Broadcom StrataDNX vs Nokia Ethernet Service Switch comparison

Broadcom and Nokia are both solutions in the Ethernet Switches category. Broadcom is ranked #25 with an average rating of 8.0, while Nokia is ranked #23 with an average rating of 8.3. Broadcom holds a 0.9% mindshare in ES, compared to Nokia’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Nokia users who would recommend it.

Broadcom StrataDNX

Read 3 Broadcom StrataDNX reviews

779 Views
779 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Nokia Ethernet Service Switch

Read 7 Nokia Ethernet Service Switch reviews

809 Views
809 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Broadcom StrataDNX

Nokia Ethernet Service Switch

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Broadcom StrataDNX and Nokia Ethernet Service Switch compete in the network infrastructure space. Broadcom StrataDNX offers more scalability and flexibility, which can be advantageous in complex networks, whereas Nokia Ethernet Service Switch provides strong performance with integrated packet processing.

Features: Broadcom StrataDNX is noted for its modular architecture, ability to handle large data volumes efficiently, and flexibility, which suits dynamic networks. Nokia Ethernet Service Switch is highlighted for advanced traffic management, integrated service delivery capabilities, and strong performance in service-oriented applications.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Nokia Ethernet Service Switch features straightforward deployment processes with clear integration steps and reliable support services. Broadcom StrataDNX demands a complex setup but offers comprehensive customer support. Organizations looking for quick integration may prefer Nokia, while Broadcom's support is suitable for more complex scenarios.

Pricing and ROI: Broadcom StrataDNX has a higher initial setup cost, reflecting its advanced scalability and longer-term investment benefits. Nokia Ethernet Service Switch offers a cost-effective initial setup and quicker ROI in service-specific environments. Nokia is favorable for a fast return on investment, while Broadcom justifies its cost with scalability and future-proof architecture.

To learn more, read our detailed Broadcom StrataDNX vs. Nokia Ethernet Service Switch Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Broadcom StrataDNX vs. Nokia Ethernet Service Switch

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 867,445 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Broadcom StrataDNX

Ranking in Ethernet Switches

25th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

3.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Nokia Ethernet Service Switch

Ranking in Ethernet Switches

23rd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

3.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Ethernet Switches category, the mindshare of Broadcom StrataDNX is 0.9%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nokia Ethernet Service Switch is 0.9%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Ethernet Switches Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Nokia Ethernet Service Switch	0.9%
Broadcom StrataDNX	0.9%
Other	98.2%

Ethernet Switches

Featured Reviews

Wisely Ng

Senior rPLM and Consulting Engineering, IP and Optical Networks, APAC at Nokia Corporation

Cost-effective chipset saves resources and offers rich features

The Broadcom StrataDNX chipset, such as the DNX, is quite a generic chipset and from the cost perspective, it is quite cost-effective hardware. When we decide to use such an Ethernet switch, our R&D and headquarters consider using the Broadcom chipset as one of the merchandised chipsets in our system, providing a cost-effective solution to our customers. The cost-saving with Broadcom StrataDNX is one of the critical criteria for using the DNX as one of our hardware chipsets. From the features perspective, it is quite feature-rich, so we can leverage those existing functions on the SDK to develop our own features in our equipment.

Read full review

Montassar Turki

Tech Lead - R&D at Numeryx

Empowering networks with enhanced scalability and reliability

It provides excellent scalability capabilities, as well as the flexibility to work with different cost structures. It supports a large number of switches very well and meets the specific requirements. In our enterprise, we currently have two hundred servers, and this technology accommodates our growing user base, which may reach millions of users.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The good thing about the StrataDNX is that the Broadcom family is very interchangeable, so they work well with different optical transceivers."

"The Broadcom StrataDNX chipset, such as the DNX, is quite a generic chipset and from the cost perspective, it is quite cost-effective hardware."

"Easy to integrate with any of the other hardware platforms."

"The cost-saving with Broadcom StrataDNX is one of the critical criteria for using the DNX as one of our hardware chipsets, and from the features perspective, it is quite feature-rich, so we can leverage those existing functions on the SDK to develop our own features in our equipment."

"The most valuable features are user functionality and interoperability."

"The most valuable feature is the product's availability."

"The highest value lies in aggregating the data to improve both traffic management and device utilization, emphasizing the importance of engagement and liability."

"On several occasions we encountered major issues with the solution and have found the Nokia technical support to be quite supportive."

"The performance and reliability are the solution's most valuable features."

"Despite initial hindrances, once understood, these differences help in forming a good career foundation."

Cons

"The standard features do not provide a full feature set, so we need to create our own features to compensate for those limitations."

"The number of surfaces that can be handled by the chipset could be increased."

"There is room for improvement in the pricing model."

"The segment routing could be improved, and they could also transfer a lot of legacy to the cloud domain."

"I would suggest improvements regarding enhancing support response times and implementing user interface modifications for quicker and more user-friendly interactions."

"The solution needs more monitoring tools."

"I would prefer that all the licenses be open for our use."

"I would like to see more collaboration with advanced metering infrastructure (AMI) vendors, such as Itron."

"The documentation needs improvement for better accessibility, as there isn't proper documentation currently available."

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The price of the solution is very competitive in comparison with that of the competition."

"It is quite expensive compared to alternative technologies."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Ethernet Switches solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,445 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

24%

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

11%

Performing Arts

10%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Broadcom StrataDNX?

From my impression regarding Broadcom StrataDNX, I can explain that while Broadcom is quite good, it is not perfect in some cases. The standard features do not provide a full feature set, so we nee...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Broadcom StrataDNX?

We use the SDK from Broadcom StrataDNX from the software features point of view. We have our own network operating system to perform adaptive configurations around different chipsets, creating an a...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Broadcom StrataDNX?

The Broadcom StrataDNX chipset from the product portfolio is quite generic and not difficult to deploy. For network monitoring, we do not rely on the Broadcom StrataDNX chipset capability. Instead,...

See all answers

What do you like most about Nokia Ethernet Service Switch?

The highest value lies in aggregating the data to improve both traffic management and device utilization, emphasizing the importance of engagement and liability.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Nokia Ethernet Service Switch?

We can understand the customer network better and propose products accordingly as areas for improvement. Engaging with customers directly would improve how that could be done easily. Many times the...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Nokia Ethernet Service Switch?

I am a system integrator working for different customers. My clients use this product for their network, either for network upgrade or new rollout.

See all answers

Comparisons

Broadcom StrataXGS vs Broadcom StrataDNX

Compared 71% of the time

NVIDIA Mellanox vs Broadcom StrataDNX

Compared 9% of the time

Arista Networks Platform vs Broadcom StrataDNX

Compared 8% of the time

Cisco Ethernet Switches vs Broadcom StrataDNX

Compared 6% of the time

Fortinet FortiSwitch - Secure Access vs Broadcom StrataDNX

Compared 5% of the time

More Broadcom StrataDNX Competitors

Cisco Ethernet Switches vs Nokia Ethernet Service Switch

Compared 48% of the time

Cisco Catalyst Switches vs Nokia Ethernet Service Switch

Compared 20% of the time

Arista Networks Platform vs Nokia Ethernet Service Switch

Compared 9% of the time

Alcatel-Lucent OmniSwitch Ethernet Switches vs Nokia Ethernet Service Switch

Compared 8% of the time

Huawei Ethernet Switches vs Nokia Ethernet Service Switch

Compared 8% of the time

More Nokia Ethernet Service Switch Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Ethernet Switches

August 2025

Download Broadcom StrataDNX product report

Buyer's Guide

Ethernet Switches

August 2025

Download Nokia Ethernet Service Switch product report

Also Known As

StrataDNX

Nokia ESS, Nokia 7450 Ethernet Service Switch, Nokia 7450 ESS

Overview

The StrataDNX product line offers the greatest extensibility and scalability of any merchant silicon switch in the industry, with the ability to scale both tables and buffering with external lookup engines or memory. The StrataDNX chips can also be connected together via DNX fabric elements to build industry-leading switches and routers with hundreds of terabits of bandwidth. The StrataDNX line features a service-rich, carrier-grade programmable architecture to meet the needs of service provider core, metro transport, mobile backhaul, microwave, POTN, access, and data center networks.

Broadcom

The Nokia 7450 Ethernet Service Switch (ESS) family of Carrier Ethernet switch routers is designed to deliver advanced Carrier Ethernet services. It also provides the ideal platform for the metro Ethernet aggregation of fixed and mobile networks.

Nokia

Sample Customers

Hill International, Coty, Banese, Algar Tech

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Broadcom StrataDNX vs. Nokia Ethernet Service Switch

September 2025

Free Report: Broadcom StrataDNX vs. Nokia Ethernet Service Switch

Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom StrataDNX vs. Nokia Ethernet Service Switch and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

867,445 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Broadcom StrataDNX vs. Nokia Ethernet Service Switch report.

See our list of best Ethernet Switches vendors.

We monitor all Ethernet Switches reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.