IT Central Station is now PeerSpot: Here's why

Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer vs Conformiq comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Buyer's Guide
Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer vs. Conformiq
July 2022
Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer vs. Conformiq and other solutions. Updated: July 2022.
622,358 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Integration with automation is one of the reasons we started to consider moving to this tool from our original tool for implementing test modeling. ARD appears to have better integration with Selenium. It also has the ability to record scripts/flows using Selenium Builder and import them into ARD, which will then create and optimize a model based on that.""Integration with TDM, test data management tool, provides the ability to generate data or use identified (preset or parametrized) test data. It allows significant expansion of test coverage and flexibility, without creating new tests and needing to maintain them.""In terms of meeting business challenges, it helped to shorten the dev/testing cycle by identifying requirements gaps early in the process, by having models shared within the development team. It helped increase test coverage and reduce the number of issues experienced by clients/customers.""The ability to create models/diagrams at multiple levels (nest/embed them) helps in taking models from high-level business requirements and building them into detailed requirements models and test models. Plus, it helps reuse lower level models. It also allows maintaining models at appropriate levels, even for very complex systems/solutions.""The support that we get from Broadcom is great.""Measuring test coverage helps in one of the most challenging tasks. It has logic that can help to select the right set of scenarios and know what coverage it will provide."

More Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer Pros →

"Though optimized and automated test generation is the core functionality, the product's integration with other tools sets it apart.""The tool has the ability to integrate with various requirement management, test management, and version control tools."

More Conformiq Pros →

Cons
"Needs improvement in aligning models so they look clear and readable without having to move boxes around.""It would help if it would save different subsets of test cases, use cases, etc., of a given diagram, for different purposes and provide an easy way to name those subsets.""The solution could improve security and authentication."

More Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer Cons →

"I would like to see the output data optionally used as input for the model, as further action in the flow.""Even though the 4.1 version is a far-improved version from its earlier avatars, the performance of test generation is still an issue on real-time models we have.""It would be helpful to have a feature in the tool's UI to map object locators within the system."

More Conformiq Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Recommendation is to go with concurrent licenses as oppose to seat license; this gives more flexibility."
  • More Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    622,358 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:I'm not involved in the pricing. I'm more from the architect level and handle the product from a technical perspective. I can't speak to licensing costs.
    Top Answer:At this moment, I can't think of any feedback which would need action. We've very happy with the product. We struggled a bit with the initial setup. It could be easier. The solution could improve… more »
    Top Answer:Though optimized and automated test generation is the core functionality, the product's integration with other tools sets it apart.
    Top Answer:Test Cases can be generated with a local system as the server. However, depending on the number of models and their size, it is better to set up a system with higher RAM and a faster processor and use… more »
    Top Answer:Though I understand every tool will have limitations, an effort can be put in to better understand and acknowledge the issues (not every issue is a problem with Conformiq) encountered in real-time… more »
    Ranking
    8th
    Views
    1,725
    Comparisons
    914
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    759
    Rating
    8.0
    12th
    Views
    917
    Comparisons
    397
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    607
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Grid Tools Agile Designer, CA ARD, CA Agile Requirements Designer
    Conformiq Creator, Conformiq Transformer
    Learn More
    Overview
    CA Agile Requirements Designer is an end-to-end requirements gathering, test automation and test case design tool which drastically reduces manual testing effort and enables organizations to deliver quality software to market earlier and at less cost. The optimal set of manual or automated tests can be derived automatically from requirements modeled as unambiguous flowcharts and are linked to the right data and expected results. These tests are updated automatically when the requirements change, allowing organizations to deliver quality software which reflects changing user needs.

    Conformiq Creator provides a solution for automating testing processes and speeding up the software development lifecycle of Enterprise IT applications. Conformiq Creator is used in various sectors, including Telecom, Banking, Finance, Insurance, Retail, and Public Sector services. Launched initially in 2013, Creator quickly gained popularity among its users for its functional testing, application testing, system testing, and end-to-end testing.

    Conformiq Transformer shortens the path to test automation, simplifies model-based testing (MBT) adoption using existing methods, and automates manual test execution. Along with Conformiq Creator, which generates executable test cases, scripts and documentation from models, it automates and transforms test design, extending the Conformiq 360° Test Automation™ solution for complex system testing at the speed of development.

    Offer
    Learn more about Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer
    Learn more about Conformiq
    Sample Customers
    Williams, Rabobank
    Alcatel-Lucent, Avaya, Daimler, Ericsson
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm46%
    Comms Service Provider23%
    Energy/Utilities Company15%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company32%
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Comms Service Provider10%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company37%
    Financial Services Firm27%
    Manufacturing Company5%
    Comms Service Provider4%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business5%
    Large Enterprise95%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise80%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business10%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise80%
    Buyer's Guide
    Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer vs. Conformiq
    July 2022
    Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer vs. Conformiq and other solutions. Updated: July 2022.
    622,358 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer is ranked 8th in Test Management Tools with 2 reviews while Conformiq is ranked 12th in Test Management Tools with 3 reviews. Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer is rated 8.0, while Conformiq is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer writes "User-friendly with great UI but could offer an easier setup". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Conformiq writes "Feature-rich stable tool with multiple options to control output, good integration with other tools, and knowledgeable support team". Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, TFS, Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, Jira and Cognizant ADPART, whereas Conformiq is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, SmartBear TestComplete, Cognizant ADPART and Micro Focus ALM Quality Center. See our Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer vs. Conformiq report.

    See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors and best Test Design Automation vendors.

    We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.