Boomi iPaaS vs CloudCheckr comparison

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its monitoring part to debug certain issues and find problems."

"I really appreciate the on-the-go access through the browser and the B2B integration."

"Very effective with its drag-and-drop feature."

"The platform is user-friendly."

"The connection configuration part and the drag-and-drop integration module are the most valuable features for me."

"The best features are that it is a cloud-based and a multi-tenant tool."

"We work on the flow between systems and the most valuable features for that purpose are the mapping of data, interface mapping, and data integration."

"AtomSphere Integration will suit those looking for small automation and simple integrations."

"It's one of the leading players for cloud optimization. It's hard to find anything better."

"It will automatically suggest areas for optimization."

"CloudCheckr has enabled an average cost saving of approximately 25% from the last year, and this occurred while also increasing the scale of production."

"The solution is scalable for our purposes."

"The most valuable feature of CloudCheckr CMx High Security is granular reporting. Additionally, the user interface is easy to use."

"The best feature I like about CloudCheckr CMx High Security is its simplicity. I love that it's not rocket science to use the solution. Even if you're not familiar with the cloud, you can easily figure out how to use CloudCheckr CMx High Security. You can use AWS, you can use Azure, and you can use GCP with the solution because the integration is quite simple. You can also use multi-cloud with it, and you could see the billing part. You'll have complete visibility into your cost which I love about the solution. I also love that data on any security issues and vulnerabilities are available on the go with CloudCheckr CMx High Security. You don't need to do anything different. Just run the scan and you'll have all these open findings in the tool, in terms of the priority level, so if it's critical, it will tell you, "It's critical," and you need to fix it right away."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"CloudCheckr has impacted my organization positively by making things easier and saving time, approximately three hours a week."

"There are stability issues."

"Documentation could be improved."

"Although Boomi iPaaS is top in the market, there might be room for improvement in the ETL aspect, which was recently integrated as another module. This aspect of Boomi iPaaS is not mature enough at the moment."

"The API can use some work to come up to speed with the competition but Dell has plans and is working on resolving that."

"There are very few string handling functions and few mathematical functions are available."

"There are more mature (dedicated) API management and master data management (MDM) solutions available in the market."

"The deployment was simple, but the implementation is missing a lot of capabilities."

"The product could be a little bit more user-friendly."

"The reporting and analytic capabilities are very limited."

"Some aspects could be made more customizable, such as the dashboard and UI."

"The solution needs to work better with larger capacities of data."

"The performance of the tool really needs to be improved."

"Many features still need to be implemented in this tool."

"What needs to be improved in CloudCheckr CMx High Security is integration. All the clouds are going quite fast, for example, all the cloud providers: Microsoft, Google, etc. CloudCheckr CMx High Security is good with AWS, no doubt about it, but with Azure and Google Cloud, I find that the solution is slow in that direction. If the vendor planned for CloudCheckr CMx High Security to be automated just for AWS, then it does make sense. If not, if the vendor is also targeting good integration with Google and Microsoft, then CloudCheckr CMx High Security integration needs improvement, in particular, it has to be faster. At the moment, its integration with Azure is not as good as its integration with AWS. With GCP, integration is nowhere."

"CloudCheckr CMx High Security is complex. There are a lot of menus, and if you do not know what you are looking for you can get lost. However, the interface is self-explanatory. It's easy to understand where to go to get what you want."

"The solution must improve its user interface."

"Approximately 20k annually."

"Boomi AtomSphere Integration is a relatively cheap and cost-effective product compared to other products like SAP or Oracle."

"This solution is very economical (based on the connections)."

"They do not charge by the number of people using the software (client-server model), but rather they charge based on the number of connections used. This makes it very cost effective."

"The pricing is a bit complex. While the entry fee may be lower than other solutions, it could be expensive depending on your usage."

"The Platinum package is good for licensing, but I’m not sure about the cost and improvements."

"When it comes to pricing, it's not so much about being less expensive as it is about how they don't tie to the hardware on the underlined VMware that you run on, as other vendors do"

"AtomSphere Integration's pricing is competitive, and I would rate it seven out of ten."

"The solution is reasonably priced."

"The cost is on par with other providers."

"A license is needed to use CloudCheckr CMx High Security, but because we are a managed service provider, the price of the license would vary. It depends on the type of cloud users we have, for example, it would be some type of percentage or monthly billing, etc."