BlazeMeter and OpenText Functional Testing Lab compete in the performance testing category, with BlazeMeter having the upper hand in user preference due to pricing and support, while OpenText distinguishes itself with a powerful feature set that justifies its higher cost.
Features: BlazeMeter integrates seamlessly with CI/CD pipelines, offers real-time reporting, and provides robust cloud-based load testing abilities. OpenText, on the other hand, offers comprehensive device lab access, strong automation for functional testing, and tight integration with enterprise tools like UFT and ALM.
Room for Improvement: BlazeMeter could enhance its functional testing depth, improve migration capabilities for existing test scripts, and expand its support for more testing protocols. OpenText may benefit from broadening its cloud integration, simplifying its pricing model, and addressing accessibility in customer support.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BlazeMeter is known for its seamless cloud-based deployment and responsive customer service, making it easy to use. In contrast, OpenText offers diverse deployment options, from on-premise to cloud, which are customizable but complex, and its customer support is often considered less accessible.
Pricing and ROI: BlazeMeter is valued for its competitive pricing structure, which offers a quick return on investment and minimal setup costs, making it budget-friendly. OpenText requires a higher initial investment but offers impactful ROI through its enriched feature set, making it a high-value choice for comprehensive testing needs.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| BlazeMeter | 1.2% |
| OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web | 1.6% |
| Other | 97.2% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 19 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 22 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 4 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 13 |
BlazeMeter ensures delivery of high-performance software by enabling DevOps teams to quickly and easily run open-source-based performance tests against any mobile app, website or API at massive scale to validate performance at every stage of software delivery.
The rapidly growing BlazeMeter community has more than 100,000 developers and includes prominent global brands such as Adobe, Atlassian, Gap, NBC Universal, Pfizer and Walmart as customers. Founded in 2011, the company is headquartered in Palo Alto, Calif., with its research and development in Tel Aviv.
OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web offers integration with HPE and non-HPE tools, real device testing, and device management. It supports real-time analytics and multi-platform testing, ensuring traceability and flexibility with decentralized devices.
OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web is designed to enhance testing efficiency for mobile and desktop applications by allowing ease of integration with different testing environments. It features real-time analytics, supports automated device management, and provides the flexibility of decentralized testing on real devices. With a focus on robust traceability, it stands out as a comprehensive choice for optimizing software development life cycles, especially notable for its ability to support multiple devices simultaneously and strategic scaling through network virtualization and AWS device farm.
What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing Lab?Financial services companies utilize OpenText Functional Testing Lab for optimizing mobile solutions and applications, ensuring a streamlined integration into their Application Lifecycle Management and Unified Functional Testing processes. It aids in functional and performance testing, adapting to both on-premises and cloud deployments to suit industry-specific demands.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
