Bonita vs Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center comparison

Bonitasoft and Interfacing Technologies Corporation are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. Bonitasoft is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.3, while Interfacing Technologies Corporation is ranked #34 with an average rating of 8.0. Bonitasoft holds a 3.1% mindshare in BPM, compared to Interfacing Technologies Corporation’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Bonitasoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of Interfacing Technologies Corporation users who would recommend it.

Bonita

Read 27 Bonita reviews

3,198 Views
2,622 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Interfacing Technologies En...

Read 2 Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center reviews

280 Views
171 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

Bonita

Interfacing Technologies En...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Bonita and Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center (EPC) compete in business process management. Bonita leads in pricing and support satisfaction, while EPC is superior in feature offerings.

Features: Bonita provides robust process automation, customizable workflows, and user-friendly design. EPC offers extensive process mapping, advanced compliance management, and comprehensive analytics for complex needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Bonita is praised for quick implementation and easy integration with existing systems. EPC involves a more complex deployment due to its rich features, supported by detailed guidance and a committed customer service team.

Pricing and ROI: Bonita features lower setup costs, making it attractive for small to mid-sized businesses seeking cost-effectiveness. EPC might demand a higher initial investment but offers advanced features that justify the cost for some organizations, delivering significant long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed Bonita vs. Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Bonita vs. Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 867,370 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Bonita

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

17th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (11th), Process Automation (15th)

Interfacing Technologies En...

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

34th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

BI (Business Intelligence) Tools (29th), GRC (22nd), Quality Management Software (40th), Document Management Software (17th)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Bonita is 3.1%, down from 3.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center is 0.3%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Bonita	3.1%
Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center	0.3%
Other	96.6%

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

Paparao Nadipineni

Architect at Evoke

A simple and lightweight college course automation system with third-party integrations

The initial setup is straightforward and can be completed with the environment within an hour. First, take the latest from the git repository and check the git code to the monitor studio and a bar file, a deployable Bonita archive file. Then, take that process to the Bonita server, running at runtime on another server. Finally, deploy and enable it by selecting the proper organization.

Read full review

SantoshKulkarni1

Consultant at a consultancy with 11-50 employees

A Robust Solution with Enhanced Automation and Process Improvement Identification Capabilities

I recommend that users invest more time in the initial setup of the process architecture within the tool. It is crucial to spend time designing how the process architecture works as it significantly impacts how the tool behaves. This upfront investment can prevent the need for extensive reworking later on.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This product is very easy-to-use and user-friendly."

"Bonita is user-friendly."

"I really enjoy using the workflow management."

"The solution is stable. Even the older versions are stable."

"Bonita is simple and lightweight and is flexible to integrate with third-party systems. The UI is now flexible, whereas it was previously rigid. Any technology can be used as a frontend, including ReactJS, Angular, and others."

"Development of forms and flows."

"We use the tool to validate and give access to the users. It is for access management."

"The most valuable features of Bonita are the connectors, detailed documentation, and web applications. The documentation was useful because it is how I learned how to use it."

More Bonita pros

"The most valuable feature is the integrated manner in which all the capabilities of the Enterprise Process Center platform work together and make it easier to complete the documentation of processes."

"One notable software-related benefit from a user perspective is our improved ability to identify opportunities for automation and process enhancement just by gaining a clearer view of the processes. There are two valuable aspects. First, setting up the process architecture is commendable. Second, not having to maintain different versions of processes is a notable benefit. The solution is stable. The support team is responsive."

Cons

"The community edition has limited module functionality. If they could release some of the functionality that's available in the enterprise edition that would be helpful to those learning to use the solution."

"The interface is advanced and quite good, but it could improve."

"Automation in vacation of a human resources replacement would be a good improvement in the product."

"There is a considerable learning curve."

"There could be an improvement in IoT connectivity."

"There is a need for more components in the library and additional customization options for these components."

"I have run into a lot of problems because there is not enough documentation."

"Bonita can improve by offering more flexibility. The developer does not receive the code of the application to modify it. Most of the other solutions I have used allow the developers to change or improve the code that is generated."

More Bonita cons

"However, on the process mining side, there's potential for improvement to gain deeper insights into process functionality. Additionally, there's always room for enhancement in the user interface."

"As with all such platforms, Enterprise Process Center is a complex tool and there are many capabilities and features that take time to learn."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"have installed the image of Bonita BPM on Amazon AWS and there is just one option to use and pay for."

"Price to service ratio with Bonita BPM is good."

"The price of the solution is reasonable."

"The product's pricing is acceptable. Pricing is yearly."

"I am using the free version of Bonita."

"We are using the Community Version, which can be used free of charge."

"The product is not cheaper, not costlier; it is reasonable. Bonita’s license is very flexible, with options to meet the needs of different customers and clients. Previously, it was less flexible, but now, many different licensing options are available."

"The price is fair for what we are using the solution for."

More Bonita pricing and cost advice

"My advice for anybody who is implementing this product is to understand what options you believe you are going to want to implement and rollout in the first three to five years, but spend the most time understanding what the set-up costs and pricing will be in the first two or maybe three."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,370 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Educational Organization

Government

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	11

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Bonita compare with Camunda Platform?

One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You c...

See all answers

What do you like most about Bonita?

The user interface is easy to use.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bonita?

The Enterprise edition is very expensive.

See all answers

What do you like most about Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center?

One notable software-related benefit from a user perspective is our improved ability to identify opportunities for automation and process enhancement just by gaining a clearer view of the processe...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center?

While we have yet to explore the tool's capabilities fully, I can't think of any immediate drawbacks. However, on the process mining side, there's potential for improvement to gain deeper insights ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center?

We use the solution for finance processes, specifically for accounts payable and accounts receivable.

See all answers

Comparisons

Camunda vs Bonita

Compared 47% of the time

Bizagi vs Bonita

Compared 14% of the time

Flowable vs Bonita

Compared 8% of the time

IBM BPM vs Bonita

Compared 5% of the time

Apache Airflow vs Bonita

Compared 3% of the time

More Bonita Competitors

iGrafx Process360 Live Platform vs Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center

Compared 100% of the time

More Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Bonita

September 2025

Download Bonita product report

Buyer's Guide

BI (Business Intelligence) Tools

August 2025

Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center report

Download Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center product report

Also Known As

Bonita BPM

Enterprise Process Center

Overview

Bonitasoft helps innovative companies worldwide deliver better digital user experiences for customers and employees. The extensible and open Bonita application platform unleashes the full potential of multidisciplinary development teams to create Living Apps: applications that allow continuous and incremental improvement, connecting tailored user interfaces with reliable back-office operations.

Bonitasoft

Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center by Interfacing Technologies Corporation integrates AI-powered enterprise software for managing operations, ensuring compliance, and driving improvement in regulated organizations.

Combining QMS, DMS, BPM, and GRC within a single platform, Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center standardizes processes and reduces risk. It provides real-time insights and adapts to changing regulations, designed for industries like aerospace and life sciences. With ISO 27001 certification, GDPR, and CFR Part 11 compliance, it meets strict global security standards. Recognized by Gartner as a leader in DTO solutions, this platform offers precision and transparency through 25 years of expertise.

What features make Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center valuable?

Quality Management: Enhances efficiency and compliance in processes.
Document Management: Centralizes information and ensures traceability.
Business Process Management: Automates workflows for operational excellence.
Governance, Risk & Compliance: Provides control and audit readiness.

What should users look for in reviews?

Operational Insight: Real-time insights into processes for better decisions.
Risk Reduction: Minimizes compliance risks and enhances security.
Adaptability: Quickly responds to changes in regulatory landscapes.

In aerospace and life sciences, Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center implementation ensures compliance and operational control. It's crucial for manufacturing and government sectors seeking adaptability and precision due to their complex regulatory requirements.

Interfacing Technologies Corporation

Sample Customers

With more than 1000 customers in 75 countries, and its ecosystem of more than 120,000 members, Bonitasoft is the largest provider of open-source Business Process Management, Low-code and Digital Transformation software worldwide.

Pepsi-Cola Manufacturing International Ltd., Pfizer Deutschland GmbH, GlaxoSmithKline, Johnson & Johnson, Bayer S.p.A., KPMG, Royal Australian Air, Orange

Buyer's Guide

Bonita vs. Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center

September 2025

Free Report: Bonita vs. Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center

Find out what your peers are saying about Bonita vs. Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

867,370 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Bonita vs. Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.