IT Central Station is now PeerSpot: Here's why

Broadcom Service Virtualization vs Micro Focus Service Virtualization comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Q&A Highlights
Question: CA Service Virtualization vs. HP Service Virtualization
Answer: Check out the comparison of CA Lisa and HP Service Virtualization at http://www.itcentralstation.com/products/comparisons/hp-service-virtualization_vs_ca-lisa
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"In the case of the virtualization of TCP/IP protocols for third-party terminal insurance, there was a device terminal, which was interacting with the application via the TCP/IP protocol. Most of the tools don't support that, but we were able to achieve it using Broadcom Service Virtualization.""The most valuable features are the recording and creating of virtual services.""There are several areas that are easily configurable."

More Broadcom Service Virtualization Pros →

"The most valuable feature is SAP virtualization."

More Micro Focus Service Virtualization Pros →

Cons
"It is not a stable solution.""I would like to have more flexibility towards the mainframe virtualization and also in JDBC virtualization.""The cost is an area that needs improvement. There are a couple of other tools which provide support for performance testing with the base version itself, but Broadcom needs a separate component to support virtualization for performance testing. This is a costly component."

More Broadcom Service Virtualization Cons →

"The integration with other solutions, such as ALM and Jira, should be improved."

More Micro Focus Service Virtualization Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "There are additional fees for advanced-level technical support."
  • "I don't have the exact dollar amount, but we have spent close to $1,000,000 for a three-year agreement, for an enterprise level."
  • "There is a yearly licensing cost, and I would give it a four out of five."
  • More Broadcom Service Virtualization Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Service Virtualization solutions are best for your needs.
    610,812 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Answers from the Community
    Anonymous User
    mgupta250 - PeerSpot reviewermgupta250 (Marketing at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees)
    Vendor

    Yes, HP's product in this domain is called, HP Service Virtualization

    it_user137409 - PeerSpot reviewerit_user137409 (User with 10,001+ employees)
    Vendor

    Hello,

    Also, I’d like to add that “HP Service test” mentioned below is a tool for functional integration (API) testing, but not for Service Virtualization. Please, pay attention to it.

    Thank you.

    it_user142806 - PeerSpot reviewerit_user142806 (Automation QA Specialist at a retailer with 1,001-5,000 employees)
    Vendor

    Ok so let me ask you guys Does HP has the capability of virtualization ? Do they they virtualization like other product ( lisa, parasoft, green hat etc ).

    it_user105102 - PeerSpot reviewerit_user105102 (Architect at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees)
    Real User

    HP Service Test and CA Lisa are not comparable products.

    HP Service Test is comparable to Soap UI- create scripts/tests that drive data to a web service.

    HP Service Test is one of three products in the HP Unified Functional Testing Suite: what used to be Quick Test Professional, Service Test and Service Test Manager.

    it_user137409 - PeerSpot reviewerit_user137409 (User with 10,001+ employees)
    Vendor

    Hello,

    Unfortunately, I don’t have experience in CA Lisa SV.
    However, I have evaluated HP SV and have an opinion about it – I can share my thoughts if you need, but I don’t think that it will help you to answer the question.

    “What needs to be considered when comparing them?”

    Of course a lot is depends on your necessities, but for the most of cases it doesn’t matter what tools you are going to compare – I believe that all the needs are the same because of the domain area (SV in this case).

    - Number of Protocols supported

    - Record and Reproduce possibility

    - Create virtual services from scratch

    - Easiness of installing, configuring and using

    - Extended possibilities for creation more complex virtual endpoints (db support, data stores, team using, etc.)

    - Other deeper criteria
    Thank you.

    Best Regards,
    Dzianis Sushko
    EPAM Integration Competency Center

    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:There are several areas that are easily configurable.
    Top Answer:I don't have the exact dollar amount, but we have spent close to $1,000,000 for a three-year agreement, for an enterprise level. Any number of people can use it, and it has three performance inputs… more »
    Top Answer:Because I have not compared it with other toolsets, I don't have a lot of insight. The only area that I can think of at the moment is the building of automated APA test cases. Based on your services… more »
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature is SAP virtualization.
    Top Answer:The integration with other solutions, such as ALM and Jira, should be improved.
    Top Answer:We are a solution reseller and Micro Focus Service Virtualization is one of the products that we provide to our customers. There are many use cases and we have done a lot of work with this product… more »
    Ranking
    1st
    Views
    2,401
    Comparisons
    1,074
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    669
    Rating
    8.0
    2nd
    Views
    795
    Comparisons
    324
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    173
    Rating
    10.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    ITKO LISA, CA LISA, CA Service Virtualization
    HPE Service Virtualization
    Learn More
    Overview

    CA Service Virtualization acts as a catalyst for DevOps by simulating constrained or unavailable systems across the software development lifecycle (SDLC). This allows developers, testers and performance teams to work in parallel to accelerate app delivery, as well as to “shift-left” the app testing to improve application quality. CA Service Virtualization was previously known as LISA, the product from the ITKO acquisition.

    Micro Focus Service Virtualization helps to simulate a services behavior in a production environment. This simulation software enables in-house development and testing teams to keep to their schedules regardless of access to production systems.

    Offer
    Learn more about Broadcom Service Virtualization
    Learn more about Micro Focus Service Virtualization
    Sample Customers
    Union Bank, Swisscom, Autotrader, KPN, ING Bank, Best Buy, American Family Insurance, TESCO, Telefonica, Molina Healthcare, California DMV, Aktia, City Index, Con-way, DirecTV, GRU Airport, Liquidnet, NAB, Nordstrom, T-Mobile, TIM Brasil, 
    Virgin Media, TTNet
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm22%
    Comms Service Provider21%
    Transportation Company7%
    Retailer7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company36%
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    Energy/Utilities Company10%
    REVIEWERS
    Retailer22%
    Financial Services Firm22%
    Media Company22%
    Consumer Goods Company11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company40%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    Energy/Utilities Company6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business5%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise88%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business12%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise76%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise64%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise74%

    Broadcom Service Virtualization is ranked 1st in Service Virtualization with 3 reviews while Micro Focus Service Virtualization is ranked 2nd in Service Virtualization with 1 review. Broadcom Service Virtualization is rated 8.0, while Micro Focus Service Virtualization is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Broadcom Service Virtualization writes "Scalable with good recording and creating of virtual services, but it's not stable and there is no support for previous versions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Micro Focus Service Virtualization writes "Simple to set up, stable, and works well for SAP virtualization". Broadcom Service Virtualization is most compared with Parasoft Service Virtualization, IBM Rational Test Virtualization Server, Tricentis Tosca, Micro Focus UFT One and SoapUI Pro, whereas Micro Focus Service Virtualization is most compared with Parasoft Service Virtualization and SmartBear ServiceV Pro.

    See our list of best Service Virtualization vendors.

    We monitor all Service Virtualization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.