"In the case of the virtualization of TCP/IP protocols for third-party terminal insurance, there was a device terminal, which was interacting with the application via the TCP/IP protocol. Most of the tools don't support that, but we were able to achieve it using Broadcom Service Virtualization."
"The most valuable features are the recording and creating of virtual services."
"There are several areas that are easily configurable."
"The most valuable feature is SAP virtualization."
"It is not a stable solution."
"I would like to have more flexibility towards the mainframe virtualization and also in JDBC virtualization."
"The cost is an area that needs improvement. There are a couple of other tools which provide support for performance testing with the base version itself, but Broadcom needs a separate component to support virtualization for performance testing. This is a costly component."
"The integration with other solutions, such as ALM and Jira, should be improved."
CA Service Virtualization acts as a catalyst for DevOps by simulating constrained or unavailable systems across the software development lifecycle (SDLC). This allows developers, testers and performance teams to work in parallel to accelerate app delivery, as well as to “shift-left” the app testing to improve application quality. CA Service Virtualization was previously known as LISA, the product from the ITKO acquisition.
Micro Focus Service Virtualization helps to simulate a services behavior in a production environment. This simulation software enables in-house development and testing teams to keep to their schedules regardless of access to production systems.
Broadcom Service Virtualization is ranked 1st in Service Virtualization with 3 reviews while Micro Focus Service Virtualization is ranked 2nd in Service Virtualization with 1 review. Broadcom Service Virtualization is rated 8.0, while Micro Focus Service Virtualization is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Broadcom Service Virtualization writes "Scalable with good recording and creating of virtual services, but it's not stable and there is no support for previous versions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Micro Focus Service Virtualization writes "Simple to set up, stable, and works well for SAP virtualization". Broadcom Service Virtualization is most compared with Parasoft Service Virtualization, IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server, Tricentis Tosca, Micro Focus UFT One and SoapUI Pro, whereas Micro Focus Service Virtualization is most compared with Parasoft Service Virtualization and SmartBear ServiceV Pro.
See our list of best Service Virtualization vendors.
We monitor all Service Virtualization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.