Bizagi vs Tungsten Insight comparison

"I like all of the features. I like that you can simulate the processes and add the time standard."

"The product allowed users to connect with flow chart elements with ease."

"I find Bizagi so user friendly. I also think that its modeling abilities are great and it's easy to teach them to new users."

"The most valuable features of the solution are the process modeling part and process simulation."

"Business process modelling and simulation."

"The amount of control that this solution provides is great."

"The user logic is very easy to understand, even for people who are not engineers nor developers."

"It is quite a stable solution."

"It provides the ability to design applications directly."

"You can easily customize reporting to pull the fields that interest you."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"The on-premise software has some bugs."

"Agriculture, Industry."

"Bizagi allows for automation, but it's very complicated."

"The solution needs to make it easier to use RPA products on it. They may need an RPA specific interface. It would be better than having to make an RPA tool to use for viewing. Most of our work is about making RPA tools with the Bizagi, not using Bizagi itself."

"There could be more documentation."

"Its performance needs to be improved. The main thing is that it is limited, especially in terms of the response times. When the processes become a bit large, it is very awkward to work with the Bizagi modeler. When you have already modeled but start to rearrange, it is quite a bit of an effort to change the stuff. When you rearrange lanes or have new structures, it goes rather squiggly up and down and so on, which could be improved. The visual outputs of the DIREPs of the process models are pixelated and have a bad image quality. It is a PNG or JPEG, and you cannot export it as a PDF. When you have rather large processes, you should be able to arrange them hierarchically. Currently, it is not supported. If you use sub-processes and inflate a process, suddenly the arrangement is totally different, and although you know the process, you have to look where is it now. You need a good understanding of the levels of your processes before you start in Bizagi. It can have automatic support for optimal presentation. In BPM, you should have it from the top left to the bottom right. However, in most cases, people don't know how they should arrange it. Therefore, it would be nice to have a suggestion system for different arrangements to be able to better present the process."

"Bizagi's UI should include shorter steps for documenting controls, documenting properties, changing some attributes in the object, and adding additional text."

"Bizagi needs a way to define categories such as process groups like the APQC framework, PCF, and handle the processes within it."

"The initial setup is complex and would be difficult to carry out without any training."

"If there's any negative, it's just the different names, the branding names that the product's gone through. It's confusing."

"It would be ideal if there were some standard forms that could be customized."

"The Bizagi modeler can be downloaded free of charge."

"We use the free version of the solution because the price is in dollars, making it expensive for where we are in Brazil."

"I was using the free version."

"The pricing model is good; I believe it's free for up to 20 users, and then they start charging. I hear the solution can get quite expensive, however."

"Some solutions are completely free. One would be the business process diagramming tool, the server beneath it, and the automation tool. You don't need to pay to map the business process, but you would need to when you want to execute any of the commands. So, basically, they lure you in with a free ride, and when you want to scale the solution, you'll have to pay for it."

"When we were working with the on-premises solution, the licenses were a little bit expensive because we had to buy one by one a package of a hundred licenses, whereas now, we are working with the cloud solution, and it has a different cost. It's a different business model because we pay the license for the developers, but the cost is by the environment, and we have unlimited licenses. The business model is different now, but the benefit ratio is good."

"I used to be very pleased with the pricing. Now, it's a bit more complicated. I don't remember exactly, however, it might be $10 a month per user."

"The product must improve its cost."