Bizagi vs Tungsten Insight comparison

"It has an easy to use interface which final users accepted with much more enthusiasm than our ERP (SAP)."

"In Bizagi, all of the features are valuable."

"The user interface is very good, making it easy for business people to understand."

"I like the business process management engine. It's very detailed, and you can probably map any of the corporate workflow processes you come across in it compared to some of the other solutions out there. I can probably say that it has very good support to work in tandem with other RP solutions in the market. The software is still very user-friendly and integral, and they have pretty good online resources. The automation feature is pretty good, so is the integration feature."

"It is open source."

"It is quite a stable solution."

"I like all of the features. I like that you can simulate the processes and add the time standard."

"The most valuable feature is the simulation."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"It provides the ability to design applications directly."

"You can easily customize reporting to pull the fields that interest you."

"Agriculture, Industry."

"The solution's interface could be a bit more user-friendly and I would like to see more integrations with other Office products, not just Office 365."

"It needs an easier setup for the Bizagi Engine."

"If they add a few more capabilities like AIML and DocGen AI, these features would be good."

"Its performance needs to be improved. The main thing is that it is limited, especially in terms of the response times. When the processes become a bit large, it is very awkward to work with the Bizagi modeler. When you have already modeled but start to rearrange, it is quite a bit of an effort to change the stuff. When you rearrange lanes or have new structures, it goes rather squiggly up and down and so on, which could be improved. The visual outputs of the DIREPs of the process models are pixelated and have a bad image quality. It is a PNG or JPEG, and you cannot export it as a PDF. When you have rather large processes, you should be able to arrange them hierarchically. Currently, it is not supported. If you use sub-processes and inflate a process, suddenly the arrangement is totally different, and although you know the process, you have to look where is it now. You need a good understanding of the levels of your processes before you start in Bizagi. It can have automatic support for optimal presentation. In BPM, you should have it from the top left to the bottom right. However, in most cases, people don't know how they should arrange it. Therefore, it would be nice to have a suggestion system for different arrangements to be able to better present the process."

"Governance is lacking, as with many easy-to-use tools. The scalability could be improved as well."

"The product used to have a simulation feature, which I had used quite often. However, it's since been discontinued. It might have originally been a paid feature. It would be nice if they could bring it back and offer it for free."

"I would like to see a facility for building a simple CRUD application. In Bizagi, you can use database modeling, diagrams, forms, etc., but in some circumstances I need CRUD (Create, Read, Update, Delete) functionalities which are not there yet."

"The initial setup is complex and would be difficult to carry out without any training."

"If there's any negative, it's just the different names, the branding names that the product's gone through. It's confusing."

"It would be ideal if there were some standard forms that could be customized."

"We didn't use the licensed versions where you could exactly go into automatization. However, we looked at the pricing in the beginning, and the only thing that I remember is that it was too expensive for the things we were using because our clients would also have to license the product. One client said that it was too expensive for the benefit they get out of it."

"It is expensive."

"It has a very high price. Many clients complain about the price for maintaining the application on Bizagi."

"It is not expensive."

"It is on par with other BPM tools, but not as expensive as Pega nor Appian."

"I used to be very pleased with the pricing. Now, it's a bit more complicated. I don't remember exactly, however, it might be $10 a month per user."

"I was using the free version."

"Bizagi is totally free for modeling."