Control-M and CA Process Automation compete in the automation market with Control-M having the upper hand in specialized data integration, while CA Process Automation is preferred for flexibility across various applications.
Features: Control-M includes robust scheduling and workload automation, with advanced task dependencies and comprehensive data workflow capabilities. It supports cross-platform scheduling and has extensive integration with various applications. Control-M excels in managing complex data tasks, providing a unified view for orchestrating workflows. CA Process Automation provides flexibility by allowing integration across various environments and systems, offering a modular process design adaptable to diverse customer needs. It supports seamless orchestration of multiple systems and presents a user-friendly interface for efficient workflow management.
Room for Improvement: Control-M can enhance its customer service quality and offer more flexible deployment options. It may benefit from improving its real-time monitoring for faster responsiveness. CA Process Automation could improve by refining its integration with third-party systems and enhancing the user interface for ease of troubleshooting. Increasing support for rapidly changing IT environments would make it more appealing. An improvement in the deployment speed could also contribute positively to user experience.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: CA Process Automation offers a modular deployment approach that aligns well with different IT setups and is praised for efficient customer service. Its adaptability ensures smooth integration across environments. Control-M simplifies setup for existing infrastructures but faces mixed reviews on its customer service. Control-M's straightforward integration speeds up deployment but may lack flexibility in diverse settings.
Pricing and ROI: Control-M involves higher initial costs with a focus on extensive data management capabilities promising significant ROI. Its comprehensive features justify the investment for data-centric tasks. CA Process Automation, with a lower initial cost, offers value through broad automation capabilities and flexible integration. It provides a strong ROI for companies seeking cost-effective, versatile automation solutions.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Control-M | 4.7% |
| CA Process Automation | 0.3% |
| Other | 95.0% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 10 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 26 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 13 |
| Large Enterprise | 113 |
Control-M by BMC is engineered to manage hybrid cloud workflows, offering orchestration capabilities starting at $29,000 annually. Aimed at helping growing teams, it efficiently supports cross-environment scheduling and automation needs.
Control-M offers robust cross-platform scheduling, automation, and integration with applications such as SAP and Informatica. Users appreciate its ease of use with a graphical interface, centralized management, and monitoring capabilities. Advanced features, including Managed File Transfer, automated error handling, and real-time alerts, enhance productivity. The ability to unify workflows and support diverse environments makes Control-M a trusted tool in many sectors. While improvements in reporting flexibility and API integration with tools like ServiceNow are needed, addressing performance issues during upgrades could enhance its value. Offering improved support for new technologies and cloud environments is beneficial, with cost-effectiveness being a consideration.
What are the key features of Control-M?Control-M is leveraged in industries like finance for enterprise scheduling and data management, supporting mainframe, Linux, Unix, Windows, and cloud platforms. It contributes to workflow orchestration and workload automation, improving operational efficiency and enhancing IT infrastructure across those environments.
We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
