Bonita vs erwin Evolve by Quest comparison

Bonitasoft and erwin by Quest are both solutions in the Business Process Design category. Bonitasoft is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.2, while erwin by Quest is ranked #18 with an average rating of 9.0. Bonitasoft holds a 4.5% mindshare in BPD, compared to erwin by Quest’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Bonitasoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 81% of erwin by Quest users who would recommend it.

Bonita

Read 27 Bonita reviews

2,533 Views
1,867 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

erwin Evolve by Quest

Read 19 erwin Evolve by Quest reviews

552 Views
339 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Bonita

erwin Evolve by Quest

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

Bonita and erwin Evolve by Quest are competing in the business process management domain. Bonita is favored for its accessible pricing and supportive customer service, whereas erwin Evolve stands out for its advanced features and comprehensive capabilities, positioning it as the preferred choice for organizations needing detailed process structures and data governance.

Features: Bonita offers an intuitive workflow design, strong integration capabilities, and ease of use, making it appealing for small to medium enterprises. erwin Evolve includes detailed modeling tools, sophisticated metadata management, and comprehensive capabilities for complex process structures.

Room for Improvement: Bonita could improve on providing more advanced features for users needing complex process management, expand its detailed modeling capabilities, and better support for larger organizations. erwin Evolve might refine its user-friendliness, simplify its deployment process, and could benefit from reducing initial setup complexity to cater to smaller enterprises.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Bonita offers a straightforward deployment process with strong customer support, facilitating smooth transitions. erwin Evolve, although more complex to deploy due to its advanced infrastructure management, provides reliable customer service that supports intricate structures.

Pricing and ROI: Bonita presents a budget-friendly setup, yielding a favorable return on investment for smaller businesses. erwin Evolve requires a higher initial investment but offers substantial ROI for enterprises needing its advanced functionalities, making it a suitable choice for those seeking comprehensive solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Bonita vs. erwin Evolve by Quest Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Bonita vs. erwin Evolve by Quest

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Bonita

Ranking in Business Process Design

10th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Management (BPM) (14th), Process Automation (12th)

erwin Evolve by Quest

Ranking in Business Process Design

18th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Architecture Management (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Business Process Design category, the mindshare of Bonita is 4.5%, up from 3.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of erwin Evolve by Quest is 0.8%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Design

Featured Reviews

Paparao Nadipineni

Architect at Evoke

A simple and lightweight college course automation system with third-party integrations

The initial setup is straightforward and can be completed with the environment within an hour. First, take the latest from the git repository and check the git code to the monitor studio and a bar file, a deployable Bonita archive file. Then, take that process to the Bonita server, running at runtime on another server. Finally, deploy and enable it by selecting the proper organization.

Read full review

ScottLawson

Director IT Architecture at QAD

Enables us to present data and objects visually, in diagrams, and to make them available via the web. Also enables web-based editing of data.

We tried their collaborative web modeling and we used it with a few people but we tend to not use that piece. We tend to collaborate with the people and then my team of architects draws up the diagram using the modeling tool. We then iterate through those. I would like to use it, but it was a little clunky when they first rolled it out. Overall, it's more about the company having room for improvement. What they need to do is to consolidate more of their products. For example, I was just looking and I couldn't figure out what erwin DT is. It's on the website but it would help if they could put information together and make it more clear as to what products they have and how they work with other things. I hear them talking in the support forums and, when I talk to the representative, they say they're going to do a bunch of stuff but it seems the progress is slow. The changes they need to make are to take their old, legacy product, which we use, and focus a lot on it so they can transform it into a modern cloud tool so that we have fewer little pieces to deal with. They could also fix their security model. It's very confusing to get new people onto the tool and to make sure that your content isn't being exposed to the wrong people.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Development of forms and flows."

"Flexible and drag-and-drop type of UI is very valuable. The integrations are also very good. You can build workflows very quickly, which is my favorite activity. By using the GUI, you can build the entire mechanism, notifications, and all this kind of stuff."

"Compared to other products on the market, Bonita presents a pretty acceptable level of robustness."

"The most valuable features of Bonita are the connectors, detailed documentation, and web applications. The documentation was useful because it is how I learned how to use it."

"I really enjoy using the workflow management."

"We use the tool to validate and give access to the users. It is for access management."

"The user interface is better than all of the open-source BPMs that I have tried."

"This product is very easy-to-use and user-friendly."

More Bonita pros

"Forward and reverse engineering were valuable features."

"We use erwin Evolve to publish to the website. This allows us to enable publishing our website using parameterisation features. In a very fast, quick way, we can publish a table or chart onto a website."

"Support for a broad range of data sources from relational to big data to the Cloud."

"The ability to share and collaborate on the solution is its most valuable feature."

"Evolve is like a tank. You can do whatever you want with the solution, but you need to customize it. I think that it's not very aligned with the framework for enterprise architecture. MEGA is focused on these enterprise architectures, but it's only for that. With Evolve, you can do everything you want with professional services."

"We can efficiently deploy business models into the databases and generate SQL scripts."

"By placing the data and the metadata into a model, which is what the tool does, you gain the abilities for linkages between different objects in the model, linkages that you cannot get on paper or with Visio or PowerPoint. That is a huge discriminator."

"One of the most valuable features is the website that sits on top of the database. There's a database of objects and how they are related, and you can make views and diagrams and visual elements out of that information on the website. The website is the part that is called Evolve and we use the Evolve Designer and publish the website out to our employees. They can click around and navigate and search, etc."

More erwin Evolve by Quest pros

Cons

"Installation could be made easier."

"The dashboard has limited features."

"I should be able to park the tasks that are within a process in a kind of container, and dynamically, a super admin should be able to connect these processes. This kind of feature might be helpful."

"The interface is advanced and quite good, but it could improve."

"There is a considerable learning curve."

"Bonita can improve by offering more flexibility. The developer does not receive the code of the application to modify it. Most of the other solutions I have used allow the developers to change or improve the code that is generated."

"We are struggling a bit with integrations."

"There is a need for more components in the library and additional customization options for these components."

More Bonita cons

"They need to develop Evolve's user experience. For example, MEGA has a useful client view that helps with impact analysis. MEGA provides information about the processes, services, infrastructure, and portfolio of applications in one central view. It lets you see the periphery and relationships among components. This view is impressive, and Evolve doesn't have it."

"Business process modelling could be improved."

"I would like to see an improvement in the output of the solution."

"Evolve is primarily focused on the entity's licenses diagrams, but it would be nice if erwin could integrate case development, so that it shows the ER diagram plus certain inputs on the use cases and how the data is used. That deviates somewhat from the overall scope, so maybe they could call it a different product."

"The way that we are using it for application management, we have several KPIs. We want to follow and monitor them regarding a number of solutions. We cannot calculate this today. We would like real-time calculations along with the KPIs in order to improve the user experience. We would like the tool to be able to display this, not only as signals, but as charts."

"There might be improvement required to better support some of the MPP databases for non-relational data structures and NoSQL databases."

"I would like it to be easier to make changes and then deploy them into production, especially when you have multiple web servers or front-ends. It would be nice to make a change and then have it propagate to the production servers in a more automated fashion."

"If it had fewer features to model all kinds of architecture, it would be less complicated."

More erwin Evolve by Quest cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of the solution is reasonable."

"Price to service ratio with Bonita BPM is good."

"I believe this is a very good financial choice."

"The Enterprise edition is very expensive."

"The product's pricing is acceptable. Pricing is yearly."

"have installed the image of Bonita BPM on Amazon AWS and there is just one option to use and pay for."

"I am using the free version of Bonita."

"We are using the Community Version, which can be used free of charge."

More Bonita pricing and cost advice

"On a yearly basis, our licensing costs are 50,000 euro. There are no additional costs because we are on a SaaS model."

"The licensing enables you to differentiate between people who edit the content and the people who consume it. We are able to keep the licensing costs down by keeping the "contributor" licenses to a minimum, and we then just roll out the content in a read-only version for the rest of our users."

"The cost is something like $15,000, per license. But I haven't looked at those numbers in three years. It was over $100,000 to initially set everything up and get it all configured."

"I think erwin is quite expensive. I have difficulty selling the portal, in fact."

"I estimate that we pay between $40,000 and $50,000 a year for the solution, not including the upfront costs to buy things the first time."

"Yearly, our cost is €100,000."

"Unless you are a one person shop – always go with the Workgroup edition and Concurrent licensing."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Design solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Educational Organization

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

16%

Government

11%

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

How does Bonita compare with Camunda Platform?

One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You c...

See all answers

What do you like most about Bonita?

The user interface is easy to use.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bonita?

The Enterprise edition is very expensive.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering erwin Evolve?

I rate erwin Evolve by Quest a nine out of ten.

See all answers

What do you like most about erwin Evolve by Quest?

We can efficiently deploy business models into the databases and generate SQL scripts.

See all answers

What needs improvement with erwin Evolve by Quest?

erwin Evolve by Quest could have additional features to manage the architecture of enterprises and businesses.

See all answers

Comparisons

Camunda vs Bonita

Compared 57% of the time

Bizagi vs Bonita

Compared 17% of the time

Flowable vs Bonita

Compared 8% of the time

IBM BPM vs Bonita

Compared 4% of the time

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs Bonita

Compared 3% of the time

More Bonita Competitors

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs erwin Evolve by Quest

Compared 26% of the time

LeanIX vs erwin Evolve by Quest

Compared 21% of the time

SAP PowerDesigner vs erwin Evolve by Quest

Compared 12% of the time

Avolution ABACUS vs erwin Evolve by Quest

Compared 9% of the time

ARIS BPA vs erwin Evolve by Quest

Compared 9% of the time

More erwin Evolve by Quest Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Bonita

April 2025

Download Bonita product report

Buyer's Guide

erwin Evolve by Quest

April 2025

Download erwin Evolve by Quest product report

Also Known As

Bonita BPM

erwin EA, erwin Business Process, erwin Enterprise Architecture

Overview

Bonitasoft helps innovative companies worldwide deliver better digital user experiences for customers and employees. The extensible and open Bonita application platform unleashes the full potential of multidisciplinary development teams to create Living Apps: applications that allow continuous and incremental improvement, connecting tailored user interfaces with reliable back-office operations.

Bonitasoft

erwin is used by more than 50,000 professionals in 60+ countries to get big results from their enterprise data initiatives. erwin is the #1 choice in virtually every industry, from government and healthcare to retail and finance.

erwin Modeling provides a collaborative environment to manage enterprise data through an intuitive, graphical interface. With a centralized view of key data definitions, you can leverage information as a strategic asset and more efficiently manage your data resources to save time and money.

erwin by Quest

Sample Customers

With more than 1000 customers in 75 countries, and its ecosystem of more than 120,000 members, Bonitasoft is the largest provider of open-source Business Process Management, Low-code and Digital Transformation software worldwide.

AT&T, Bank of America, Chevron, Duke University, ESPN, Fidelity, GE, JP Morgan Chase, KPMG, McGraw Hill, NASA, Pfizer, Royal Bank of Scotland, Teradata, Union Pacific, Vodafone, Wells Fargo.

Buyer's Guide

Bonita vs. erwin Evolve by Quest

April 2025

Free Report: Bonita vs. erwin Evolve by Quest

Find out what your peers are saying about Bonita vs. erwin Evolve by Quest and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Bonita vs. erwin Evolve by Quest report.

See our list of best Business Process Design vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.