Juniper QFX Series Switches vs Nokia Ethernet Service Switch comparison

Juniper and Nokia are both solutions in the Ethernet Switches category. Juniper is ranked #19 with an average rating of 8.4, while Nokia is ranked #26 with an average rating of 7.5. Juniper holds a 0.2% mindshare in ES, compared to Nokia’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Juniper users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Nokia users who would recommend it.

Juniper QFX Series Switches

Read 7 Juniper QFX Series Switches reviews

96 Views
75 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Nokia Ethernet Service Switch

Read 6 Nokia Ethernet Service Switch reviews

890 Views
576 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Juniper QFX Series Switches

Nokia Ethernet Service Switch

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Nokia Ethernet Service Switch and Juniper QFX Series Switches are two notable competitors in the networking solutions market. Nokia is recognized for competitive pricing and reliable support, while Juniper stands out with a superior range of features that cater to advanced functionalities.

Features: Nokia Ethernet Service Switch offers scalability, MPLS capabilities, and quality of service for traffic management. Juniper QFX Series Switches present strong automation, high-speed performance, low latency, and comprehensive security features.

Room for Improvement: Nokia can improve by enhancing advanced features, security inclusions, and automation capabilities. Juniper could benefit from simplifying setup, optimizing cost-efficiency further, and improving scalability options beyond current limitations.

Ease Of Deployment and Customer Service: Nokia is acclaimed for straightforward deployment and trustworthy customer service, making it a good fit for many organizations. Juniper provides comprehensive deployment tools and proactive support, requiring more initial setup but compensating with enhanced functionalities.

Pricing and ROI: Nokia is known for affordable setup costs with favorable ROI, delivering essential features for most businesses. Juniper, however, involves a higher initial expense, with advanced features and performance that can justify this investment for enterprises seeking cutting-edge solutions, potentially achieving a higher ROI over time.

To learn more, read our detailed Juniper QFX Series Switches vs. Nokia Ethernet Service Switch Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Juniper QFX Series Switches vs. Nokia Ethernet Service Switch

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Juniper QFX Series Switches

Ranking in Ethernet Switches

19th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Center Networking (5th)

Nokia Ethernet Service Switch

Ranking in Ethernet Switches

26th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Ethernet Switches category, the mindshare of Juniper QFX Series Switches is 0.2%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nokia Ethernet Service Switch is 0.7%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Ethernet Switches

Featured Reviews

RafaelTorres

Founder at Torres & Torres Tech

Offers automation capabilities and good customer support

Juniper QFX Series Switches offer several features that contribute to improved efficiency. One key advantage is the automation capabilities. This allows us to automate network configuration and management tasks using scripting languages. In our case, at the bank, we use a script for automation to confirm the switch's scalability in the local data center. We expanded the environment to utilize the environment feature with AWS, creating connections between both data centers. This setup allowed us to extend our operations to another data center in Latin America, using AWS and Juniper together.

Read full review

Teuku Maiyasya

CTO at PT Bali Towerindo Sentra, Tbk

A stable solution which is competitively priced and offers good support

We would like to have an unified monitoring system, while Nokia have different monitoring system for different product, we find it to be quite troublesome. I also would prefer that all the licenses be open for our use. This would obviate the need to purchase individual licenses for each feature.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features are the VxLAN and the EVPN."

"The QFX series is a good choice for large data centers, particularly for Spine-Leaf architectures."

"It's a stable solution."

"EVPN-VXLAN feature offers the most benefits."

"It's really easy to replicate rules. It's the one that I've used; it was CLI-based. You can implement a large set of rules with CLI. You can just copy a script and add additional changes to the source and destination on the part. And so it's easy to do large zone-based rules."

"Support is good and customer-friendly"

"Juniper QFX Series Switches provide a good platform for all of our hardware and are easy to use."

"The performance and reliability are the solution's most valuable features."

"The most valuable features are user functionality and interoperability."

"The most valuable feature is the product's availability."

"On several occasions we encountered major issues with the solution and have found the Nokia technical support to be quite supportive."

"The highest value lies in aggregating the data to improve both traffic management and device utilization, emphasizing the importance of engagement and liability."

"Despite initial hindrances, once understood, these differences help in forming a good career foundation."

Cons

"Integrating QFX switches was the first point of challenge."

"I faced issues with the deployment and upgrade. In the QFX5110 series, features like ISSU and DSSQ should be improved. Upgrades should be smoother."

"There have been some issues sometimes. When you upgrade the device, it doesn't come up. It gets stuck."

"It is very costly."

"There is room for improvement in the pricing model. It is too high."

"The price could be cheaper."

"I would prefer that all the licenses be open for our use."

"The segment routing could be improved, and they could also transfer a lot of legacy to the cloud domain."

"The documentation needs improvement for better accessibility, as there isn't proper documentation currently available."

"The solution needs more monitoring tools."

"I would suggest improvements regarding enhancing support response times and implementing user interface modifications for quicker and more user-friendly interactions."

"I would like to see more collaboration with advanced metering infrastructure (AMI) vendors, such as Itron."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is cheap, especially compared to competitors like Cisco."

"The price of Juniper QFX Series Switches is expensive because we are running some enterprise hardware. However, they are less expensive than Cisco or HPE hardware."

"The cost is expensive."

"It is quite expensive compared to alternative technologies."

"The price of the solution is very competitive in comparison with that of the competition."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Ethernet Switches solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

23%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

18%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Government

10%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Juniper QFX Series Switches?

EVPN-VXLAN feature offers the most benefits.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Juniper QFX Series Switches?

It is very costly. It has a three-year license.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Juniper QFX Series Switches?

The price could be cheaper.

See all answers

What do you like most about Nokia Ethernet Service Switch?

The highest value lies in aggregating the data to improve both traffic management and device utilization, emphasizing the importance of engagement and liability.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Nokia Ethernet Service Switch?

In my opinion, Nokia has to improve its documentation, offering step-by-step configuration guides and examples of what outputs look like on Windows. There should also be a comparison of commands be...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Nokia Ethernet Service Switch?

I have been working with Nokia switches for six months. Before that, I was using Cisco devices. I am involved in configuring Nokia Internet Service Switches in our network.

See all answers

Comparisons

Cisco Nexus vs Juniper QFX Series Switches

Compared 59% of the time

PTX Series Routers vs Juniper QFX Series Switches

Compared 23% of the time

Juniper MX Series Universal Routing Platforms vs Juniper QFX Series Switches

Compared 7% of the time

Cisco Catalyst Switches vs Juniper QFX Series Switches

Compared 5% of the time

NVIDIA Mellanox vs Juniper QFX Series Switches

Compared 3% of the time

More Juniper QFX Series Switches Competitors

Cisco Ethernet Switches vs Nokia Ethernet Service Switch

Compared 55% of the time

Cisco Catalyst Switches vs Nokia Ethernet Service Switch

Compared 17% of the time

Arista Networks Platform vs Nokia Ethernet Service Switch

Compared 15% of the time

Alcatel-Lucent OmniSwitch Ethernet Switches vs Nokia Ethernet Service Switch

Compared 7% of the time

Huawei Ethernet Switches vs Nokia Ethernet Service Switch

Compared 7% of the time

More Nokia Ethernet Service Switch Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Ethernet Switches

March 2025

Download Juniper QFX Series Switches product report

Buyer's Guide

Ethernet Switches

March 2025

Download Nokia Ethernet Service Switch product report

Also Known As

No data available

Nokia ESS, Nokia 7450 Ethernet Service Switch, Nokia 7450 ESS

Overview

QFX Series Switches deliver industry-leading throughput and scalability, an extensive routing stack, the open programmability of the Junos OS, and a broad set of EVPN-VXLAN and IP fabric capabilities. With QFX, you’ll find premier solutions for data center spine-and-leaf, campus distribution, core, and data center gateway and interconnect switching.

Rethink data center operations and fabric management with turnkey Juniper Apstra software in your QFX Series environment. You can automate the entire network lifecycle to simplify design and deployment and provide closed-loop assurance. With Apstra, customers have achieved 90% faster time to deployment, 70% faster time to resolution, and 83% OpEx reduction.

Juniper

The Nokia 7450 Ethernet Service Switch (ESS) family of Carrier Ethernet switch routers is designed to deliver advanced Carrier Ethernet services. It also provides the ideal platform for the metro Ethernet aggregation of fixed and mobile networks.

Nokia

Sample Customers

Linode, VPRO, West Chester University

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Juniper QFX Series Switches vs. Nokia Ethernet Service Switch

April 2025

Free Report: Juniper QFX Series Switches vs. Nokia Ethernet Service Switch

Find out what your peers are saying about Juniper QFX Series Switches vs. Nokia Ethernet Service Switch and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Juniper QFX Series Switches vs. Nokia Ethernet Service Switch report.

See our list of best Ethernet Switches vendors.

We monitor all Ethernet Switches reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.