BlazeMeter and OpenText Functional Testing Lab are both recognized in the mobile and web testing domain. BlazeMeter appears more favorable in pricing and support, while OpenText is praised for its comprehensive features.
Features: BlazeMeter offers robust testing across performance, functional, and API dimensions, easily integrating with CI/CD pipelines. OpenText is noted for its detailed simulation environments, providing powerful tools to recreate real-world conditions.
Room for Improvement: BlazeMeter could enhance its real-time monitoring capabilities and expand integration with additional third-party tools. Its user interface could be more intuitive, and documentation needs updates to cover advanced scenarios. OpenText should consider simplifying its deployment process and focusing on extending support for broader integration options. Additionally, improving its setup time could attract more users.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BlazeMeter provides a quick deployment process with its cloud-based model, offering seamless infrastructure integration and responsive customer support. OpenText has a more detailed but complicated deployment requiring specialized setups, offering tailored integration within Pega applications and robust support for complex environments.
Pricing and ROI: BlazeMeter features a subscription-based model offering scalability and high ROI with minimal upfront costs. OpenText demands higher investment, with pricing aligned with its specialized services and aiming for ROI through precise testing effectiveness.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| BlazeMeter | 0.6% |
| OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web | 1.2% |
| Other | 98.2% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 18 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 22 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 4 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 13 |
BlazeMeter ensures delivery of high-performance software by enabling DevOps teams to quickly and easily run open-source-based performance tests against any mobile app, website or API at massive scale to validate performance at every stage of software delivery.
The rapidly growing BlazeMeter community has more than 100,000 developers and includes prominent global brands such as Adobe, Atlassian, Gap, NBC Universal, Pfizer and Walmart as customers. Founded in 2011, the company is headquartered in Palo Alto, Calif., with its research and development in Tel Aviv.
OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web offers integration with HPE and non-HPE tools, real device testing, and device management. It supports real-time analytics and multi-platform testing, ensuring traceability and flexibility with decentralized devices.
OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web is designed to enhance testing efficiency for mobile and desktop applications by allowing ease of integration with different testing environments. It features real-time analytics, supports automated device management, and provides the flexibility of decentralized testing on real devices. With a focus on robust traceability, it stands out as a comprehensive choice for optimizing software development life cycles, especially notable for its ability to support multiple devices simultaneously and strategic scaling through network virtualization and AWS device farm.
What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing Lab?Financial services companies utilize OpenText Functional Testing Lab for optimizing mobile solutions and applications, ensuring a streamlined integration into their Application Lifecycle Management and Unified Functional Testing processes. It aids in functional and performance testing, adapting to both on-premises and cloud deployments to suit industry-specific demands.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
