BlazeMeter vs LEAPWORK comparison

Perforce and LEAPWORK are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. Perforce is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.0, while LEAPWORK is ranked #20. Perforce holds a 0.5% mindshare in TAt, compared to LEAPWORK’s 1.5% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Perforce users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of LEAPWORK users who would recommend it.

BlazeMeter

Read 49 BlazeMeter reviews

4,544 Views
318 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

LEAPWORK

Read 3 LEAPWORK reviews

1,925 Views
1,925 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

BlazeMeter

LEAPWORK

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

BlazeMeter and LEAPWORK compete in the test automation market. BlazeMeter holds an advantage in cost-effectiveness and flexibility, while LEAPWORK is noted for a comprehensive feature set despite a steeper price.

Features: BlazeMeter offers load testing capabilities, broad protocol support for diverse environments, and adaptability in scalable testing contexts. LEAPWORK provides a no-code automation suite, visual test creation appealing to non-technical stakeholders, and extensive automation capabilities with an integrated user-friendly design.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: BlazeMeter provides cloud-based deployment with extensive documentation and robust customer service through responsive support channels. LEAPWORK also features cloud-based deployment with visual configuration, making it accessible for a wider team. LEAPWORK emphasizes personalized training and consultancy services for hands-on guidance.

Pricing and ROI: BlazeMeter offers lower setup costs with flexible plans for various organizational needs, providing a justifiable ROI. LEAPWORK, despite higher initial costs, offers significant ROI by reducing the need for additional support resources through an inclusive feature set.

To learn more, read our detailed BlazeMeter vs. LEAPWORK Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

BlazeMeter vs. LEAPWORK

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BlazeMeter

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Performance Testing Tools (2nd), Functional Testing Tools (10th), Load Testing Tools (3rd), API Testing Tools (7th)

LEAPWORK

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

20th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of BlazeMeter is 0.5%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of LEAPWORK is 1.5%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

Manoj Raghavendra

Director at SMKR Consultancy LLP

Provides global load simulations without managing infrastructure and offers built-in reporting features

BlazeMeter should improve or make available some features out of the box that JMeter requires customization for. The licensing cost is also a concern since BlazeMeter is not free like JMeter, which limits its use. Additionally, if there is no host in preferred locations such as some Asian or Middle Eastern countries, it might not be convenient to use BlazeMeter.

Read full review

Blaine Anderson

Software Development Team Lead at a engineering company with 51-200 employees

Flow automation software that is user friendly for non technical teams and offers good value for money

If it is a business critical environment that needs to be up 99.999% of the time, LEAPWORK is the solution to go with because the ROI on it is good. We ended up using SmartBear because of how expensive LEAPWORK is. I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product's most valuable features include its cloud-based nature, which allows us to conduct tests without relying on local resources."

"BlazeMeter's most valuable feature is its cloud-based platform for performance testing."

"For me, the best part is that we can graphically see the test result at runtime. It helps us understand the behavior of the application during all stages of the test."

"Using cloud-based load generators is highly valuable to us, as we can test from outside our network and increase load generation without having to upscale our hardware as much. The cloud load generator is there when we need it and is the feature we leverage the most."

"The product's initial setup phase was straightforward."

"The stability is good."

"It has helped us simulate heavy load situations so we can fix performance issues ahead of time."

"The on-the-fly test data improved our testing productivity a lot. The new test data features changed how we test the applications because there are different things we can do. We can use mock data or real data. We can also build data based on different formats."

More BlazeMeter pros

"The UI is user-friendly."

"The most valuable of this solution is the no code option. It offers drag and drop when it comes to development and removes the need for a developer."

"It provides automated testing. Instead of us doing manual testing, we can utilize Leapwork, and it tests most of our critical processes. In the next phase, we also plan to do some process work with it, such as using Leapwork to create reports or provide certain extracts of data."

Cons

"The seamless integration with mobiles could be improved."

"BlazeMeter should improve or make available some features out of the box that JMeter requires customization for."

"In terms of improvement, I would like to have the ability to customize reports."

"Sometimes, when we execute tests, the results calculated by BlazeMeter, specifically the response times for failed transactions, are incorrect."

"The support could be better."

"The product currently doesn't allow users to run parallel thread groups, making it an area that should be considered for improvement."

"The should be some visibility into load testing. I'd like to capture items via snapshots."

"BlazeMeter needs more granular access control. Currently, BlazeMeter controls everything at a workspace level, so a user can view or modify anything inside that workspace depending on their role. It would be nice if there was a more granular control where you could say, "This person can only do A, B, and C," or, "This user only has access to functional testing. This user only has access to mock services." That feature set doesn't currently exist."

More BlazeMeter cons

"This solution could be improved by offering better reporting related to the integration into Azure DevOps."

"The only thing that I don't like about the product is the need to deploy agents on the laptops of people doing the testing. So, you have an agent on a server, then you have an agent on the laptop of the person who is doing the testing, and that seems like a lot of stuff and a kind of anti-cloud. Why do I have to deploy agents on people's machines in order to do something in the cloud? I'm sure they're doing that so they can monitor their licensing and all that stuff, but it is not necessarily a friendly process."

"The initial setup is difficult."

"It is a very comprehensive tool, and there is a significant learning curve to being able to adopt the tool. Because it does so much, there is only so much that you can learn. You can, however, do some simpler things right away. They do have a kind of boot camp where some of their experts engage with you, and during that time, you can work on the top initiatives that you want to do, and that's a good process. After you start using the tool, there is a lot more that you would want to do."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the product's price two on a scale of one to ten, where one is very cheap, and ten is very expensive. The solution is not expensive."

"The overall product is less costly than our past solutions, so we've absolutely saved money."

"The product isn't cheap, but it isn't the most expensive on the market. During our proof of concept, we discovered that you get what you pay for; we found a cheaper solution we tested to be full of bugs. Therefore, we are willing to pay the higher price tag for the quality BlazeMeter offers."

"The solution is free and open source."

"The product pricing is reasonable."

"We pay a yearly licensing fee for the solution."

"It's consumption-based pricing but with a ceiling. They're called CVUs, or consumption variable units. We can use API testing, GUI testing, and test data, but everything gets converted into CVUs, so we are free to use the platform in its entirety without getting bogged down by a license for certain testing areas. We know for sure how much we are going to spend."

"It is an averagely priced product."

More BlazeMeter pricing and cost advice

"We got a deal on it for the first year. We're paying $8,000."

"The product is not cheap."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

20%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does BlazeMeter compare with Apache JMeter?

Blazemeter is a continuous testing platform that provides scriptless test automation. It unifies functional and performance testing, enabling users to monitor and test public and private APIs. We ...

See all answers

What do you like most about BlazeMeter?

It has a unique programming dashboard that is very user-friendly.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for BlazeMeter?

BlazeMeter's pricing depends on the type of account used. They offer multiple account types, with cost variations based on features accessible under each account.

See all answers

Do you recommend Leapwork? How is Leapwork pricing?

Do you recommend Leapwork? I absolutely recommend Leapwork. In fact, I consider it to be one of the best test automation tools. I like it because it provides many benefits. Some of the ones I fin...

See all answers

Comparisons

Apache JMeter vs BlazeMeter

Compared 41% of the time

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs BlazeMeter

Compared 16% of the time

Tricentis NeoLoad vs BlazeMeter

Compared 15% of the time

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs BlazeMeter

Compared 5% of the time

k6 Open Source vs BlazeMeter

Compared 5% of the time

More BlazeMeter Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs LEAPWORK

Compared 54% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs LEAPWORK

Compared 16% of the time

ACCELQ Automate vs LEAPWORK

Compared 12% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs LEAPWORK

Compared 10% of the time

Avo Assure vs LEAPWORK

Compared 8% of the time

More LEAPWORK Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BlazeMeter

August 2025

Download BlazeMeter product report

Buyer's Guide

Test Automation Tools

August 2025

Download LEAPWORK product report

Also Known As

JMeter Cloud

No data available

Overview

BlazeMeter ensures delivery of high-performance software by enabling DevOps teams to quickly and easily run open-source-based performance tests against any mobile app, website or API at massive scale to validate performance at every stage of software delivery.

The rapidly growing BlazeMeter community has more than 100,000 developers and includes prominent global brands such as Adobe, Atlassian, Gap, NBC Universal, Pfizer and Walmart as customers. Founded in 2011, the company is headquartered in Palo Alto, Calif., with its research and development in Tel Aviv.

Perforce

LEAPWORK is a no-code automation platform. This solution’s main purpose is to make it easy for business and IT administrators to automate repetitive processes.

LEAPWORK Features

LEAPWORK has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

Hyper-visual debugging: LEAPWORK’s hyper-visual debugging leads to faster maintenance. LEAPWORK’s platform provides representation of issues either with a video recording of the run, a debug version of the automation flow that contains data-level insights, or an activity log.

Reusable sub-flows: With LEAPWORK, you can identify process steps that can resurface across different automation cases, which can then be turned into reusable sub-flows. The sub-flows can be used over and over across projects and teams.

Robust execution across multiple machines: LEAPWORK makes it possible for you to run automation in multiple environments at the same time. The solution also makes it easy to handle SSO scenarios and execute remotely.

Efficient scheduling: With LEAPWORK you can schedule automation flows to run during any time of day or night, in parallel, or on local, remote, and virtual machines, in the cloud, or even in closed networks. The scheduling feature can also be programmed to run once or repeatedly according to a recurring schedule.

Calendar assistant: LEAPWORK has an advanced calendar assistant that allows you to see what is running and when, which also helps you plan more strategically. In addition, the calendar assistant provides you with an overview of agent resource usage.

Workflow and assignee management: LEAPWORK enables you to segregate duties and to track contributors as needed, providing complete transparency so that managing hundreds of automation flows is more efficient.

Governance and compliance: LEAPWORK offers audit logs, video-based reporting, and dashboards, which helps you manage governance issues. LEAPWORK also provides compliance features to help your organization.

LEAPWORK Benefits

Some of the benefits of using LEAPWORK include:

Easy to learn: Since using LEAPWORK automates tests in minutes or hours rather than days, the platform is intuitive, simple, and easy to learn.

Low maintenance: LEAPWORK is designed with reusability built in, which helps decrease the maintenance burden on your QA and development teams and also results in fewer automation bottlenecks.

Reliable and secure: LEAPWORK is an enterprise-grade test automation solution that can be relied on as a secure product. It is also reliable since it works across all technologies.

Large data management: Large volumes of data can be managed easily. Data sources and dynamic values can be entered with visual connectors easily.

Good support and service: LEAPWORK has a team of specialists who are dedicated to supporting you with all your automation needs.

Built for DevOps: LEAPWORK is designed to Integrate seamlessly into your existing infrastructure and break down traditional communication barriers between business teams and IT departments.

Reviews from Real Users

PeerSpot user Timothy C., Founder and Chief Technologist at Spider Technologies, says, “It provides automated testing. Instead of us doing manual testing, we can utilize LEAPWORK, and it tests most of our critical processes. In the next phase, we also plan to do some process work with it, such as using Leapwork to create reports or provide certain extracts of data.”

LEAPWORK

Sample Customers

DIRECTV, GAP, MIT, NBCUniversal, Pfizer, StubHub

Samutec

Buyer's Guide

BlazeMeter vs. LEAPWORK

July 2025

Free Report: BlazeMeter vs. LEAPWORK

Find out what your peers are saying about BlazeMeter vs. LEAPWORK and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BlazeMeter vs. LEAPWORK report.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.