial setup phase and configuration are areas with certain shortcomings where improvements are required."

"The customer service and support took a lot of time to come on the troubleshooting call."

"The setup was complex."

"The distribution can be improved, particularly in this part of the world."

More Mojo Networks cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the product's pricing an eight out of ten."

"If one is a high price and ten is a low price, I rate the product price as one."

"The pricing for Cambium Networks Wireless LAN is much cheaper than Meraki. For example, I have to pay $200 for one AP from Cambium, while for a Meraki AP, I have to pay $450 including the user license. Meraki has a higher price over Cambium Networks Wireless LAN."

"It is an expensive product compared to other competitors."

"Cambium Networks Wireless LAN is cheaper than Aruba."

"High-end products from Cambium PTP, point-to-point radio, maybe cost around $1000 per year."

"It's a good price, but not the best price. It's on the higher end of what I would call affordable for small to medium-sized businesses."

"The pricing and licensing might vary based on each country's specific needs and telecommunication regulations."

More Cambium Networks Wireless LAN pricing and cost advice

"Since they have only the cloud and on-premises platform, the price looks good compared to the other OEMs like Cisco and Ruckus. For one of the Wi-Fi 6 access points for five years, they might be charging 20,000 to 25,000 INR."

"The pricing was a good value and substantially less than some of the other products that we looked at. In some cases, with some of the big names, this product was even close to half the price."

"We have a term that is renewed every three years."

"The cost is a one-time fee."

"In Australian dollars, we buy it for five years at $1,200."

"They have been a great price competitor against some of the other big brands, like Meraki, especially for cloud-based WiFi. However, Meraki has been more expensive. They beat Meraki on features for the WiFi, which makes them a better choice even if the price is the same."

"The price of the solution is too high for our country."

"It requires a license and that's a recurring cost and that has a really high cheque value."

More Mojo Networks pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless LAN solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,768 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

15%

Educational Organization

11%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

18%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Wholesaler/Distributor

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cambium Networks Wireless LAN?

It is a stable and secure platform.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cambium Networks Wireless LAN?

Cambium's pricing is better compared to Ruckus, which has multiple components with associated costs, like license support and access point support costs. Although nominal, these costs are still there.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cambium Networks Wireless LAN?

I would Cambium Networks to improve by having more products on the product side.I would want more WiFi products, specifically WiFi indoor access point products. They should also look into getting a...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Mojo Networks?

I rate the product's price as an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive. People are not used to cloud-based Wi-Fi solutions. When it comes to cloud-based Wi-Fi sol...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Mojo Networks?

The product's initial setup phase and configuration are areas with certain shortcomings where improvements are required. Those who are not familiar with the product might not be able to set it up p...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Mojo Networks?

Most of our company's clients use the product in enterprise settings. In terms of the security features, I feel the firewall is present in the product and it works pretty well for enterprise-sized ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Ubiquiti WLAN vs Cambium Networks Wireless LAN

Compared 18% of the time

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Cambium Networks Wireless LAN

Compared 14% of the time

Fortinet FortiWLM vs Cambium Networks Wireless LAN

Compared 8% of the time

Ruckus Wireless vs Cambium Networks Wireless LAN

Compared 8% of the time

More Cambium Networks Wireless LAN Competitors

Aruba Wireless vs Mojo Networks

Compared 21% of the time

Mist AI and Cloud vs Mojo Networks

Compared 21% of the time

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Mojo Networks

Compared 16% of the time

Cisco Wireless vs Mojo Networks

Compared 14% of the time

More Mojo Networks Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cambium Networks Wireless LAN

January 2026

Download Cambium Networks Wireless LAN product report

Buyer's Guide

Mojo Networks

December 2025

Download Mojo Networks product report

Also Known As

No data available

Mojo Networks WLAN, AirTight Networks, AirTight, Mojo Aware

Overview

Information not available

Cambium Networks

Mojo is revolutionizing WiFi through the power of the cloud and open standards. We liberate networks from proprietary hardware and utilize the full power of the cloud to deliver cognitive WiFi: a self-driving network that makes things remarkably simple and reliable at massive scale. Mojo WiFi is not just secure itself but also secures your wired network and IT assets from wireless attacks. Mojo Network’s innovations provide superior WiFi experience, effortless troubleshooting and empowers IT with better user experiences, more options, and more velocity, all at much lower costs.

Arista

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Robert Half, Yum Brands, Costco, AMC, NEC, Walsh University, JCT600, Region 6 Education Service Center, Universidad Alfonso X el Sabio, Santa Rosa County District Schools, Marysville Schools, Knob Noster Public Schools, Tao Group, Presidio Partners, Garden Fresh Restaurant Corp, Zurich, Hesperia Unified School District, Maine Medical Center

Buyer's Guide

Cambium Networks Wireless LAN vs. Mojo Networks

December 2025

Free Report: Cambium Networks Wireless LAN vs. Mojo Networks

Find out what your peers are saying about Cambium Networks Wireless LAN vs. Mojo Networks and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,768 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cambium Networks Wireless LAN vs. Mojo Networks report.

See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.

We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.