We performed a comparison between Betty Blocks and Bizagi based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, OutSystems and others in Rapid Application Development Software."The most valuable feature is the back end."
"Very, very stable."
"The approval process is simple."
"Agility, reverse engineering, customized portal web, help desk and user guides, easy deployment, simple to modify."
"I very much like the reusable rules and forms, and the way Bizagi controls the process flow. I also like the document generating system to generate PDFs and then .doc files with information gathered from a flow. At the end of a process, you can generate a document that can be printed."
"The API is pretty straightforward."
"The product allowed users to connect with flow chart elements with ease."
"It is easy to use and easy to learn. It is also fully compatible with BPMN virtual tool. Bizagi is very fast in responding to and fixing the issues."
"The documentation capabilities are very good. Very structured documents and process versions are valuable features, and being able to communicate that to our customers is also a very good feature. It has a good balance between the effort and the result. So, you don't need to be too detailed. You can document while you are modeling, which is a very good feature."
"What I find lacking in the software is its ability to query the database."
"I would like to see full integration with AI."
"In many cases, they make choices where flexibility is a little bit degraded, but if you leave everything open and the flexibility is great then the usability is a little bit less."
"Its price can be improved. The price is high for the application as well as for maintaining and developing applications. When you develop, for example, a BPM, you need to pay a lot for Bizagi."
"The performance could use improvement. We couldn't connect the processes to on one file. The performance is an issue for us."
"There could be more documentation."
"The on-premise software has some bugs."
"From a developer's point of view, an improvement in the layout would make the UI better."
"The product used to have a simulation feature, which I had used quite often. However, it's since been discontinued. It might have originally been a paid feature. It would be nice if they could bring it back and offer it for free."
"One part of the university has changed its regular desktops to Linux. This is a weak point because Bizagi doesn't run on Linux. I would like the opportunity to run the software inside of Linux."
"The open source version lacks the option to publish."
Betty Blocks is ranked 27th in Rapid Application Development Software with 2 reviews while Bizagi is ranked 13th in Rapid Application Development Software with 78 reviews. Betty Blocks is rated 7.6, while Bizagi is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Betty Blocks writes "The solution is stable and has good support, but is expensive ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Bizagi writes "A flexible, customizable solution that reduced time to market, but the UI and customer support could be better". Betty Blocks is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps and Mendix, whereas Bizagi is most compared with Camunda, Visio, Bonita, Microsoft Power Apps and ARIS BPA.
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors and best No-Code Development Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
