BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs Datadog comparison

BMC and Datadog are both solutions in the Cloud Monitoring Software category. BMC is ranked #45, while Datadog is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.7. BMC holds a 0.3% mindshare in CMS, compared to Datadog’s 9.3% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of BMC users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Datadog users who would recommend it.

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Read 5 BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management reviews

476 Views
195 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Datadog

Read 188 Datadog reviews

26,409 Views
8,715 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Datadog

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 13, 2025

Datadog and BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management compete in the cloud management and monitoring space. Datadog often holds an edge due to positive feedback on pricing and support, while BMC is noted for its strong features deemed worth the investment.

Features: Datadog offers powerful real-time monitoring, customizable dashboards, and extensive integrations. It supports numerous services, facilitating seamless monitoring across diverse environments. BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management excels in orchestration and automation, is ideal for multi-cloud environments, and emphasizes resource management and orchestration.

Room for Improvement: Datadog can enhance its support for complex orchestration and improve documentation for newer users. There's room to improve its large-scale integration management. BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management could streamline its deployment process for ease of use. Enhancements in user interface design and initial setup costs could benefit BMC.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Datadog's straightforward deployment process and comprehensive documentation support swift implementations. Its customer service is praised for responsiveness. BMC, while requiring more technical expertise during setup, offers structured support levels, benefiting more complex deployment needs and fostering ongoing customer support once operational.

Pricing and ROI: Datadog's competitive pricing and flexible plans cater to a range of usage levels, encouraging better ROI with lower initial costs. BMC involves higher upfront and ongoing costs but offers high ROI for enterprises requiring detailed orchestration and resource management, serving long-term strategic investments.

To learn more, read our detailed BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. Datadog Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. Datadog

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

45th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Management (38th)

Datadog

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

2nd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

188

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (1st), Network Monitoring Software (4th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (2nd), Log Management (3rd), Container Monitoring (1st), AIOps (1st), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Cloud Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management is 0.3%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Datadog is 9.3%, down from 12.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Entprssol67

Enterprise Solution Architect at Engineering Ingegneria Informatica SPA

Helps design blueprints in a cloud environment but the support is a major problem

One of the major problems is that support is not so good. I used to have a support expert in Spain but they left two years ago. BMC doesn't invest a lot in network automation but network automation is a major point in CLM. There aren't any experts here in Europe, maybe they have in America, I don't know. The main problem is the support in Europe. We had a lot of problems with the people who got put on our cases. The agents that we were assigned to were not so capable. They wanted to replicate the problem. If you have an incident, it takes a lot of time to troubleshoot the problem. The incident support is not so good. The technicians don't know the platform well. BMC doesn't want to invest in CLM. Two years ago we had a lot of problems. Maybe BMC realized that CLM is an end of life product.

Read full review

reviewer820579

Senior Product Manager at Redfin Corp

Single pane of glass, easy to share dashboards, and good for monitoring

We've had some issues where we had Datadog automatically turned on in AWS regions that we weren't using, which incurred a small but steady cost that amounted to tens of thousands of dollars spent over a few weeks. I wish there was a global setting that lets an admin restrict which regions DD is turned on in as a default setup step. Sometimes, the APM service dashboard link isn't sharable. I click something in the service catalog, and on that service's APM default view, I try to share a link to that with a teammate, and they reach a blank or error screen. I wish there was more organization and detail in the suggestions when I use the query editor. I'm never quite sure when the autofill dropdown shows up if I'm seeing some custom tag or some default property, so I have to know exactly what I'm looking for in order to build a chart. It's hard to navigate and explore using the query autofill suggestions without knowing exactly what tag to look for. It's been a bit hard to understand how data gets sampled or how many data points a particular dashboard value is using. We've had questions over the RUM metrics that we see and we had to ask for help with how values are calculated, bin sizes, etc to get confidence in our data.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"You can tie together your public and private cloud infrastructure into a "single pane of glass"."

"By allowing end users to request their own services, the request process for systems is much quicker and more accurate."

"Integrates role-based access control with pre-configured policies for CIS, DISA, HIPAA, PCI, SOX, NIST, and SCAP documentation and remediation."

"Automates Java EE Application Deployment from an SCM system."

"Assesses change impact or completes an audit using multiple dashboard views."

"CLM has a multi-cloud portal because they have the resources to implement in various environments in various ports."

"Supports unattended installs and image-based, script-based, or template-based provisioning."

"The observability pipelines are the most valuable aspect of the solution."

"The logging in general is one of my favorite features."

"The service catalog helped improve our organization by giving a good view of the flow for our microservices applications."

"We've been able to glean from the monitors what servers are down, and can alert the team in Slack."

"We have been able to set very specific CPU and memory alerts, at the very base level, then we started to pull real business value, like 99th percentile response rates for our API calls."

"The product has offered increased visibility via logging APM, metrics, RUM, etc."

"The solution has helped out organization gain improved visibility."

"We like the distributed tracing and flame graphs for debugging. This has been invaluable for us during periods of high traffic or red alert conditions."

More Datadog pros

Cons

"The installation and configuration can be tricky due to it being built on Remedy."

"One of the major problems is that support is not so good."

"Needs integrations with other providers to provide a custom public cloud environment."

"I've only been using Datadog for a few months, and at first, it was frankly overwhelming in terms of both the UI and the available capabilities."

"We need to learn more about the session reply feature inside of DD."

"Ingesting data from various sources to monitor the log metrics of the system can always improve so that, if something goes wrong, the right teams are alerted."

"I would love to see support for front-end and mobile applications. Right now, it is mostly all back-end stuff. Being able to do some integration with our front-end products would be awesome."

"I would like to see the integration between PagerDuty and Datadog improved. The tags in Datadog don't match those in PagerDuty, and we have to make it work."

"It can be overwhelming for new people as it has a lot of features."

"Datadog could make their use cases more visible either through their docs or tutorial videos."

"We would like to see smaller or shorter tutorials and video sessions."

More Datadog cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Pricing is somewhat affordable compared to other solutions but in order to really lower the costs of other products you need to plan very carefully your resources usage, otherwise, it can get expensive real quick."

"The solution's pricing depends on project volume."

"It has always scaled for us. Cost scales up too, but that is not necessarily a bad thing. It's reasonable for what they're providing."

"Datadog does not provide any free plans to use the solution. When I start with a proof of concept it would be sensible to have a free plan to test the tool and check whether it fits the requirements of the project. Before the production stage, it is always good to have a free plan with some limited features, number of requests, or logs."

"The solution is fairly priced but history and log storage can get costly depending on your needs."

"The price is better than some competing products."

"It is easy to run up a large bill, so become familiar with the cost of each piece of your bill and use the metrics they supply to estimate and monitor your bill."

"At my last company, we did see ROI, specifically around response time. We could get to mission critical things that were down and losing revenue on immediately. So, the product paid itself back."

More Datadog pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Any advice about APM solutions?

There are many factors and we know little about your requirements (size of org, technology stack, management systems, the scope of implementation). Our goal was to consolidate APM and infra monitor...

See all answers

Datadog vs ELK: which one is good in terms of performance, cost and efficiency?

With Datadog, we have near-live visibility across our entire platform. We have seen APM metrics impacted several times lately using the dashboards we have created with Datadog; they are very good c...

See all answers

Which would you choose - Datadog or Dynatrace?

Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether the Datadog or Dynatrace network monitoring software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Dynatrace. Dynatrace offers network ...

See all answers

Comparisons

CloudBolt vs BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Compared 42% of the time

Pandora FMS vs BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Compared 33% of the time

Amazon CloudWatch vs BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Compared 24% of the time

More BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management Competitors

Dynatrace vs Datadog

Compared 11% of the time

Azure Monitor vs Datadog

Compared 9% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Datadog

Compared 5% of the time

AWS X-Ray vs Datadog

Compared 4% of the time

New Relic vs Datadog

Compared 4% of the time

More Datadog Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Management

July 2025

Download BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Datadog

August 2025

Download Datadog product report

Also Known As

BMC CLM

No data available

Overview

BMC's cloud management platform drives digital innovation with agile, full-stack service provisioning across cloud and traditional platforms. BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management scales easily while integrating with essential compliance and governance policies to reduce risk.

BMC

Datadog is a comprehensive cloud monitoring platform designed to track performance, availability, and log aggregation for cloud resources like AWS, ECS, and Kubernetes. It offers robust tools for creating dashboards, observing user behavior, alerting, telemetry, security monitoring, and synthetic testing.

Datadog supports full observability across cloud providers and environments, enabling troubleshooting, error detection, and performance analysis to maintain system reliability. It offers detailed visualization of servers, integrates seamlessly with cloud providers like AWS, and provides powerful out-of-the-box dashboards and log analytics. Despite its strengths, users often note the need for better integration with other solutions and improved application-level insights. Common challenges include a complex pricing model, setup difficulties, and navigation issues. Users frequently mention the need for clearer documentation, faster loading times, enhanced error traceability, and better log management.

What are the key features of Datadog?

Graphs and Dashboards: Visualizes servers and infrastructure with customizable views.
Metrics: Offers deep insights into system performance and user behavior.
Log Management: Provides powerful analytics for logs and seamless log aggregation.
Unified Tagging: Facilitates organization and retrieval of metrics and logs.
APM and RUM: Enables application performance monitoring and real user monitoring for comprehensive insights.
Synthetic Testing: Allows the simulation of user interactions to test application performance.

What benefits and ROI should users look for in reviews?

System Reliability: Helps ensure uptime and performance across cloud environments.
Proactive Issue Resolution: Assists in identifying and resolving issues before they impact users.
Operational Efficiency: Streamlines monitoring and log management tasks.
Flexible Integrations: Adapts to various cloud services and infrastructure setups.
Real-Time Alerts: Provides timely notifications to address problems swiftly.

Datadog is implemented across different industries, from tech companies monitoring cloud applications to finance sectors ensuring transactional systems' performance. E-commerce platforms use Datadog to track and visualize user behavior and system health, while healthcare organizations utilize it for maintaining secure, compliant environments. Every implementation assists teams in customizing monitoring solutions specific to their industry's requirements.

Datadog

Sample Customers

JDA Software, Morningstar, Orange Business Services, Wipro

Adobe, Samsung, facebook, HP Cloud Services, Electronic Arts, salesforce, Stanford University, CiTRIX, Chef, zendesk, Hearst Magazines, Spotify, mercardo libre, Slashdot, Ziff Davis, PBS, MLS, The Motley Fool, Politico, Barneby's

Buyer's Guide

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. Datadog

July 2025

Free Report: BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. Datadog

Find out what your peers are saying about BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. Datadog and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management vs. Datadog report.

See our list of best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.